Difference between revisions of "STAC co Berkshire"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' Berkshire ''' | ''' Berkshire ''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed. ''' | ||
''' A ''' | ''' A ''' | ||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
*John Arnold of Didcot Berkshire yeoman and Johan his wife, in re copyhold land in Didcot. STAC 5/A2/8 | *John Arnold of Didcot Berkshire yeoman and Johan his wife, in re copyhold land in Didcot. STAC 5/A2/8 | ||
*STAC 5/A2/8 - B A - Trin 38 Eliz - Berkshire - John Arnold et Johan uxor v Edward Dew, John Dew, Robert Sawyer, William Capell | *STAC 5/A2/8 - B A - Trin 38 Eliz - Berkshire - John Arnold et Johan uxor v Edward Dew, John Dew, Robert Sawyer, William Capell | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Arnold]] | + | *see also [[STAC Arnold]] |
| + | |||
| + | ''' Almoner''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Almoner v Stevens ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A6/17 - B - 38 Eliz - Berkshire - Almoner v William Stevens | ||
| + | *That whereas on Edmonde Bullock late of Eaton in the parishe of Appleforde in co Barf. labourer 14 Jan 37 Eliz thatching a certain stack or rick of beanes and pease one of the staves of the ladder. STAC 5/A6/17 | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Stephens]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Attorney General ‘'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' AG v Lambold ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A6/23 - I D - 40 Eliz - Berkshire - AG v Edward Lambold et al | ||
| + | *Imp: whether had youe at any tyme any conference or speche with Sir Thomas Sherley thelder knight touchinge the buyinge of certen wood and trees growing and beinge upon a fearme Late in he occupation of Thomas Blythe in the parishe of Inglefeilde co Berkshire, yea or no. Item was not the writtinge that was made for the saide Bargayn made unto the said John Conway only or else unto youe, yea or no. STAC 5/A6/23 | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Lambold]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' AG v Purcell ''' | ||
| + | *Events in Reading Gaol. STAC 5/A7/2 | ||
| + | *STAC 5/A7/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Berkshire - AG v Humphrey Purcell | ||
| + | *see also [[STAC Purcell]] | ||
''' B ''' | ''' B ''' | ||
| Line 14: | Line 35: | ||
*STAC 5/B98/31 - I D - 19 Eliz - Berkshire - Thomas Bagnall v Henry Edes, Edward Brocker | *STAC 5/B98/31 - I D - 19 Eliz - Berkshire - Thomas Bagnall v Henry Edes, Edward Brocker | ||
*STAC 7/1/37 - - - Berkshire - Thomas Bagnale v Henry Edes, Edward Brooker et al | *STAC 7/1/37 - - - Berkshire - Thomas Bagnale v Henry Edes, Edward Brooker et al | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Bagnall]] | + | *see also [[STAC Bagnall]] |
''' C ''' | ''' C ''' | ||
| Line 24: | Line 45: | ||
*STAC 5/D11/31 - B A Rn Rr - 17 Eliz - Berkshire - William Darrell v William Weldon, Edward Avelyn/Avenell/Avelen, Edward Foster, Edmunde Butterfeld & James Cater | *STAC 5/D11/31 - B A Rn Rr - 17 Eliz - Berkshire - William Darrell v William Weldon, Edward Avelyn/Avenell/Avelen, Edward Foster, Edmunde Butterfeld & James Cater | ||
*STAC 5/D5/7 - I D - 17 Eliz - Berkshire - William Darell v William Weldon, Edward Avelyn, Edward Foster et al | *STAC 5/D5/7 - I D - 17 Eliz - Berkshire - William Darell v William Weldon, Edward Avelyn, Edward Foster et al | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Darrell]] | + | *see also [[STAC Darrell]] |
''' Doyley v Smith ''' | ''' Doyley v Smith ''' | ||
| Line 31: | Line 52: | ||
*STAC 5/D16/29 - B - 33 Eliz - Berkshire - Henry Doyley, James Browne v John Smith et uxor, Thomas Cottrel et al | *STAC 5/D16/29 - B - 33 Eliz - Berkshire - Henry Doyley, James Browne v John Smith et uxor, Thomas Cottrel et al | ||
*STAC 7/11/20 - - - Berkshire - Henry Doylye, James Browne v William Stampe et al | *STAC 7/11/20 - - - Berkshire - Henry Doylye, James Browne v William Stampe et al | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Doyley]] | + | *see also [[STAC Doyley]] |
''' E ''' | ''' E ''' | ||
| Line 40: | Line 61: | ||
*Thomas Fetyplace of Pusey in the co of Berk., Esquire . . free warren of coneys called Pusey Warren. STAC 5/F11/20 | *Thomas Fetyplace of Pusey in the co of Berk., Esquire . . free warren of coneys called Pusey Warren. STAC 5/F11/20 | ||
*STAC 5/F11/20 - B - 43 Eliz - Berkshire - Thomas Fetyplace v John Church et al | *STAC 5/F11/20 - B - 43 Eliz - Berkshire - Thomas Fetyplace v John Church et al | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Fettyplace]] | + | *see also [[STAC Fettyplace]] |
''' Figgins v Edwards ''' | ''' Figgins v Edwards ''' | ||
| Line 46: | Line 67: | ||
*STAC 5/F15/16 - I D - 28 Eliz - Berkshire - Roger Figgins v William Edmunds, Christopher Cleyton, Martin Honiwell | *STAC 5/F15/16 - I D - 28 Eliz - Berkshire - Roger Figgins v William Edmunds, Christopher Cleyton, Martin Honiwell | ||
*STAC 5/F2/4 - B A - 28 Eliz - Berkshire - Roger Figgins v William Edwards, Martin Honywell, Christopher Clayton, John Spencer et al. | *STAC 5/F2/4 - B A - 28 Eliz - Berkshire - Roger Figgins v William Edwards, Martin Honywell, Christopher Clayton, John Spencer et al. | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Figgins]] | + | *see also [[STAC Figgins]] |
''' Fytche v Moore ''' | ''' Fytche v Moore ''' | ||
*STAC 5/F22/16 - B A - 35 Eliz - Berkshire - John Fytche v Thomas Moore, Arthur Jenyver | *STAC 5/F22/16 - B A - 35 Eliz - Berkshire - John Fytche v Thomas Moore, Arthur Jenyver | ||
*STAC 5/F13/12 - I D - 35 Eliz - - John Fytche v Richard Blake, John Handye et al | *STAC 5/F13/12 - I D - 35 Eliz - - John Fytche v Richard Blake, John Handye et al | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Fitch]] | + | *see also [[STAC Fitch]] |
''' G ''' | ''' G ''' | ||
* | * | ||
''' H ''' | ''' H ''' | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Hore]] - see [[STAC Hyde]] | + | *see also [[STAC Hore]] - *see also [[STAC Hyde]] |
''' IJ ''' | ''' IJ ''' | ||
* | * | ||
| Line 62: | Line 83: | ||
* | * | ||
''' L ''' | ''' L ''' | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Loveden]] | + | *see also [[STAC Loveden]] |
''' M ''' | ''' M ''' | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Marbury]] | + | *see also [[STAC Marbury]] |
''' N ''' | ''' N ''' | ||
| − | * see [[STAC Newberry]] | + | * *see also [[STAC Newberry]] |
''' O ''' | ''' O ''' | ||
* | * | ||
| Line 74: | Line 95: | ||
* | * | ||
''' R ''' | ''' R ''' | ||
| − | * see [[STAC Rich]] | + | * *see also [[STAC Rich]] |
''' S ''' | ''' S ''' | ||
| − | * see [[STAC Style]] | + | * *see also [[STAC Style]] |
''' T ''' | ''' T ''' | ||
* | * | ||
| Line 82: | Line 103: | ||
* | * | ||
''' W ''' | ''' W ''' | ||
| − | *see [[STAC Ward]] | + | *see also [[STAC Ward]] |
''' X ''' | ''' X ''' | ||
* | * | ||
Revision as of 15:48, 12 September 2015
Berkshire
NOTA BENE - These case names are approximate and very likely to be changed.
A
Arnold v Dew
- John Arnold of Didcot Berkshire yeoman and Johan his wife, in re copyhold land in Didcot. STAC 5/A2/8
- STAC 5/A2/8 - B A - Trin 38 Eliz - Berkshire - John Arnold et Johan uxor v Edward Dew, John Dew, Robert Sawyer, William Capell
- see also STAC Arnold
Almoner
Almoner v Stevens
- STAC 5/A6/17 - B - 38 Eliz - Berkshire - Almoner v William Stevens
- That whereas on Edmonde Bullock late of Eaton in the parishe of Appleforde in co Barf. labourer 14 Jan 37 Eliz thatching a certain stack or rick of beanes and pease one of the staves of the ladder. STAC 5/A6/17
- see also STAC Stephens
' Attorney General ‘
AG v Lambold
- STAC 5/A6/23 - I D - 40 Eliz - Berkshire - AG v Edward Lambold et al
- Imp: whether had youe at any tyme any conference or speche with Sir Thomas Sherley thelder knight touchinge the buyinge of certen wood and trees growing and beinge upon a fearme Late in he occupation of Thomas Blythe in the parishe of Inglefeilde co Berkshire, yea or no. Item was not the writtinge that was made for the saide Bargayn made unto the said John Conway only or else unto youe, yea or no. STAC 5/A6/23
- see also STAC Lambold
AG v Purcell
- Events in Reading Gaol. STAC 5/A7/2
- STAC 5/A7/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Berkshire - AG v Humphrey Purcell
- see also STAC Purcell
B
Bagnall v Edes
- TNA Note: Forgery of a bond in deceased's name. Edward Brooker, vicar of Hungerford. STAC 7/1/37
- STAC 5/B98/31 - I D - 19 Eliz - Berkshire - Thomas Bagnall v Henry Edes, Edward Brocker
- STAC 7/1/37 - - - Berkshire - Thomas Bagnale v Henry Edes, Edward Brooker et al
- see also STAC Bagnall
C
D
Darrel v Weldon
- Maidenhead, Berks. Assault while staying at the Greyhound in Maidenhead. William Darrell of Lytlecote in Wiltshire. Edmunde Butterfeld & James Cater constables of Maidenhead at the time). STAC 5/D11/31
- STAC 5/D11/31 - B A Rn Rr - 17 Eliz - Berkshire - William Darrell v William Weldon, Edward Avelyn/Avenell/Avelen, Edward Foster, Edmunde Butterfeld & James Cater
- STAC 5/D5/7 - I D - 17 Eliz - Berkshire - William Darell v William Weldon, Edward Avelyn, Edward Foster et al
- see also STAC Darrell
Doyley v Smith
- TNA Note: Wallingford: Maintenance of quarrels, and corrupt and illegal practices concerning the borough. STAC 7/11/20
- STAC 10/2/2 - Rn - - - Henry Doylie v John Smith Sr, John Smith Jr, Christopher Stevens and Gilbert Skinner.
- STAC 5/D16/29 - B - 33 Eliz - Berkshire - Henry Doyley, James Browne v John Smith et uxor, Thomas Cottrel et al
- STAC 7/11/20 - - - Berkshire - Henry Doylye, James Browne v William Stampe et al
- see also STAC Doyley
E
F
Fettyplace v Church
- Thomas Fetyplace of Pusey in the co of Berk., Esquire . . free warren of coneys called Pusey Warren. STAC 5/F11/20
- STAC 5/F11/20 - B - 43 Eliz - Berkshire - Thomas Fetyplace v John Church et al
- see also STAC Fettyplace
Figgins v Edwards
- Roger Figgins of Kintbury (? Knitbury) Berkshire dyer. STAC 5/F2/4
- STAC 5/F15/16 - I D - 28 Eliz - Berkshire - Roger Figgins v William Edmunds, Christopher Cleyton, Martin Honiwell
- STAC 5/F2/4 - B A - 28 Eliz - Berkshire - Roger Figgins v William Edwards, Martin Honywell, Christopher Clayton, John Spencer et al.
- see also STAC Figgins
Fytche v Moore
- STAC 5/F22/16 - B A - 35 Eliz - Berkshire - John Fytche v Thomas Moore, Arthur Jenyver
- STAC 5/F13/12 - I D - 35 Eliz - - John Fytche v Richard Blake, John Handye et al
- see also STAC Fitch
G
H
IJ
K
L
- see also STAC Loveden
M
- see also STAC Marbury
N
- *see also STAC Newberry
O
P
Q
R
- *see also STAC Rich
S
- *see also STAC Style
T
UV
W
- see also STAC Ward
X
Y
Z
