Difference between revisions of "STAC co York"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Yorkshire ''' | '''Yorkshire ''' | ||
| − | + | NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed. | |
''' A ''' | ''' A ''' | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
'''Abbott v Webster ''' | '''Abbott v Webster ''' | ||
*One Bartilmew Abbott late husbant of the complainant seised of property in Bellessies in Yorkshire v Wm Webster of Flamborough Yorkshire ER esquire STAC 5/A2/35 | *One Bartilmew Abbott late husbant of the complainant seised of property in Bellessies in Yorkshire v Wm Webster of Flamborough Yorkshire ER esquire STAC 5/A2/35 | ||
| − | *STAC 5/A2/35 - B | + | *STAC 5/A2/35 - B''' Yorkshire ''' |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | '''Acclome | + | NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed. |
| + | |||
| + | ''' Acclome v Beckwith ''' | ||
*Imprimis whether did Wm Thackwray about the second day of October in the xxxiijth year of the Queens Majesties reign that now is at Little Moreby in co York ER declare unto you Thomas Beckwith that he had a warrant or precept from Philip Constable esq the then Shireve of Yorkshire to arrest you at the suit of John Acclome esq, you then lying or being within a hedge that had of late inclosed or compassed about a Retche or stack of corn or hay. STAC 5/A32/28 | *Imprimis whether did Wm Thackwray about the second day of October in the xxxiijth year of the Queens Majesties reign that now is at Little Moreby in co York ER declare unto you Thomas Beckwith that he had a warrant or precept from Philip Constable esq the then Shireve of Yorkshire to arrest you at the suit of John Acclome esq, you then lying or being within a hedge that had of late inclosed or compassed about a Retche or stack of corn or hay. STAC 5/A32/28 | ||
*STAC 5/A47/18 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Acclome v Isabella Beckwith, Francis Fairfax, George Knowles et al | *STAC 5/A47/18 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Acclome v Isabella Beckwith, Francis Fairfax, George Knowles et al | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
*see also [[STAC Acklam]] | *see also [[STAC Acklam]] | ||
| − | + | ''' Boynton and Wormald v Hammond and Barker ''' | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | '''Boynton and Wormald v Hammond and Barker''' | ||
*TNA Note: Yorkshire, Debt STAC 10/2/18 | *TNA Note: Yorkshire, Debt STAC 10/2/18 | ||
*STAC 10/2/18 - - - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton and John Wormall v William Hammond and Thomas Barker | *STAC 10/2/18 - - - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton and John Wormall v William Hammond and Thomas Barker | ||
| Line 130: | Line 31: | ||
*see also [[STAC Boynton]] | *see also [[STAC Boynton]] | ||
| − | + | ''' Coore v Hatgill ‘'' | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ''' Coore v Hatgill | ||
*Thomas Coore of Scanderowes in the co of York. STAC 5/C2/34 | *Thomas Coore of Scanderowes in the co of York. STAC 5/C2/34 | ||
*STAC 5/C2/34 - B A Letter - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Coore v Adam Halkell, Richard Stout, Richard Holden, Ralph Walker. see transcription of letter [[STAC 5/C2/34]] | *STAC 5/C2/34 - B A Letter - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Coore v Adam Halkell, Richard Stout, Richard Holden, Ralph Walker. see transcription of letter [[STAC 5/C2/34]] | ||
*STAC 5/C41/32 - B Dr - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Corre v Adam Hatgill, Richard Holden et al | *STAC 5/C41/32 - B Dr - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Corre v Adam Hatgill, Richard Holden et al | ||
*see also [[STAC Coore]] | *see also [[STAC Coore]] | ||
| − | + | * | |
''' D ''' | ''' D ''' | ||
| − | + | * | |
| − | + | ''' Elwick v Crossthwait ‘'' | |
| − | |||
| − | * | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ''' Elwick v Crossthwait | ||
*Jane Elwick widow of George Elwick late of the City of York. In re a house in York. STAC 5/E1/33 | *Jane Elwick widow of George Elwick late of the City of York. In re a house in York. STAC 5/E1/33 | ||
*STAC 5/E17/29 - I D - 44 Eliz - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crosthwaite | *STAC 5/E17/29 - I D - 44 Eliz - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crosthwaite | ||
| Line 176: | Line 46: | ||
*see also [[STAC Elwick]] | *see also [[STAC Elwick]] | ||
| − | + | ''' Fairfax v Fairfax ‘'' | |
| − | |||
| − | ''' Fairfax v Fairfax | ||
*See GANG, T. M. “The quarrel between Edward Fairfax and his brother” Notes and Queries, 214 (1969) 28-33. STAC 5/F31/33 | *See GANG, T. M. “The quarrel between Edward Fairfax and his brother” Notes and Queries, 214 (1969) 28-33. STAC 5/F31/33 | ||
*STAC 5/F31/33 - B - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Fairfax, John Holmes v Sir Thomas Fairfax Jr, Robert Holmes et al | *STAC 5/F31/33 - B - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Fairfax, John Holmes v Sir Thomas Fairfax Jr, Robert Holmes et al | ||
| Line 207: | Line 75: | ||
*see also [[STAC Fairfax]] | *see also [[STAC Fairfax]] | ||
| − | + | ''' Fuller v Babbington ''' | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | ''' Fuller v Babbington''' | ||
*Mortgaged land in the Co of York - Udall exhibited a bill in Chancery. Sir Wm Babington Knight and Mr Edmund Babbington. STAC 5/F22/28 | *Mortgaged land in the Co of York - Udall exhibited a bill in Chancery. Sir Wm Babington Knight and Mr Edmund Babbington. STAC 5/F22/28 | ||
*STAC 5/F22/28 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Avery Unedall et al | *STAC 5/F22/28 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Avery Unedall et al | ||
| Line 256: | Line 82: | ||
*STAC 5/F8/25 - I D - 16 Eliz - John Fullar v William Babington et al | *STAC 5/F8/25 - I D - 16 Eliz - John Fullar v William Babington et al | ||
*see also [[STAC Fuller]] | *see also [[STAC Fuller]] | ||
| − | + | * | |
''' G ''' | ''' G ''' | ||
| + | * | ||
| + | ''' Hansby v Hillyard ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/H78/11 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralf Hansby v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Robert Wilkinson et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/H70/31 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hansby v Sir Christopher Hildyard, Henry Swann et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/H75/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralf Hansby v Sir Christopher Hildiard et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/H11/33 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hansbie v Sir Christopher Hyldyard et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/H32/12 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Raph Hansbye v Sir Christopher Hylleard, Henry Swann, George Barret, et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/H42/6 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hanstey v Sir Christopher Hilliard et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/H56/5 - I D - 43 Eliz - Ralph Hausby v Robert Cartwright, William Jackson et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/H59/8 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Ralph Hausbye v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Henry Swanne et al | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Hansby]] | ||
| − | ''' | + | ''' Jenkynson v Dalton ''' |
| − | * | + | *TNA Note: York: Perjury in a suit by first defendant against plaintiff for slander. STAC 7/3/20 |
| − | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/J16/31 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - James Jenkynson v Elizabeth Dalton |
| − | *STAC | + | *STAC 7/3/20 - - - Yorkshire - James Jenkinson v Elizabeth Dalton, William Chewe, John Sproxton, alias Sprowston, Leonard Chewe, John Skinner |
| − | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/J21/15 - A - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - James Jenkinson v William Chewe, John Skynner et al |
| − | *see also [[STAC | + | *see also [[STAC Jenkinson]] |
| − | ''' | + | ''' Jobson v Story ''' |
| − | * | + | *STAC 5/J3/1 - B - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - Walter Jobson v Richard Story |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*see also [[STAC Jobson]] | *see also [[STAC Jobson]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Johnson v Smyth ''' | ||
| + | *TNA Notes: Frivolous suits and perjuries. STAC 7/3/21 | ||
| + | *STAC 7/3/21 - - - Yorkshire - Robert Johnson, v John Smyth, Richard Smyth, William Cutting, Nicholas Smyth | ||
*see also [[STAC Johnson]] | *see also [[STAC Johnson]] | ||
| + | * | ||
''' K ''' | ''' K ''' | ||
| − | * | + | * |
| − | + | ''' Lacy v Farror ''' | |
| − | * | + | *STAC 5/L27/12 - B A - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacie, Henry Farror v Robert Waterhouse, Gregory Waterhouse |
| − | * | + | *STAC 5/L47/20 - C - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacye et al v Robert Waterhowse et al |
| − | + | *STAC 5/L20/27 - I D - 14 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacy, Henry Farror v Gregory Waterhouse | |
| − | * | ||
*see also [[STAC Lacy]] | *see also [[STAC Lacy]] | ||
| − | ''' | + | |
| − | * | + | ''' Mason v Foljamb ''' |
| + | *TNA Note: Estate of the late Sir Godfrey Foljamb. STAC 7/4/25 | ||
| + | *STAC 7/4/25 - - - Yorkshire - James Mason, Mathias Bromley v Francis Foljamb, Godfrey Platts, Hercules Foljamb, Arthur Hollingsworth, William Tagg | ||
*see also [[STAC Mason]] | *see also [[STAC Mason]] | ||
| − | * | + | |
| + | ''' Micklethwaite v Parker ‘'' | ||
| + | *TNA Note: York: Perjury concerning the arrest of William Pennington. Ralph Micklethwaite and Robert Askwith, late sheriffs of York STAC 7/9/24 | ||
| + | *STAC 7/9/24 - - - Yorkshire - Ralph Micklethwaite, Robert Askwith v Thomas Parker, Richard Secker | ||
*see also [[STAC Micklethwaite]] | *see also [[STAC Micklethwaite]] | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | ''' | + | ''' Neville v Blithe ''' |
| + | *Blithe contends that Nevill was excomunicated (province of York).STAC 5/N1/36 | ||
| + | *STAC 5/N1/11 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - Isabell Nevell v William Blyth, George Kirk, Henry Carter, John Foster et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/N1/36 - Dr - 32 Eliz - Isabell Nevill v William Blithe | ||
*see also [[STAC Neville]] | *see also [[STAC Neville]] | ||
| − | * | + | * |
| − | |||
| − | |||
''' O ''' | ''' O ''' | ||
* | * | ||
| − | ''' | + | ''' Parker v Gascoyne ''' |
| + | *TNA Note: Ferrybridge: Rescue of a sheriff's prisoner and assault on plaintiff's son. STAC 7/4/37 | ||
| + | *STAC 5/P38/25 - B A - 35 Eliz - William Parker v Thomas Whitewhood et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/P55/18 - B A C - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoyne, Thomas Whytwood et al | ||
| + | *STAC 7/4/37 - - - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoygne and his servants | ||
*see also [[STAC Parker]] | *see also [[STAC Parker]] | ||
| − | *see also [[STAC Proctor]] | + | |
| + | ''' Proctor v Fitton ''' | ||
| + | *See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.) STAC 5/P14/21 | ||
| + | *STAC 5/P35/24 - B A Rn - 38 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shallcrosse | ||
| + | *STAC 5/P40/6 - I D - 38 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shalecrosse | ||
| + | *STAC 5/P27/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - Steven Procter v Sir Edward Fitton | ||
| + | *STAC 5/P14/21 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir William Mallory, Sir Edward Yorke et al | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Proctor]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Proctor v Chatterton ''' | ||
| + | *See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.) STAC 5/P14/21 | ||
| + | *STAC 5/P58/14 - A - 39 Eliz - Stephen Procter v John Chatterton et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/P48/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v John Chatterton | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Proctor]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Proctor v Sherborne and Bridge ''' | ||
| + | *TNA Note: York: False charge of vagrancy. STAC 7/4/33 | ||
| + | *STAC 7/4/33 - - - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Robert Sherborne, John Bridge et al | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Proctor]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Proctor v Levett ''' | ||
| + | *TNA Note: Warsell: Non-fulfilment of contracts concerning a mortgage on the manor. STAC 7/4/34 | ||
| + | *STAC 7/4/34 - - - Yorkshire - Thomas Proctor v Richard Levett, William Levett | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Proctor]] | ||
| + | * | ||
''' Q ''' | ''' Q ''' | ||
* | * | ||
''' R ''' | ''' R ''' | ||
| − | * | + | * |
''' S ''' | ''' S ''' | ||
| − | * | + | * |
| − | + | ''' Turner v Hilton ''' | |
| − | + | *STAC 7/7/24 - - - Yorkshire - Christopher Turner v Matthew Hilton, Henry Baylie, Edward Hornebie | |
| − | ''' | ||
| − | * | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*see also [[STAC Turner]] | *see also [[STAC Turner]] | ||
| − | |||
* | * | ||
| − | ''' | + | ''' UV ''' |
| − | * | + | * |
| − | *see also [[STAC | + | ''' Wheatman v Brunskell and Hilton ''' |
| − | + | *TNA Note: Perjury in a suit by plaintiff against Sir Simon Musgrave in the Council of the North. STAC 7/9/8 | |
| + | *STAC 5/W58/16 - B - - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hiltal et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/W74/35 - Dr - - Janett Wheatman v Thomas Hylton, Peter Brimskill | ||
| + | *STAC 5/W68/28 - Dr - - Jane Wheatman v Michael Brunskell et al | ||
| + | *STAC 7/9/8 - - - - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hilton, Michael Brunskell | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A25/30 - Rn - 33 Eliz - Richard Araye et uxor v Peter Bruskill, Thomas Hilton | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A55/17 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Richard Ayrey et uxor Richard v Thomas Hilton, Peter Brunskel | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Wheatman]] | ||
| + | |||
* | * | ||
| − | ''' | + | ''' XYZ ‘'' |
| − | |||
| − | |||
* | * | ||
| + | ''' Almoner ''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Almoner v Myres ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A33/7 - B A - 37 Eliz - Almoner v Matthew Myers | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A7/14 - I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Matthew Myres | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Myers]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' AG v Wood ''' | ||
| + | *Depositions from Yorkshire. STAC 5/A7/4 | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A18/14 - B A - 43 Eliz - AG v Edmund Wood et uxor, John Beckwith et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A31/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Edmond Wood | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A7/4 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmund Wood et al | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Wood]] | ||
Revision as of 20:42, 7 February 2016
Yorkshire
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
A
Abbott v Webster
- One Bartilmew Abbott late husbant of the complainant seised of property in Bellessies in Yorkshire v Wm Webster of Flamborough Yorkshire ER esquire STAC 5/A2/35
- STAC 5/A2/35 - B Yorkshire
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
Acclome v Beckwith
- Imprimis whether did Wm Thackwray about the second day of October in the xxxiijth year of the Queens Majesties reign that now is at Little Moreby in co York ER declare unto you Thomas Beckwith that he had a warrant or precept from Philip Constable esq the then Shireve of Yorkshire to arrest you at the suit of John Acclome esq, you then lying or being within a hedge that had of late inclosed or compassed about a Retche or stack of corn or hay. STAC 5/A32/28
- STAC 5/A47/18 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Acclome v Isabella Beckwith, Francis Fairfax, George Knowles et al
- STAC 5/A45/22 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - - John Acclome v Isabell Beckwith et al
- STAC 5/A32/28 - I D - 35 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Acchlam v Thomas Beckwith, William Latham, Francis Farfax et al
- STAC 5/A56/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - - John Acclome v George Knowles et al
- STAC 5/A35/10 - B A C I D - 38 Eliz - - John Aulome v Leonard Beckwith, Cuthbert Faulconer, John Gilbert et al
- see also STAC Acklam
Boynton and Wormald v Hammond and Barker
- TNA Note: Yorkshire, Debt STAC 10/2/18
- STAC 10/2/18 - - - Yorkshire - Francis Boynton and John Wormall v William Hammond and Thomas Barker
- STAC 5/B78/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hammond
- STAC 5/B63/40 - Rn - 40 Eliz - - Francis Boynton, John Wormall v William Hammond, Thomas Barker
- STAC 5/B103/2 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hamond, Thomas Barker
- STAC 5/B20/1 - C I D - 41 Eliz - - Francis Baynton, John Wormell v William Hamond, Thomas Barker
- STAC 5/B47/5 - C I D - 42 Eliz - - Francis Boynton, John Woormall v William Hamonde, Thomas Barker
- STAC 5/B92/3 - B A - 40 Eliz - - Francis Boyninton, John Wormall v John Barker, Thomas Robinson et al
- see also STAC Boynton
' Coore v Hatgill ‘
- Thomas Coore of Scanderowes in the co of York. STAC 5/C2/34
- STAC 5/C2/34 - B A Letter - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Coore v Adam Halkell, Richard Stout, Richard Holden, Ralph Walker. see transcription of letter STAC 5/C2/34
- STAC 5/C41/32 - B Dr - 39 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Corre v Adam Hatgill, Richard Holden et al
- see also STAC Coore
D
' Elwick v Crossthwait ‘
- Jane Elwick widow of George Elwick late of the City of York. In re a house in York. STAC 5/E1/33
- STAC 5/E17/29 - I D - 44 Eliz - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crosthwaite
- STAC 5/E12/2 - B - 43 Eliz - Jane Elwicke v Robert Crostwhate, Christian Barker, William Tewe et al
- STAC 5/E1/33 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Jane Elwick v Robert Crossthwait, William Hawley, John Buson, William Riley et al
- see also STAC Elwick
' Fairfax v Fairfax ‘
- See GANG, T. M. “The quarrel between Edward Fairfax and his brother” Notes and Queries, 214 (1969) 28-33. STAC 5/F31/33
- STAC 5/F31/33 - B - 42 Eliz - Yorkshire - Edward Fairfax, John Holmes v Sir Thomas Fairfax Jr, Robert Holmes et al
- see also STAC Fairfax
Fairfax v Fairfax
- Sir Thomas Fairfax of Denton in co York. Land in Appleton (Anstey) - STAC 5/F1/15
- Thomas Fairefax of Denton in the co of York WR Esquire. STAC 5/F22/12
- TNA Note: Inheritance of Sir William Fairfax, first plaintiff's father. STAC 7/12/17
- STAC 5/F29/7 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fayrefaxe, Robert Bullock v Gabriel Fayrefaxe, Robert Ashe et al
- STAC 5/F23/7 - B - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairefax v Gabriell Fairefax
- STAC 5/F27/9 - C I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfaxe, Robert Bullock v Robert Aske, Thomas Green et al
- STAC 5/F17/11 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairefax v Gabriell Fairefax
- STAC 5/F11/13 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfax, Robert Bullocke v Gabriel Fairfax, Robert Aske et al
- STAC 7/12/17 - - - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfaxe, Robert [Bullock] v Gabriel Fayrefaxe, Robert Aske, Thomas Grene
- STAC 5/F22/12 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfax v Gabriell Fairfax.
- STAC 5/F1/15 - B A Dr C - Hil 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v William Fairfax, James Thompson, Robert Usherwoode.
- STAC 5/F27/18 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfaxe v William Fairfax, John Carrock et al
- STAC 5/F26/27 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Thomas Fairfaxe v Robert Usherwood, James Thompson et al
- STAC 5/F13/35 - B A C D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairefax v James Thompson
- see also STAC Fairfax
Fairfax v Moyser
- TNA Notes: Yorkshire: Forgery of pleadings concerning land at Appleton (Anstey). STAC 7/2/33
- STAC 5/F29/36 - B - 39 Eliz - - Thomas Fayrefaxe v James Moyser, Lawrence Lenton et al
- STAC 5/F10/19 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v Francis Moyser
- STAC 7/2/33 - - - Yorkshire - Sir Thomas Fairfax v Francis Moyse, John Frobisker
- see also STAC Fairfax
Fuller v Babbington
- Mortgaged land in the Co of York - Udall exhibited a bill in Chancery. Sir Wm Babington Knight and Mr Edmund Babbington. STAC 5/F22/28
- STAC 5/F22/28 - B - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Avery Unedall et al
- STAC 5/F26/33 - I D - 17 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Averye Uvedall, Edmund Babington et al
- STAC 5/F24/13 - B A C I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Fuller v Avery Unedall, Anne Unedall
- STAC 5/F8/25 - I D - 16 Eliz - John Fullar v William Babington et al
- see also STAC Fuller
G
Hansby v Hillyard
- STAC 5/H78/11 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralf Hansby v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Robert Wilkinson et al
- STAC 5/H70/31 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hansby v Sir Christopher Hildyard, Henry Swann et al
- STAC 5/H75/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralf Hansby v Sir Christopher Hildiard et al
- STAC 5/H11/33 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hansbie v Sir Christopher Hyldyard et al
- STAC 5/H32/12 - I D - 43 Eliz - Yorkshire - Raph Hansbye v Sir Christopher Hylleard, Henry Swann, George Barret, et al
- STAC 5/H42/6 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Ralph Hanstey v Sir Christopher Hilliard et al
- STAC 5/H56/5 - I D - 43 Eliz - Ralph Hausby v Robert Cartwright, William Jackson et al
- STAC 5/H59/8 - C I D - 43 Eliz - Ralph Hausbye v Sir Christopher Hyldyard, Henry Swanne et al
- see also STAC Hansby
Jenkynson v Dalton
- TNA Note: York: Perjury in a suit by first defendant against plaintiff for slander. STAC 7/3/20
- STAC 5/J16/31 - B A C - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - James Jenkynson v Elizabeth Dalton
- STAC 7/3/20 - - - Yorkshire - James Jenkinson v Elizabeth Dalton, William Chewe, John Sproxton, alias Sprowston, Leonard Chewe, John Skinner
- STAC 5/J21/15 - A - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - James Jenkinson v William Chewe, John Skynner et al
- see also STAC Jenkinson
Jobson v Story
- STAC 5/J3/1 - B - 38 Eliz - Yorkshire - Walter Jobson v Richard Story
- see also STAC Jobson
Johnson v Smyth
- TNA Notes: Frivolous suits and perjuries. STAC 7/3/21
- STAC 7/3/21 - - - Yorkshire - Robert Johnson, v John Smyth, Richard Smyth, William Cutting, Nicholas Smyth
- see also STAC Johnson
K
Lacy v Farror
- STAC 5/L27/12 - B A - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacie, Henry Farror v Robert Waterhouse, Gregory Waterhouse
- STAC 5/L47/20 - C - 12 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacye et al v Robert Waterhowse et al
- STAC 5/L20/27 - I D - 14 Eliz - Yorkshire - John Lacy, Henry Farror v Gregory Waterhouse
- see also STAC Lacy
Mason v Foljamb
- TNA Note: Estate of the late Sir Godfrey Foljamb. STAC 7/4/25
- STAC 7/4/25 - - - Yorkshire - James Mason, Mathias Bromley v Francis Foljamb, Godfrey Platts, Hercules Foljamb, Arthur Hollingsworth, William Tagg
- see also STAC Mason
' Micklethwaite v Parker ‘
- TNA Note: York: Perjury concerning the arrest of William Pennington. Ralph Micklethwaite and Robert Askwith, late sheriffs of York STAC 7/9/24
- STAC 7/9/24 - - - Yorkshire - Ralph Micklethwaite, Robert Askwith v Thomas Parker, Richard Secker
- see also STAC Micklethwaite
Neville v Blithe
- Blithe contends that Nevill was excomunicated (province of York).STAC 5/N1/36
- STAC 5/N1/11 - B Dr - 31 Eliz - Yorkshire - Isabell Nevell v William Blyth, George Kirk, Henry Carter, John Foster et al
- STAC 5/N1/36 - Dr - 32 Eliz - Isabell Nevill v William Blithe
- see also STAC Neville
O
Parker v Gascoyne
- TNA Note: Ferrybridge: Rescue of a sheriff's prisoner and assault on plaintiff's son. STAC 7/4/37
- STAC 5/P38/25 - B A - 35 Eliz - William Parker v Thomas Whitewhood et al
- STAC 5/P55/18 - B A C - 36 Eliz - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoyne, Thomas Whytwood et al
- STAC 7/4/37 - - - Yorkshire - William Parker v William Gascoygne and his servants
- see also STAC Parker
Proctor v Fitton
- See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.) STAC 5/P14/21
- STAC 5/P35/24 - B A Rn - 38 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shallcrosse
- STAC 5/P40/6 - I D - 38 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v Sir Edward Phitton, Charles Shalecrosse
- STAC 5/P27/34 - I D - 40 Eliz - Steven Procter v Sir Edward Fitton
- STAC 5/P14/21 - B A - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Sir William Mallory, Sir Edward Yorke et al
- see also STAC Proctor
Proctor v Chatterton
- See WOOD, Andy, “Subordination, Solidarity and the Limits of Popular Agency in a Yorkshire Valley c.1596-1615”, Past & Present 193 (2006) 41-72. (STAC 5/P35/24, 40/6, 48/21, 58/14, and 27/34 mentioned in footnote on p 47, as part of the same man’s earlier career.) STAC 5/P14/21
- STAC 5/P58/14 - A - 39 Eliz - Stephen Procter v John Chatterton et al
- STAC 5/P48/21 - I D - 39 Eliz - Stephen Proctor v John Chatterton
- see also STAC Proctor
Proctor v Sherborne and Bridge
- TNA Note: York: False charge of vagrancy. STAC 7/4/33
- STAC 7/4/33 - - - Yorkshire - Stephen Proctor v Robert Sherborne, John Bridge et al
- see also STAC Proctor
Proctor v Levett
- TNA Note: Warsell: Non-fulfilment of contracts concerning a mortgage on the manor. STAC 7/4/34
- STAC 7/4/34 - - - Yorkshire - Thomas Proctor v Richard Levett, William Levett
- see also STAC Proctor
Q
R
S
Turner v Hilton
- STAC 7/7/24 - - - Yorkshire - Christopher Turner v Matthew Hilton, Henry Baylie, Edward Hornebie
- see also STAC Turner
UV
Wheatman v Brunskell and Hilton
- TNA Note: Perjury in a suit by plaintiff against Sir Simon Musgrave in the Council of the North. STAC 7/9/8
- STAC 5/W58/16 - B - - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hiltal et al
- STAC 5/W74/35 - Dr - - Janett Wheatman v Thomas Hylton, Peter Brimskill
- STAC 5/W68/28 - Dr - - Jane Wheatman v Michael Brunskell et al
- STAC 7/9/8 - - - - Jane Wheatman v Peter Brunskell, Thomas Hilton, Michael Brunskell
- STAC 5/A25/30 - Rn - 33 Eliz - Richard Araye et uxor v Peter Bruskill, Thomas Hilton
- STAC 5/A55/17 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Richard Ayrey et uxor Richard v Thomas Hilton, Peter Brunskel
- see also STAC Wheatman
' XYZ ‘
Almoner
Almoner v Myres
- STAC 5/A33/7 - B A - 37 Eliz - Almoner v Matthew Myers
- STAC 5/A7/14 - I D - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire - Almoner v Matthew Myres
- see also STAC Myers
Attorney General
AG v Wood
- Depositions from Yorkshire. STAC 5/A7/4
- STAC 5/A18/14 - B A - 43 Eliz - AG v Edmund Wood et uxor, John Beckwith et al
- STAC 5/A31/13 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Edmond Wood
- STAC 5/A7/4 - I D - 44 Eliz - Yorkshire - AG v Edmund Wood et al
- see also STAC Wood
