Module 8

by Leigh Hollyer

dog@uh.edu

   Click here to start

 

Table of Contents

Module 8

The underlying structure will be

Felix Klein wrote that

We’ll be starting with a whole lot of new definitions and we’ll be in Euclidean geometry initially. This way of presenting geometry has ties to modern algebra and to computer science.

Superposition

The issue is:

It is utterly necessary that we use congruence as a concept…many of our proofs rely on finding or creating congruent angles, lengths, or triangles. Congruence by moving one object over another or near requires that the “moving” be precisely defined.

Invariant

Examples of invariants in mathematics:

Examples of properties that are NOT invariant:

For the background vocabulary and structure, we’ll need definitions for:

isometries in the plane

Defining a geometry

Getting to “Transformation”

The set A in the preceding definition is called the domain of f and the set B is called the codomain of f.

A mapping f: A ?? B is called

Familiar graphs of functions:

In keeping with the notion of saying why do we care…there are functions that are not 1:1 or not onto or not both.

A function that is not onto and not 1:1:

thus 1/2 has no preimage (not onto)

1:1 function that is not onto:

An onto function that is not 1:1 and not from a set to itself:

Transformation

example

Well, take (p, s) and (p, r). If s ? r, it’s not a function.

checking onto:

Unless you know a list of mathematical instructions is a transformation you have to check that it is a function that is 1:1 and onto on your own.

3 ? 14

Fixed Points

To find the fixed point, use the definition:

When you have a transformation in two dimensions you are using the set

Some caution is required when checking for fixed points of transformations in

Looking for a fixed point, t(x ) = x and t(y) = y, use:

This function leaves (1,1) alone, possibly all the other points move around.

Example 2, page 133, our text

What is happening?

Let’s do exercise 2, p134: check for a fixed point:

Checking this:

Stable Sets

Definition

Composition

Definition

example

Theorem

Identity Transformation

hint

The identity transformation is the transformation, I, on a set S such that

The identity function:

Inverse Transformation

The characteristic behavior of inverse functions is that composition with them results in the identity.

A Group

3. There are inverses

Closure means that using the operation on set elements results in a set element.

Identity element means that there has to be a set element that functions just like the definition of identity. The identity element is unique.

Inverses means that for each set element there is a unique companion set element such that composition in either order results in the identity element.

Associativity means that the order of combining three set elements is irrelevant.

A Group

T = the set of all transformations from a given set to itself

2. Is there an identity?

3. Are there inverses? I’ve asserted it, and we’ll see them soon.

Notebook Problems

Hint on stable lines

In Class work

Start first with (0,0)

Up to now, we’ve just talked abstractly about transformations. The ones we’ll focus on are

There is one more adjective, a very restrictive adjective, that we’ll apply to these important geometric transformations:

En Anglais, naturellement,

Isometries

Definition

As often happens, the definition also includes a way to check or test if a transformation is an isometry.

Looking at the rotation from the preceding section:

(0,0) ? (2,2)

((2-x2) - (2-x1))2 =

Therefore, this transformation is an isometry.

Plane Motions

Each of these is an isometry.

2. Angle measure is invariant under an

Definitions

Usually symbolized “R(P,a)” a rotation of a (with the ccw motion understood to be positive) about the point P.

The collection of all rotations about a given point P is a group:

The product of two rotations is a rotation.

An isometry, t, is called a translation iff for all points P and Q, the points P, Q, T(P) and T(Q) would form a parallelogram if joined appropriately.

On an intuitive level, a translation is a correspondence between domain points and image points that moves each point in the domain the same distance and in the same direction.

A translation has no fixed points. The stable lines of a translation are parallel to the direction of motion.

Theorem:

The collection of a translations is a group:

The inverse of a reflection is the same reflection (a condition known as “involutory” or self-inverse).

The identity glide reflection is the composition of the identities of the reflection and translation involved so that each point is it’s own image.

At last

PPT Slide

Show that it’s inverse is an isometry which he does by selecting image points for two arbitrary points and using the definition of inverse:

Notebook problems

Theorem

Proof

If F(D) = D, then F is the identity isometry. Why?

Because we can, let’s construct three circles, each centered at one of our original noncollinear points A, B, and C.

Since A ? B, the circles intersect at two points at most, one of which is D.

Suppose there’s exactly two intersections D and E and F(D) = E. Then AB is the perpendicular bisector of DE.

This means that both D and E are the same distance from any point on the extended line AB.

Since C isn’t on the line AB (from the hypothesis), d(C,E) isn’t the radius length d(C,D). This says that E can’t be F(D).

Therefore, there’s only one point of intersection of the circles centered at A and B: F(D) = D.

Theorem

Theorem

This is a modern realization. There is only one motion…the others come about by composing it cleverly.

The Results

Product of three reflections:

If two lines of reflection intersect at a point on the third, then the motion is a rotation.

Uses of these motions

Theorem

Proof:

illustration

Since T is an isometry, side AC is parallel to BC, thus m?ACB = m? CBC’.

Substituting

Recasting statements

Using transformational geometry:

Congruence

Theorem

Isosceles Triangles

Proof:

Consider the reflection, r, of DABP about the line AP.

Since r is an isometry, AB ? AX

Theorem

Proof

There are two types of isometries that map A onto D and B onto E: one is direct and the other is opposite. The direct isometry finishes the proof since, then, one triangle is the isometric image of the other.

Let P be the isometry that maps C to C’ with C’ in the half plane opposite F. Since P is an isometry, angle measures are invariant and all corresponding angles are congruent. However, P is an orientation reversing motion.

Let rDE be a reflection about DE, which will then be a fixed line for the reflection.

Test 3 suggestions

Know the definition of isometry and be able to come up with examples of planar motions that are and are not examples.

Be able to identify some invariant properties of geometric objects:

Know the proof of “the composition of two transformations is a transformation”.

Know the proof of “A Euclidean plane isometry is determined by what it does to three noncollinear points.”

Be able to rewrite an isometry as a composition of reflections.

Some sample problems:

Illustration

Construct the bisector of angle BAE and call it ray AP with the point P at the intersection of the triangle side BE.

Since the reflection is an isometry, AX ? AD and AD ? AC, by hypothesis.

Under the reflection, D goes to C and we do know that angle ADE is congruent to angle ACB. So the image of E is on CB as well as AB. Thus the image of E is B since B is the only point that satisfies both criteria.

This means that the image of triangle ADE under the isometry is triangle ACB, which means that the triangles are congruent.

Things to notice:

Problem Two

Problem Three

Problem Four