| Table of ContentsModule 8 The underlying structure will be  Felix Klein wrote that  Well be starting with a whole lot of new
    definitions and well be in Euclidean geometry initially. This way of presenting
    geometry has ties to modern algebra and to computer science.  Superposition The issue is:  It is utterly necessary that we use congruence as a
    concept
many of our proofs rely on finding or creating congruent angles, lengths, or
    triangles. Congruence by moving one object over another or near requires that the
    moving be precisely defined. Invariant Examples of invariants in mathematics:  Examples of properties that are NOT invariant:  For the background vocabulary and structure,
    well need definitions for:  isometries in the plane  Defining a geometry Getting to Transformation The set A in the preceding definition is called the
    domain of f and the set B is called the codomain of f.  A mapping f: A ?? B is called  Familiar graphs of functions:  In keeping with the notion of saying why do we
    care
there are functions that are not 1:1 or not onto or not both.  A function that is not onto and not 1:1:  thus 1/2 has no preimage (not onto)  1:1 function that is not onto:  An onto function that is not 1:1 and not from a set
    to itself:  Transformation example Well, take (p, s) and (p, r). If s ? r, its
    not a function.  checking onto:  Unless you know a list of mathematical instructions
    is a transformation you have to check that it is a function that is 1:1 and onto on your
    own.  3 ? 14  Fixed Points To find the fixed point, use the definition:  When you have a transformation in two dimensions
    you are using the set  Some caution is required when checking for fixed
    points of transformations in  Looking for a fixed point, t(x ) = x and t(y) = y,
    use:  This function leaves (1,1) alone, possibly all the
    other points move around.  Example 2, page 133, our text  What is happening?  Lets do exercise 2, p134: check for a fixed
    point:  Checking this:  Stable Sets Definition Composition Definition example Theorem Identity Transformation hint The identity transformation is the transformation,
    I, on a set S such that  The identity function:  Inverse Transformation The characteristic behavior of inverse functions is
    that composition with them results in the identity. A Group 3. There are inverses  Closure means that using the operation on set
    elements results in a set element.  Identity element means that there has to be a set
    element that functions just like the definition of identity. The identity element is
    unique.  Inverses means that for each set element there is a
    unique companion set element such that composition in either order results in the identity
    element.  Associativity means that the order of combining
    three set elements is irrelevant.  A Group T = the set of all transformations from a given set
    to itself  2. Is there an identity?  3. Are there inverses? Ive asserted it, and
    well see them soon.  Notebook Problems Hint on stable lines In Class work Start first with (0,0)  Up to now, weve just talked abstractly about
    transformations. The ones well focus on are  There is one more adjective, a very restrictive
    adjective, that well apply to these important geometric transformations:  En Anglais, naturellement,  Isometries Definition As often happens, the definition also includes a
    way to check or test if a transformation is an isometry.  Looking at the rotation from the preceding section:
     (0,0) ? (2,2)  ((2-x2) - (2-x1))2 =  Therefore, this transformation is an isometry.  Plane Motions Each of these is an isometry.  2. Angle measure is invariant under an  Definitions Usually symbolized R(P,a) a rotation of
    a (with the ccw motion understood to be positive) about the point P.  The collection of all rotations about a given point
    P is a group:  The product of two rotations is a rotation.  An isometry, t, is called a translation iff for all
    points P and Q, the points P, Q, T(P) and T(Q) would form a parallelogram if joined
    appropriately.  On an intuitive level, a translation is a
    correspondence between domain points and image points that moves each point in the domain
    the same distance and in the same direction.  A translation has no fixed points. The stable lines
    of a translation are parallel to the direction of motion.  Theorem:  The collection of a translations is a group:  The inverse of a reflection is the same reflection
    (a condition known as involutory or self-inverse).  The identity glide reflection is the composition of
    the identities of the reflection and translation involved so that each point is its
    own image.  At last PPT Slide Show that its inverse is an isometry which he
    does by selecting image points for two arbitrary points and using the definition of
    inverse:  Notebook problems Theorem Proof  If F(D) = D, then F is the identity isometry. Why?  Because we can, lets construct three circles,
    each centered at one of our original noncollinear points A, B, and C.  Since A ? B, the circles intersect at two points at
    most, one of which is D.  Suppose theres exactly two intersections D
    and E and F(D) = E. Then AB is the perpendicular bisector of DE.  This means that both D and E are the same distance
    from any point on the extended line AB.  Since C isnt on the line AB (from the
    hypothesis), d(C,E) isnt the radius length d(C,D). This says that E cant be
    F(D).  Therefore, theres only one point of
    intersection of the circles centered at A and B: F(D) = D.  Theorem Theorem This is a modern realization. There is only one
    motion
the others come about by composing it cleverly.  The Results Product of three reflections:  If two lines of reflection intersect at a point on
    the third, then the motion is a rotation.  Uses of these motions Theorem Proof:  illustration Since T is an isometry, side AC is parallel to BC,
    thus m?ACB = m? CBC.  Substituting  Recasting statements Using transformational geometry:  Congruence Theorem Isosceles Triangles Proof:  Consider the reflection, r, of DABP about the line
    AP.  Since r is an isometry, AB ? AX  Theorem Proof  There are two types of isometries that map A onto D
    and B onto E: one is direct and the other is opposite. The direct isometry finishes the
    proof since, then, one triangle is the isometric image of the other.  Let P be the isometry that maps C to C with
    C in the half plane opposite F. Since P is an isometry, angle measures are invariant
    and all corresponding angles are congruent. However, P is an orientation reversing motion.
     Let rDE be a reflection about DE, which will then
    be a fixed line for the reflection.  Test 3 suggestions Know the definition of isometry and be able to come
    up with examples of planar motions that are and are not examples. Be able to identify some invariant properties of
    geometric objects:  Know the proof of the composition of two
    transformations is a transformation.  Know the proof of A Euclidean plane isometry
    is determined by what it does to three noncollinear points.  Be able to rewrite an isometry as a composition of
    reflections. Some sample problems:  Illustration Construct the bisector of angle BAE and call it ray
    AP with the point P at the intersection of the triangle side BE.  Since the reflection is an isometry, AX ? AD and AD
    ? AC, by hypothesis.  Under the reflection, D goes to C and we do know
    that angle ADE is congruent to angle ACB. So the image of E is on CB as well as AB. Thus
    the image of E is B since B is the only point that satisfies both criteria.  This means that the image of triangle ADE under the
    isometry is triangle ACB, which means that the triangles are congruent. Things to notice:  Problem Two  Problem Three  Problem Four  |