Difference between revisions of "STAC co Surrey"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Surrey '''  
 
''' Surrey '''  
  
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
+
*Aldrington v Greenhill
 +
*Conningsby v King
 +
*Covert v Inesley
 +
*Curtis v Newdick
 +
*Jefferson v Peryer and Christmas
 +
*Newball and Bird v Hitney and Stanley
 +
*Stoughton v Griffin & Harmar
 +
*Tarpley v Parker
 +
*Wanborough Bailifs v Peterson
 +
*Whorwood v Southwark Corporation
 +
*Almoner v Carrol - Almoner v Dorick - Almoner v Harman - Almoner v Miller
 +
*AG v Causton
  
''' Aldriche v Pack and Freer '''
+
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
*in re inheritance of lands of John Packe deceased. STAC 5/A52/26
+
 
*STAC 5/A52/26 - B A I D - 36 Eliz - Suffolk - Robert Aldriche v Thomas Packe, Anthony Frere et al
+
''' A '''
*STAC 5/A23/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - Robert Aldriche v Margery Smith, Richard Frere et al
+
*see also [[STAC Aldrich]]
+
  
 
''' Aldrington v Greenhill '''  
 
''' Aldrington v Greenhill '''  
Line 13: Line 22:
 
*STAC 5/A39/22 - B A - 2 Eliz - Surrey - Thomas Aldrington v Alexander Grenehill, Tristram Griffith, John Crowe et al
 
*STAC 5/A39/22 - B A - 2 Eliz - Surrey - Thomas Aldrington v Alexander Grenehill, Tristram Griffith, John Crowe et al
 
*see also [[STAC Aldrington]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Aldrington]]  
*
+
 
 
''' B '''  
 
''' B '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' C '''
 +
 
 
''' Conningsby v King '''   
 
''' Conningsby v King '''   
 
*In re manor of Breckham in East Betchworth co Surrey. STAC 5/C14/19
 
*In re manor of Breckham in East Betchworth co Surrey. STAC 5/C14/19
 
*Bill, partial. Answer of Thomas Kinge Willyam Kempe and Willyam Weller - partial. Interrogatories of Conningsby. Ex, capt. xxiij oct Ao Dne R Eliz xxx - Depositions of various husbandmen of Betchworth co Surrey. Replication of Sir Henry Conningsbye Kt complt to the answers of Thomas Kinge Willyam Kempe and Willyam Weller defts. STAC 5/C14/19
 
*Bill, partial. Answer of Thomas Kinge Willyam Kempe and Willyam Weller - partial. Interrogatories of Conningsby. Ex, capt. xxiij oct Ao Dne R Eliz xxx - Depositions of various husbandmen of Betchworth co Surrey. Replication of Sir Henry Conningsbye Kt complt to the answers of Thomas Kinge Willyam Kempe and Willyam Weller defts. STAC 5/C14/19
 
*STAC 5/C14/19 - B A Rn I D - 30 Eliz - Surrey - Sir Henry Coningsby v William Kempe, William Weller et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/19 - B A Rn I D - 30 Eliz - Surrey - Sir Henry Coningsby v William Kempe, William Weller et al  
*STAC 5/C26/37 - I D - 30 Eliz - - Sir Henry Coningesby v Thomas King et uxor, William Kempe, William Wellar et al  
+
*STAC 5/C26/37 - I D - 30 Eliz - Surrey - Sir Henry Coningesby v Thomas King et uxor, William Kempe, William Wellar et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Conningsby]]
 
*see also [[STAC Conningsby]]
  
 
''' Covert v Inesley '''  
 
''' Covert v Inesley '''  
 
*In re a common or wood called Grays wood near Haslemere Surrey. Dep - Ex. capt. 26 Oct 38 Eliz. STAC 5/C14/14
 
*In re a common or wood called Grays wood near Haslemere Surrey. Dep - Ex. capt. 26 Oct 38 Eliz. STAC 5/C14/14
*STAC 5/C68/5 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Richard Covert v Lawrence Sloughton, John Barrett et al  
+
*STAC 5/C68/5 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Surrey - Richard Covert v Lawrence Sloughton, John Barrett et al  
*STAC 5/C11/2 - I D - 38 Eliz - Richard Covert et al v Lawrence Scowghton et al  
+
*STAC 5/C11/2 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - Richard Covert et al v Lawrence Scowghton et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/14 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - Richard Covert et al v Thomas Inesley, Thomas Stillwell et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/14 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - Richard Covert et al v Thomas Inesley, Thomas Stillwell et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Covert]]
 
*see also [[STAC Covert]]
  
 
''' Curtis v Newdick '''
 
''' Curtis v Newdick '''
*STAC 5/C13/14 - I D B A C - 42 Eliz - - William Curteis et uxor v Robert Newdicke, John Seabrighte et al  
+
*STAC 5/C13/14 - I D B A C - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curteis et uxor v Robert Newdicke, John Seabrighte et al  
 
*STAC 5/C2/8 - I D - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis et Joanne uxor v Robert Newdicke, John Lagge, Vincent Burt alias Lovel  
 
*STAC 5/C2/8 - I D - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis et Joanne uxor v Robert Newdicke, John Lagge, Vincent Burt alias Lovel  
*STAC 5/C29/11 - I D - 42 Eliz - - William Curtis et uxor v John Seabright et al  
+
*STAC 5/C29/11 - I D - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis et uxor v John Seabright et al  
*STAC 5/C51/11 - Rr - 43 Eliz - - Joan Curtis, William Curtis v Robert Newdyke, John Seabright et al
+
*STAC 5/C51/11 - Rr - 43 Eliz - Surrey - Joan Curtis, William Curtis v Robert Newdyke, John Seabright et al
*STAC 5/C64/30 - Rn - 47 Eliz - - William Curtis, Joan Curtis v John Seybridget, Ribert Newdick et al
+
*STAC 5/C64/30 - Rn - 47 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis, Joan Curtis v John Seybridget, Ribert Newdick et al
*STAC 5/C71/35 - I D - 42 Eliz - - William Curtis, Joan Curtis v Robert Nudick, John Seybright et al
+
*STAC 5/C71/35 - I D - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis, Joan Curtis v Robert Nudick, John Seybright et al
 
*see also [[STAC Curtis]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Curtis]]  
*
+
 
 
''' D '''  
 
''' D '''  
*
+
 
 
''' E '''
 
''' E '''
*
+
 
 
''' F '''  
 
''' F '''  
*
+
 
 
''' G '''  
 
''' G '''  
*
+
 
 
''' H '''  
 
''' H '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' I J '''
 +
 
 
''' Jefferson v Peryer and Christmas '''
 
''' Jefferson v Peryer and Christmas '''
 
*Deposition of William Wysham gent. At Guildford in Surrey, Gateward arrested Peryar at the suit of Jefferson. There was a fight. Jefferson and Gateward were then both arrested by Chrismas the constable. STAC 5/J3/14
 
*Deposition of William Wysham gent. At Guildford in Surrey, Gateward arrested Peryar at the suit of Jefferson. There was a fight. Jefferson and Gateward were then both arrested by Chrismas the constable. STAC 5/J3/14
*STAC 5/J12/15 - B A - 38 Eliz - John Jefferson v Richard Peryer et al
+
*STAC 5/J12/15 - B A - 38 Eliz - Surrey - John Jefferson v Richard Peryer et al
*STAC 5/J21/14 - I D - 38 Eliz - John Jefferson v Thomas Christmas
+
*STAC 5/J21/14 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - John Jefferson v Thomas Christmas
*STAC 5/J22/12 - Rn - - John Jefferson v Thomas Christmas, et al
+
*STAC 5/J22/12 - Rn - Surrey - John Jefferson v Thomas Christmas, et al
 
*STAC 5/J3/14 - I D - 39 Eliz - Surrey - John Jefferson v Richard Perryer, Thomas Chrismas et al
 
*STAC 5/J3/14 - I D - 39 Eliz - Surrey - John Jefferson v Richard Perryer, Thomas Chrismas et al
 
*see also [[STAC Jefferson]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Jefferson]]  
*
+
 
 
''' K '''  
 
''' K '''  
*
+
 
 
''' L '''  
 
''' L '''  
*
+
 
 
''' M '''  
 
''' M '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' N '''
 +
 
 
''' Newball and Bird v Hitney and Stanley '''
 
''' Newball and Bird v Hitney and Stanley '''
 
*Mitcham, Surrey. George Newball, goldsmith of London and Richard Byrd and Richard Jackson, servants to Sir Thomas Blancke of London, Knight vs. Henrye Whitney, Gent. in the right and behalfe of Sir Thomas Kempe, Knight, and Joan, Ladie Mordaunt, his wife, and William Stanley, his servant. STAC 5/N13/33  
 
*Mitcham, Surrey. George Newball, goldsmith of London and Richard Byrd and Richard Jackson, servants to Sir Thomas Blancke of London, Knight vs. Henrye Whitney, Gent. in the right and behalfe of Sir Thomas Kempe, Knight, and Joan, Ladie Mordaunt, his wife, and William Stanley, his servant. STAC 5/N13/33  
 
*STAC 5/N13/33 - B A - 28 Eliz - Surrey - George Newball, Richard Byrd v Henry Witney, William Stanley
 
*STAC 5/N13/33 - B A - 28 Eliz - Surrey - George Newball, Richard Byrd v Henry Witney, William Stanley
 
*see also [[STAC Newball]]
 
*see also [[STAC Newball]]
*
+
 
 
''' O '''  
 
''' O '''  
*
+
 
 
''' P '''  
 
''' P '''  
*
+
 
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
*
+
 
 
''' R '''  
 
''' R '''  
*
+
 
 
''' S '''  
 
''' S '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' Stoughton v Griffin & Harmar ‘''
 +
*William Stoughton of North [?Perlesdon?], Surrey v William Harmer former bailiff of Warwick, George Wyncott former constable of Warwick, Richard Gryffyn & Thomas Reynoldes. Assault near Warwick, Warks.(dk) - STAC 5/S29/8
 +
*STAC 5/S48/37 - B A - 33 Eliz - Surrey - William Stoughton v William Harmar, George WIncott et al
 +
*STAC 5/S29/8 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Surrey - William Stoughton v Richard Gryffin, Thomas Reynolds et al
 +
*STAC 5/S19/38 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Surrey - William Stoughton v Richard Gryffin, William Harmer et al
 +
*STAC 5/S76/7 - Rr - 34 Eliz - Surrey - William Stowghton v Richard Griffyn, William Harmar
 +
*STAC 5/S69/23 - I D - 34 Eliz - Surrey - William Stoughton v William Harmar, George Wincett et al
 +
*see also [[STAC Stoughton]]
 +
 
 +
''' T '''
 +
 
 
''' Tarpley v Parker '''
 
''' Tarpley v Parker '''
 
*TNA Note: Warlingham: Forgery of grant of next presentation to the vicarage. STAC 7/6/27  
 
*TNA Note: Warlingham: Forgery of grant of next presentation to the vicarage. STAC 7/6/27  
*STAC 5/T25/4 - I D - 38 Eliz - John Torpley v William Parker, John Parker
+
*STAC 5/T25/4 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - John Torpley v William Parker, John Parker
 
*STAC 7/6/27 - - - Surrey - John Torpley v William Parker, John Parker  
 
*STAC 7/6/27 - - - Surrey - John Torpley v William Parker, John Parker  
 
*see also [[STAC Tarpley]]
 
*see also [[STAC Tarpley]]
*
+
 
 
''' UV '''  
 
''' UV '''  
*
+
 
 +
''' W '''
 +
 
 
''' Wanborough Bailifs v Peterson '''
 
''' Wanborough Bailifs v Peterson '''
 
*STAC 5/W15/22 - B A Richard - 8 Eliz - Surrey - The Bailiffs of Wanborough v William Peterson et uxor, Thomas Brynd et uxor et al
 
*STAC 5/W15/22 - B A Richard - 8 Eliz - Surrey - The Bailiffs of Wanborough v William Peterson et uxor, Thomas Brynd et uxor et al
Line 92: Line 120:
 
''' Whorwood v Southwark Corporation '''
 
''' Whorwood v Southwark Corporation '''
 
*TNA Note: Southwark: False imprisonment. STAC 7/9/22  
 
*TNA Note: Southwark: False imprisonment. STAC 7/9/22  
*STAC 5/W27/22 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - William Whorwood v William Whorwood, Thomas Parkes et al
 
 
*STAC 7/9/22 - - - Surrey - Thomas Whorwood v Bailiffs of Southwark
 
*STAC 7/9/22 - - - Surrey - Thomas Whorwood v Bailiffs of Southwark
 
*see also [[STAC Whorewood]]
 
*see also [[STAC Whorewood]]
*
+
 
 
''' XYZ '''  
 
''' XYZ '''  
*
+
 
 
''' Almoner '''
 
''' Almoner '''
  
Line 118: Line 145:
 
*TNA Note: Goods and documents belonging to John Myller, deceased. STAC 7/14/3  
 
*TNA Note: Goods and documents belonging to John Myller, deceased. STAC 7/14/3  
 
*STAC 5/A5/28 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 28 Eliz - Surrey - Almoner v George Miller, John Parsons, William Leverett
 
*STAC 5/A5/28 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 28 Eliz - Surrey - Almoner v George Miller, John Parsons, William Leverett
*STAC 5/A17/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - Almoner v George Myller
+
*STAC 5/A17/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - Surrey - Almoner v George Myller
 
*see also [[STAC Miller]]
 
*see also [[STAC Miller]]
  

Revision as of 06:09, 30 November 2016

Surrey

  • Aldrington v Greenhill
  • Conningsby v King
  • Covert v Inesley
  • Curtis v Newdick
  • Jefferson v Peryer and Christmas
  • Newball and Bird v Hitney and Stanley
  • Stoughton v Griffin & Harmar
  • Tarpley v Parker
  • Wanborough Bailifs v Peterson
  • Whorwood v Southwark Corporation
  • Almoner v Carrol - Almoner v Dorick - Almoner v Harman - Almoner v Miller
  • AG v Causton

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

A

Aldrington v Greenhill

  • Thomas Aldrington esquire, Surrey. STAC 5/A39/22
  • STAC 5/A39/22 - B A - 2 Eliz - Surrey - Thomas Aldrington v Alexander Grenehill, Tristram Griffith, John Crowe et al
  • see also STAC Aldrington

B

C

Conningsby v King

  • In re manor of Breckham in East Betchworth co Surrey. STAC 5/C14/19
  • Bill, partial. Answer of Thomas Kinge Willyam Kempe and Willyam Weller - partial. Interrogatories of Conningsby. Ex, capt. xxiij oct Ao Dne R Eliz xxx - Depositions of various husbandmen of Betchworth co Surrey. Replication of Sir Henry Conningsbye Kt complt to the answers of Thomas Kinge Willyam Kempe and Willyam Weller defts. STAC 5/C14/19
  • STAC 5/C14/19 - B A Rn I D - 30 Eliz - Surrey - Sir Henry Coningsby v William Kempe, William Weller et al
  • STAC 5/C26/37 - I D - 30 Eliz - Surrey - Sir Henry Coningesby v Thomas King et uxor, William Kempe, William Wellar et al
  • see also STAC Conningsby

Covert v Inesley

  • In re a common or wood called Grays wood near Haslemere Surrey. Dep - Ex. capt. 26 Oct 38 Eliz. STAC 5/C14/14
  • STAC 5/C68/5 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Surrey - Richard Covert v Lawrence Sloughton, John Barrett et al
  • STAC 5/C11/2 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - Richard Covert et al v Lawrence Scowghton et al
  • STAC 5/C14/14 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - Richard Covert et al v Thomas Inesley, Thomas Stillwell et al
  • see also STAC Covert

Curtis v Newdick

  • STAC 5/C13/14 - I D B A C - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curteis et uxor v Robert Newdicke, John Seabrighte et al
  • STAC 5/C2/8 - I D - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis et Joanne uxor v Robert Newdicke, John Lagge, Vincent Burt alias Lovel
  • STAC 5/C29/11 - I D - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis et uxor v John Seabright et al
  • STAC 5/C51/11 - Rr - 43 Eliz - Surrey - Joan Curtis, William Curtis v Robert Newdyke, John Seabright et al
  • STAC 5/C64/30 - Rn - 47 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis, Joan Curtis v John Seybridget, Ribert Newdick et al
  • STAC 5/C71/35 - I D - 42 Eliz - Surrey - William Curtis, Joan Curtis v Robert Nudick, John Seybright et al
  • see also STAC Curtis

D

E

F

G

H

I J

Jefferson v Peryer and Christmas

  • Deposition of William Wysham gent. At Guildford in Surrey, Gateward arrested Peryar at the suit of Jefferson. There was a fight. Jefferson and Gateward were then both arrested by Chrismas the constable. STAC 5/J3/14
  • STAC 5/J12/15 - B A - 38 Eliz - Surrey - John Jefferson v Richard Peryer et al
  • STAC 5/J21/14 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - John Jefferson v Thomas Christmas
  • STAC 5/J22/12 - Rn - Surrey - John Jefferson v Thomas Christmas, et al
  • STAC 5/J3/14 - I D - 39 Eliz - Surrey - John Jefferson v Richard Perryer, Thomas Chrismas et al
  • see also STAC Jefferson

K

L

M

N

Newball and Bird v Hitney and Stanley

  • Mitcham, Surrey. George Newball, goldsmith of London and Richard Byrd and Richard Jackson, servants to Sir Thomas Blancke of London, Knight vs. Henrye Whitney, Gent. in the right and behalfe of Sir Thomas Kempe, Knight, and Joan, Ladie Mordaunt, his wife, and William Stanley, his servant. STAC 5/N13/33
  • STAC 5/N13/33 - B A - 28 Eliz - Surrey - George Newball, Richard Byrd v Henry Witney, William Stanley
  • see also STAC Newball

O

P

Q

R

S

' Stoughton v Griffin & Harmar ‘

  • William Stoughton of North [?Perlesdon?], Surrey v William Harmer former bailiff of Warwick, George Wyncott former constable of Warwick, Richard Gryffyn & Thomas Reynoldes. Assault near Warwick, Warks.(dk) - STAC 5/S29/8
  • STAC 5/S48/37 - B A - 33 Eliz - Surrey - William Stoughton v William Harmar, George WIncott et al
  • STAC 5/S29/8 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Surrey - William Stoughton v Richard Gryffin, Thomas Reynolds et al
  • STAC 5/S19/38 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Surrey - William Stoughton v Richard Gryffin, William Harmer et al
  • STAC 5/S76/7 - Rr - 34 Eliz - Surrey - William Stowghton v Richard Griffyn, William Harmar
  • STAC 5/S69/23 - I D - 34 Eliz - Surrey - William Stoughton v William Harmar, George Wincett et al
  • see also STAC Stoughton

T

Tarpley v Parker

  • TNA Note: Warlingham: Forgery of grant of next presentation to the vicarage. STAC 7/6/27
  • STAC 5/T25/4 - I D - 38 Eliz - Surrey - John Torpley v William Parker, John Parker
  • STAC 7/6/27 - - - Surrey - John Torpley v William Parker, John Parker
  • see also STAC Tarpley

UV

W

Wanborough Bailifs v Peterson

  • STAC 5/W15/22 - B A Richard - 8 Eliz - Surrey - The Bailiffs of Wanborough v William Peterson et uxor, Thomas Brynd et uxor et al
  • see also STAC Wanborough

Whorwood v Southwark Corporation

  • TNA Note: Southwark: False imprisonment. STAC 7/9/22
  • STAC 7/9/22 - - - Surrey - Thomas Whorwood v Bailiffs of Southwark
  • see also STAC Whorewood

XYZ

Almoner

Almoner v Carrol

  • STAC 5/A5/17 - B - 34 Eliz - Surrey - Almoner v John Carrol, Thomas Aldridge
  • see also STAC Carrell

Almoner v Dorick

  • Thomas Chennell late of Wonnershe Surrey yeoman. drowned felo de se. STAC 5/A2/14
  • STAC 5/A2/14 - B - 33 Eliz - Surrey - Almoner v John Dorick (Coroner), John Gosden, John Lickner, William Hewett
  • see also STAC Dorick

Almoner v Harman

  • John Ward in the parish of St Thomas in the borough of Southwark co Surrey, with a bear cart and one horse drawing the same, price liijs iiijd, was then and there slain. Alexander Harman owner of the cart and horse dwelling in the parish of St Saviour. STAC 5/A4/39
  • STAC 5/A4/39 - B A - - Surrey - Almoner v Alexander Harman
  • see also STAC Harmon

Almoner v Miller

  • John Miller late of Croyden Surrey, felo de se in Marton. Hanged himself on the bough of a Crabtree. STAC 5/A5/28
  • TNA Note: Goods and documents belonging to John Myller, deceased. STAC 7/14/3
  • STAC 5/A5/28 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 28 Eliz - Surrey - Almoner v George Miller, John Parsons, William Leverett
  • STAC 5/A17/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - Surrey - Almoner v George Myller
  • see also STAC Miller

Attorney General

AG v Causton

  • Admiralty sessions in Southwark Surrey. Court of Dr Lewes for the Admiral. Jury failed to convict pirates. STAC 5/A52/34
  • AG is Gilbert Gerrard 1559-81
  • STAC 5/A52/34 - B A - - Surrey, Maritime - AG v John Causton, John Croft et al
  • see also STAC Causton