Difference between revisions of "STAC co Buckingham"

From Waalt
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' Buckinghamshire '''
 
''' Buckinghamshire '''
  
−
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
+
*Alford v Goodwin
 +
*Blanchard v Wycam and Long
 +
*Bury v Huntfield or Hore
 +
*Calveley v Rysley
 +
*Clark v Burlace 
 +
*Cornwall v Risley 
 +
*Frankish v Risley
 +
*Furthoe v Pen
 +
*Goodwin v Dorrell
 +
*Harte v Crosley
 +
*Kydwell v Moore
 +
*Morle v Pen
 +
*Osmore v Ongley
 +
*Packington v Gwyne
 +
*Smith v Windsor 
 +
*Tyrrell v Harcourt
 +
*Tyrringham v Ardis
 +
*Ward v Pinge
 +
*Wright v Bratridge
 +
*Wycombe Corporation v Raunce
 +
*Wyer v Okebank
 +
*Almoner v Gill - Almoner v Raunce
 +
 
 +
''' NOTA BENE ''' - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.  
 +
 
 +
''' A '''
  
 
''' Alford v Goodwin'''
 
''' Alford v Goodwin'''
−
*STAC 7/10/6 - TNA Note: Hitcham and Woburn: Boundaries of the manors.  
+
*TNA Note: Hitcham and Woburn: Boundaries of the manors. STAC 7/10/6
−
*STAC 5/A13/25 - B A - 9 Eliz - - Roger Alford v John Goodwin, John Heywood et al
+
*STAC 5/A13/25 - B A - 9 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Roger Alford v John Goodwin, John Heywood et al
−
*STAC 5/A16/34 - I D - 15 Eliz - - Roger Alford et uxor v John Goodwyn et al
+
*STAC 5/A16/34 - I D - 15 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Roger Alford et uxor v John Goodwyn et al
 
*STAC 7/10/6 - - - Buckinghamshire - Roger Alforde et Elizabeth uxor v John Goodwyn, William Over
 
*STAC 7/10/6 - - - Buckinghamshire - Roger Alforde et Elizabeth uxor v John Goodwyn, William Over
−
*STAC 5/A2/34 - A Rr - - Roger Allford et uxor v John Goodwyne, Ralph Burt, Joanne Tylbye, Alice Blunt, Joan Fisher, Mary Godfrey et al
+
*STAC 5/A2/34 - A Rr - Buckinghamshire - Roger Allford et uxor v John Goodwyne, Ralph Burt, Joanne Tylbye, Alice Blunt, Joan Fisher, Mary Godfrey et al
−
*STAC 5/A14/10 - I D - 9 Eliz - - George Alforde et uxor v Joan Tylbie, Alice Blunt et al
+
*STAC 5/A14/10 - I D - 9 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - George Alforde et uxor v Joan Tylbie, Alice Blunt et al
 
*see also [[STAC Alford]]
 
*see also [[STAC Alford]]
 +
 +
''' B '''
  
 
''' Blanchard v Wycam and Long'''
 
''' Blanchard v Wycam and Long'''
Line 19: Line 46:
 
**Answer of James Longe; Answer of Robrte Lewen, clerke;  
 
**Answer of James Longe; Answer of Robrte Lewen, clerke;  
 
**Replication of Thomas Blanchard.
 
**Replication of Thomas Blanchard.
−
*STAC 5/B38/3 - I D - 29 Eliz - - Thomas Blanchard clericus v Robert Lewyn clericus, Martin Paryfye, James Longe
+
*STAC 5/B38/3 - I D - 29 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Blanchard clericus v Robert Lewyn clericus, Martin Paryfye, James Longe
 
*see also [[STAC Blanchard]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Blanchard]]  
  
 
'''Bury v Huntfield or Hore '''
 
'''Bury v Huntfield or Hore '''
 
*TNA Note: Water-Eaton: Affray. STAC 7/10/39  
 
*TNA Note: Water-Eaton: Affray. STAC 7/10/39  
−
*STAC 5/B63/34 - B A Rn - 10 Eliz - - John Bury v Thomas Huntfeild, Christopher Atkinson
+
*STAC 5/B63/34 - B A Rn - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Bury v Thomas Huntfeild, Christopher Atkinson
−
*STAC 5/B15/39 - I D - 10 Eliz - - John Bury v Thomas Hore, William Mere et al
+
*STAC 5/B15/39 - I D - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Bury v Thomas Hore, William Mere et al
−
*STAC 5/B22/27 - D  - 11 Eliz - - John Burye v William Norice, William Meare, [blank] Hore et al
+
*STAC 5/B22/27 - D  - 11 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Burye v William Norice, William Meare, [blank] Hore et al
 
*STAC 7/10/39 - - - Buckinghamshire - John Bury v Thomas Hore, William Mere, Christopher Atkinson
 
*STAC 7/10/39 - - - Buckinghamshire - John Bury v Thomas Hore, William Mere, Christopher Atkinson
 
*see also [[STAC Bury]]
 
*see also [[STAC Bury]]
 +
 +
''' C '''
 +
 +
''' Calveley v Rysley '''
 +
*George Caulveley & Agnes his wife owners of the manor of Chitwod/Chitwood, Bucks & John Chitwod, Willm Robyns, Willm Warre, Thomas Robyns, Willm Kinge & Thomas Herringe, inhabitants of the parish of Chitwod v Willm Rysley. Repair of the Parish Church in Chitwod, formerly part of the late Priory of Chitwod, united with the Monastery of St Mary & St John Baptist of Noteley, Bucks.(dk) STAC 5/C80/18
 +
*STAC 5/C80/18 - B - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Agnes Caulveley, George Caulveley v William Rysley
 +
*STAC 5/C81/34 - A Rn Rr - Buckinghamshire - Agnes Caulverley, George Caulverley et al v William Rysleye et al
 +
*STAC 5/C62/30 - C I D - 11 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Agnes Calvelye, George Calvelye et al v William Ryslye
 +
*STAC 5/C18/27 - I D - 11 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - George Caulvelye et uxor v William Ryslie
 +
*see also [[STAC Calveley]]
  
 
''' Clark v Burlace '''  
 
''' Clark v Burlace '''  
 
*Deposition from Chipping Wickham Bucks (a scrap). STAC 5/C14/37
 
*Deposition from Chipping Wickham Bucks (a scrap). STAC 5/C14/37
−
*STAC 5/C28/9 - I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Clarke v William Borlacye
+
*STAC 5/C28/9 - I D - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlacye
−
*STAC 5/C76/2 - B A C I - 42 Eliz - Richard Clark v William Burlacie, John Smith et al
+
*STAC 5/C76/2 - B A C I - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clark v William Burlacie, John Smith et al
 
*STAC 5/C14/37 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlas, John Smith et al  
 
*STAC 5/C14/37 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlas, John Smith et al  
−
*STAC 5/C25/8 - I D - 43 Eliz - Richard Clerke v William Borlas alias Burlacy, John Smith, Zachary Smyth
+
*STAC 5/C25/8 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clerke v William Borlas alias Burlacy, John Smith, Zachary Smyth
−
*STAC 5/C25/16 - C I D B A - 43 Eliz - Richard Clarke v William Burlace, John Smyth, Zachary Smyth
+
*STAC 5/C25/16 - C I D B A - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Burlace, John Smyth, Zachary Smyth
−
*STAC 5/C26/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Richard Clarke v William Borlace, John Smith, Zachary Smith (C28/9)  
+
*STAC 5/C26/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlace, John Smith, Zachary Smith (C28/9)  
−
*STAC 5/C69/8 - I - 43 Eliz - Richard Clark v William Borlas, John Smith, Zachary Smith
+
*STAC 5/C69/8 - I - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clark v William Borlas, John Smith, Zachary Smith
−
*STAC 5/C71/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Richard Clarke v William Borlace et al
+
*STAC 5/C71/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlace et al
 
*see also [[STAC Clark]]
 
*see also [[STAC Clark]]
  
Line 48: Line 85:
 
*STAC 5/C9/22 -  I D - 14 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - William Cornwall et uxor v William Rysley, John Hare, William Warr et al  
 
*STAC 5/C9/22 -  I D - 14 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - William Cornwall et uxor v William Rysley, John Hare, William Warr et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Cornwall]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Cornwall]]  
−
*
+
 
 
''' D '''  
 
''' D '''  
−
*
+
 
 
''' E '''
 
''' E '''
−
*
+
 
 +
''' F '''
 +
 
 
''' Frankish v Risley '''
 
''' Frankish v Risley '''
 
*Anthony Frankish gent. of Water Stratforde alias West Stratforde, Buckinghamshire. In re Manor of Waterstratford. STAC 5/F3/3  
 
*Anthony Frankish gent. of Water Stratforde alias West Stratforde, Buckinghamshire. In re Manor of Waterstratford. STAC 5/F3/3  
Line 66: Line 105:
 
*STAC 5/F23/39 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edmund Furthe v Henry Penn, John Mylborn et al
 
*STAC 5/F23/39 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edmund Furthe v Henry Penn, John Mylborn et al
 
*see also [[STAC Furthoe]]
 
*see also [[STAC Furthoe]]
 +
 +
''' G '''
  
 
''' Goodwin v Dorrell '''
 
''' Goodwin v Dorrell '''
Line 71: Line 112:
 
*STAC 5/G3/19 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Francis Goodwin v John Dorrell
 
*STAC 5/G3/19 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Francis Goodwin v John Dorrell
 
*see also [[STAC Goodwin]]
 
*see also [[STAC Goodwin]]
 +
 +
''' H '''
  
 
''' Harte v Crosley '''
 
''' Harte v Crosley '''
Line 76: Line 119:
 
*STAC 7/3/1 - - - Buckinghamshire - Edward Harte v Thomas Crosleye, Thomas Skilman, Edward Hadnot, Edmund Este et al
 
*STAC 7/3/1 - - - Buckinghamshire - Edward Harte v Thomas Crosleye, Thomas Skilman, Edward Hadnot, Edmund Este et al
 
*see also [[STAC Harte]]
 
*see also [[STAC Harte]]
−
*
+
 
−
''' IJ '''  
+
''' I J '''
−
*
+
 
 +
''' K '''  
 +
 
 
''' Kydwell v Moore '''
 
''' Kydwell v Moore '''
 
*STAC 5/K1/20 - B A Rn Rr I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Kidwell et uxor, Inhabitants of Cleydon in Com Bucks v Lamentation Chapman, Thomas Tane, William Hughes, Thomas Neale, Peter Neale et al
 
*STAC 5/K1/20 - B A Rn Rr I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Kidwell et uxor, Inhabitants of Cleydon in Com Bucks v Lamentation Chapman, Thomas Tane, William Hughes, Thomas Neale, Peter Neale et al
Line 87: Line 132:
 
*STAC 5/K4/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Kydwell et Johane uxor v William Hewes
 
*STAC 5/K4/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Kydwell et Johane uxor v William Hewes
 
*see also [[STAC Kidwell]]
 
*see also [[STAC Kidwell]]
−
*
+
 
 
''' L '''  
 
''' L '''  
−
*
+
 
 +
''' M '''
 +
 
 
''' Morle v Pen '''
 
''' Morle v Pen '''
 
*Interrogatories. Were you near unto a close called Stratton Close 2nd Jan last past in the evening or night time. Did you saw down any oaks.  
 
*Interrogatories. Were you near unto a close called Stratton Close 2nd Jan last past in the evening or night time. Did you saw down any oaks.  
Line 95: Line 142:
 
*STAC 5/M1/2 - I D - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Morle v John Pen, Thomas Williams alias Tomkyn, John Allen, William Ewer, Thomas Revelyn, Lawrence Jones alias Griffin et al  
 
*STAC 5/M1/2 - I D - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Morle v John Pen, Thomas Williams alias Tomkyn, John Allen, William Ewer, Thomas Revelyn, Lawrence Jones alias Griffin et al  
 
*see also [[STAC Morle]]
 
*see also [[STAC Morle]]
−
*
+
 
 
''' N '''  
 
''' N '''  
−
*
+
 
 +
''' O '''
 +
 
 
''' Osmore v Ongley '''
 
''' Osmore v Ongley '''
 
*STAC 5/B67/8: Payment of tenths to the Exchequer. Bill of Thomas Blanchard, Parson of Quainton, Bucks; Answer of John Purefoy; Answer of Martin Purefoy; Answer of James Longe; Answer of Robrte Lewen, clerke; Replication of Thomas Blanchard.
 
*STAC 5/B67/8: Payment of tenths to the Exchequer. Bill of Thomas Blanchard, Parson of Quainton, Bucks; Answer of John Purefoy; Answer of Martin Purefoy; Answer of James Longe; Answer of Robrte Lewen, clerke; Replication of Thomas Blanchard.
Line 103: Line 152:
 
*STAC 5/O8/22 - I D - 25 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Osmore v Robert Ongley, John Smythe.
 
*STAC 5/O8/22 - I D - 25 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Osmore v Robert Ongley, John Smythe.
 
*see also [[STAC Osmore]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Osmore]]  
−
*
+
 
 +
''' P '''
 +
 
 
''' Packington v Gwyne '''
 
''' Packington v Gwyne '''
 
*TNA Note: Ellesborough: Forcible dispute as to land. STAC 7/14/17  
 
*TNA Note: Ellesborough: Forcible dispute as to land. STAC 7/14/17  
−
*STAC 5/P59/31 - B A - - Sir Thomas Packyngham v Rice Gwynne, Thomas Butler et al  
+
*STAC 5/P59/31 - B A - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Packyngham v Rice Gwynne, Thomas Butler et al  
 
*STAC 7/14/17 - - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Packyngton v John Gregory, Richard Gwyn, John Johnson et al
 
*STAC 7/14/17 - - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Packyngton v John Gregory, Richard Gwyn, John Johnson et al
−
*STAC 7/27/12 - - - Sir Thomas Packington v Rice Gwyne et al
+
*STAC 7/27/12 - - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Packington v Rice Gwyne et al
 
*see also [[STAC Packington]]
 
*see also [[STAC Packington]]
−
*
+
 
 
''' Q '''  
 
''' Q '''  
−
*
+
 
 
''' R '''  
 
''' R '''  
−
*
+
 
 +
''' S '''
 +
 
 
''' Smith v Windsor '''  
 
''' Smith v Windsor '''  
 
*TNA Note: Ankerwyke: Forcible ouster from the monastery buildings. STAC 7/15/3  
 
*TNA Note: Ankerwyke: Forcible ouster from the monastery buildings. STAC 7/15/3  
−
*STAC 5/S25/17 - B - - Sir Thomas Smyth v Thomas Wyndesor, Edmund Roof et al
+
*STAC 5/S25/17 - B - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Smyth v Thomas Wyndesor, Edmund Roof et al
 
*STAC 7/15/3 - - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Smythe v Thomas Wyndesor, Edmund Wyndesor, William Fyssher, William Langleye, Robert Lorchynne et al
 
*STAC 7/15/3 - - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Smythe v Thomas Wyndesor, Edmund Wyndesor, William Fyssher, William Langleye, Robert Lorchynne et al
 
*see also [[STAC Smith, S-Z]]
 
*see also [[STAC Smith, S-Z]]
 +
 +
''' T '''
  
 
''' Tyrrell v Harcourt '''
 
''' Tyrrell v Harcourt '''
 
*TNA Note: Assault between Thornton and Lillingstone. STAC 7/7/25  
 
*TNA Note: Assault between Thornton and Lillingstone. STAC 7/7/25  
−
*STAC 5/T34/3 - B A Rn - 33 Eliz - Edward Tirrell v Michael Harcourt
+
*STAC 5/T34/3 - B A Rn - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tirrell v Michael Harcourt
−
*STAC 5/T10/16 - B A Rn C I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Tirrell v Michael Harcourte, William Becke et al
+
*STAC 5/T10/16 - B A Rn C I D - 34 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tirrell v Michael Harcourte, William Becke et al
−
*STAC 5/T25/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt
+
*STAC 5/T25/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt
−
*STAC 5/T23/2 - I D - 33 Eliz - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt, William Beck et al
+
*STAC 5/T23/2 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt, William Beck et al
−
*STAC 5/T19/7 - I D - 38 Eliz - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt et al
+
*STAC 5/T19/7 - I D - 38 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt et al
 
*STAC 7/7/25 - - - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt, Anthony Greenway, Walter Harcourte, Thomas Beden et al
 
*STAC 7/7/25 - - - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt, Anthony Greenway, Walter Harcourte, Thomas Beden et al
−
*STAC 5/T28/12 - I D - 33 Eliz - Edward Tirrell v William Beck, John Chewe et al
+
*STAC 5/T28/12 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tirrell v William Beck, John Chewe et al
 
*see also [[STAC Tyrrell]]
 
*see also [[STAC Tyrrell]]
  
Line 135: Line 190:
 
*TNA Note: Sherrington: Unlawful entries, slander, conspiracy. STAC 7/6/9  
 
*TNA Note: Sherrington: Unlawful entries, slander, conspiracy. STAC 7/6/9  
 
*TNA Note: Sherrington: Forgery of title-deeds to the manor of Linford, and slander. STAC 7/6/10  
 
*TNA Note: Sherrington: Forgery of title-deeds to the manor of Linford, and slander. STAC 7/6/10  
−
*STAC 5/T33/21 - I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Tyringham v Edward Still et al
+
*STAC 5/T33/21 - I D - 32 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Edward Still et al
−
*STAC 5/T12/11 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Tyrnygham v Jane Ardis et al
+
*STAC 5/T12/11 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyrnygham v Jane Ardis et al
−
*STAC 5/T10/31 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Tyrringham v Richard Ardis et al
+
*STAC 5/T10/31 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyrringham v Richard Ardis et al
−
*STAC 5/T4/7 - A - 33 Eliz - Thomas Terringham v Jane Ardis
+
*STAC 5/T4/7 - A - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Terringham v Jane Ardis
−
*STAC 5/T4/34 - I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Tyringham v Thomas Ardis, Katherine Pemberton
+
*STAC 5/T4/34 - I D - 32 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Thomas Ardis, Katherine Pemberton
 
*STAC 7/6/9 - - - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Richard Ardis, Edward Ardis
 
*STAC 7/6/9 - - - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Richard Ardis, Edward Ardis
 
*STAC 7/6/10 - - - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Richard Ardis et Jane uxor, Edward Still clericus, Thomas Ardis et al
 
*STAC 7/6/10 - - - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Richard Ardis et Jane uxor, Edward Still clericus, Thomas Ardis et al
 
*see also [[STAC Tyrringham]]  
 
*see also [[STAC Tyrringham]]  
−
*
+
 
 
''' UV '''
 
''' UV '''
−
*
+
 
 +
''' W '''
 +
 
 
''' Ward v Pinge '''
 
''' Ward v Pinge '''
 
*TNA Note: Pightlesthorne: Felling timber. STAC 7/16/11  
 
*TNA Note: Pightlesthorne: Felling timber. STAC 7/16/11  
Line 154: Line 211:
 
*Arthur Wright of the parish of Ivar (Iver) co Bucks gent. Against some enclosers in that parish. STAC 5/W3/8
 
*Arthur Wright of the parish of Ivar (Iver) co Bucks gent. Against some enclosers in that parish. STAC 5/W3/8
 
*STAC 5/W3/8 - B - Hil 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Leonard Bratridge, John King, Henry Monke, Henry Martin, John Martin et al  
 
*STAC 5/W3/8 - B - Hil 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Leonard Bratridge, John King, Henry Monke, Henry Martin, John Martin et al  
−
*STAC 5/W40/7 - I D - 44 Eliz - Arthur Wright v Henry Munck, John King et al
+
*STAC 5/W40/7 - I D - 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Munck, John King et al
−
*STAC 5/W41/10 - I D - 41 Eliz - Arthur Wright v Leonard Britridge et al
+
*STAC 5/W41/10 - I D - 41 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Leonard Britridge et al
−
*STAC 5/W18/32 - I D C - 43 Eliz - Arthur Wright v Henry Monke, John Kinge et al
+
*STAC 5/W18/32 - I D C - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Monke, John Kinge et al
−
*STAC 5/W17/32 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Arthur Wright v Henry Monke, John Kinge et al
+
*STAC 5/W17/32 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Monke, John Kinge et al
−
*STAC 5/W81/7 - I D - 45 Eliz - Arthur Wright v Leonard Brightridge et al
+
*STAC 5/W81/7 - I D - 45 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Leonard Brightridge et al
−
*STAC 5/W74/21 - I D - 45 Eliz - Arthur Wright v Henry Munck, Michael Bedell et al
+
*STAC 5/W74/21 - I D - 45 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Munck, Michael Bedell et al
−
*STAC 5/W54/13 - A - 44 Eliz - Arthur Wright v Henry Monk, John King et al
+
*STAC 5/W54/13 - A - 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Monk, John King et al
 
*see also [[STAC Wright]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wright]]
  
Line 173: Line 230:
 
*Wendover, Bucks. [http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~fnicholson/humfrey2.htm see notes] STAC 5/W78/1
 
*Wendover, Bucks. [http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~fnicholson/humfrey2.htm see notes] STAC 5/W78/1
 
*STAC 5/W78/1 - B A Rn - Buckinghamshire - 15 Eliz - Henry Wyer v Robert Okebancke, Richard Woodehouse et al
 
*STAC 5/W78/1 - B A Rn - Buckinghamshire - 15 Eliz - Henry Wyer v Robert Okebancke, Richard Woodehouse et al
−
*STAC 7/31/30 - - - Henry Weier v Edmund (?) Okebanck  
+
*STAC 7/31/30 - - - Buckinghamshire - Henry Weier v Edmund (?) Okebanck  
−
*STAC 5/F29/34 - B A - 15 Eliz - Henry Free v Edmund Skebank,
+
*STAC 5/F29/34 - B A - 15 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Henry Free v Edmund Skebank,
−
*STAC 5/F16/19 - I D - 15 Eliz - Henry Free v Edmund Okebanke
+
*STAC 5/F16/19 - I D - 15 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Henry Free v Edmund Okebanke
 
*see also [[STAC Wyer]] and [[STAC Free]]
 
*see also [[STAC Wyer]] and [[STAC Free]]
−
*
+
 
 
''' XYZ '''  
 
''' XYZ '''  
−
*
+
 
 
''' Almoner '''
 
''' Almoner '''
  
 
''' Almoner v Gill '''
 
''' Almoner v Gill '''
 
*In re Wm Brookes deceased, tenament in Castle Street, Buckingham - STAC 5/A1/26
 
*In re Wm Brookes deceased, tenament in Castle Street, Buckingham - STAC 5/A1/26
−
*STAC 5/A54/18 - B - 2 Eliz - Almoner v John Gylle, Richard Heddon
+
*STAC 5/A54/18 - B - 2 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v John Gylle, Richard Heddon
 
*STAC 5/A1/26 - I D - 22 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v William Gill, Robert Seare.   
 
*STAC 5/A1/26 - I D - 22 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v William Gill, Robert Seare.   
 
*STAC 5/A36/16 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Alis Gill, Robert Geare
 
*STAC 5/A36/16 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Alis Gill, Robert Geare
Line 195: Line 252:
 
*STAC 5/A2/1 - B - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Robert Raunce
 
*STAC 5/A2/1 - B - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Robert Raunce
 
*STAC 5/A7/12 - B A - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v John Raunce, Robert Raunce
 
*STAC 5/A7/12 - B A - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v John Raunce, Robert Raunce
−
*STAC 5/A1/4 - I D - 33 Eliz - Almoner v Robert Raunce, John Raunce
+
*STAC 5/A1/4 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Robert Raunce, John Raunce
 
*see also [[STAC Raunce]]
 
*see also [[STAC Raunce]]

Revision as of 17:47, 7 November 2016

Buckinghamshire

  • Alford v Goodwin
  • Blanchard v Wycam and Long
  • Bury v Huntfield or Hore
  • Calveley v Rysley
  • Clark v Burlace
  • Cornwall v Risley
  • Frankish v Risley
  • Furthoe v Pen
  • Goodwin v Dorrell
  • Harte v Crosley
  • Kydwell v Moore
  • Morle v Pen
  • Osmore v Ongley
  • Packington v Gwyne
  • Smith v Windsor
  • Tyrrell v Harcourt
  • Tyrringham v Ardis
  • Ward v Pinge
  • Wright v Bratridge
  • Wycombe Corporation v Raunce
  • Wyer v Okebank
  • Almoner v Gill - Almoner v Raunce

NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.

A

Alford v Goodwin

  • TNA Note: Hitcham and Woburn: Boundaries of the manors. STAC 7/10/6
  • STAC 5/A13/25 - B A - 9 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Roger Alford v John Goodwin, John Heywood et al
  • STAC 5/A16/34 - I D - 15 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Roger Alford et uxor v John Goodwyn et al
  • STAC 7/10/6 - - - Buckinghamshire - Roger Alforde et Elizabeth uxor v John Goodwyn, William Over
  • STAC 5/A2/34 - A Rr - Buckinghamshire - Roger Allford et uxor v John Goodwyne, Ralph Burt, Joanne Tylbye, Alice Blunt, Joan Fisher, Mary Godfrey et al
  • STAC 5/A14/10 - I D - 9 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - George Alforde et uxor v Joan Tylbie, Alice Blunt et al
  • see also STAC Alford

B

Blanchard v Wycam and Long

  • Payment of tenths to the Exchequer. STAC 5/B67/8
  • STAC 5/B67/8 - B A Rn I D - 26 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Blanchard v William Wycam, James Longe
    • Bill of Thomas Blanchard, Parson of Quainton, Bucks;
    • Answer of John Purefoy; Answer of Martin Purefoy;
    • Answer of James Longe; Answer of Robrte Lewen, clerke;
    • Replication of Thomas Blanchard.
  • STAC 5/B38/3 - I D - 29 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Blanchard clericus v Robert Lewyn clericus, Martin Paryfye, James Longe
  • see also STAC Blanchard

Bury v Huntfield or Hore

  • TNA Note: Water-Eaton: Affray. STAC 7/10/39
  • STAC 5/B63/34 - B A Rn - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Bury v Thomas Huntfeild, Christopher Atkinson
  • STAC 5/B15/39 - I D - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Bury v Thomas Hore, William Mere et al
  • STAC 5/B22/27 - D - 11 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Burye v William Norice, William Meare, [blank] Hore et al
  • STAC 7/10/39 - - - Buckinghamshire - John Bury v Thomas Hore, William Mere, Christopher Atkinson
  • see also STAC Bury

C

Calveley v Rysley

  • George Caulveley & Agnes his wife owners of the manor of Chitwod/Chitwood, Bucks & John Chitwod, Willm Robyns, Willm Warre, Thomas Robyns, Willm Kinge & Thomas Herringe, inhabitants of the parish of Chitwod v Willm Rysley. Repair of the Parish Church in Chitwod, formerly part of the late Priory of Chitwod, united with the Monastery of St Mary & St John Baptist of Noteley, Bucks.(dk) STAC 5/C80/18
  • STAC 5/C80/18 - B - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Agnes Caulveley, George Caulveley v William Rysley
  • STAC 5/C81/34 - A Rn Rr - Buckinghamshire - Agnes Caulverley, George Caulverley et al v William Rysleye et al
  • STAC 5/C62/30 - C I D - 11 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Agnes Calvelye, George Calvelye et al v William Ryslye
  • STAC 5/C18/27 - I D - 11 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - George Caulvelye et uxor v William Ryslie
  • see also STAC Calveley

Clark v Burlace

  • Deposition from Chipping Wickham Bucks (a scrap). STAC 5/C14/37
  • STAC 5/C28/9 - I D - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlacye
  • STAC 5/C76/2 - B A C I - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clark v William Burlacie, John Smith et al
  • STAC 5/C14/37 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlas, John Smith et al
  • STAC 5/C25/8 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clerke v William Borlas alias Burlacy, John Smith, Zachary Smyth
  • STAC 5/C25/16 - C I D B A - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Burlace, John Smyth, Zachary Smyth
  • STAC 5/C26/25 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlace, John Smith, Zachary Smith (C28/9)
  • STAC 5/C69/8 - I - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clark v William Borlas, John Smith, Zachary Smith
  • STAC 5/C71/27 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Richard Clarke v William Borlace et al
  • see also STAC Clark

Cornwall v Risley

  • William Cornwall of Water Stratford in the co of Buckingham, esquire. STAC 5/C1/35
  • STAC 5/C1/35 - B - - Buckinghamshire - William Cornwall et Mary uxor v William Riselye et uxor, John Hare, William Warr et uxor, John Walcott, Robert Pomslowe et al
  • STAC 5/C78/26 - A - Buckinghamshire - Mary Cornwall, William Cornwall v William Risley, John Hare et al
  • STAC 5/C9/22 - I D - 14 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - William Cornwall et uxor v William Rysley, John Hare, William Warr et al
  • see also STAC Cornwall

D

E

F

Frankish v Risley

  • Anthony Frankish gent. of Water Stratforde alias West Stratforde, Buckinghamshire. In re Manor of Waterstratford. STAC 5/F3/3
  • STAC 5/F3/3 - B A Rn - Trin 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Anthony Frankish v Paul Ryselye, James Robins, Mychell Hayle, Christopher Andrews et al.
  • STAC 5/F20/32 - I D - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Anthony Franckish v Paul Risley, Thomas Miller
  • STAC 5/F4/38 - I D C - 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Anthony Frankishe v Paul Risley, James Robins, William Warre et al
  • see also STAC Frankish

Furthoe v Pen

  • Edward Furtho of Furtho, Northamptonshire. Land in Stoneystratford Wolverton and Calverton, Buckinghamshire. STAC 5/F3/10
  • STAC 5/F3/10 - B A - Trin 41 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Furtho v Henry Pen, Thomas Pen, William Nycklese, John Mylbourne, Richard Saunders et al.
  • STAC 5/F5/5 - I D - 41 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Furthoe v Henry Pen, Thomas Pen, Christopher Carne, John Mylbourne et al
  • STAC 5/F23/39 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edmund Furthe v Henry Penn, John Mylborn et al
  • see also STAC Furthoe

G

Goodwin v Dorrell

  • Frauncis Goodwin esquire of Woborcet in Buckinghamshire . . . Justice of Peace . . . displaced John Dorrell of the high constableship of Disborough hundred for corruption - STAC 5/G3/19
  • STAC 5/G3/19 - B - Trin 39 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Francis Goodwin v John Dorrell
  • see also STAC Goodwin

H

Harte v Crosley

  • STAC 5/H20/14 - I D - 22 Eliz - Edward Harte v Luke Wyat, Thomas Crosley et al
  • STAC 7/3/1 - - - Buckinghamshire - Edward Harte v Thomas Crosleye, Thomas Skilman, Edward Hadnot, Edmund Este et al
  • see also STAC Harte

I J

K

Kydwell v Moore

  • STAC 5/K1/20 - B A Rn Rr I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Kidwell et uxor, Inhabitants of Cleydon in Com Bucks v Lamentation Chapman, Thomas Tane, William Hughes, Thomas Neale, Peter Neale et al
  • STAC 5/K15/15 - Rn - - Buckinghamshire - Joan Kydwell, Thomas Kydwell v Davye More
  • STAC 5/K14/39 - Rn - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Joan Kydwell, Thomas Kydwell v Lamentation Chapman, Robert Webbe et al
  • STAC 5/K6/15 - I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Kydwell et uxor v Davey Moore
  • STAC 5/K6/22 - I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Kydwell et uxor v Lamentation Chapman, George Hews et al
  • STAC 5/K4/38 - I D - 24 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Kydwell et Johane uxor v William Hewes
  • see also STAC Kidwell

L

M

Morle v Pen

  • Interrogatories. Were you near unto a close called Stratton Close 2nd Jan last past in the evening or night time. Did you saw down any oaks.
  • Depositions of John Allen of Kings Sutton in the County of Northampton and of John Pen of Pen (Penn) co Bucks gent. STAC 5/M1/2
  • STAC 5/M1/2 - I D - 42 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Morle v John Pen, Thomas Williams alias Tomkyn, John Allen, William Ewer, Thomas Revelyn, Lawrence Jones alias Griffin et al
  • see also STAC Morle

N

O

Osmore v Ongley

  • STAC 5/B67/8: Payment of tenths to the Exchequer. Bill of Thomas Blanchard, Parson of Quainton, Bucks; Answer of John Purefoy; Answer of Martin Purefoy; Answer of James Longe; Answer of Robrte Lewen, clerke; Replication of Thomas Blanchard.
  • NOTE: In this bundle are also the following, which would appear to relate to STAC 5/O8/22: Interrogatories to be administered to Robt Ongley on the part of John Osmore, complt; Interrogatories to be administered to John Smith on the part of John Osmore, complt.
  • STAC 5/O8/22 - I D - 25 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - John Osmore v Robert Ongley, John Smythe.
  • see also STAC Osmore

P

Packington v Gwyne

  • TNA Note: Ellesborough: Forcible dispute as to land. STAC 7/14/17
  • STAC 5/P59/31 - B A - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Packyngham v Rice Gwynne, Thomas Butler et al
  • STAC 7/14/17 - - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Packyngton v John Gregory, Richard Gwyn, John Johnson et al
  • STAC 7/27/12 - - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Packington v Rice Gwyne et al
  • see also STAC Packington

Q

R

S

Smith v Windsor

  • TNA Note: Ankerwyke: Forcible ouster from the monastery buildings. STAC 7/15/3
  • STAC 5/S25/17 - B - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Smyth v Thomas Wyndesor, Edmund Roof et al
  • STAC 7/15/3 - - - Buckinghamshire - Sir Thomas Smythe v Thomas Wyndesor, Edmund Wyndesor, William Fyssher, William Langleye, Robert Lorchynne et al
  • see also STAC Smith, S-Z

T

Tyrrell v Harcourt

  • TNA Note: Assault between Thornton and Lillingstone. STAC 7/7/25
  • STAC 5/T34/3 - B A Rn - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tirrell v Michael Harcourt
  • STAC 5/T10/16 - B A Rn C I D - 34 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tirrell v Michael Harcourte, William Becke et al
  • STAC 5/T25/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt
  • STAC 5/T23/2 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt, William Beck et al
  • STAC 5/T19/7 - I D - 38 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt et al
  • STAC 7/7/25 - - - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tyrrell v Michael Harcourt, Anthony Greenway, Walter Harcourte, Thomas Beden et al
  • STAC 5/T28/12 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Edward Tirrell v William Beck, John Chewe et al
  • see also STAC Tyrrell

Tyrringham v Ardis

  • TNA Note: Sherrington: Unlawful entries, slander, conspiracy. STAC 7/6/9
  • TNA Note: Sherrington: Forgery of title-deeds to the manor of Linford, and slander. STAC 7/6/10
  • STAC 5/T33/21 - I D - 32 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Edward Still et al
  • STAC 5/T12/11 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyrnygham v Jane Ardis et al
  • STAC 5/T10/31 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyrringham v Richard Ardis et al
  • STAC 5/T4/7 - A - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Terringham v Jane Ardis
  • STAC 5/T4/34 - I D - 32 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Thomas Ardis, Katherine Pemberton
  • STAC 7/6/9 - - - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Richard Ardis, Edward Ardis
  • STAC 7/6/10 - - - Buckinghamshire - Thomas Tyringham v Richard Ardis et Jane uxor, Edward Still clericus, Thomas Ardis et al
  • see also STAC Tyrringham

UV

W

Ward v Pinge

  • TNA Note: Pightlesthorne: Felling timber. STAC 7/16/11
  • STAC 7/16/11 - - - Buckinghamshire - Richard Warde v Thomas Pinge, John Tatnell, et al
  • see also STAC Ward

Wright v Bratridge

  • Arthur Wright of the parish of Ivar (Iver) co Bucks gent. Against some enclosers in that parish. STAC 5/W3/8
  • STAC 5/W3/8 - B - Hil 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Leonard Bratridge, John King, Henry Monke, Henry Martin, John Martin et al
  • STAC 5/W40/7 - I D - 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Munck, John King et al
  • STAC 5/W41/10 - I D - 41 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Leonard Britridge et al
  • STAC 5/W18/32 - I D C - 43 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Monke, John Kinge et al
  • STAC 5/W17/32 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Monke, John Kinge et al
  • STAC 5/W81/7 - I D - 45 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Leonard Brightridge et al
  • STAC 5/W74/21 - I D - 45 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Munck, Michael Bedell et al
  • STAC 5/W54/13 - A - 44 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Arthur Wright v Henry Monk, John King et al
  • see also STAC Wright

Wycombe Corporation v Raunce

  • STAC 5/W53/18 - B - 39 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Mayor Bailiff and Burgesses of Wycomb v Robert Raunce, Thomas Kempe et al
  • STAC 5/W61/4 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Mayor Bailiffs, Burgesses of Wycombe v Robert Wright, Alice Funge alias Cock
  • STAC 5/W35/34 - I D - 39 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Mayor Bailiffs Burgesses of Wicombe v Thomas Kempe et al
  • STAC 5/W21/32 - I D - 39 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Mayor Baylifs and Burgesses of Wicombe, v Robert Raunce, Robert Wrighte, Alice Funge
  • see also STAC Wycombe

Wyer v Okebank

  • Wendover, Bucks. see notes STAC 5/W78/1
  • STAC 5/W78/1 - B A Rn - Buckinghamshire - 15 Eliz - Henry Wyer v Robert Okebancke, Richard Woodehouse et al
  • STAC 7/31/30 - - - Buckinghamshire - Henry Weier v Edmund (?) Okebanck
  • STAC 5/F29/34 - B A - 15 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Henry Free v Edmund Skebank,
  • STAC 5/F16/19 - I D - 15 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Henry Free v Edmund Okebanke
  • see also STAC Wyer and STAC Free

XYZ

Almoner

Almoner v Gill

  • In re Wm Brookes deceased, tenament in Castle Street, Buckingham - STAC 5/A1/26
  • STAC 5/A54/18 - B - 2 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v John Gylle, Richard Heddon
  • STAC 5/A1/26 - I D - 22 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v William Gill, Robert Seare.
  • STAC 5/A36/16 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Alis Gill, Robert Geare
  • STAC 5/A20/3 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Alice Gylle, Robert Seare
  • see also STAC Gill

Almoner v Raunce

  • Chipping wicombe [Chepping Wycombe] co Bucks. STAC 5/A7/12
  • John Raunce late of Lowater in the parish of Chyppinge Wycombe Buckinghamshire drowned himself in the River Brockebrydge, felo de se. STAC 5/A2/1
  • STAC 5/A2/1 - B - 10 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Robert Raunce
  • STAC 5/A7/12 - B A - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v John Raunce, Robert Raunce
  • STAC 5/A1/4 - I D - 33 Eliz - Buckinghamshire - Almoner v Robert Raunce, John Raunce
  • see also STAC Raunce
Retrieved from "https://waalt.uh.edu/index.php?title=STAC_co_Buckingham&oldid=60703"