Difference between revisions of "User talk:Tsmith"
From Waalt
(Created page with "Don't worry about editing contributions as long as you are are clear that the change is warranted. Wiki pages are meant to be edited. rcp") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Regarding Cornforth v Boyes, C78, 1727, wondering if you have any information which pins this down as Thornton in the West Riding? There is another Thornton, in the North Riding, and given the names involved, I’m wondering whether that may also be an option? Dk | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Hi, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is the entry for 1700: 1025/3 an inadvertent copy of previous? Appears to contradict the names in the party field? | ||
| + | |||
| + | dk | ||
| + | |||
Don't worry about editing contributions as long as you are are clear that the change is warranted. Wiki pages are meant to be edited. rcp | Don't worry about editing contributions as long as you are are clear that the change is warranted. Wiki pages are meant to be edited. rcp | ||
Latest revision as of 17:16, 28 October 2019
Hi,
Regarding Cornforth v Boyes, C78, 1727, wondering if you have any information which pins this down as Thornton in the West Riding? There is another Thornton, in the North Riding, and given the names involved, I’m wondering whether that may also be an option? Dk
Hi,
Is the entry for 1700: 1025/3 an inadvertent copy of previous? Appears to contradict the names in the party field?
dk
Don't worry about editing contributions as long as you are are clear that the change is warranted. Wiki pages are meant to be edited. rcp
