Difference between revisions of "STAC Whittingham"
From Waalt
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/A47/7 - I - 42 Eliz - AG v Jessey Whittingham et al | + | *STAC 5/A47/7 - I - 42 Eliz - Gloucestershire - AG v Jessey Whittingham et al |
− | *STAC 5/A23/8 - D - 42 Eliz - AG v Jesse Whittingham | + | *STAC 5/A23/8 - D - 42 Eliz - Gloucestershire - AG v Jesse Whittingham |
− | ** see | + | **see [[STAC co Gloucester]] |
''' Almoner ''' | ''' Almoner ''' | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
**[[STAC co Middlesex]] | **[[STAC co Middlesex]] | ||
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' |
− |
Latest revision as of 17:54, 4 November 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Whittingham, George
- STAC 5/W58/34 - B A Rn - 34 Eliz - George Whittingam, Timothy May v Richard Danck, John Moore
- STAC 5/W27/27 - I D - 27 Eliz - George Whittingham, Timothy May v John Moore, Richard Dankes
Whittingham, John
- STAC 5/W77/10 - B - 42 Eliz - John Whittingham v Nicholas White, William Cooke et al
Whittingham, Richard
- STAC 5/W27/13 - B A - 37 Eliz - Richard Wittingham, Francis Piers v Judyth Marton, William Bullard et al
- STAC 5/W5/17 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Richard Whittingham v Judith Martin, William Ballard, Edward Ballard
- STAC 7/31/41 - - - Richard Whittingham v William Ballard
- STAC 5/W12/31 - I D - 37 Eliz - Richard Whittingham, Francis Pyers v Judith Morton
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A47/7 - I - 42 Eliz - Gloucestershire - AG v Jessey Whittingham et al
- STAC 5/A23/8 - D - 42 Eliz - Gloucestershire - AG v Jesse Whittingham
Almoner
- STAC 5/A2/28 - A - 43 Eliz - Middlesex - Almoner v Alice Whittingham, Katherine Robinson
- STAC 5/A59/10 - B - 43 Eliz - Middlesex - Almoner v Alice Whittingham, Katherine Robinson
Notes, Additions and Corrections: