Difference between revisions of "STAC co Norfolk"

From Waalt
Line 6: Line 6:
 
*Thomas Aleyn of Northrepps co Norfolk. STAC 5/A52/8
 
*Thomas Aleyn of Northrepps co Norfolk. STAC 5/A52/8
 
*STAC 5/A52/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allen v Henry Playford et al  
 
*STAC 5/A52/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allen v Henry Playford et al  
*STAC 5/A7/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - Thomas Aleyn v Henry Playforth et al, John Atkyns, William Perker et al
+
*STAC 5/A7/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Aleyn v Henry Playforth et al, John Atkyns, William Perker et al
 
*see also [[STAC Allen]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Allen]]  
  
Line 24: Line 24:
 
''' Armiger v Whitney '''  
 
''' Armiger v Whitney '''  
 
*Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/4
 
*Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/4
*STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
+
*STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
*STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
+
*STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
 
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
  
Line 31: Line 31:
 
*William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A3/26  
 
*William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A3/26  
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al  
 
*STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al  
*STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - William Armiger v John Barber et al
+
*STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v John Barber et al
*STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
+
*STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
*STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
+
*STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
 
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Armiger]]  
  
''' Almoner'''
+
''' Almoner ''
  
 
''' Almoner v Blundeville '''
 
''' Almoner v Blundeville '''
Line 52: Line 52:
 
*Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39  
 
*Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39  
 
*Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.  
 
*Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.  
*STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - AG v Edward Cleare
+
*STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Cleare
 
*STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
 
*STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
 
**Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
 
**Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
Line 58: Line 58:
 
**Answer of Thomas Sego
 
**Answer of Thomas Sego
 
**Demurrer of William Gressham
 
**Demurrer of William Gressham
*STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
+
*STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
 
*see also [[STAC Clere]]
 
*see also [[STAC Clere]]
  
Line 70: Line 70:
 
''' Becker v Neave '''
 
''' Becker v Neave '''
 
*Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
 
*Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
*STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
+
*STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
 
*STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
 
*STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
 
*see also [[STAC Becker]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Becker]]  
Line 80: Line 80:
 
**Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.  
 
**Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.  
 
**Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
 
**Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
*STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
+
*STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
*STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
+
*STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
*STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
+
*STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
*STAC 7/18/23 - - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
+
*STAC 7/18/23 - - - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
 
*see also [[STAC Beckham]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Beckham]]  
  
 
''' Blenerhasset v Sayers '''
 
''' Blenerhasset v Sayers '''
*STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
+
*STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
*STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
+
*STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
*STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
+
*STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
*STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
+
*STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
 
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
 
*STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
 
*see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Blenerhasset]]  
Line 103: Line 103:
  
 
''' Cooke v Jewell '''  
 
''' Cooke v Jewell '''  
*STAC 5/C3/25 - William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk  
+
*William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/25
*STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
+
*STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
 
*see also [[STAC Cooke]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Cooke]]  
  
 
''' Cooper v Goose '''  
 
''' Cooper v Goose '''  
 
*Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute. STAC 5/C3/12
 
*Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute. STAC 5/C3/12
*STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
+
*STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
*STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
+
*STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
*STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
+
*STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - - - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
 
*see also [[STAC Cooper]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Cooper]]  
  
Line 127: Line 127:
 
*STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
 
*STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
 
*STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
 
*STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
*STAC 5/C72/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - Charles Conwallis v William Le Gris, Robert Cottrell
+
*STAC 5/C72/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - - Charles Conwallis v William Le Gris, Robert Cottrell
 
*see also [[STAC Cornwallis]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cornwallis]]
  
Line 141: Line 141:
 
*STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
 
*STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
*STAC 5/C28/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - Lord Cromwell v Edward Daulton, Val(entine) Hartoppe, Martyn Arden et al  
+
*STAC 5/C28/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Edward Daulton, Val(entine) Hartoppe, Martyn Arden et al  
 
*STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al  
 
*STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al  
*STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
+
*STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
*STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
+
*STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
 
*see also [[STAC Cromwell]] see also [[STAC Taverner]]
 
*see also [[STAC Cromwell]] see also [[STAC Taverner]]
  
Line 213: Line 213:
 
''' Flatman v Ward and Pigeon '''
 
''' Flatman v Ward and Pigeon '''
 
*TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury. STAC 7/12/9
 
*TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury. STAC 7/12/9
*STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
+
*STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
*STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
+
*STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
 
*STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
 
*STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
 
*STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
 
*STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
*STAC 5/F18/22 - I - - Richard Flatman v Thomas Downing et al
+
*STAC 5/F18/22 - I - - - Richard Flatman v Thomas Downing et al
*STAC 5/F12/32 - A - 38 Eliz - Richard Flatman et al v Thomas Downing
+
*STAC 5/F12/32 - A - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flatman et al v Thomas Downing
 
*see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Flatman]]  
  
Line 244: Line 244:
 
''' Fuller v Dalton and Elmer '''
 
''' Fuller v Dalton and Elmer '''
 
*Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen. STAC 5/F3/5  
 
*Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen. STAC 5/F3/5  
*STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
+
*STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
 
*STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
 
*STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
 
*STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
 
*STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
*STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
+
*STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
 
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
 
*see also [[STAC Fuller]]
  

Revision as of 16:13, 23 August 2015

Norfolk

A

Allen v Playford

  • Thomas Aleyn of Northrepps co Norfolk. STAC 5/A52/8
  • STAC 5/A52/8 - B A - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allen v Henry Playford et al
  • STAC 5/A7/31 - I D - 20 Eliz - - Thomas Aleyn v Henry Playforth et al, John Atkyns, William Perker et al
  • see also STAC Allen

Allyson v Richman

  • Thomas Alyson of Aylesham co Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/2
  • STAC 5/A2/2 - B Dr - Easter 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Allyson v Thomas Richman, George Thomson
  • see also STAC Allyson

Anguish v Nicholas

  • Walsingham in the co of Norfolk. STAC 5/A1/30
  • STAC 5/A47/8 - B A C I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Eme Angwishe v Agnes Nicholas, John Rame et al
  • STAC 5/A53/14 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v Agnes Nicholas, Rame, John Craddock et al
  • STAC 5/A1/30 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Anguishe v William Nicholas
  • STAC 5/A20 /2 - Rr - 36 Eliz - Norfolk - Emme Angus v Anne Nicholas, William Nicholas et al
  • see also STAC Anguish

Armiger v Whitney

  • Possibly Burnham and [King's] Lynne, Norfolk. STAC 5/A2/4
  • STAC 5/A2/4 - B A - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney, Ralph Hildiche
  • STAC 5/A26/29 - I D - 36 Eliz - - William Armiger v Robert Whitney et al
  • see also STAC Armiger

Armiger v Barber

  • William Arminger the elder of North Creake in Norfolk gentleman. In re the manor of Hillham in Holkham, Norfolk. STAC 5/A3/26
  • STAC 5/A3/26 - B A - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - William Armiger Sr v Roger Barbor, John Barbor, William Barbor, Robert Dowe, Christopher Buller et al
  • STAC 5/A30/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v John Barber et al
  • STAC 5/A24/8 - I D - 37 Eliz - - William Armiger v Roger Barber, Robert Dowe
  • STAC 5/A57/23 - I - - - William Armiger Sr v Robert Dowe, Roger Barber et al
  • see also STAC Armiger

' Almoner ‘

Almoner v Blundeville

  • Andrew Green late of Catfeild Norfolk. Hanged himself. felo de se. STAC 5/A2/32
  • STAC 5/A2/32 - B A - Hil 41 Eliz - Norfolk - Almoner v John Blundeville et uxor
  • see also STAC Blundeville

Attorney General

Attorney General v Abrahan

  • STAC 5/A39/24 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Robert Abrahan
  • see also STAC Abrahan

Attorney General v Gresham and Clere

  • Corruption in raising of soldiers in Norfolk (and at Harwich). STAC 5/A32/39
  • Answer of John Hamonde: “often time repaired unto him unto him in the behalf of one Symonde Thayne of Attleborough to the ende to procure his discharge, whereupon by his importunate sute unto him this defendant being moved with pittye on the greivous complaint . . . did goe unto one John Browne who did kepe the Recorde or booke of the souldiers names desiring him to discharge the said Thayne out of the booke, if it were possible, who answered that he durst not do it because Mr Gressham had his name in his book. Thayne (or his wife) paid 30s to Brown.
  • STAC 5/A18/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Cleare
  • STAC 5/A32/39 - B A Dr - 37 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v William Gressham, Edward Cleere, Thomas Sego, Thomas Jackson, John Browne, Edmond Newarck, John Hamonde, [blank] Bushell
    • Bill of Edward Coke Attorney General
    • Answer of Edward Clere.
    • Answer of Thomas Sego
    • Demurrer of William Gressham
  • STAC 5/A31/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - - AG v Edward Clere, William Gresham, John Brown et al
  • see also STAC Clere

B

Baldrey v Ward

  • Theft of crop of peas. Rednall, Norfolk. John Baldrye v Thomas Warde of Rednall, tanner & Margery his wife; Anne Myddaye of Rednall, spinster; John Lawne & Wyllm Palmer of Southreps, yeoman. STAC/B67/4
  • STAC 5/B67/4 - B - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - John Baldrye v Margaret Warde,Thomas Warde, William Palmer
  • see also STAC Baldrey

Becker v Neave

  • Norfolk. Interrogatories to be administered on behalf of Roose Becker complt against Wyllm Neale . . . Thomas Bretton, Thomas Neale, Thomas Becker & Elinor his wife, Thomas Wyth.., John Alyson, Rauffe Symes & Edmund Crell.. defts. Complt is widow of Wyllm Becker of ?Suttyngton?, Norfolk. STAC 5/B67/18
  • STAC 5/B7/12 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - - Rose Becker v William Neve, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Becker et al
  • STAC 5/B67/18 - I D - 24 Eliz - Norfolk - Roose Becker v Thomas Neave, William Neave, Thomas Bretton
  • see also STAC Becker

Beckham v Halman and Crane

  • Fronsham, Norfolk. Refers to writ of ravishment of ward from High Court of Chancery directed to the Shreve of Norfolk against the brothers Richard & Henrye Beckham, and a suit tried at Norwich Assizes by Robert Crane against Richard & Henrye Beckham concerning the wardship of Sara Futter, only daughter & heir of Rycharde Futter. Mention also of the death of Alice Futter, mother of Sara Futter. STAC 5/B68/2
  • STAC 5/B68/2 - B A - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Richard Beckham v [blank] Halman, Elizabeth Paynter et al
    • Bill of Richard Beckham of Little Frannsham, Norfolk. Defts Edmund Halman, Thomas Halman, John Halman, Robert Crane, Elizabeth Paynter.
    • Answers of Isabell (otherwise Elizabeth) Paynter widow to the bill of complaint of Richard Beckham.
    • Answers of Robarte Crane, Edmunde Halman, John Halman & Thomas Halman
  • STAC 5/B99/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v John Halman, Thomas Halrnan
  • STAC 5/B16/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
  • STAC 5/B103/9 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane, Edmund Halman et al
  • STAC 7/18/23 - - - - Richard Beckham v Robert Crane
  • see also STAC Beckham

Blenerhasset v Sayers

  • STAC 5/B21/40 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhassett, William Seyers v Richard Manser, Fermer Peapes et al
  • STAC 5/B56/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - - William Blenherhasset, William Seyres v Thomas Peapes
  • STAC 5/B23/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - - William Blenerhayset v Richard Manser et al
  • STAC 5/B29/21 - I - 11 Eliz - - William Bleverhasset et al v Richard Mansuer et al
  • STAC 5/B104/40 - I D - 35 Eliz - Norfolk - William Blennerhasset, William Seyers v Richard Manser
  • see also STAC Blenerhasset

C

Cobbe v Radcliffe

  • Wolverton, Norfolk. Elizabeth Cobbe, widow. Trespass and destruction of property. Interrogatories administered on behalf of the plaintiff. STAC 10/2/7
  • STAC 5/C46/8 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe, Gyles Skeete et al
  • STAC 10/2/7 - I - - Norfolk - Elizabeth Cobbe v Robert Radcliffe
  • see also STAC Cobbe

Cooke v Jewell

  • William Coke of Walcoote [Walcott] in Norfolk yeoman, two and a half acres of land in Estruston [East Ruston] Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/25
  • STAC 5/C3/25 - B C A - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - - William Coke v Edmund Jewell et uxor, Thomas Jewell
  • see also STAC Cooke

Cooper v Goose

  • Isaac Cooper of Yarmouth in Norfolk merchant. Inheritance dispute. STAC 5/C3/12
  • STAC 5/C3/12 - B A - Mich 44/45 Eliz - - Norfolk - Isaac Cooper v William Goose, George Goose
  • STAC 5/C10/34 - I D - 44 Eliz - - John Cowper v William Goose, George Goose
  • STAC 10/2/4 - Rn - - - - Isaac Cooper v William Goose and George Goose
  • see also STAC Cooper

Coppin v Palmer

  • William Coppinge of Beddingham in Norfolk. STAC 5/C2/6
  • STAC 5/C2/6 - B - 43 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Felthrop, Robert Barker, Robert Gooche, Thomas Grimsbye et al
  • STAC 5/C64/16 - A Rn C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppin v Robert Palmer, William Jackson, Robert Barker et al
  • STAC 5/C29/38 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge et al v Robert Palmer, John Cunger, Thomas Grimsbye et al
  • STAC 5/C71/12 - I D - 42 Eliz - Norfolk - William Coppinge v Robert Palmer, William Nelthorpe et al
  • see also STAC Coppin

Cornwallis v Gesh and Pinner

  • Charles Cornwaleys of Carowe in the County of the City of Norwich esquire. In re the manor of Kilverston in Norfolk. STAC 5/C1/24
  • TNA Note: Kilverston: Forcible dispute as to cutting furze, etc. STAC 7/11/11
  • STAC 5/C1/24 - B A - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleys v Simon Gesh, John Pinner, John Smith, William Browett
  • STAC 7/11/11 - - - Norfolk - Charles Cornwaleis v Simon Gest, John Pynner
  • STAC 5/C72/1 - B A - 39 Eliz - - Charles Conwallis v William Le Gris, Robert Cottrell
  • see also STAC Cornwallis

Cromwell v Tavernor

  • North Elmham, Norfolk. Referenced in "Custom Improvement and Anti-Improvement in Early Modern Britain" edited by Richard W. Hoyle, which also refers to related Chancery cases. STAC 5/C73/17; C35/9; C42/9; C58/5; C78/14
  • STAC 5/C17/9 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Crumwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
  • STAC 5/C73/17 - I D - 14 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Camwell [Cromwell] v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C30/21 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor
  • STAC 5/C58/5 - I D - 20 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C78/14 - I - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C73/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Crumwell v James Taverner
  • STAC 5/C45/36 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Crumwell v James Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/C32/18 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v John Browne
  • STAC 5/C38/21 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - Lord Cromwell v James Tavernor, John Browne
  • STAC 5/C28/3 - I D - 23 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Edward Daulton, Val(entine) Hartoppe, Martyn Arden et al
  • STAC 5/C42/9 - B A - 25 Eliz - Norfolk - Henry Lord Cromwell v Thomas Steward, John Taverner et al
  • STAC 5/C53/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Crumwell v Thomas Steward
  • STAC 5/C74/14 - I D - 25 Eliz - - Lord Cromwell v Roger Townshend
  • see also STAC Cromwell see also STAC Taverner

Curdey v Skeet

  • William Curdy of Aldeburgh in Norfolk. STAC 5/C1/37
  • STAC 5/C1/37 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdy v John Skeete Sr, John Skette Jr, John Orrys, Richard Smyth
  • STAC 5/C48/21 - I - Norfolk - William Curdye v John Orrys, John Skete Sr, John Skete Jr
  • STAC 5/C19/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - Norfolk - William Curdys v Richard Smith
  • see also STAC Curdey

Curtis v Evance

  • Thomas Curteis of Lynn Regis Norfolk. STAC 5/C3/5
  • STAC 5/C3/5 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Curteis v Edmond Evance, Thomas Burton
  • see also STAC Curtis

D

Dereham v Barton

  • TNA Note: West Dereham: Affray. STAC 7/11/27
  • STAC 5/D21/8 - B - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, Robert Edge, John Atkins
  • STAC 5/D36/17 - I D - 12 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dereham v Peter Barton, John Atkins
  • STAC 5/D34/26 - C I D - 13 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Dearham v Peter Barton
  • STAC 7/11/27 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Deareham v Peter Barton, John Atkyns
  • STAC 7/20/25 - - - Norfolk - Thomas Derham v Peter Barton et al
  • see also STAC Dereham

E

F

Farmor v Haydon

  • Thomas Farmor of East Bashnn’in co Norfolk esquire. STAC 5/F3/27
  • STAC 5/F30/39 - B - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fermer v Sir William Heydon
  • STAC 5/F3/27 - B A C I D - 29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Farmor v Sir William Haydon.
  • see also STAC Farmer

Fawcett v Woolman, Boston and Sharpe

  • James Fawcett of Kings Lynne in the co of Norfolk whereas Robert Page and Elizabeth his wife executrix of Wm Judye deceased . . was possessed of one cupboard and divers other goods . . STAC 5/F22/14
  • STAC 5/F22/14 - B A Rn C - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcett v William Wolman, John Sharpe et al.
  • STAC 5/F4/2 - I D - 27 Eliz - Norfolk - James Fawcet v William Wolman, John Sharp, Thomas Boston, Thomas Miller et al
  • STAC 5/F31/28 - Rr - - Norfolk - James Fawcet v Thomas Boston, William Woolman et al
  • see also STAC Fawcett

Fenn v Flowerdew

  • TNA Note: Burston and Thirning: Estate of Thomas Appleton. STAC 7/12/7
  • STAC 5/F26/21 - B - - Norfolk - William Fenn v Thomas Allenn, Stephen Flowerdue et al
  • STAC 5/F8/12 - Rn Rr - 19 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdine et uxor, John Vinyor Sr et al
  • STAC 5/F6/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenn v Stephen Flowerden et uxor, Thomas Allen et al
  • STAC 5/F13/17 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdew et al
  • STAC 7/12/7 - - - Norfolk - William Fenne v Stephen Flowerdewe, et Agnes uxor, John Vinyour et al
  • see also STAC Fenn

Fenton v Wright

  • That whereas one Robert Clarke of Walpole in the co of Norfolk deceased . . . STAC 5/F2/5
  • STAC 5/F10/23 - B A - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, William Edes et al
  • STAC 5/F2/5 - B A C - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright Sr, Henry Huntson, William Brown, William Eades et al.
  • STAC 5/F16/15 - I D - 38 Eliz - Norfolk - Charles Fenton v John Wright, William Welbie et al
  • see also STAC Fenton

Fiske v Goldsmith and Gaunt

  • Ambrose Fyske of Welles in co Norfolk, merchaunte was impleaded by one Edwarde Waytes before the Mayor and recorder of Lynne in the town court there . . . an action upon the case . . Waytes and John Chartres of Lynne merchaunt bought of Fyske one ship called the George for 240li.) STAC 5/F22/19
  • TNA Notes: Lynn: Perjury in a suit concerning a ship. STAC 7/2/29
  • STAC 5/F22/19 - B A - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fiske v Henry Goldsmith, Christopher Gaunte et al
  • STAC 5/F12/26 - I D - 21 Eliz - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Christopher Grante, Nicholas Derbye et al
  • STAC 7/2/29 - - - Norfolk - Ambrose Fyske v Edward Waytes, Christopher Gaunt
  • see also STAC Fiske

Flatman v Ward and Pigeon

  • TNA Note: Norwich: Verdict of deft's, as a jury. STAC 7/12/9
  • STAC 5/F19/4 - B A - 37 Eliz - - Richard Flatman v William Ward, John Pigeon, Robert Prentice
  • STAC 5/F25/23 - B A C - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flattman v William Ward, Robert Prentice et al
  • STAC 5/F24/7 - I - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Bigeon, Robert Tyte
  • STAC 7/12/9 - - - Norfolk - Richard Flatman v John Pigeon, John Tyte et al
  • STAC 5/F18/22 - I - - - Richard Flatman v Thomas Downing et al
  • STAC 5/F12/32 - A - 38 Eliz - - Richard Flatman et al v Thomas Downing
  • see also STAC Flatman

Flatman v Carter

  • Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk. STAC 5/F2/20, STAC 5/F2/1
  • STAC 5/F2/20 - B - 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Carter, John Rose, Richard Shreve, Henry Horne
  • see also STAC Flatman

Flatman v Flatman

  • Thomas Flatman of Sterston, Norfolk. STAC 5/F2/20, STAC 5/F2/1
  • STAC 5/F2/1 - B Dr - Trin 33 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Flatman v John Flatman, Robert Prince, Richard Flatman, et al
  • see also STAC Flatman

Forest v Lacy and Booth

  • John Forrest gent. of Holkham Norfolk and Alice his wife, late the widow and administratrix of Edmund Windham esquire. STAC 5/F3/14
  • STAC 5/F3/14 - B A - Trin 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest et uxor v John Lacey, William Booeth, George Booeth et uxor, John Burbitch et al.
  • STAC 5/F19/19 - I D - 41 Eliz - Norfolk - John Forrest v George Boothe, John Burbyche, Henry Call
  • see also STAC Forest

Fulhurste v Vowell

  • George Fulhurste of London gent. Thomas Vowell in [blank] co Norfolk. STAC 5/F3/30
  • STAC 5/F3/30 - B - 39 Eliz - Norfolk - George Fulshurste v Thomas Vowell, Robert Vowell, Richard Fiejohn alias Feejohn, Robert Franklin et al
  • see also STAC Fullhurst

Fuller v Dalton and Elmer

  • Thomas Fuller of Norhold in co Norfolk. Henry Sparrowe and Robart Dalton of the said town yeomen. STAC 5/F3/5
  • STAC 5/F7/33 - B Dr - 27 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Richard Elemour, Thomas Neale et al
  • STAC 5/F1/11 - B A - Mich 28/29 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller, Henry Sparrow, Robert Dalton v Richard Elmor, Thomas Neale, Robert Sparrow, Robert Raymond Sr, Robert Raymond Jr
  • STAC 5/F3/5 - B Dr - Hil 30 Eliz - Norfolk - Thomas Fuller v Robert Dalton, Richard Elmer
  • STAC 5/F7/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Thomas Fuller v Robert Rayner Sr et al
  • see also STAC Fuller

G

H

IJ

K

L

M

N

O

P

Q

R

S

T

UV

W

X

Y

Z