Difference between revisions of "STAC co York"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Yorkshire '''  
 
''' Yorkshire '''  
  
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
+
*Acclome v Beckwith
 +
*Boynton and Wormald v Hammond and Barker
 +
*Cage v Swayne
 +
*Conyers v Wright
 +
*Elwick v Crossthwait
 +
*Fairfax v Fairfax - Fairfax v Fairfax - Fairfax v Moyser
 +
*Fuller v Babbington
 +
*Hansby v Hillyard
 +
*Jobson v Story
 +
*Johnson v Smyth
 +
*Lacy v Farror
 +
*Mason v Foljamb
 +
*Micklethwaite v Parker
 +
*Neville v Blithe
 +
*Oglethorpe v Watson
 +
*Parker v Gascoyne
 +
*Proctor v Chatterton - Proctor v Fitton - Proctor v Levett - Proctor v Sherborne and Bridge
 +
*Turner v Hilton
 +
*Wheatman v Brunskell and Hilton
 +
*Almoner v Myres
 +
*AG v Wood
 +
 
 +
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
 +
 
 +
''' A '''
  
 
''' Acclome v Beckwith '''
 
''' Acclome v Beckwith '''
 
*Imprimis whether did Wm Thackwray about the second day of October in the xxxiijth year of the Queens Majesties reign that now is at Little Moreby in co York ER declare unto you Thomas Beckwith that he had a warrant or precept from Philip Constable esq the then Shireve of Yorkshire to arrest you at the suit of John Acclome esq, you then lying or being within a hedge that had of late inclosed or compassed about a Retche or stack of corn or hay. STAC 5/A32/28
 
*Imprimis whether did Wm Thackwray about the second day of October in the xxxiijth year of the Queens Majesties reign that now is at Little Moreby in co York ER declare unto you Thomas Beckwith that he had a warrant or precept from Philip Constable esq the then Shireve of Yorkshire to arrest you at the suit of John Acclome esq, you then lying or being within a hedge that had of late inclosed or compassed about a Retche or stack of corn or hay. STAC 5/A32/28
*STAC 5/A47/18 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Acclome v Isabella Beckwith, Francis Fairfax, George Knowles et al
+
*STAC 5/A47/18 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acclome v Isabella Beckwith, Francis Fairfax, George Knowles et al
*STAC 5/A45/22 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Acclome v Isabell Beckwith et al
+
*STAC 5/A45/22 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acclome v Isabell Beckwith et al
 
*STAC 5/A32/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acchlam v Thomas Beckwith, William Latham, Francis Farfax et al
 
*STAC 5/A32/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acchlam v Thomas Beckwith, William Latham, Francis Farfax et al
*STAC 5/A56/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - - John Acclome v George Knowles et al
+
*STAC 5/A56/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acclome v George Knowles et al
*STAC 5/A35/10 - B A C I D - 38 Eliz - - John Aulome v Leonard Beckwith, Cuthbert Faulconer, John Gilbert et al  
+
*STAC 5/A35/10 - B A C I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Aulome v Leonard Beckwith, Cuthbert Faulconer, John Gilbert et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Acklam]]
 
*see also [[STAC Acklam]]
 +
 +
''' B '''
  
 
''' Boynton and Wormald v Hammond and Barker '''  
 
''' Boynton and Wormald v Hammond and Barker '''  
 
*TNA Note: Yorkshire, Debt STAC 10/2/18
 
*TNA Note: Yorkshire, Debt STAC 10/2/18
 
*STAC 10/2/18 - - - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton and John Wormall v William Hammond and Thomas Barker
 
*STAC 10/2/18 - - - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton and John Wormall v William Hammond and Thomas Barker
*STAC 5/B78/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hammond
+
*STAC 5/B78/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hammond
*STAC 5/B63/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - - Francis Boynton, John Wormall v William Hammond, Thomas Barker
+
*STAC 5/B63/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton, John Wormall v William Hammond, Thomas Barker
*STAC 5/B103/2 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hamond, Thomas Barker
+
*STAC 5/B103/2 - I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hamond, Thomas Barker
*STAC 5/B20/1 - C I D - 41 Eliz - - Francis Baynton, John Wormell v William Hamond, Thomas Barker
+
*STAC 5/B20/1 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Baynton, John Wormell v William Hamond, Thomas Barker
*STAC 5/B47/5 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hamonde, Thomas Barker
+
*STAC 5/B47/5 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hamonde, Thomas Barker
*STAC 5/B92/3 - B A - 40 Eliz - - Francis Boyninton, John Wormall v John Barker, Thomas Robinson et al  
+
*STAC 5/B92/3 - B A - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boyninton, John Wormall v John Barker, Thomas Robinson et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Boynton]]
 
*see also [[STAC Boynton]]
 +
 +
''' C '''
  
 
''' Cage v Swayne '''  
 
''' Cage v Swayne '''  
*Bill of Edward Cage, citizen and grocer of London, in re land in the county of York. A very difficuld document - there is mention of a heap of charcoal
+
*Bill of Edward Cage, citizen and grocer of London, in re land in the county of York. A very difficult document - there is mention of a heap of charcoal
 
*STAC 5/C14/5 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v Robert Swayne, Robert Bayldon et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/5 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v Robert Swayne, Robert Bayldon et al  
*STAC 5/C56/33 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Edward Cage v Robert Swayne, Robert Baildon et al
+
*STAC 5/C56/33 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v Robert Swayne, Robert Baildon et al
*STAC 5/C36/16 - I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Cage v Robert Swaine, Thomas Warren et al  
+
*STAC 5/C36/16 - I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v Robert Swaine, Thomas Warren et al  
*STAC 5/C44/17 - I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Cage v William Rawson et al  
+
*STAC 5/C44/17 - I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v William Rawson et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Cage]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cage]]
*
+
 
 +
''' Conyers v Wright '''
 +
*Nicholas Coniers v Robert Wright. Ref to Assizes at York, finding of boot (?boat?). Possibly Staxbye (?Stakesby nr Whitby?).(dk) STAC 5/C78/19
 +
*STAC 5/C80/1 - B - 18 Eliz - Yorkshire - Nicholas Coniers v Robert Wright, William Fitchett et al
 +
*STAC 5/C63/13 - A - 18 Eliz - Yorkshire - Nicholas Conyers v Robert Wright
 +
*STAC 5/C78/19 - Rn - - Yorkshire - Sir Nicholas Coniers v Robert Wrighte
 +
*see also [[STAC Conyers]]
 +
 
 
''' D '''  
 
''' D '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' E '''
 +
 
 
''' Elwick v Crossthwait '''  
 
''' Elwick v Crossthwait '''  
 
*Jane Elwick widow of George Elwick late of the City of York. In re a house in York. STAC 5/E1/33
 
*Jane Elwick widow of George Elwick late of the City of York. In re a house in York. STAC 5/E1/33
*STAC 5/E17/29 - I D - 44 Eliz - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crosthwaite
+
*STAC 5/E17/29 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crosthwaite
*STAC 5/E12/2 - B - 43 Eliz - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crostwhate, Christian Barker, William Tewe et al
+
*STAC 5/E12/2 - B - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crostwhate, Christian Barker, William Tewe et al
 
*STAC 5/E1/33 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Jane Elwick v Robert Crossthwait, William Hawley, John Buson, William Riley et al
 
*STAC 5/E1/33 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Jane Elwick v Robert Crossthwait, William Hawley, John Buson, William Riley et al
 
*see also [[STAC Elwick]]
 
*see also [[STAC Elwick]]
 +
 +
''' F '''
  
 
''' Fairfax v Fairfax '''  
 
''' Fairfax v Fairfax '''  
Line 64: Line 103:
 
''' Fairfax v Moyser '''
 
''' Fairfax v Moyser '''
 
*TNA Notes: Yorkshire: Forgery of pleadings concerning land at Appleton (Anstey). STAC 7/2/33
 
*TNA Notes: Yorkshire: Forgery of pleadings concerning land at Appleton (Anstey). STAC 7/2/33
*STAC 5/F29/36 - B - 39 Eliz - - Thomas Fayrefaxe v James Moyser, Lawrence Lenton et al
+
*STAC 5/F29/36 - B - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fayrefaxe v James Moyser, Lawrence Lenton et al
 
*STAC 5/F10/19 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v Francis Moyser
 
*STAC 5/F10/19 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v Francis Moyser
 
*STAC 7/2/33 - - - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v Francis Moyse, John Frobisker
 
*STAC 7/2/33 - - - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v Francis Moyse, John Frobisker
Line 74: Line 113:
 
*STAC 5/F26/33 - I D - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Averye Uvedall, Edmund Babington et al
 
*STAC 5/F26/33 - I D - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Averye Uvedall, Edmund Babington et al
 
*STAC 5/F24/13 - B A C I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Avery Unedall, Anne Unedall
 
*STAC 5/F24/13 - B A C I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Avery Unedall, Anne Unedall
*STAC 5/F8/25 - I D - 16 Eliz - John Fullar v William Babington et al
+
*STAC 5/F8/25 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fullar v William Babington et al
 
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
 
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
*
+
 
 
''' G '''  
 
''' G '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' H '''
 +
 
 
''' Hansby v Hillyard '''
 
''' Hansby v Hillyard '''
 
*STAC 5/H78/11 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralf Hansby v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Robert Wilkinson et al
 
*STAC 5/H78/11 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralf Hansby v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Robert Wilkinson et al
Line 86: Line 127:
 
*STAC 5/H32/12 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Raph Hansbye v Sir Christopher Hylleard, Henry Swann, George Barret, et al
 
*STAC 5/H32/12 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Raph Hansbye v Sir Christopher Hylleard, Henry Swann, George Barret, et al
 
*STAC 5/H42/6 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hanstey v Sir Christopher Hilliard et al
 
*STAC 5/H42/6 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hanstey v Sir Christopher Hilliard et al
*STAC 5/H56/5 - I D - 43 Eliz - Ralph Hausby v Robert Cartwright, William Jackson et al
+
*STAC 5/H56/5 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hausby v Robert Cartwright, William Jackson et al
*STAC 5/H59/8 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Ralph Hausbye v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Henry Swanne et al
+
*STAC 5/H59/8 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hausbye v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Henry Swanne et al
 
*see also [[STAC Hansby]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Hansby]]  
 +
 +
''' I J '''
  
 
''' Jobson v Story '''
 
''' Jobson v Story '''
Line 98: Line 141:
 
*STAC 7/3/21 - - - Yorkshire - Robert Johnson, v John Smyth, Richard Smyth, William Cutting, Nicholas Smyth
 
*STAC 7/3/21 - - - Yorkshire - Robert Johnson, v John Smyth, Richard Smyth, William Cutting, Nicholas Smyth
 
*see also [[STAC Johnson]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Johnson]]  
*
+
 
 
''' K '''  
 
''' K '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' L '''
 +
 
 
''' Lacy v Farror '''  
 
''' Lacy v Farror '''  
 
*STAC 5/L27/12 - B A - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacie, Henry Farror v Robert Waterhouse, Gregory Waterhouse
 
*STAC 5/L27/12 - B A - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacie, Henry Farror v Robert Waterhouse, Gregory Waterhouse
Line 106: Line 151:
 
*STAC 5/L20/27 - I D - 14 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacy, Henry Farror v Gregory Waterhouse
 
*STAC 5/L20/27 - I D - 14 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacy, Henry Farror v Gregory Waterhouse
 
*see also [[STAC Lacy]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Lacy]]  
 +
 +
''' M '''
  
 
''' Mason v Foljamb '''
 
''' Mason v Foljamb '''
Line 116: Line 163:
 
*STAC 7/9/24 - - - Yorkshire - Ralph Micklethwaite, Robert Askwith v Thomas Parker, Richard Secker
 
*STAC 7/9/24 - - - Yorkshire - Ralph Micklethwaite, Robert Askwith v Thomas Parker, Richard Secker
 
*see also [[STAC Micklethwaite]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Micklethwaite]]  
 +
 +
''' N '''
  
 
''' Neville v Blithe '''
 
''' Neville v Blithe '''
 
*Blithe contends that Nevill was excomunicated (province of York).STAC 5/N1/36  
 
*Blithe contends that Nevill was excomunicated (province of York).STAC 5/N1/36  
 
*STAC 5/N1/11 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - Isabell Nevell v William Blyth, George Kirk, Henry Carter, John Foster et al  
 
*STAC 5/N1/11 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - Isabell Nevell v William Blyth, George Kirk, Henry Carter, John Foster et al  
*STAC 5/N1/36 - Dr - 32 Eliz - Isabell Nevill v William Blithe
+
*STAC 5/N1/36 - Dr - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire - Isabell Nevill v William Blithe
 
*see also [[STAC Neville]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Neville]]  
 +
 +
''' O '''
  
 
''' Oglethorpe v Watson '''
 
''' Oglethorpe v Watson '''
Line 128: Line 179:
 
*STAC 5/O8/43 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Robert Gilman, Robert Harryson et al.
 
*STAC 5/O8/43 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Robert Gilman, Robert Harryson et al.
 
*STAC 5/O8/48 - Rn I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorp v Thomas Watson, Robert Gilman, John Morden et al.
 
*STAC 5/O8/48 - Rn I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorp v Thomas Watson, Robert Gilman, John Morden et al.
*STAC 5/O4/15 - Rr - 38 Eliz - - William Oglethorpe v Robert Harrison, Thomas Watson et al.
+
*STAC 5/O4/15 - Rr - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Robert Harrison, Thomas Watson et al.
*STAC 5/O6/13 - I D - 38 Eliz - - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Robert Harryson, Robert Gilman et al.
+
*STAC 5/O6/13 - I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Robert Harryson, Robert Gilman et al.
*STAC 5/O2/33 - I D - 38 Eliz - - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Thomas Harryson et al.
+
*STAC 5/O2/33 - I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Thomas Harryson et al.
 
*see also [[STAC Oglethorpe]]
 
*see also [[STAC Oglethorpe]]
 +
 +
''' P '''
  
 
''' Parker v Gascoyne '''
 
''' Parker v Gascoyne '''
 
*TNA Note: Ferrybridge: Rescue of a sheriff's prisoner and assault on plaintiff's son. STAC 7/4/37  
 
*TNA Note: Ferrybridge: Rescue of a sheriff's prisoner and assault on plaintiff's son. STAC 7/4/37  
*STAC 5/P38/25 - B A - 35 Eliz - William Parker v Thomas Whitewhood et al
+
*STAC 5/P38/25 - B A - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Parker v Thomas Whitewhood et al
 
*STAC 5/P55/18 - B A C - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoyne, Thomas Whytwood et al
 
*STAC 5/P55/18 - B A C - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoyne, Thomas Whytwood et al
 
*STAC 7/4/37 - - - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoygne and his servants
 
*STAC 7/4/37 - - - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoygne and his servants
Line 142: Line 195:
 
''' Proctor v Fitton '''
 
''' Proctor v Fitton '''
 
*See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.)  STAC 5/P14/21
 
*See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.)  STAC 5/P14/21
*STAC 5/P35/24 - B A Rn - 38 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shallcrosse
+
*STAC 5/P35/24 - B A Rn - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shallcrosse
*STAC 5/P40/6 - I D - 38 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shalecrosse
+
*STAC 5/P40/6 - I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shalecrosse
*STAC 5/P27/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - Steven Procter v Sir Edward Fitton
+
*STAC 5/P27/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Steven Procter v Sir Edward Fitton
 
*STAC 5/P14/21 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir William Mallory, Sir Edward Yorke et al
 
*STAC 5/P14/21 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir William Mallory, Sir Edward Yorke et al
 
*see also [[STAC Proctor]]
 
*see also [[STAC Proctor]]
Line 150: Line 203:
 
''' Proctor v Chatterton '''
 
''' Proctor v Chatterton '''
 
*See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.)  STAC 5/P14/21
 
*See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.)  STAC 5/P14/21
*STAC 5/P58/14 - A - 39 Eliz - Stephen Procter v John Chatterton et al  
+
*STAC 5/P58/14 - A - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Procter v John Chatterton et al  
*STAC 5/P48/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v John Chatterton
+
*STAC 5/P48/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v John Chatterton
 
*see also [[STAC Proctor]]
 
*see also [[STAC Proctor]]
  
Line 163: Line 216:
 
*STAC 7/4/34 - - - Yorkshire - Thomas Proctor v Richard Levett, William Levett
 
*STAC 7/4/34 - - - Yorkshire - Thomas Proctor v Richard Levett, William Levett
 
*see also [[STAC Proctor]]
 
*see also [[STAC Proctor]]
*
+
 
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
*
+
 
''' R '''  
+
''' R '''
*
+
 
 
''' S '''  
 
''' S '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' T '''
 +
 
 
''' Turner v Hilton '''
 
''' Turner v Hilton '''
 
*STAC 7/7/24 - - - Yorkshire - Christopher Turner v Matthew Hilton, Henry Baylie, Edward Hornebie
 
*STAC 7/7/24 - - - Yorkshire - Christopher Turner v Matthew Hilton, Henry Baylie, Edward Hornebie
 
*see also [[STAC Turner]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Turner]]  
*
+
 
 
''' UV '''
 
''' UV '''
*
+
 
 +
''' W '''
 +
 
 
''' Wheatman v Brunskell and Hilton '''
 
''' Wheatman v Brunskell and Hilton '''
 
*TNA Note: Perjury in a suit by plaintiff against Sir Simon Musgrave in the Council of the North. STAC 7/9/8  
 
*TNA Note: Perjury in a suit by plaintiff against Sir Simon Musgrave in the Council of the North. STAC 7/9/8  
*STAC 5/W58/16 - B - - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hiltal et al
+
*STAC 5/W58/16 - B - Yorkshire - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hiltal et al
*STAC 5/W74/35 - Dr - - Janett Wheatman v Thomas Hylton, Peter Brimskill
+
*STAC 5/W74/35 - Dr - Yorkshire - Janett Wheatman v Thomas Hylton, Peter Brimskill
*STAC 5/W68/28 - Dr - - Jane Wheatman v Michael Brunskell et al
+
*STAC 5/W68/28 - Dr - Yorkshire - Jane Wheatman v Michael Brunskell et al
*STAC 7/9/8 - - - - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hilton, Michael Brunskell
+
*STAC 7/9/8 - - - Yorkshire - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hilton, Michael Brunskell
*STAC 5/A25/30 - Rn - 33 Eliz - Richard Araye et uxor v Peter Bruskill, Thomas Hilton
+
*STAC 5/A25/30 - Rn - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire - Richard Araye et uxor v Peter Bruskill, Thomas Hilton
*STAC 5/A55/17 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Richard Ayrey et uxor Richard v Thomas Hilton, Peter Brunskel
+
*STAC 5/A55/17 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Richard Ayrey et uxor v Thomas Hilton, Peter Brunskel
 
*see also [[STAC Wheatman]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wheatman]]
*
+
 
 
''' XYZ '''  
 
''' XYZ '''  
*
+
 
 
''' Almoner '''  
 
''' Almoner '''  
  
 
''' Almoner v Myres '''
 
''' Almoner v Myres '''
*STAC 5/A33/7 - B A - 37 Eliz - Almoner v Matthew Myers  
+
*STAC 5/A33/7 - B A - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Matthew Myers  
 
*STAC 5/A7/14 - I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Matthew Myres  
 
*STAC 5/A7/14 - I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Matthew Myres  
 
*see also [[STAC Myers]]
 
*see also [[STAC Myers]]
Line 199: Line 256:
 
''' AG v Wood '''  
 
''' AG v Wood '''  
 
*Depositions from Yorkshire. STAC 5/A7/4  
 
*Depositions from Yorkshire. STAC 5/A7/4  
*STAC 5/A18/14 - B A - 43 Eliz - AG v Edmund Wood et uxor, John Beckwith et al  
+
*STAC 5/A18/14 - B A - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmund Wood et uxor, John Beckwith et al  
*STAC 5/A31/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Edmond Wood
+
*STAC 5/A31/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmond Wood
 
*STAC 5/A7/4 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmund Wood et al
 
*STAC 5/A7/4 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmund Wood et al
 
*see also [[STAC Wood]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wood]]

Revision as of 06:15, 22 October 2016

Yorkshire

  • Acclome v Beckwith
  • Boynton and Wormald v Hammond and Barker
  • Cage v Swayne
  • Conyers v Wright
  • Elwick v Crossthwait
  • Fairfax v Fairfax - Fairfax v Fairfax - Fairfax v Moyser
  • Fuller v Babbington
  • Hansby v Hillyard
  • Jobson v Story
  • Johnson v Smyth
  • Lacy v Farror
  • Mason v Foljamb
  • Micklethwaite v Parker
  • Neville v Blithe
  • Oglethorpe v Watson
  • Parker v Gascoyne
  • Proctor v Chatterton - Proctor v Fitton - Proctor v Levett - Proctor v Sherborne and Bridge
  • Turner v Hilton
  • Wheatman v Brunskell and Hilton
  • Almoner v Myres
  • AG v Wood

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

A

Acclome v Beckwith

  • Imprimis whether did Wm Thackwray about the second day of October in the xxxiijth year of the Queens Majesties reign that now is at Little Moreby in co York ER declare unto you Thomas Beckwith that he had a warrant or precept from Philip Constable esq the then Shireve of Yorkshire to arrest you at the suit of John Acclome esq, you then lying or being within a hedge that had of late inclosed or compassed about a Retche or stack of corn or hay. STAC 5/A32/28
  • STAC 5/A47/18 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acclome v Isabella Beckwith, Francis Fairfax, George Knowles et al
  • STAC 5/A45/22 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acclome v Isabell Beckwith et al
  • STAC 5/A32/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acchlam v Thomas Beckwith, William Latham, Francis Farfax et al
  • STAC 5/A56/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acclome v George Knowles et al
  • STAC 5/A35/10 - B A C I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Aulome v Leonard Beckwith, Cuthbert Faulconer, John Gilbert et al
  • see also STAC Acklam

B

Boynton and Wormald v Hammond and Barker

  • TNA Note: Yorkshire, Debt STAC 10/2/18
  • STAC 10/2/18 - - - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton and John Wormall v William Hammond and Thomas Barker
  • STAC 5/B78/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hammond
  • STAC 5/B63/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton, John Wormall v William Hammond, Thomas Barker
  • STAC 5/B103/2 - I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hamond, Thomas Barker
  • STAC 5/B20/1 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Baynton, John Wormell v William Hamond, Thomas Barker
  • STAC 5/B47/5 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hamonde, Thomas Barker
  • STAC 5/B92/3 - B A - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Francis Boyninton, John Wormall v John Barker, Thomas Robinson et al
  • see also STAC Boynton

C

Cage v Swayne

  • Bill of Edward Cage, citizen and grocer of London, in re land in the county of York. A very difficult document - there is mention of a heap of charcoal
  • STAC 5/C14/5 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v Robert Swayne, Robert Bayldon et al
  • STAC 5/C56/33 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v Robert Swayne, Robert Baildon et al
  • STAC 5/C36/16 - I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v Robert Swaine, Thomas Warren et al
  • STAC 5/C44/17 - I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Cage v William Rawson et al
  • see also STAC Cage

Conyers v Wright

  • Nicholas Coniers v Robert Wright. Ref to Assizes at York, finding of boot (?boat?). Possibly Staxbye (?Stakesby nr Whitby?).(dk) STAC 5/C78/19
  • STAC 5/C80/1 - B - 18 Eliz - Yorkshire - Nicholas Coniers v Robert Wright, William Fitchett et al
  • STAC 5/C63/13 - A - 18 Eliz - Yorkshire - Nicholas Conyers v Robert Wright
  • STAC 5/C78/19 - Rn - - Yorkshire - Sir Nicholas Coniers v Robert Wrighte
  • see also STAC Conyers

D

E

Elwick v Crossthwait

  • Jane Elwick widow of George Elwick late of the City of York. In re a house in York. STAC 5/E1/33
  • STAC 5/E17/29 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crosthwaite
  • STAC 5/E12/2 - B - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crostwhate, Christian Barker, William Tewe et al
  • STAC 5/E1/33 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Jane Elwick v Robert Crossthwait, William Hawley, John Buson, William Riley et al
  • see also STAC Elwick

F

Fairfax v Fairfax

  • See GANG, T. M. “The quarrel between Edward Fairfax and his brother” Notes and Queries, 214 (1969) 28-33. STAC 5/F31/33
  • STAC 5/F31/33 - B - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Fairfax, John Holmes v Sir Thomas Fairfax Jr, Robert Holmes et al
  • see also STAC Fairfax

Fairfax v Fairfax

  • Sir Thomas Fairfax of Denton in co York. Land in Appleton (Anstey) - STAC 5/F1/15
  • Thomas Fairefax of Denton in the co of York WR Esquire. STAC 5/F22/12
  • TNA Note: Inheritance of Sir William Fairfax, first plaintiff's father. STAC 7/12/17
  • STAC 5/F29/7 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fayrefaxe, Robert Bullock v Gabriel Fayrefaxe, Robert Ashe et al
  • STAC 5/F23/7 - B - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairefax v Gabriell Fairefax
  • STAC 5/F27/9 - C I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfaxe, Robert Bullock v Robert Aske, Thomas Green et al
  • STAC 5/F17/11 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairefax v Gabriell Fairefax
  • STAC 5/F11/13 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfax, Robert Bullocke v Gabriel Fairfax, Robert Aske et al
  • STAC 7/12/17 - - - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfaxe, Robert [Bullock] v Gabriel Fayrefaxe, Robert Aske, Thomas Grene
  • STAC 5/F22/12 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfax v Gabriell Fairfax.
  • STAC 5/F1/15 - B A Dr C - Hil 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v William Fairfax, James Thompson, Robert Usherwoode.
  • STAC 5/F27/18 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfaxe v William Fairfax, John Carrock et al
  • STAC 5/F26/27 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfaxe v Robert Usherwood, James Thompson et al
  • STAC 5/F13/35 - B A C D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairefax v James Thompson
  • see also STAC Fairfax

Fairfax v Moyser

  • TNA Notes: Yorkshire: Forgery of pleadings concerning land at Appleton (Anstey). STAC 7/2/33
  • STAC 5/F29/36 - B - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fayrefaxe v James Moyser, Lawrence Lenton et al
  • STAC 5/F10/19 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v Francis Moyser
  • STAC 7/2/33 - - - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v Francis Moyse, John Frobisker
  • see also STAC Fairfax

Fuller v Babbington

  • Mortgaged land in the Co of York - Udall exhibited a bill in Chancery. Sir Wm Babington Knight and Mr Edmund Babbington. STAC 5/F22/28
  • STAC 5/F22/28 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Avery Unedall et al
  • STAC 5/F26/33 - I D - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Averye Uvedall, Edmund Babington et al
  • STAC 5/F24/13 - B A C I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Avery Unedall, Anne Unedall
  • STAC 5/F8/25 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fullar v William Babington et al
  • see also STAC Fuller

G

H

Hansby v Hillyard

  • STAC 5/H78/11 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralf Hansby v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Robert Wilkinson et al
  • STAC 5/H70/31 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hansby v Sir Christopher Hildyard, Henry Swann et al
  • STAC 5/H75/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralf Hansby v Sir Christopher Hildiard et al
  • STAC 5/H11/33 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hansbie v Sir Christopher Hyldyard et al
  • STAC 5/H32/12 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Raph Hansbye v Sir Christopher Hylleard, Henry Swann, George Barret, et al
  • STAC 5/H42/6 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hanstey v Sir Christopher Hilliard et al
  • STAC 5/H56/5 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hausby v Robert Cartwright, William Jackson et al
  • STAC 5/H59/8 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hausbye v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Henry Swanne et al
  • see also STAC Hansby

I J

Jobson v Story

  • STAC 5/J3/1 - B - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - Walter Jobson v Richard Story
  • see also STAC Jobson

Johnson v Smyth

  • TNA Notes: Frivolous suits and perjuries. STAC 7/3/21
  • STAC 7/3/21 - - - Yorkshire - Robert Johnson, v John Smyth, Richard Smyth, William Cutting, Nicholas Smyth
  • see also STAC Johnson

K

L

Lacy v Farror

  • STAC 5/L27/12 - B A - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacie, Henry Farror v Robert Waterhouse, Gregory Waterhouse
  • STAC 5/L47/20 - C - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacye et al v Robert Waterhowse et al
  • STAC 5/L20/27 - I D - 14 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacy, Henry Farror v Gregory Waterhouse
  • see also STAC Lacy

M

Mason v Foljamb

  • TNA Note: Estate of the late Sir Godfrey Foljamb. STAC 7/4/25
  • STAC 7/4/25 - - - Yorkshire - James Mason, Mathias Bromley v Francis Foljamb, Godfrey Platts, Hercules Foljamb, Arthur Hollingsworth, William Tagg
  • see also STAC Mason

Micklethwaite v Parker

  • TNA Note: York: Perjury concerning the arrest of William Pennington. Ralph Micklethwaite and Robert Askwith, late sheriffs of York STAC 7/9/24
  • STAC 7/9/24 - - - Yorkshire - Ralph Micklethwaite, Robert Askwith v Thomas Parker, Richard Secker
  • see also STAC Micklethwaite

N

Neville v Blithe

  • Blithe contends that Nevill was excomunicated (province of York).STAC 5/N1/36
  • STAC 5/N1/11 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - Isabell Nevell v William Blyth, George Kirk, Henry Carter, John Foster et al
  • STAC 5/N1/36 - Dr - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire - Isabell Nevill v William Blithe
  • see also STAC Neville

O

Oglethorpe v Watson

  • William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Robte Harrison, Robte Gilman and John Morden. Partnership of Thomas Oglethorpe & Thomas Thornell in trading merchandise beyond the seas, and debts to the complt. Depositions from the following: Robte Hudson, City of York, merchant, 46; Peter Smithe, City of York, merchant, 50; John Plewman, City of York, taylor, 35; William Prewdome, City of York, haberdasher, 22; Henry Hall, City of York, merchant, 50; Richarde Wilson, City of York, taylor, 30; Miles Franklande, City of York, taylor, 22; Richard Pocklington, City of York, yeoman, 21; Robte Siddall, City of York, yeoman, 34; Thomas Awmocke, Oglethorpe, yeoman, 30; John Bell, Kirkefenton, husbandman, 28; John Wrighte, City of York, merchant, 47; Thomas Hudson, Howley, yeoman, 23; Robte Wilkinson, City of York, apothecary, 23. STAC 5/O8/43
  • Rn of William Oglethorpe & depositions of defts. STAC 5/O8/48
  • STAC 5/O8/43 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Robert Gilman, Robert Harryson et al.
  • STAC 5/O8/48 - Rn I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorp v Thomas Watson, Robert Gilman, John Morden et al.
  • STAC 5/O4/15 - Rr - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Robert Harrison, Thomas Watson et al.
  • STAC 5/O6/13 - I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Robert Harryson, Robert Gilman et al.
  • STAC 5/O2/33 - I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Oglethorpe v Thomas Watson, Thomas Harryson et al.
  • see also STAC Oglethorpe

P

Parker v Gascoyne

  • TNA Note: Ferrybridge: Rescue of a sheriff's prisoner and assault on plaintiff's son. STAC 7/4/37
  • STAC 5/P38/25 - B A - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Parker v Thomas Whitewhood et al
  • STAC 5/P55/18 - B A C - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoyne, Thomas Whytwood et al
  • STAC 7/4/37 - - - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoygne and his servants
  • see also STAC Parker

Proctor v Fitton

  • See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.) STAC 5/P14/21
  • STAC 5/P35/24 - B A Rn - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shallcrosse
  • STAC 5/P40/6 - I D - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shalecrosse
  • STAC 5/P27/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - Yorkshire - Steven Procter v Sir Edward Fitton
  • STAC 5/P14/21 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir William Mallory, Sir Edward Yorke et al
  • see also STAC Proctor

Proctor v Chatterton

  • See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.) STAC 5/P14/21
  • STAC 5/P58/14 - A - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Procter v John Chatterton et al
  • STAC 5/P48/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v John Chatterton
  • see also STAC Proctor

Proctor v Sherborne and Bridge

  • TNA Note: York: False charge of vagrancy. STAC 7/4/33
  • STAC 7/4/33 - - - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Robert Sherborne, John Bridge et al
  • see also STAC Proctor

Proctor v Levett

  • TNA Note: Warsell: Non-fulfilment of contracts concerning a mortgage on the manor. STAC 7/4/34
  • STAC 7/4/34 - - - Yorkshire - Thomas Proctor v Richard Levett, William Levett
  • see also STAC Proctor

Q

R

S

T

Turner v Hilton

  • STAC 7/7/24 - - - Yorkshire - Christopher Turner v Matthew Hilton, Henry Baylie, Edward Hornebie
  • see also STAC Turner

UV

W

Wheatman v Brunskell and Hilton

  • TNA Note: Perjury in a suit by plaintiff against Sir Simon Musgrave in the Council of the North. STAC 7/9/8
  • STAC 5/W58/16 - B - Yorkshire - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hiltal et al
  • STAC 5/W74/35 - Dr - Yorkshire - Janett Wheatman v Thomas Hylton, Peter Brimskill
  • STAC 5/W68/28 - Dr - Yorkshire - Jane Wheatman v Michael Brunskell et al
  • STAC 7/9/8 - - - Yorkshire - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hilton, Michael Brunskell
  • STAC 5/A25/30 - Rn - 33 Eliz - Yorkshire - Richard Araye et uxor v Peter Bruskill, Thomas Hilton
  • STAC 5/A55/17 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Yorkshire - Richard Ayrey et uxor v Thomas Hilton, Peter Brunskel
  • see also STAC Wheatman

XYZ

Almoner

Almoner v Myres

  • STAC 5/A33/7 - B A - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Matthew Myers
  • STAC 5/A7/14 - I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Matthew Myres
  • see also STAC Myers

Attorney General

AG v Wood

  • Depositions from Yorkshire. STAC 5/A7/4
  • STAC 5/A18/14 - B A - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmund Wood et uxor, John Beckwith et al
  • STAC 5/A31/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmond Wood
  • STAC 5/A7/4 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmund Wood et al
  • see also STAC Wood