Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dking"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 85: Line 85:
 
*STAC 5/B67/13 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smythe  
 
*STAC 5/B67/13 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smythe  
 
**see also [[STAC Byron]]
 
**see also [[STAC Byron]]
 +
 +
 +
'''Lincolnshire:'''
 +
 +
''' Buckberry v Turner '''
 +
*STAC 5/B43/25 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 8 Eliz - Edward Buckbery v Richard Turner, Thomas Newton, John Walker et al
 +
*STAC 5/B21/38 - I D - 7 Eliz - Edward Buckberie v Robert Chalmeley, Richard Turner et al
 +
**Interrs refer to assault at Donyngton in Hollande, Lincs by the defts, the bailiff & under bailiff of the liberty of Richemonde in Hollande.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/B14/4 - I D - 8 Eliz - Edward Buckberye v Robert Chamley et al
 +
**see also [[STAC Buckberry]]
  
  
Line 107: Line 117:
 
*STAC 5/B51/12 - D - 34 Eliz - William Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
 
*STAC 5/B51/12 - D - 34 Eliz - William Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
 
*STAC 5/B57/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Francis Bolde v Thomas Hill, Richard Webb
 
*STAC 5/B57/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Francis Bolde v Thomas Hill, Richard Webb
**see also [[STAC Boles]]  
+
**see also [[STAC Boles]]
 +
 
 +
 
 +
'''Norfolk:'''
 +
 
 +
''' Blenerhasset v Mansuer '''
 +
*STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
 +
**Norfolk. Estate of Thomas Pepis/Pepes.(dk)
 +
*STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
 +
*STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
 +
*STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
 +
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
 +
**see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]] 
  
  
Line 171: Line 193:
 
**Interrs (damaged & fragile) refer to manor of Clerks, Wilts, to possession of parcels of land called Redlandes Leas & Redlandes Mead, and to a jury at Salisbury.(dk)   
 
**Interrs (damaged & fragile) refer to manor of Clerks, Wilts, to possession of parcels of land called Redlandes Leas & Redlandes Mead, and to a jury at Salisbury.(dk)   
 
**see also [[STAC Blackborough]]
 
**see also [[STAC Blackborough]]
 +
 +
 +
'''Yorks ER:'''
 +
 +
''' Brackenbury v Barkeston '''
 +
*STAC 5/B21/32 - B - 28 Eliz - George Brackenburye v William Barkeston, Ralph Langdale et al
 +
**George Brakenberye who married Joane Beverley. Violent entry into lands in Barston[?Barmston?], Yorks & carrying away hay etc.(dk)
 +
**see also [[STAC Brackenbury]]
 +
  
  

Revision as of 13:36, 3 April 2019

3/4/19:


Cheshire:

Bunbury v Leeche

  • STAC 5/B21/22 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Thomas Bunbury v Rannulph Leeche, David Mountforde
    • Complt Thomas Bunbury of Stanney, Cheshire. Perjury. Writ of error before Justices at Court of Chester.(dk)
    • see also STAC Bunbury


Derbyshire:

Bromley v Slyghe

  • STAC 5/B21/26 - B A Rn C - 16 Eliz - George Bromley v John Slyghe, Robert Smith et al
    • George Bromley of Horseley, Derbyshire, clerk. Disturbance in parish church.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B85/9 - I D - 16 Eliz - George Bromelye v John Slighe et al
  • STAC 5/B33/36 - I D C - 17 Eliz - George Bromeley v John Sleighe, Richard Ashton, Robert Smith et al
  • STAC 5/B108/28 - A - 17 Eliz - George Bromley v John Sleighe


Devon:

Bound v Sweet

  • STAC 5/B58/5 - B A C - 23 Eliz - Robert Bound v Victor Sweet, Roger Lowcroft
  • STAC 5/B21/24 - I D - 23 Eliz - Robert Bownde v Victor Sweete, John Ricke et al
    • Interrs refer to a messuage in Upton in the parish of South Mylton, Devon.(dk)
    • see also STAC Bond


Dorset:

AG v Culliford

  • STAC 5/A56/4 - B A - 40 Eliz - AG v William Culliford et al
  • STAC 5/A35/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v William Cullyford
    • Deposition of William Cullinforde, one of the defts, of Quarre in the Isle of Purbeck, Dorset.(dk)
    • see also STAC Cullyford


Gloucs:

Almoner v Harwood

  • STAC 5/A35/39 - I D - 44 Eliz - Almoner v John Harwood
    • Interrs ref Edmund Belsher of Wapeley, Gloucs, yeoman, who was felo de se.(dk)
    • see also STAC Harward

Bromwich v Braine

  • STAC 5/B21/27 - B A - 44 Eliz - Roger Bromwith v Richard Braine, John Crooke et al
    • Roger Bromwich of Chatesly/Chaseley, Worcs. Debts of complts brother in law Thomas Dunne of Newent, Gloucs. Assault at Newent.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B76/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Roger Bromwich v Richard Brayne, Thomas Dunne, Thomas Morgan


Hampshire:

Abere v Travers

  • STAC 5/A35/21 - B Dr - 38 Eliz - William Abere v John Travers, Edward Creswell, William Symonds et al
    • William Abere of Winchester, Hants. Sowing of Woad in various places in Hants, contrary to proclamation.(dk)
    • see also STAC Abere

Bunte v Luke

  • STAC 5/B21/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - William Bunte et uxor v Luke, William Elliott
    • Possession of land in the manor of Walchampton, in the hundred of Christchurch, Hants.(dk)
    • see also STAC Bunt


Kent:

AG v Tookey

  • STAC 5/A50/28 - I D - 42 Eliz - AG v Thomas Tookey et al
  • STAC 5/A35/38 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - AG v Thomas Tookey, John Harwood, Thomas Allen et al
    • Depositions taken at the Red Lyon in Canterbury, Kent. Deponents from Kent. Disturbance at Snargatt, Kent.(dk)
    • see also STAC Tookey

(NOTE it looks like this may be the same case as the AG v Harwood immediately above it on the Kent page)


Lancashire:

Byron v Smith

  • STAC 5/B21/31 - B A Rr C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smith
    • Sir John Byron of Newsteed, Notts, steward of the manor of Ratchdale, Lancs. Riot & destruction of enclosures.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B49/39 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smyth
  • STAC 5/B67/13 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smythe


Lincolnshire:

Buckberry v Turner

  • STAC 5/B43/25 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 8 Eliz - Edward Buckbery v Richard Turner, Thomas Newton, John Walker et al
  • STAC 5/B21/38 - I D - 7 Eliz - Edward Buckberie v Robert Chalmeley, Richard Turner et al
    • Interrs refer to assault at Donyngton in Hollande, Lincs by the defts, the bailiff & under bailiff of the liberty of Richemonde in Hollande.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B14/4 - I D - 8 Eliz - Edward Buckberye v Robert Chamley et al


London

Almoner v Le Mare

  • STAC 5/A5/4 - B A - Trin 43 Eliz - London - Almoner v David le Mare
    • Whereas on Peter van Bellowys late of London Broker . . . became felo de se . . . also one David la Mare a Merchant Stranger dwelling within the City of London was indebted unto Peter van Bellowys
  • STAC 5/A35/33 - I D - 43 Eliz - London - Almoner v David Le Mare
    • Interrs tbm to David le Mare, merchant stranger of London. Deposition of David le Mare. Debts due to Peter van Bellowes, felo de se, a factor or broker of London.(dk)
    • see also STAC Lemarre

(NOTE this inserts the details of A35/33 into an existing case on this page)

Bowles v Hill

  • STAC 5/B25/2 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - Francis Booles v Thomas Hilles, Robert Atkinson et al
  • STAC 5/B65/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Bolles v Thomas Hills, Robert March et al
  • STAC 5/B60/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Frances Boolles v Thomas Hilles, Richard Webb
  • STAC 5/B81/14 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Booll v Thomas Hull
  • STAC 5/B21/25 - I - 31 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
    • Interrs refer to the sale of onion seeds by Thomas Hill, citizen & grocer of London, which he had bought from the complt, warranted as fresh seed, and which did not grow. Seeds sold in a bag with the seal of the town of Strawseborough. Interrs discuss whether all genuine bags of Strawseborough seed are sealed with a lead seal carrying the year of production, and whether in this case that had been tampered with or replaced. Mention also of appearance at the Guidhall Court in London.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B90/18 - I - 34 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
  • STAC 5/B51/12 - D - 34 Eliz - William Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
  • STAC 5/B57/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Francis Bolde v Thomas Hill, Richard Webb


Norfolk:

Blenerhasset v Mansuer

  • STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
    • Norfolk. Estate of Thomas Pepis/Pepes.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
  • STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
  • STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
  • STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser


Pembroke

Attorney General v Meyrick

  • STAC 5/A45/30 - B A - 44 Eliz - AG v John Meyricke et al
  • STAC 5/A35/35 - D - 44 Eliz - AG v John Merricke
    • Deposition of John Merricke of Allestonne, Pembroke.(dk)
    • see also STAC Meyrick


Suffolk:

Breadstreet v Reason

  • STAC 5/B21/29 - I D - 25 Eliz - John Bredstreate v Alexander Reason, John Pawle
    • Interrs refer to assault about a mile outside Ipswich, Suffolk.(dk)
  • STAC 5/B59/15 - I - - John Bradstreate v John Sheppard, Thomas Blomfeyld
  • STAC 5/B69/25 - B - 27 Eliz - John Bredstrete v Thomas Cook, Thomas Mellys
  • STAC 5/B68/9 - C D - - Suffolk - John Broadstrete v Alexander Rensom, Thomas Cooke et al
  • STAC 5/B111/14 - Rn - - John Bredstreet v Alexander Reasbie, Thomas Blomefeild et al


Surrey

AG v Cook

  • STAC 5/A35/36 - B A - 43 Eliz - AG v John Cook, George Cook
    • Cranley, Surrey
  • STAC 5/A44/6 - I D - 43 Eliz - AG v George Cook, John Cook


Sussex

Avery v White

  • STAC 5/A48/27 - B - 17 Eliz - James Averye v Thomas White, Richard Harris, Richard Hayne
  • STAC 5/A10/9 - I D - 17 Eliz - James Averye v Robert White, Thomas Harris et al
  • STAC 5/A35/25 - A Rn Rr - 17 Eliz - James Avery v Thomas White, Richard Harries, Thomas Freeman et al
    • Parishes of Sealle als Beeding, Horton & Henfilde, Sussex.(dk)
    • see also STAC Avery


Warwickshire

Ashley v Gater

  • STAC 5/A3/3 - I - 44 Eliz - Warwickshire - Mary Ashley v Michael Gater et al
    • Interrs ref trial at assizes at Warwick & manor of Hilmorton.(dk)
  • STAC 5/A21/34 - I - 45 Eliz - Warwickshire - Mary Astelye v Michael Gater, Thomas Perkins et al
  • STAC 5/A35/31 - I D - 45 Eliz - Mary Ashley v Richard Baylie, John Radborne, John Turner et al
    • Interrs ref to a trial at Warwick Assizes regarding a trespass at Hillmorton, Warks.(dk)
    • see STAC Ashley for other possible references

(NOTE this is an insertion of A35/31 into an existing case on this county page)


Wiltshire:

Blackborough v Goddard

  • STAC 5/B7/4 - B A Rn C I D - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborough v Richard Goddard, Ambrose Holston, William Shepherd et al
  • STAC 5/B29/18 - D - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborowe v William Sheppard
  • STAC 5/B21/28 - I - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborough v Richard Goddard, Ambrose Halston et al
    • Interrs (damaged & fragile) refer to manor of Clerks, Wilts, to possession of parcels of land called Redlandes Leas & Redlandes Mead, and to a jury at Salisbury.(dk)
    • see also STAC Blackborough


Yorks ER:

Brackenbury v Barkeston

  • STAC 5/B21/32 - B - 28 Eliz - George Brackenburye v William Barkeston, Ralph Langdale et al
    • George Brakenberye who married Joane Beverley. Violent entry into lands in Barston[?Barmston?], Yorks & carrying away hay etc.(dk)
    • see also STAC Brackenbury




Notes for which I have not made any changes:

  • STAC 5/A35/40 - I D - 38 Eliz - London - Richard Aldworth v Francis Smalman
    • listed in London with a large group of similar items, interrs refer to a disturbance at Wargrove, Berks, and deponent from Wargrave, Berks, so I am sitting on the fence with this one, and have not made any changes
  • STAC 5/A35/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Atkins v John Robins, Thomas Wilks, Michael Hunt
    • mention of Gloucester
  • STAC 5/A35/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - William Abbs v Robert Harper, Valentine Cotssill, Simon Grey
    • Complt is William Abbs of Yarmouth, Norfolk, cooper
  • STAC 5/B21/23 - B A C I D - 33 Eliz - Rees Boulde v Owen Wood, Hugh Lewis
    • Anglesey, Wales