Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dking"
m |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''3/4/19:''' | '''3/4/19:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Cheshire:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bunbury v Leeche ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/22 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Thomas Bunbury v Rannulph Leeche, David Mountforde | ||
+ | **Complt Thomas Bunbury of Stanney, Cheshire. Perjury. Writ of error before Justices at Court of Chester.(dk) | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Bunbury]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Derbyshire:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bromley v Slyghe''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/26 - B A Rn C - 16 Eliz - George Bromley v John Slyghe, Robert Smith et al | ||
+ | **George Bromley of Horseley, Derbyshire, clerk. Disturbance in parish church.(dk) | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B85/9 - I D - 16 Eliz - George Bromelye v John Slighe et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B33/36 - I D C - 17 Eliz - George Bromeley v John Sleighe, Richard Ashton, Robert Smith et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B108/28 - A - 17 Eliz - George Bromley v John Sleighe | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Bromley]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Devon:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bound v Sweet ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B58/5 - B A C - 23 Eliz - Robert Bound v Victor Sweet, Roger Lowcroft | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/24 - I D - 23 Eliz - Robert Bownde v Victor Sweete, John Ricke et al | ||
+ | **Interrs refer to a messuage in Upton in the parish of South Mylton, Devon.(dk) | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Bond]] | ||
Line 18: | Line 46: | ||
**Interrs ref Edmund Belsher of Wapeley, Gloucs, yeoman, who was felo de se.(dk) | **Interrs ref Edmund Belsher of Wapeley, Gloucs, yeoman, who was felo de se.(dk) | ||
**see also [[STAC Harward]] | **see also [[STAC Harward]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bromwich v Braine ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/27 - B A - 44 Eliz - Roger Bromwith v Richard Braine, John Crooke et al | ||
+ | **Roger Bromwich of Chatesly/Chaseley, Worcs. Debts of complts brother in law Thomas Dunne of Newent, Gloucs. Assault at Newent.(dk) | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B76/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Roger Bromwich v Richard Brayne, Thomas Dunne, Thomas Morgan | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Bromwith]] | ||
Line 26: | Line 60: | ||
** William Abere of Winchester, Hants. Sowing of Woad in various places in Hants, contrary to proclamation.(dk) | ** William Abere of Winchester, Hants. Sowing of Woad in various places in Hants, contrary to proclamation.(dk) | ||
**see also [[STAC Abere]] | **see also [[STAC Abere]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bunte v Luke''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - William Bunte et uxor v Luke, William Elliott | ||
+ | **Possession of land in the manor of Walchampton, in the hundred of Christchurch, Hants.(dk) | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Bunt]] | ||
Line 36: | Line 75: | ||
**see also [[STAC Tookey]] | **see also [[STAC Tookey]] | ||
(NOTE it looks like this may be the same case as the AG v Harwood immediately above it on the Kent page) | (NOTE it looks like this may be the same case as the AG v Harwood immediately above it on the Kent page) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Lancashire:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Byron v Smith ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/31 - B A Rr C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smith | ||
+ | **Sir John Byron of Newsteed, Notts, steward of the manor of Ratchdale, Lancs. Riot & destruction of enclosures.(dk) | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B49/39 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smyth | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B67/13 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smythe | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Byron]] | ||
Line 47: | Line 96: | ||
**see also [[STAC Lemarre]] | **see also [[STAC Lemarre]] | ||
(NOTE this inserts the details of A35/33 into an existing case on this page) | (NOTE this inserts the details of A35/33 into an existing case on this page) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bowles v Hill ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B25/2 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - Francis Booles v Thomas Hilles, Robert Atkinson et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B65/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Bolles v Thomas Hills, Robert March et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B60/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Frances Boolles v Thomas Hilles, Richard Webb | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B81/14 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Booll v Thomas Hull | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/25 - I - 31 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al | ||
+ | **Interrs refer to the sale of onion seeds by Thomas Hill, citizen & grocer of London, which he had bought from the complt, warranted as fresh seed, and which did not grow. Seeds sold in a bag with the seal of the town of Strawseborough. Interrs discuss whether all genuine bags of Strawseborough seed are sealed with a lead seal carrying the year of production, and whether in this case that had been tampered with or replaced. Mention also of appearance at the Guidhall Court in London.(dk) | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B90/18 - I - 34 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B51/12 - D - 34 Eliz - William Bowles v Thomas Hill et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B57/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Francis Bolde v Thomas Hill, Richard Webb | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Boles]] | ||
+ | |||
Line 56: | Line 118: | ||
**Deposition of John Merricke of Allestonne, Pembroke.(dk) | **Deposition of John Merricke of Allestonne, Pembroke.(dk) | ||
**see also [[STAC Meyrick]] | **see also [[STAC Meyrick]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Suffolk:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Breadstreet v Reason ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/29 - I D - 25 Eliz - John Bredstreate v Alexander Reason, John Pawle | ||
+ | **Interrs refer to assault about a mile outside Ipswich, Suffolk.(dk) | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B59/15 - I - - John Bradstreate v John Sheppard, Thomas Blomfeyld | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B69/25 - B - 27 Eliz - John Bredstrete v Thomas Cook, Thomas Mellys | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B68/9 - C D - - Suffolk - John Broadstrete v Alexander Rensom, Thomas Cooke et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B111/14 - Rn - - John Bredstreet v Alexander Reasbie, Thomas Blomefeild et al | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Breadstreet]] | ||
Line 87: | Line 161: | ||
**see [[STAC Ashley]] for other possible references | **see [[STAC Ashley]] for other possible references | ||
(NOTE this is an insertion of A35/31 into an existing case on this county page) | (NOTE this is an insertion of A35/31 into an existing case on this county page) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Wiltshire:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Blackborough v Goddard ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B7/4 - B A Rn C I D - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborough v Richard Goddard, Ambrose Holston, William Shepherd et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B29/18 - D - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborowe v William Sheppard | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/28 - I - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborough v Richard Goddard, Ambrose Halston et al | ||
+ | **Interrs (damaged & fragile) refer to manor of Clerks, Wilts, to possession of parcels of land called Redlandes Leas & Redlandes Mead, and to a jury at Salisbury.(dk) | ||
+ | **see also [[STAC Blackborough]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
'''Notes for which I have not made any changes:''' | '''Notes for which I have not made any changes:''' | ||
Line 95: | Line 183: | ||
*STAC 5/A35/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - William Abbs v Robert Harper, Valentine Cotssill, Simon Grey | *STAC 5/A35/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - William Abbs v Robert Harper, Valentine Cotssill, Simon Grey | ||
**Complt is William Abbs of Yarmouth, Norfolk, cooper | **Complt is William Abbs of Yarmouth, Norfolk, cooper | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B21/23 - B A C I D - 33 Eliz - Rees Boulde v Owen Wood, Hugh Lewis | ||
+ | **Anglesey, Wales |
Revision as of 17:50, 3 April 2019
3/4/19:
Cheshire:
Bunbury v Leeche
- STAC 5/B21/22 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Thomas Bunbury v Rannulph Leeche, David Mountforde
- Complt Thomas Bunbury of Stanney, Cheshire. Perjury. Writ of error before Justices at Court of Chester.(dk)
- see also STAC Bunbury
Derbyshire:
Bromley v Slyghe
- STAC 5/B21/26 - B A Rn C - 16 Eliz - George Bromley v John Slyghe, Robert Smith et al
- George Bromley of Horseley, Derbyshire, clerk. Disturbance in parish church.(dk)
- STAC 5/B85/9 - I D - 16 Eliz - George Bromelye v John Slighe et al
- STAC 5/B33/36 - I D C - 17 Eliz - George Bromeley v John Sleighe, Richard Ashton, Robert Smith et al
- STAC 5/B108/28 - A - 17 Eliz - George Bromley v John Sleighe
- see also STAC Bromley
Devon:
Bound v Sweet
- STAC 5/B58/5 - B A C - 23 Eliz - Robert Bound v Victor Sweet, Roger Lowcroft
- STAC 5/B21/24 - I D - 23 Eliz - Robert Bownde v Victor Sweete, John Ricke et al
- Interrs refer to a messuage in Upton in the parish of South Mylton, Devon.(dk)
- see also STAC Bond
Dorset:
AG v Culliford
- STAC 5/A56/4 - B A - 40 Eliz - AG v William Culliford et al
- STAC 5/A35/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - AG v William Cullyford
- Deposition of William Cullinforde, one of the defts, of Quarre in the Isle of Purbeck, Dorset.(dk)
- see also STAC Cullyford
Gloucs:
Almoner v Harwood
- STAC 5/A35/39 - I D - 44 Eliz - Almoner v John Harwood
- Interrs ref Edmund Belsher of Wapeley, Gloucs, yeoman, who was felo de se.(dk)
- see also STAC Harward
Bromwich v Braine
- STAC 5/B21/27 - B A - 44 Eliz - Roger Bromwith v Richard Braine, John Crooke et al
- Roger Bromwich of Chatesly/Chaseley, Worcs. Debts of complts brother in law Thomas Dunne of Newent, Gloucs. Assault at Newent.(dk)
- STAC 5/B76/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Roger Bromwich v Richard Brayne, Thomas Dunne, Thomas Morgan
- see also STAC Bromwith
Hampshire:
Abere v Travers
- STAC 5/A35/21 - B Dr - 38 Eliz - William Abere v John Travers, Edward Creswell, William Symonds et al
- William Abere of Winchester, Hants. Sowing of Woad in various places in Hants, contrary to proclamation.(dk)
- see also STAC Abere
Bunte v Luke
- STAC 5/B21/30 - B A - 16 Eliz - William Bunte et uxor v Luke, William Elliott
- Possession of land in the manor of Walchampton, in the hundred of Christchurch, Hants.(dk)
- see also STAC Bunt
Kent:
AG v Tookey
- STAC 5/A50/28 - I D - 42 Eliz - AG v Thomas Tookey et al
- STAC 5/A35/38 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - AG v Thomas Tookey, John Harwood, Thomas Allen et al
- Depositions taken at the Red Lyon in Canterbury, Kent. Deponents from Kent. Disturbance at Snargatt, Kent.(dk)
- see also STAC Tookey
(NOTE it looks like this may be the same case as the AG v Harwood immediately above it on the Kent page)
Lancashire:
Byron v Smith
- STAC 5/B21/31 - B A Rr C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smith
- Sir John Byron of Newsteed, Notts, steward of the manor of Ratchdale, Lancs. Riot & destruction of enclosures.(dk)
- STAC 5/B49/39 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smyth
- STAC 5/B67/13 - C I D - 38 Eliz - Sir John Byron v Ottywell Smythe
- see also STAC Byron
London
Almoner v Le Mare
- STAC 5/A5/4 - B A - Trin 43 Eliz - London - Almoner v David le Mare
- Whereas on Peter van Bellowys late of London Broker . . . became felo de se . . . also one David la Mare a Merchant Stranger dwelling within the City of London was indebted unto Peter van Bellowys
- STAC 5/A35/33 - I D - 43 Eliz - London - Almoner v David Le Mare
- Interrs tbm to David le Mare, merchant stranger of London. Deposition of David le Mare. Debts due to Peter van Bellowes, felo de se, a factor or broker of London.(dk)
- see also STAC Lemarre
(NOTE this inserts the details of A35/33 into an existing case on this page)
Bowles v Hill
- STAC 5/B25/2 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - Francis Booles v Thomas Hilles, Robert Atkinson et al
- STAC 5/B65/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Bolles v Thomas Hills, Robert March et al
- STAC 5/B60/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - Frances Boolles v Thomas Hilles, Richard Webb
- STAC 5/B81/14 - I D - 34 Eliz - Francis Booll v Thomas Hull
- STAC 5/B21/25 - I - 31 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
- Interrs refer to the sale of onion seeds by Thomas Hill, citizen & grocer of London, which he had bought from the complt, warranted as fresh seed, and which did not grow. Seeds sold in a bag with the seal of the town of Strawseborough. Interrs discuss whether all genuine bags of Strawseborough seed are sealed with a lead seal carrying the year of production, and whether in this case that had been tampered with or replaced. Mention also of appearance at the Guidhall Court in London.(dk)
- STAC 5/B90/18 - I - 34 Eliz - Francis Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
- STAC 5/B51/12 - D - 34 Eliz - William Bowles v Thomas Hill et al
- STAC 5/B57/26 - I D - 31 Eliz - Francis Bolde v Thomas Hill, Richard Webb
- see also STAC Boles
Pembroke
Attorney General v Meyrick
- STAC 5/A45/30 - B A - 44 Eliz - AG v John Meyricke et al
- STAC 5/A35/35 - D - 44 Eliz - AG v John Merricke
- Deposition of John Merricke of Allestonne, Pembroke.(dk)
- see also STAC Meyrick
Suffolk:
Breadstreet v Reason
- STAC 5/B21/29 - I D - 25 Eliz - John Bredstreate v Alexander Reason, John Pawle
- Interrs refer to assault about a mile outside Ipswich, Suffolk.(dk)
- STAC 5/B59/15 - I - - John Bradstreate v John Sheppard, Thomas Blomfeyld
- STAC 5/B69/25 - B - 27 Eliz - John Bredstrete v Thomas Cook, Thomas Mellys
- STAC 5/B68/9 - C D - - Suffolk - John Broadstrete v Alexander Rensom, Thomas Cooke et al
- STAC 5/B111/14 - Rn - - John Bredstreet v Alexander Reasbie, Thomas Blomefeild et al
- see also STAC Breadstreet
Surrey
AG v Cook
- STAC 5/A35/36 - B A - 43 Eliz - AG v John Cook, George Cook
- Cranley, Surrey
- STAC 5/A44/6 - I D - 43 Eliz - AG v George Cook, John Cook
- see also STAC Cooke
Sussex
Avery v White
- STAC 5/A48/27 - B - 17 Eliz - James Averye v Thomas White, Richard Harris, Richard Hayne
- STAC 5/A10/9 - I D - 17 Eliz - James Averye v Robert White, Thomas Harris et al
- STAC 5/A35/25 - A Rn Rr - 17 Eliz - James Avery v Thomas White, Richard Harries, Thomas Freeman et al
- Parishes of Sealle als Beeding, Horton & Henfilde, Sussex.(dk)
- see also STAC Avery
Warwickshire
Ashley v Gater
- STAC 5/A3/3 - I - 44 Eliz - Warwickshire - Mary Ashley v Michael Gater et al
- Interrs ref trial at assizes at Warwick & manor of Hilmorton.(dk)
- STAC 5/A21/34 - I - 45 Eliz - Warwickshire - Mary Astelye v Michael Gater, Thomas Perkins et al
- STAC 5/A35/31 - I D - 45 Eliz - Mary Ashley v Richard Baylie, John Radborne, John Turner et al
- Interrs ref to a trial at Warwick Assizes regarding a trespass at Hillmorton, Warks.(dk)
- see STAC Ashley for other possible references
(NOTE this is an insertion of A35/31 into an existing case on this county page)
Wiltshire:
Blackborough v Goddard
- STAC 5/B7/4 - B A Rn C I D - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborough v Richard Goddard, Ambrose Holston, William Shepherd et al
- STAC 5/B29/18 - D - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborowe v William Sheppard
- STAC 5/B21/28 - I - 37 Eliz - Henry Blackborough v Richard Goddard, Ambrose Halston et al
- Interrs (damaged & fragile) refer to manor of Clerks, Wilts, to possession of parcels of land called Redlandes Leas & Redlandes Mead, and to a jury at Salisbury.(dk)
- see also STAC Blackborough
Notes for which I have not made any changes:
- STAC 5/A35/40 - I D - 38 Eliz - London - Richard Aldworth v Francis Smalman
- listed in London with a large group of similar items, interrs refer to a disturbance at Wargrove, Berks, and deponent from Wargrave, Berks, so I am sitting on the fence with this one, and have not made any changes
- STAC 5/A35/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Atkins v John Robins, Thomas Wilks, Michael Hunt
- mention of Gloucester
- STAC 5/A35/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - William Abbs v Robert Harper, Valentine Cotssill, Simon Grey
- Complt is William Abbs of Yarmouth, Norfolk, cooper
- STAC 5/B21/23 - B A C I D - 33 Eliz - Rees Boulde v Owen Wood, Hugh Lewis
- Anglesey, Wales