Difference between revisions of "STAC co York ER"

From Waalt
Line 3: Line 3:
 
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
 
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
  
Key: ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
+
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
  
Line 10: Line 10:
 
''' Abbott v Webster '''  
 
''' Abbott v Webster '''  
 
*One Bartilmew Abbott late husbant of the complainant seised of property in Bellessies in Yorkshire v Wm Webster of Flamborough Yorkshire ER esquire STAC 5/A2/35
 
*One Bartilmew Abbott late husbant of the complainant seised of property in Bellessies in Yorkshire v Wm Webster of Flamborough Yorkshire ER esquire STAC 5/A2/35
*STAC 5/A2/35 - B A Rn Rr - 15 Eliz - Yorkshire - Elizabeth Abbott v William Webster, Thomas Tomlyn, Thomas Crowsy, Nicholas Croser et al
+
*STAC 5/A2/35 - B A Rn Rr - 15 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Elizabeth Abbott v William Webster, Thomas Tomlyn, Thomas Crowsy, Nicholas Croser et al
*STAC 5/A14/35 - I D - 14 Eliz - Yorkshire - Elizabeth Abbott v William Webster, Thomas Tomlynne et al
+
*STAC 5/A14/35 - I D - 14 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Elizabeth Abbott v William Webster, Thomas Tomlynne et al
 
*see also [[STAC Abbott]]
 
*see also [[STAC Abbott]]
  
Line 35: Line 35:
 
''' Atkinson v Hewett '''  
 
''' Atkinson v Hewett '''  
 
*Anthony Atkinson your Majesty's searcher of the port of Hull Yorkshire ER. STAC 5/A52/35 see also AG v Atkinson infra
 
*Anthony Atkinson your Majesty's searcher of the port of Hull Yorkshire ER. STAC 5/A52/35 see also AG v Atkinson infra
*STAC 5/A52/35 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Anthony Atkinson v John Groves, John Hewett
+
*STAC 5/A52/35 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Anthony Atkinson v John Groves, John Hewett
 
**Bill torn, small areas missing  
 
**Bill torn, small areas missing  
*STAC 5/A1/6 - B A - 45 Eliz - Yorkshire - Anthony Atkinson v John Hewett, Emanuel Fenton, Francis Egglisfeild, John Clant
+
*STAC 5/A1/6 - B A - 45 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Anthony Atkinson v John Hewett, Emanuel Fenton, Francis Egglisfeild, John Clant
*STAC 5/A36/29 - I D - 45 Eliz -  Yorkshire - Anthony Atkinson v Emanuell Fenton et al
+
*STAC 5/A36/29 - I D - 45 Eliz -  Yorkshire ER - Anthony Atkinson v Emanuell Fenton et al
 
*see also [[STAC Atkinson]]
 
*see also [[STAC Atkinson]]
  
Line 47: Line 47:
 
''' Carleton v Holmes '''  
 
''' Carleton v Holmes '''  
 
*John Carleton of Besoucthe in Holderness Yorkshire ER, Gentleman. STAC 5/C3/23
 
*John Carleton of Besoucthe in Holderness Yorkshire ER, Gentleman. STAC 5/C3/23
*STAC 5/C3/23 - B A - 18 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Carleton v Edward Holmes, Philip Booth, Eleonor Strickland
+
*STAC 5/C3/23 - B A - 18 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Carleton v Edward Holmes, Philip Booth, Eleonor Strickland
 
*see also [[STAC Carlton]]
 
*see also [[STAC Carlton]]
  
 
''' Cave v Ellerker '''
 
''' Cave v Ellerker '''
 
*Kingston upon Hull, Yorkshire ER, scuffle between in-laws with confessional differences.  
 
*Kingston upon Hull, Yorkshire ER, scuffle between in-laws with confessional differences.  
*STAC 5/C5/27 - B Dn C I D - Mich 33/34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Walter Cave v Ralph Ellerker, James Ellerker, Philip Dalton, Robert Clark, Alexander Smith see transcription [[STAC 5/C5/27]]
+
*STAC 5/C5/27 - B Dn C I D - Mich 33/34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Walter Cave v Ralph Ellerker, James Ellerker, Philip Dalton, Robert Clark, Alexander Smith see transcription [[STAC 5/C5/27]]
*STAC 5/C81/14 - Rn  - Yorkshire - Walter Cave v Thomas Ellerker, Raffe Ellerker, Philip Dalton et al  
+
*STAC 5/C81/14 - Rn  - Yorkshire ER - Walter Cave v Thomas Ellerker, Raffe Ellerker, Philip Dalton et al  
*STAC 5/C21/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire - Walter Cave v Raphe Ellerker, James Ellerker, Philip Dalton et al  
+
*STAC 5/C21/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Walter Cave v Raphe Ellerker, James Ellerker, Philip Dalton et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Cave]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cave]]
  
 
''' Cholmeley v Thorley '''  
 
''' Cholmeley v Thorley '''  
 
*Marmaduke Cholmeley (of Brandisbye in the co of York esquire) In re manor of South Dalton in the Co of York ER. STAC 5/C1/2
 
*Marmaduke Cholmeley (of Brandisbye in the co of York esquire) In re manor of South Dalton in the Co of York ER. STAC 5/C1/2
*STAC 5/C1/2 - B Dr - Trin 26 Eliz - Yorkshire - Marmaduke Cholmeley v Richard Thorley  
+
*STAC 5/C1/2 - B Dr - Trin 26 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Marmaduke Cholmeley v Richard Thorley  
 
*see also [[STAC Cholmondeley]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cholmondeley]]
  
Line 100: Line 100:
 
''' Frothingham v Grimstone '''  
 
''' Frothingham v Grimstone '''  
 
*Edward Frothingham esquire of South Frothingham Yorkshire. STAC 5/F2/11
 
*Edward Frothingham esquire of South Frothingham Yorkshire. STAC 5/F2/11
*STAC 5/F2/11 - B Dr C - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Frothingham v John Stalam, Marmaduke Grymston, Christopher Grymston, William Collyer, Thomas Dickson et al
+
*STAC 5/F2/11 - B Dr C - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Edward Frothingham v John Stalam, Marmaduke Grymston, Christopher Grymston, William Collyer, Thomas Dickson et al
*STAC 5/F3/15 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Frothingham v Marmaduke Grymstone, Christopher Grymstone, William Collier, Thomas Dyxson et al
+
*STAC 5/F3/15 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Edward Frothingham v Marmaduke Grymstone, Christopher Grymstone, William Collier, Thomas Dyxson et al
*STAC 5/F8/35 - Dr C - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Frothingham v George Hawood
+
*STAC 5/F8/35 - Dr C - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Edward Frothingham v George Hawood
 
*see also [[STAC Frothingham]]
 
*see also [[STAC Frothingham]]
  
Line 128: Line 128:
 
*Re: Assault on waste ground in Scorborough, East Yorkshire. (B.McD.) STAC 5/H24/9  
 
*Re: Assault on waste ground in Scorborough, East Yorkshire. (B.McD.) STAC 5/H24/9  
 
*Hotham accused of keeping Henry Frothingham in his house (a man “vehemently suspected for committing of burglaries and robberies by the highway”) and of procuring a riot against Thorpe. (B.McD.) STAC 5/H65/38  
 
*Hotham accused of keeping Henry Frothingham in his house (a man “vehemently suspected for committing of burglaries and robberies by the highway”) and of procuring a riot against Thorpe. (B.McD.) STAC 5/H65/38  
*STAC 5/H24/9 - Yorkshire - B A Rn C I D - 38 Eliz - Arthur Hall v Launcelot Anneslye, John Hotham et al
+
*STAC 5/H24/9 - Yorkshire ER - B A Rn C I D - 38 Eliz - Arthur Hall v Launcelot Anneslye, John Hotham et al
*STAC 5/H65/38 - Yorkshire - I D - 38 Eliz - Arthur Hall v John Hotham et al
+
*STAC 5/H65/38 - Yorkshire ER - I D - 38 Eliz - Arthur Hall v John Hotham et al
 
*see also [[STAC Hall]]
 
*see also [[STAC Hall]]
  
Line 153: Line 153:
 
''' Langdale v Ward '''  
 
''' Langdale v Ward '''  
 
*Re: Riotous entry into balks & meres in Sancton, East Yorkshire. (B.McD.) STAC 5/L30/35 -  
 
*Re: Riotous entry into balks & meres in Sancton, East Yorkshire. (B.McD.) STAC 5/L30/35 -  
*STAC 5/L30/35 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Marmaduke Langdale v John Ward, Hugh Graye et al
+
*STAC 5/L30/35 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Marmaduke Langdale v John Ward, Hugh Graye et al
 
*see also [[STAC Langdale]]
 
*see also [[STAC Langdale]]
  
 
''' Langdale v Constable '''  
 
''' Langdale v Constable '''  
 
*Men of North Cliffe destroying hedges in Houghton mentioned in MCDONAGH, Briony, “Subverting the ground : private property and public protest in the sixteenth-century Yorkshire Wolds”  Agricultural History Review 57:2 (2009) 191-206. STAC 5/L3/40  
 
*Men of North Cliffe destroying hedges in Houghton mentioned in MCDONAGH, Briony, “Subverting the ground : private property and public protest in the sixteenth-century Yorkshire Wolds”  Agricultural History Review 57:2 (2009) 191-206. STAC 5/L3/40  
*STAC 5/L3/40 - B - 30 Eliz - Yorkshire - Peter Langdale v Marmaduke Constable, Roger Gartham, John Pannel et al
+
*STAC 5/L3/40 - B - 30 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Peter Langdale v Marmaduke Constable, Roger Gartham, John Pannel et al
 
*see also [[STAC Langdale]]
 
*see also [[STAC Langdale]]
  
Line 201: Line 201:
  
 
''' R '''  
 
''' R '''  
 +
 +
''' Richard v Cooke / Belton '''
 +
*Land in Gouldalle [Gowdall] in the parish of Snaithe co York ER - STAC 5/R3/18
 +
*STAC 5/R16/32 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Rikard, Edward Pullen v William Cooke, Robert Smith et al
 +
*STAC 5/R35/16 - I D - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Ricard, Edward Pullen v William Cooke, Robert Smyth et al
 +
*STAC 5/R40/29 - C I D - 25 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Ricarde, Edward Pullen v William Cooke, Robert Smyth et al
 +
*STAC 5/R25/36 - I D - 20 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Rikard, Edward Pullen v William Cooke, Robert Smith et al
 +
*STAC 5/R19/24 - I D - 20 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Ricard, Edward Pullen v Robert Belton et al
 +
*STAC 5/R3/18 - B - Hil 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Richard v Robert Belton
 +
*STAC 5/R30/40 - C I D - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Ricard v Robert Belton
 +
*STAC 5/R4/40 - I D - 20 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswold Rickarde v Robert Beltone
 +
*See also [[STAC Richard]]
  
 
''' Robinson v Aske '''
 
''' Robinson v Aske '''
*STAC 5/R1/37 - B - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Robinson v John Aske, John Redman, Christopher Ashe et al. Transcription [[STAC 5/R1/37]]
+
*STAC 5/R1/37 - B - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Robinson v John Aske, John Redman, Christopher Ashe et al. Transcription [[STAC 5/R1/37]]
  
 
''' Russia Company v Mayor of Hull '''
 
''' Russia Company v Mayor of Hull '''
*STAC 5/M21/5 - B Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire - Merchants for the discovery of new trades v John Gregory see transcription [[STAC 5/M21/5]]
+
*STAC 5/M21/5 - B Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Merchants for the discovery of new trades v John Gregory see transcription [[STAC 5/M21/5]]
*STAC 5/M19/24 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire - English Merchants for the discovery of new trades v John Gregory see transcription [[STAC 5/M19/24]]
+
*STAC 5/M19/24 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - English Merchants for the discovery of new trades v John Gregory see transcription [[STAC 5/M19/24]]
*STAC 5/M36/29 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire - Fellowship of Merchants at Hull v John Gregory  
+
*STAC 5/M36/29 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Fellowship of Merchants at Hull v John Gregory  
*STAC 5/M1/31 - A - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire - The Fellowship of English Merchants for Discovery of the New Lands v John Gregory see transcription [[STAC 5/M1/31]]
+
*STAC 5/M1/31 - A - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - The Fellowship of English Merchants for Discovery of the New Lands v John Gregory see transcription [[STAC 5/M1/31]]
*STAC 5/E3/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire - English Merchants v John Gregory
+
*STAC 5/E3/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - English Merchants v John Gregory
 
*see also [[STAC Russia Company]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Russia Company]]  
  
Line 238: Line 250:
  
 
''' Wharton v Langdale '''
 
''' Wharton v Langdale '''
*STAC 5/W81/24 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire - Lawrence Wharton v Marmaduke Langdale et al
+
*STAC 5/W81/24 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Lawrence Wharton v Marmaduke Langdale et al
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
  
 
''' Wharton v Ellerker '''
 
''' Wharton v Ellerker '''
*STAC 5/W16/5 - B A - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Warton v Ralph Ellerker, Robert Whitlocke et al
+
*STAC 5/W16/5 - B A - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Warton v Ralph Ellerker, Robert Whitlocke et al
*STAC 5/W15/2 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Warton v Robert Ellerker, John Casse et al
+
*STAC 5/W15/2 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Warton v Robert Ellerker, John Casse et al
*STAC 5/W46/23 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v Rice Ellerker Sr, Rice Ellerker Jr, William Acklam
+
*STAC 5/W46/23 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Rice Ellerker Sr, Rice Ellerker Jr, William Acklam
*STAC 5/W22/30 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Wharton v Ralph Ellesker William Ellesker et al
+
*STAC 5/W22/30 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Wharton v Ralph Ellesker William Ellesker et al
*STAC 5/W44/10 - Rr - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v Ralph Ellerker, William Ellerker, William Aklam et al
+
*STAC 5/W44/10 - Rr - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Ralph Ellerker, William Ellerker, William Aklam et al
*STAC 5/W8/40 - I D - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v William Ellerker, Ralph Ellerker et al
+
*STAC 5/W8/40 - I D - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v William Ellerker, Ralph Ellerker et al
*STAC 5/W71/3 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v Ralph Ellerker, William Ellerker
+
*STAC 5/W71/3 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Ralph Ellerker, William Ellerker
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
  
 
''' Wharton v Trudove '''
 
''' Wharton v Trudove '''
 
*TNA Note: Perjury in a suit for debt by plaintiff before the Council of the North. STAC 7/9/20  
 
*TNA Note: Perjury in a suit for debt by plaintiff before the Council of the North. STAC 7/9/20  
*STAC 7/9/20 - - - Yorkshire - Michael Warton v Edward Trudove
+
*STAC 7/9/20 - - - Yorkshire ER - Michael Warton v Edward Trudove
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
  
 
''' Wharton v Hillyard '''
 
''' Wharton v Hillyard '''
 
*Wharton assaulted on six occassions (inc on the Hull - Barton ferry), mentioned in MCDONAGH, Briony, “Subverting the ground : private property and public protest in the sixteenth-century Yorkshire Wolds”  Agricultural History Review 57:2 (2009) 191-206. STAC 5/W15/32  
 
*Wharton assaulted on six occassions (inc on the Hull - Barton ferry), mentioned in MCDONAGH, Briony, “Subverting the ground : private property and public protest in the sixteenth-century Yorkshire Wolds”  Agricultural History Review 57:2 (2009) 191-206. STAC 5/W15/32  
*STAC 5/W15/32 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hildyard, Robert Hildyard, William Hildyard, James Ellerker, Edward Ellerker et al
+
*STAC 5/W15/32 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hildyard, Robert Hildyard, William Hildyard, James Ellerker, Edward Ellerker et al
*STAC 5/W79/35 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hildyard, Hector Couper et al
+
*STAC 5/W79/35 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hildyard, Hector Couper et al
*STAC 5/W37/11 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v Edward Ellerken, Cristopher Hillyard et al
+
*STAC 5/W37/11 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Edward Ellerken, Cristopher Hillyard et al
*STAC 5/W29/30 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hillyard, John Ewrye
+
*STAC 5/W29/30 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hillyard, John Ewrye
*STAC 5/W19/27 - B A C I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hylye, William Hylye et al
+
*STAC 5/W19/27 - B A C I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hylye, William Hylye et al
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wharton]]
  
Line 271: Line 283:
 
''' Almoner v Constable '''
 
''' Almoner v Constable '''
 
*In re Thomas Perkyns late of Flamborough in the county of York died last day of March 24 Eliz. John Pate (Bayliff). STAC 5/1/24  
 
*In re Thomas Perkyns late of Flamborough in the county of York died last day of March 24 Eliz. John Pate (Bayliff). STAC 5/1/24  
*STAC 5/1/24 - B A - - Yorkshire - Almoner v Robert Constable, John Pate, Robert Johnson, Anthony Hicke  
+
*STAC 5/1/24 - B A - - Yorkshire ER - Almoner v Robert Constable, John Pate, Robert Johnson, Anthony Hicke  
 
*see also [[STAC Constable]]
 
*see also [[STAC Constable]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Martin '''
 
''' Almoner v Martin '''
 
*Richard Gilderalls of Howcke [? Hook] Yorkshire, drowned, felo de se. STAC 5/A5/23  
 
*Richard Gilderalls of Howcke [? Hook] Yorkshire, drowned, felo de se. STAC 5/A5/23  
*STAC 5/A22/1 - B A I D - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Thomas Martin, William Hurrome et al
+
*STAC 5/A22/1 - B A I D - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Almoner v Thomas Martin, William Hurrome et al
*STAC 5/A5/23 - B - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Thomas Martyne, William Harrande, Simon Bonde, Thomas Margeson
+
*STAC 5/A5/23 - B - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Almoner v Thomas Martyne, William Harrande, Simon Bonde, Thomas Margeson
 
*see also [[STAC Martin]]
 
*see also [[STAC Martin]]
  
 
''' Almoner v Spencer '''
 
''' Almoner v Spencer '''
 
*In re Robert Atkinson of Ferreby in Hullshire in the county of York felo de se. STAC 5/A59/10  
 
*In re Robert Atkinson of Ferreby in Hullshire in the county of York felo de se. STAC 5/A59/10  
*STAC 5/A59/10 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Robert Spencer, Anthony Burnesall see transcription [[STAC 5/A59/10]]
+
*STAC 5/A59/10 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Almoner v Robert Spencer, Anthony Burnesall see transcription [[STAC 5/A59/10]]
 
*see also [[STAC Spencer]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Spencer]]  
  
Line 289: Line 301:
 
''' AG v Atkinson '''
 
''' AG v Atkinson '''
 
*Arising from Atkinson v Hewett vide supra  
 
*Arising from Atkinson v Hewett vide supra  
*STAC 5/A39/40 - B A Rn Rr - 44 Eliz -  Yorkshire - AG v Anthony Atkinson, Gilbert Wilkinson, Michael Cawley et al
+
*STAC 5/A39/40 - B A Rn Rr - 44 Eliz -  Yorkshire ER - AG v Anthony Atkinson, Gilbert Wilkinson, Michael Cawley et al
*STAC 5/A34/8 - C I D - 44 Eliz -Yorkshire - AG v Anthony Atkinson, Gilbert Wilkinson, William Elston et al
+
*STAC 5/A34/8 - C I D - 44 Eliz -Yorkshire ER - AG v Anthony Atkinson, Gilbert Wilkinson, William Elston et al
 
*see also [[STAC Atkinson]]
 
*see also [[STAC Atkinson]]
  
 
''' AG v Towse '''
 
''' AG v Towse '''
 
*Assault on a house and family by a small mob of armed men, in one of the Gartons. STAC 5/A52/2  
 
*Assault on a house and family by a small mob of armed men, in one of the Gartons. STAC 5/A52/2  
*STAC 5/A52/2 - B - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Brian Towse, John Edwards et al  
+
*STAC 5/A52/2 - B - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - AG v Brian Towse, John Edwards et al  
*STAC 5/A22/22 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Antony Towse, William Towse et al  
+
*STAC 5/A22/22 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - AG v Antony Towse, William Towse et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Towse]]
 
*see also [[STAC Towse]]
 
<BR>
 
<BR>

Revision as of 21:48, 7 December 2018

Yorkshire, East Riding

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

A

Abbott v Webster

  • One Bartilmew Abbott late husbant of the complainant seised of property in Bellessies in Yorkshire v Wm Webster of Flamborough Yorkshire ER esquire STAC 5/A2/35
  • STAC 5/A2/35 - B A Rn Rr - 15 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Elizabeth Abbott v William Webster, Thomas Tomlyn, Thomas Crowsy, Nicholas Croser et al
  • STAC 5/A14/35 - I D - 14 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Elizabeth Abbott v William Webster, Thomas Tomlynne et al
  • see also STAC Abbott

Acclome v Beckwith

  • Imprimis whether did Wm Thackwray about the second day of October in the xxxiijth year of the Queens Majesties reign that now is at Little Moreby in co York ER declare unto you Thomas Beckwith that he had a warrant or precept from Philip Constable esq the then Shireve of Yorkshire to arrest you at the suit of John Acclome esq, you then lying or being within a hedge that had of late inclosed or compassed about a Retche or stack of corn or hay. STAC 5/A32/28
  • STAC 5/A47/18 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Acclome v Isabella Beckwith, Francis Fairfax, George Knowles et al
  • STAC 5/A45/22 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Acclome v Isabell Beckwith et al
  • STAC 5/A32/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Acchlam v Thomas Beckwith, William Latham, Francis Farfax et al
  • STAC 5/A56/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Acclome v George Knowles et al
  • STAC 5/A35/10 - B A C I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Aulome v Leonard Beckwith, Cuthbert Faulconer, John Gilbert et al
  • see also STAC Acklam

Acklam v Wharton

  • Int 3: Was one Thomas Suttons head broken by the said William Accham the complainant at he time of the serving of the said proces and in howe many places was his head broken, and with what weapon - STAC 5/A37/26
  • STAC 5/A24/22 - B A - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Acclam v Michael Wharton, Hugh Lukbarre
  • STAC 5/A45/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Acklam v Michael Warton
  • STAC 5/A50/15 - Rr - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Acklam v Michael Wharton, Hugh Lickbarroughe
  • STAC 5/A33/3 - I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Acklam v Hugh Hickbarrowe
  • STAC 5/A37/26 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Acklam v Michael Wharton, Hugh Lickbarrowe
  • STAC 5/A28/9 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Adam v Hughe Lickborough, Michael Warton
  • see also STAC Acklam

Atkinson v Hewett

  • Anthony Atkinson your Majesty's searcher of the port of Hull Yorkshire ER. STAC 5/A52/35 see also AG v Atkinson infra
  • STAC 5/A52/35 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Anthony Atkinson v John Groves, John Hewett
    • Bill torn, small areas missing
  • STAC 5/A1/6 - B A - 45 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Anthony Atkinson v John Hewett, Emanuel Fenton, Francis Egglisfeild, John Clant
  • STAC 5/A36/29 - I D - 45 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Anthony Atkinson v Emanuell Fenton et al
  • see also STAC Atkinson

B

C

Carleton v Holmes

  • John Carleton of Besoucthe in Holderness Yorkshire ER, Gentleman. STAC 5/C3/23
  • STAC 5/C3/23 - B A - 18 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Carleton v Edward Holmes, Philip Booth, Eleonor Strickland
  • see also STAC Carlton

Cave v Ellerker

  • Kingston upon Hull, Yorkshire ER, scuffle between in-laws with confessional differences.
  • STAC 5/C5/27 - B Dn C I D - Mich 33/34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Walter Cave v Ralph Ellerker, James Ellerker, Philip Dalton, Robert Clark, Alexander Smith see transcription STAC 5/C5/27
  • STAC 5/C81/14 - Rn - Yorkshire ER - Walter Cave v Thomas Ellerker, Raffe Ellerker, Philip Dalton et al
  • STAC 5/C21/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Walter Cave v Raphe Ellerker, James Ellerker, Philip Dalton et al
  • see also STAC Cave

Cholmeley v Thorley

  • Marmaduke Cholmeley (of Brandisbye in the co of York esquire) In re manor of South Dalton in the Co of York ER. STAC 5/C1/2
  • STAC 5/C1/2 - B Dr - Trin 26 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Marmaduke Cholmeley v Richard Thorley
  • see also STAC Cholmondeley

D

Dawson v Cowlson

  • Alexander Dawson & Herberte Dawson, uncles & proch amies of Seethe Dawson & John Dawson sons of John Dawson late of Skerne, Yorks.(dk) - STAC 5/D42/17
  • STAC 5/D42/17 - B - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Alexander Dawson v William Cowlson, Randall Etherington et al
  • see also STAC Dawson

Dixon v Wensley

  • Willm Dixon of Brandesburton, Yorks. Assault at the house of the complt.(dk) - STAC 5/D9/10
  • STAC 5/D9/10 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Dixon v John Wensley, Thomas Burrell et al
  • see also STAC Dixon

E

Eslybye v Stockdale

  • Henry Eslybye of Etton, Yorks, tailor. Crabtree Close in Etton.(dk) - STAC 5/E7/3
  • STAC 5/E7/3 - B - 29 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Henry Eslybye v Robert Stockdale, William Wallis et al
  • see also STAC Eslyby

Estofte v Pinder

  • John Estofte of Estofte, Yorks. Unlawful removal of tithe corn from a close called More Closse in Wilf Parke in Ufflett [?Adlingfleet?], Yorks which the complt had leased from Wm Cholmeley of Highgate, Middx.(dk) - STAC 5/E7/10
  • Most Deponents from Estoft and one from Beverley - STAC 5/E4/17
  • STAC 5/E4/31 - B A C Rn - 6 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Estofte v Katherine Pynder, Alice Coldwell et al
  • STAC 5/E4/17 - C I D - 7 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Estoft v Robert Pynder, William Stucks et al
  • STAC 5/E15/14 - B - - Yorkshire ER - John Estofte v Robert Pindar et al
  • STAC 5/E7/10 - B A - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - - John Estofte v William Pyndar, Richard Freman et al
  • STAC 5/E3/34 - I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Estocke v Robert Pindar, Thomas Davyd
  • See also STAC Estofte

F

Fortescue v Jordayne

  • Interrs refer to assizes at York & bargain between Richard Robson late of London & Edward Stiringe. Deponents from Hilderthroppe & Wilstroppe in Yorks. - STAC 5/F22/7
  • STAC 5/F22/7 - I D - 19 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Fortescue v John Jordayne, George Smith et al
  • see also STAC Fortescue for other possible references

Frothingham v Grimstone

  • Edward Frothingham esquire of South Frothingham Yorkshire. STAC 5/F2/11
  • STAC 5/F2/11 - B Dr C - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Edward Frothingham v John Stalam, Marmaduke Grymston, Christopher Grymston, William Collyer, Thomas Dickson et al
  • STAC 5/F3/15 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Edward Frothingham v Marmaduke Grymstone, Christopher Grymstone, William Collier, Thomas Dyxson et al
  • STAC 5/F8/35 - Dr C - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Edward Frothingham v George Hawood
  • see also STAC Frothingham

G

Groves v Pearson and Elswicke

  • Interrs refer Assizes at York. Annuity. Deposition of Roger Shottinge of Bylton in Holderness, Yorks.(dk) - STAC 5/G8/40
  • Hughe Groves of Kingston upon Hull, merchant. Perjury at Council in the North in case brought by John Pearson of Hornsaye, son in law of John Browne of West Skyrley, Yorks, decd, claiming that some of the goods of the decd had previously been granted to him and his wife on their marriage.(dk) - STAC 5/G5/23
  • STAC 5/G5/23 - B - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Hugh Groves v John Pearson, John Elswicke, Leonard Thewlesse
  • STAC 5/G17/13 - B A - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Hugh Groves v John Elswicke, Roger Shotling, John Pearson
  • STAC 5/G28/14 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Hugh Groves v John Peirson, John Elsewicke
  • STAC 5/G8/40 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Hugh Grove v Roger Shottinge
  • see also STAC Grove

H

Hall v Garbury

  • Christopher Hall, draper. Theft from messuage etc in Beverley, Yorks, property of Ellynor Farley, widow.(dk) - STAC 5/H6/4
  • STAC 5/H6/4 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Christopher Hall v Richard Garbury, John Brown, Christopher Ridley, Henry Storey
  • STAC 5/H20/18 - B A - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Christopher Hall v Christopher Ridlye, Richard Garbrie et al
  • STAC 5/H38/19 - I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Christopher Hall v Christopher Ridley et al
  • see also STAC Hall

Hall v Hotham

  • Re: Assault on waste ground in Scorborough, East Yorkshire. (B.McD.) STAC 5/H24/9
  • Hotham accused of keeping Henry Frothingham in his house (a man “vehemently suspected for committing of burglaries and robberies by the highway”) and of procuring a riot against Thorpe. (B.McD.) STAC 5/H65/38
  • STAC 5/H24/9 - Yorkshire ER - B A Rn C I D - 38 Eliz - Arthur Hall v Launcelot Anneslye, John Hotham et al
  • STAC 5/H65/38 - Yorkshire ER - I D - 38 Eliz - Arthur Hall v John Hotham et al
  • see also STAC Hall

Hussey v Hutton

  • John Hussey of Northe Duffield, Yorks. Manor of Northe Duffield. Forgery of deeds.(dk) - STAC 5/H6/6
  • STAC 5/H6/6 - B A Rn Rr - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Hussey v Richard Hutton
  • STAC 5/H59/31 - I D - 13 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Hussey v Richard Hutton
  • see also STAC Hussey

I J

K

Kenne v Wentworth

  • Case Book Report STAC 5/K7/39r
  • STAC 5/K7/39 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 19 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Christopher Kenne et uxor, Roger Beckwithe v Richard Wentworth, John Adamson et al
  • STAC 5/K2/37 - I D - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Christopher Kenne et uxor, Roger Beckwith v John Adamson, John Hewley, John Adcocke
  • STAC 5/K7/8 - I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Christopher Kenne v John Adcocke et al
  • see also STAC Kenne

L

Langdale v Ward

  • Re: Riotous entry into balks & meres in Sancton, East Yorkshire. (B.McD.) STAC 5/L30/35 -
  • STAC 5/L30/35 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Marmaduke Langdale v John Ward, Hugh Graye et al
  • see also STAC Langdale

Langdale v Constable

  • Men of North Cliffe destroying hedges in Houghton mentioned in MCDONAGH, Briony, “Subverting the ground : private property and public protest in the sixteenth-century Yorkshire Wolds” Agricultural History Review 57:2 (2009) 191-206. STAC 5/L3/40
  • STAC 5/L3/40 - B - 30 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Peter Langdale v Marmaduke Constable, Roger Gartham, John Pannel et al
  • see also STAC Langdale

M

Markes v Newby

  • Deposition of Ambrose Newbye of Ricall co York ER gent. Interrogatories to Ambrose Newbie one of the defendants to the Bill of Complaint of Richard Markes Compl. Inprimis whether have you heard Peter Tompson at any time refuse to pay to William Hamond Esquire the fine whereof the said 14 acres of copyhold now in question was seized yea or no. STAC 5/M1/39
  • STAC 5/M36/8 - B A - 16 Eliz - Richard Marks v Ambrose Newby, William Hammond
  • STAC 5/M1/39 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Richard Markes v Ambrose Newbie et al
  • see also STAC Marke

N

Nettleton v Thwing

  • Interrs refer to whether or not Edward Nettleton of Emswell, Yorks made a will.(dk) - STAC 5/N6/30
  • Case Book Report STAC 5/N8/26r
  • STAC 5/N6/1 - B A Richard - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettelton, William Nettelton, Robert Nettelton, Francis Nettelton v John Thrwynge, Robert Thwynge, William Danyell, John Craven et al
  • STAC 5/N8/26 - B I D - 29 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton, William Nettleton v John Thwinge, William Richardson, Thomas Dale et al
  • STAC 5/N17/20 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettilton v John Thwinge, Lawrence Golding et al
  • STAC 5/N17/40 - Rn - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton, William Nettleton, Robert Nettleton v John Thwing, Thomas Dales et al
  • STAC 5/N6/30 - C I D - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton et al v John Thwinge et al
  • STAC 5/N8/31 - I D - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton, Robert Nettleton et al v William Normanvile
  • STAC 5/N5/8 - B A - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Nettleton, William Nettleton, Robert Nettleton v John Thwinge, William Normavyle et al
  • see also STAC Nettleton

Normaville v Jarrett

  • Interrs refer to parsonage of Beswick (no county) and an injunction at suit of Nettleton's to deliver possession & refusal to do so. Deponent of Hutton Cranswick, Yorks.(dk) - STAC 5/N10/12
  • STAC 5/N14/12 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Normaville v John Jarrett, William Utye
  • STAC 5/N10/12 - I D - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Normavell v William Uty, John Jarrett, Edward Pearson
  • see also STAC Normanville

Earl of Northumberland v Hotham

  • Re: impounding of cattle at Scorborough, East Yorkshire (B.McD.). STAC 5/N9/9
  • STAC 5/N9/9 - I D - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Earl of Northumberland v John Hotham et al
  • see also STAC Northumberland

O

P

Q

R

Richard v Cooke / Belton

  • Land in Gouldalle [Gowdall] in the parish of Snaithe co York ER - STAC 5/R3/18
  • STAC 5/R16/32 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Rikard, Edward Pullen v William Cooke, Robert Smith et al
  • STAC 5/R35/16 - I D - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Ricard, Edward Pullen v William Cooke, Robert Smyth et al
  • STAC 5/R40/29 - C I D - 25 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Ricarde, Edward Pullen v William Cooke, Robert Smyth et al
  • STAC 5/R25/36 - I D - 20 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Rikard, Edward Pullen v William Cooke, Robert Smith et al
  • STAC 5/R19/24 - I D - 20 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Ricard, Edward Pullen v Robert Belton et al
  • STAC 5/R3/18 - B - Hil 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Richard v Robert Belton
  • STAC 5/R30/40 - C I D - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswald Ricard v Robert Belton
  • STAC 5/R4/40 - I D - 20 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Oswold Rickarde v Robert Beltone
  • See also STAC Richard

Robinson v Aske

  • STAC 5/R1/37 - B - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - John Robinson v John Aske, John Redman, Christopher Ashe et al. Transcription STAC 5/R1/37

Russia Company v Mayor of Hull

  • STAC 5/M21/5 - B Rn Rr - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Merchants for the discovery of new trades v John Gregory see transcription STAC 5/M21/5
  • STAC 5/M19/24 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - English Merchants for the discovery of new trades v John Gregory see transcription STAC 5/M19/24
  • STAC 5/M36/29 - C I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Fellowship of Merchants at Hull v John Gregory
  • STAC 5/M1/31 - A - 21 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - The Fellowship of English Merchants for Discovery of the New Lands v John Gregory see transcription STAC 5/M1/31
  • STAC 5/E3/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - English Merchants v John Gregory
  • see also STAC Russia Company

S

Stockdale v Brownrigg

  • Robt Stockdale of Lockington, Yorks. Forcibly cutting & taking away hay from the complts close called Belaye Becke Close in Lockington by a number of men *.. dwelling within the counties of Nottingham & Lyncolne ..”.(dk) - STAC 5/S35/31
  • STAC 5/S35/31 - B A - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Robert Stockdale v Ambrose Brownerigge, Robert Manbye et al
  • STAC 5/S71/37 - I D - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Robert Stocdaile v Ambrose Brownrigge
  • STAC 5/S67/4 - I D - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Robert Stockdale v Robert Manbye, Philip Utye et al
  • see also STAC Stockdale

Strickland v Jeffrayson

  • William Strickland of Boynton, Yorks, Walter Strickland and Thomas Strickland of Grays Inn, Middx and William Strickland the younger of Easton, Yorks, sons of the said William Strickland the elder. Lands in Easton, Yorks granted by Letters Patent.(dk) - STAC 5/S6/9
  • STAC 5/S44/33 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Strickland, Thomas Strickland, Walter Strickland v John Waring, John Jeffreson et al
  • STAC 5/S6/9 - B A - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Strickland, Walter Strickland, Thomas Strickland, William Strickland Jr v Peter Gibbon, John Jeffreyson, John King, Nathaniell King, Richard Gibbon, William Jeffreyson et al
  • STAC 5/S67/30 - I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Strickland et al v Thomas Parkins et al
  • STAC 5/S6/28 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Strickland et al v John Jeffe
  • STAC 5/S42/32 - I D - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Stricklande v John Jeffreysonne, Peter Gibon et al
  • see also STAC Strickland

T

UV

W

Wharton v Langdale

  • STAC 5/W81/24 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Lawrence Wharton v Marmaduke Langdale et al
  • see also STAC Wharton

Wharton v Ellerker

  • STAC 5/W16/5 - B A - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Warton v Ralph Ellerker, Robert Whitlocke et al
  • STAC 5/W15/2 - B A C I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Warton v Robert Ellerker, John Casse et al
  • STAC 5/W46/23 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Rice Ellerker Sr, Rice Ellerker Jr, William Acklam
  • STAC 5/W22/30 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - William Wharton v Ralph Ellesker William Ellesker et al
  • STAC 5/W44/10 - Rr - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Ralph Ellerker, William Ellerker, William Aklam et al
  • STAC 5/W8/40 - I D - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v William Ellerker, Ralph Ellerker et al
  • STAC 5/W71/3 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Ralph Ellerker, William Ellerker
  • see also STAC Wharton

Wharton v Trudove

  • TNA Note: Perjury in a suit for debt by plaintiff before the Council of the North. STAC 7/9/20
  • STAC 7/9/20 - - - Yorkshire ER - Michael Warton v Edward Trudove
  • see also STAC Wharton

Wharton v Hillyard

  • Wharton assaulted on six occassions (inc on the Hull - Barton ferry), mentioned in MCDONAGH, Briony, “Subverting the ground : private property and public protest in the sixteenth-century Yorkshire Wolds” Agricultural History Review 57:2 (2009) 191-206. STAC 5/W15/32
  • STAC 5/W15/32 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hildyard, Robert Hildyard, William Hildyard, James Ellerker, Edward Ellerker et al
  • STAC 5/W79/35 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hildyard, Hector Couper et al
  • STAC 5/W37/11 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Edward Ellerken, Cristopher Hillyard et al
  • STAC 5/W29/30 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hillyard, John Ewrye
  • STAC 5/W19/27 - B A C I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Michael Wharton v Christopher Hylye, William Hylye et al
  • see also STAC Wharton

XYZ

Almoner

Almoner v Constable

  • In re Thomas Perkyns late of Flamborough in the county of York died last day of March 24 Eliz. John Pate (Bayliff). STAC 5/1/24
  • STAC 5/1/24 - B A - - Yorkshire ER - Almoner v Robert Constable, John Pate, Robert Johnson, Anthony Hicke
  • see also STAC Constable

Almoner v Martin

  • Richard Gilderalls of Howcke [? Hook] Yorkshire, drowned, felo de se. STAC 5/A5/23
  • STAC 5/A22/1 - B A I D - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Almoner v Thomas Martin, William Hurrome et al
  • STAC 5/A5/23 - B - 28 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Almoner v Thomas Martyne, William Harrande, Simon Bonde, Thomas Margeson
  • see also STAC Martin

Almoner v Spencer

  • In re Robert Atkinson of Ferreby in Hullshire in the county of York felo de se. STAC 5/A59/10
  • STAC 5/A59/10 - B - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Almoner v Robert Spencer, Anthony Burnesall see transcription STAC 5/A59/10
  • see also STAC Spencer

Attorney General

AG v Atkinson

  • Arising from Atkinson v Hewett vide supra
  • STAC 5/A39/40 - B A Rn Rr - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - AG v Anthony Atkinson, Gilbert Wilkinson, Michael Cawley et al
  • STAC 5/A34/8 - C I D - 44 Eliz -Yorkshire ER - AG v Anthony Atkinson, Gilbert Wilkinson, William Elston et al
  • see also STAC Atkinson

AG v Towse

  • Assault on a house and family by a small mob of armed men, in one of the Gartons. STAC 5/A52/2
  • STAC 5/A52/2 - B - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - AG v Brian Towse, John Edwards et al
  • STAC 5/A22/22 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - AG v Antony Towse, William Towse et al
  • see also STAC Towse


Palmer's cumulative totals of Star Chamber fines preserved in the E159s (rp)

  • TNA E159/378 Hilary Term, 22 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1580
    • From William Dawkyn of Kingston upon Hull, Yorks: £40.
  • TNA E159/379 Easter Term, 22 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1581
    • From William Stanley de Womersley, Yorks: £50.
  • TNA E159/420 Michaelmas Term, 42-43 Elizabeth. Fine Paid 1600.
    • From Ralph Ellerker, jr, de Rysbye, Yorks, armiger: 500 marks.
    • From James Ellerker de Rysbye, Yorks: £100.
    • From Ralph Ellerker, sr, de More Graunge, Yorks: £20.
    • From William Acclam de Rysbye, Yorks: £50.
    • Order that Raphe Ellerker will pay the fines of William Acclam if Acclam is unable to do so.
    • From Edward Ellerker de Rysbye, Yorks, yeoman: £20.
  • TNA E159/422 Hilary Term, 44 Elizabeth. Fines Paid 1602
    • From William Lambe de Wistead, Yorks, knight: £100.
    • From Christofer Hillyard de Wistead, Yorks, knight: £100.
    • From Christofer Hillyard de Gowzell, Lincs, armiger: 100 marks.
    • From William Jackson de Bushopp Burton, Yorks: £20.
    • From Hector Cowper de Walkington, Yorks: £20.
    • From Henry Spence de Wistead, Yorks: £20.
    • From Henry Swan de Gowzell, Lincs: £5.
    • From Robert Hilliard of the City of York, Yorks: £5.
    • From Robert Cartwright de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • From John Thornaby de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • From James Camage de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • From Richard Jackson de Bushop Burton, Yorks: £5.
    • From Richard Hillyard, jr, de Ottringham, Yorks: £5.
    • From Christofer Ferrer de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • From Anthony Jackson de Bushop Burton, Yorks: £5.
    • From Tristram Torye de Wistead, Yorks: £5.
    • From Richard Thurley de Wistead, Yorks: £5.
    • From Thomas Greneburye de Leaven, Yorks: £5.
    • From Roger Barton de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • From Francis Wright de Wystead, Yorks: £5.
    • From Ralph Goldesborough de Wistead, Yorks: £5.
    • From John Hilliard of the City of York, Yorks: £5.
    • From Richard Lawson de Wistead, Yorks: £5.
    • From Richard Rawe de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • From Thomas Hetherwicke de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • From William Heynes de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • From George Cole de Lockingfield, Yorks: £5.
    • From James Crosse de Bushop Burton, Yorks: £5.
    • From William Apleyard de Owsby, Lincs: £5.
    • From Joseph Hanby de Gowzell, Lincs: £5.
    • From John Wakelinge de Gowzell, Lincs: £5.
    • From Thomas Bucke de Gowzell, Lincs: £5.
    • From Thomas Singleton de Gowzell, Lincs: £5.
    • From William barrett de Beverley, Yorks: £5.
    • Order that Sir Christofer Hillyard, knight, and Christofer Hillyard, esq, should pay their servants' fines if they are unable to do so.