Difference between revisions of "STAC co Flint"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' Flint ''' | ''' Flint ''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
''' A ''' | ''' A ''' | ||
Line 6: | Line 11: | ||
* | * | ||
''' C ''' | ''' C ''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Conway v Conway ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/C13/32 - B - 5 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conwaye v John Conwaye | ||
+ | *STAC 5/C31/38 - I D - 10 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conway, Henry Conway v John Conway et al | ||
+ | *STAC 7/11/7 - - - Flint - Edward, Conwey, Henry Conwey v John Conwey | ||
*see [[STAC Conway]] | *see [[STAC Conway]] | ||
+ | |||
''' D ''' | ''' D ''' | ||
* | * | ||
Line 15: | Line 26: | ||
*STAC 5/E1/10 - B Dr - Hil 29 Eliz - Flint - Thomas Edowe v William Hanmer, Thomas Hanmer, John Egerton, Humphrey Thomas, Richard Nickson, Thomas Nickson, John Nickson | *STAC 5/E1/10 - B Dr - Hil 29 Eliz - Flint - Thomas Edowe v William Hanmer, Thomas Hanmer, John Egerton, Humphrey Thomas, Richard Nickson, Thomas Nickson, John Nickson | ||
*see also [[STAC Edowe]] | *see also [[STAC Edowe]] | ||
− | + | ||
''' F ''' | ''' F ''' | ||
* | * | ||
Line 23: | Line 34: | ||
* | * | ||
''' IJ ''' | ''' IJ ''' | ||
− | * | + | |
+ | ''' John ap Ievan v Lloyd ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 7/10/25 - - - Flint - John ap Jevan, v Robert Lloyde, Edward ap Hugh | ||
+ | * see [[STAC Welsh names IJ]] | ||
+ | |||
''' K ''' | ''' K ''' | ||
* | * | ||
''' L ''' | ''' L ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Lewis]] - see [[STAC Lloyd]] - see [[STAC Lloyd]] - | + | |
− | + | '''Lewes v John ap Ithell ''' | |
+ | *STAC 5/L41/5 - B - - Flint - Richard Lewes v John ap Ithell, Elizabeth verche Ithell, Ievan ap John ap Meredith et Jane uxor et al | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Lewis]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Lloyd v Griffith ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L25/14 - B A - 17 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Lloid v Peyrs Gryffith, Jonet David | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L7/32 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Lloid v Jonet David | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Lloyd]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Lloyd, Robert ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L9/24 - B A - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloid v Robert Davies, John ap William et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L7/39 - I D - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloid v Robert Davies, John ap Williams et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L30/1 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloyd v Robert Davies, William ap John | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L21/32 - B A C I D - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloyd v David Williams et al | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Lloyd]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Lloyd, William ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L33/18 - B A - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloyd v Robert Lloyd, John ap William et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L39/12 - A Rn C I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v Robert Lloid, Griffith Mountford et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L31/39 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v Robert Lloyd | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L10/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v John ap William et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L10/9 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloyd v Griffith Mountford et al | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Lloyd]] | ||
+ | |||
''' M ''' | ''' M ''' | ||
* | * | ||
Line 34: | Line 72: | ||
* | * | ||
''' O ''' | ''' O ''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
* | * | ||
''' P ''' | ''' P ''' | ||
− | * | + | |
+ | ''' Pearce v Bythell ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/P2/32 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Flint - Thomas Pearce v John Bythell, Henry ap John David, William ap Hugh ap Rice ap Jenkin, Thomas ap Morgan et al | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Pearce]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Pirs v Brereton ''' | ||
+ | *Transcription [[STAC 5/P4/7]] | ||
+ | *STAC 5/P4/7 - B - 39 Eliz - Flint - Henry Pirs, William Jones v Vrion Brereton, Robert Salesbury, George Manly, John Pirs, Hugh Kenricke | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Piers]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Powell v Katherine verch Howell ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/P67/17 - B - - Flint - Kenrick Powell v Katherine verch Howell ap Ievan, Thomas ap Edward et Gwensey uxor | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Powell]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Price v Sanys''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/P50/31 - I D - 24 Eliz - Flint - Sir Fryth Pryce v Walter Sanys, Elizabeth Maddox | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Price]] | ||
+ | |||
''' Q ''' | ''' Q ''' | ||
* | * | ||
Line 44: | Line 97: | ||
''' Roberts v Hugh ap Rees ''' | ''' Roberts v Hugh ap Rees ''' | ||
+ | *Transcription [[STAC 5/R1/35]] | ||
*STAC 5/R1/35 - B - 41 Eliz - Flint - John Roberts v Hugh ap Rees, Richard ap Hugh, Edward ap Robert, Simon ap Meredythe Transcribed [[STAC 5/R1/35]] | *STAC 5/R1/35 - B - 41 Eliz - Flint - John Roberts v Hugh ap Rees, Richard ap Hugh, Edward ap Robert, Simon ap Meredythe Transcribed [[STAC 5/R1/35]] | ||
− | *STAC 7/28/15 - - - John Robertes v Simon ap Meredith | + | *STAC 7/28/15 - - - Flint - John Robertes v Simon ap Meredith |
− | * | + | *see also [[STAC Roberts]] |
+ | |||
''' S ''' | ''' S ''' | ||
* | * | ||
Line 54: | Line 109: | ||
* | * | ||
''' W ''' | ''' W ''' | ||
− | *see [[STAC Williams]] - see [[STAC Whitford]] | + | |
− | + | ''' Williams v Whitacres and Mitton''' | |
+ | *STAC 5/W76/1 - B A C - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Whytacres, John Mytton et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/W69/2 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mitton, John Whitacres et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/W52/4 - B A - 42 Eliz - Flint - Roger William v John Mitton, John Whittacres et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/W59/13 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mytton, John Roberts et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/W2/9 - B A I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mytton, John Whitacres, Lewes ap Hughe, John ap Rees alias Glasse, Thomas David ap John | ||
+ | *STAC 5/W75/16 - I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v Glasse alias Rees ap John, Owen ap Daivd et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/W39/6 - A - 42 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John ap Grass alias Rees | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Williams]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Whitford v Episc. St Asaph ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/W31/20 - A C I D - 8 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Whitford v William Mostyn, Thomas Bishop of St Asaph | ||
+ | *STAC 5/W21/38 - B A - 3 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Whitforde v Thomas Bishop of St Asaph, William Mostyn et al | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Whitford]] | ||
+ | |||
''' X ''' | ''' X ''' | ||
* | * | ||
Line 62: | Line 131: | ||
''' Z ''' | ''' Z ''' | ||
* | * | ||
− | + | <BR> | |
− | |||
*STAC 10/1/109 - D - - Flint - - [Unknown] v [Unknown] TNA Note:Incomplete deposition of Harry ap Harry, concerning an alleged assault and riot in Flintshire | *STAC 10/1/109 - D - - Flint - - [Unknown] v [Unknown] TNA Note:Incomplete deposition of Harry ap Harry, concerning an alleged assault and riot in Flintshire | ||
− | + | <BR> | |
− | + | *A Catalogue of Star Chamber Proceedings Relating to Wales compiled by Ifan ab Owen Edwards, Cardiff U P 1929 | |
− | + | <BR> | |
*TNA E159/360 Trinity Term, 12 Elizabeth. Fine paid | *TNA E159/360 Trinity Term, 12 Elizabeth. Fine paid | ||
**From Hugh Trevor de Moulde, Flynt: £20. | **From Hugh Trevor de Moulde, Flynt: £20. | ||
**From David ap William Lloid de Moulde, Flint: £60. | **From David ap William Lloid de Moulde, Flint: £60. | ||
**From John Parker de Moulde, Flint: £20. | **From John Parker de Moulde, Flint: £20. |
Revision as of 17:25, 10 February 2019
Flint
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
A
B
C
Conway v Conway
- STAC 5/C13/32 - B - 5 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conwaye v John Conwaye
- STAC 5/C31/38 - I D - 10 Eliz - Flint - Edward Conway, Henry Conway v John Conway et al
- STAC 7/11/7 - - - Flint - Edward, Conwey, Henry Conwey v John Conwey
- see STAC Conway
D
E
Edowe v Hanmer
- Thomas Edowe of Tybroughton co Flint gent. Land in Tybroughton. STAC 5/E1/10
- STAC 5/E1/10 - B Dr - Hil 29 Eliz - Flint - Thomas Edowe v William Hanmer, Thomas Hanmer, John Egerton, Humphrey Thomas, Richard Nickson, Thomas Nickson, John Nickson
- see also STAC Edowe
F
G
H
IJ
John ap Ievan v Lloyd
- STAC 7/10/25 - - - Flint - John ap Jevan, v Robert Lloyde, Edward ap Hugh
- see STAC Welsh names IJ
K
L
Lewes v John ap Ithell
- STAC 5/L41/5 - B - - Flint - Richard Lewes v John ap Ithell, Elizabeth verche Ithell, Ievan ap John ap Meredith et Jane uxor et al
- see also STAC Lewis
Lloyd v Griffith
- STAC 5/L25/14 - B A - 17 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Lloid v Peyrs Gryffith, Jonet David
- STAC 5/L7/32 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Lloid v Jonet David
- see also STAC Lloyd
Lloyd, Robert
- STAC 5/L9/24 - B A - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloid v Robert Davies, John ap William et al
- STAC 5/L7/39 - I D - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloid v Robert Davies, John ap Williams et al
- STAC 5/L30/1 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloyd v Robert Davies, William ap John
- STAC 5/L21/32 - B A C I D - 37 Eliz - Flint - Robert Lloyd v David Williams et al
- see also STAC Lloyd
Lloyd, William
- STAC 5/L33/18 - B A - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloyd v Robert Lloyd, John ap William et al
- STAC 5/L39/12 - A Rn C I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v Robert Lloid, Griffith Mountford et al
- STAC 5/L31/39 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v Robert Lloyd
- STAC 5/L10/7 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloid v John ap William et al
- STAC 5/L10/9 - I D - 40 Eliz - Flint - William Lloyd v Griffith Mountford et al
- see also STAC Lloyd
M
N
O
P
Pearce v Bythell
- STAC 5/P2/32 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Flint - Thomas Pearce v John Bythell, Henry ap John David, William ap Hugh ap Rice ap Jenkin, Thomas ap Morgan et al
- see also STAC Pearce
Pirs v Brereton
- Transcription STAC 5/P4/7
- STAC 5/P4/7 - B - 39 Eliz - Flint - Henry Pirs, William Jones v Vrion Brereton, Robert Salesbury, George Manly, John Pirs, Hugh Kenricke
- see also STAC Piers
Powell v Katherine verch Howell
- STAC 5/P67/17 - B - - Flint - Kenrick Powell v Katherine verch Howell ap Ievan, Thomas ap Edward et Gwensey uxor
- see also STAC Powell
Price v Sanys
- STAC 5/P50/31 - I D - 24 Eliz - Flint - Sir Fryth Pryce v Walter Sanys, Elizabeth Maddox
- see also STAC Price
Q
R
Roberts v Hugh ap Rees
- Transcription STAC 5/R1/35
- STAC 5/R1/35 - B - 41 Eliz - Flint - John Roberts v Hugh ap Rees, Richard ap Hugh, Edward ap Robert, Simon ap Meredythe Transcribed STAC 5/R1/35
- STAC 7/28/15 - - - Flint - John Robertes v Simon ap Meredith
- see also STAC Roberts
S
T
UV
W
Williams v Whitacres and Mitton
- STAC 5/W76/1 - B A C - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Whytacres, John Mytton et al
- STAC 5/W69/2 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mitton, John Whitacres et al
- STAC 5/W52/4 - B A - 42 Eliz - Flint - Roger William v John Mitton, John Whittacres et al
- STAC 5/W59/13 - C I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mytton, John Roberts et al
- STAC 5/W2/9 - B A I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John Mytton, John Whitacres, Lewes ap Hughe, John ap Rees alias Glasse, Thomas David ap John
- STAC 5/W75/16 - I D - 41 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v Glasse alias Rees ap John, Owen ap Daivd et al
- STAC 5/W39/6 - A - 42 Eliz - Flint - Roger Williams v John ap Grass alias Rees
- see also STAC Williams
Whitford v Episc. St Asaph
- STAC 5/W31/20 - A C I D - 8 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Whitford v William Mostyn, Thomas Bishop of St Asaph
- STAC 5/W21/38 - B A - 3 Eliz - Flint - Hugh Whitforde v Thomas Bishop of St Asaph, William Mostyn et al
- see also STAC Whitford
X
Y
Z
- STAC 10/1/109 - D - - Flint - - [Unknown] v [Unknown] TNA Note:Incomplete deposition of Harry ap Harry, concerning an alleged assault and riot in Flintshire
- A Catalogue of Star Chamber Proceedings Relating to Wales compiled by Ifan ab Owen Edwards, Cardiff U P 1929
- TNA E159/360 Trinity Term, 12 Elizabeth. Fine paid
- From Hugh Trevor de Moulde, Flynt: £20.
- From David ap William Lloid de Moulde, Flint: £60.
- From John Parker de Moulde, Flint: £20.