Difference between revisions of "STAC Welsh names E"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' ap Edward ''' | ''' ap Edward ''' | ||
*STAC 5/E1/16 - B A - 34 Eliz - Montgomery ? - Davis ap Edward v David Loyd, ap John ap Jenkin, Robert David Loyd, Griffith David Loyd, Lewis ap Cadwallader | *STAC 5/E1/16 - B A - 34 Eliz - Montgomery ? - Davis ap Edward v David Loyd, ap John ap Jenkin, Robert David Loyd, Griffith David Loyd, Lewis ap Cadwallader | ||
| + | *STAC 5/E15/29 - I D - 34 Eliz - Montgomery ? - David ap Edwards v Lewis ap Cadwallader, Richard ap David Lloid et al | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Montgomery]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' ap Edward ''' | ||
*STAC 5/E3/27 - I D - 37 Eliz - Watkyn ap Edward v David Morgan | *STAC 5/E3/27 - I D - 37 Eliz - Watkyn ap Edward v David Morgan | ||
*STAC 5/E3/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - Richard ap John ap Edward, Edward Morgan v Richard Corbett alias Corbert | *STAC 5/E3/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - Richard ap John ap Edward, Edward Morgan v Richard Corbett alias Corbert | ||
| Line 9: | Line 17: | ||
*STAC 5/E8/37 - I D - 22 Eliz - Robert ap Edward v David Hanmer, Robert Stanney et al | *STAC 5/E8/37 - I D - 22 Eliz - Robert ap Edward v David Hanmer, Robert Stanney et al | ||
*STAC 5/E11/39 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Robert ap Edwards v Robert Slaney, Robert ap Richard, David Hanmer et al | *STAC 5/E11/39 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Robert ap Edwards v Robert Slaney, Robert ap Richard, David Hanmer et al | ||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/E16/14 - B A C - 30 Eliz - Watkin ap Edward v Morris Griffith, Jenn’ Myle | *STAC 5/E16/14 - B A C - 30 Eliz - Watkin ap Edward v Morris Griffith, Jenn’ Myle | ||
| − | *STAC 7/1/2 - - - Denbigh - Ap Edward v William Lewis, William ap Lewis ap Robert | + | |
| + | ''' ap Edward ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 7/1/2 - B - - Denbigh - Ap Edward v William Lewis, William ap Lewis ap Robert | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Denbigh]] | ||
''' ap Ellice ''' | ''' ap Ellice ''' | ||
| Line 18: | Line 28: | ||
*STAC 5/E15/35 - B A - 44 Eliz - Morris ap John Ellis v Robert ap Jenn’ et al | *STAC 5/E15/35 - B A - 44 Eliz - Morris ap John Ellis v Robert ap Jenn’ et al | ||
*STAC 5/E16/32 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Ellice ap John ap Morice v Jenn’ Robert Griffith, John ap Robert Velmth | *STAC 5/E16/32 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Ellice ap John ap Morice v Jenn’ Robert Griffith, John ap Robert Velmth | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Margaret verch Evan ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/E1/25 - B C A - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v John David ap Howell, Robert Lewis, William ap William, Evan ap David ap Howell, William Vaughan ap Morrice et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/E5/34 - B A C - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evane v Griffith ap Nicholas, Lowcie Lewes | ||
| + | *STAC 5/E8/35 - B A - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v John David ap Howell et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/E13/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v William ap William et al | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Caernarvon]] | ||
''' ap Evan ''' | ''' ap Evan ''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/E6/6 - I D - 32 Eliz - David ap Evan v David Edwards | *STAC 5/E6/6 - I D - 32 Eliz - David ap Evan v David Edwards | ||
*STAC 5/E7/24 - B A - 37 Eliz - William ap Evan v Thomas Lawrence, Richard Boydon et al | *STAC 5/E7/24 - B A - 37 Eliz - William ap Evan v Thomas Lawrence, Richard Boydon et al | ||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/E12/15 - I D - 33 Eliz - David ap Evan v David Loyd ap Griff, David Edwards, Henry Owen | *STAC 5/E12/15 - I D - 33 Eliz - David ap Evan v David Loyd ap Griff, David Edwards, Henry Owen | ||
| − | |||
''' Elyssa ap Roland ''' | ''' Elyssa ap Roland ''' | ||
| Line 54: | Line 67: | ||
*Ap Thomas v James - STAC 5/E16/6 | *Ap Thomas v James - STAC 5/E16/6 | ||
*Morgan v Corbet - STAC 5/M57/37, STAC 5/E3/30, STAC 5/E14/3 | *Morgan v Corbet - STAC 5/M57/37, STAC 5/E3/30, STAC 5/E14/3 | ||
| + | *Verch Evan v Ap Howell - STAC 5/E1/25, STAC 5/E8/35, STAC 5/E13/27 | ||
| + | *Verch Evan v Ap Nicholas - STAC 5/E5/34 | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
| − | * | + | *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 52r. A writ of privilege to discharge one that made affidavit being neither plaintiff nor defendant. Ed ap Prichard, plaintiff; Ed ap Williams et al, defendants: one Cook being arrested at the defendant’s suit Williams at such time as one Wood attended to make affidavit for serving of process of this court in this cause was discharged by writ of privilege of imprisonment and action. Hillary 35 Elizabeth (kk) |
Revision as of 07:36, 9 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
ap Edward
- STAC 5/E1/16 - B A - 34 Eliz - Montgomery ? - Davis ap Edward v David Loyd, ap John ap Jenkin, Robert David Loyd, Griffith David Loyd, Lewis ap Cadwallader
- STAC 5/E15/29 - I D - 34 Eliz - Montgomery ? - David ap Edwards v Lewis ap Cadwallader, Richard ap David Lloid et al
ap Edward
- STAC 5/E3/27 - I D - 37 Eliz - Watkyn ap Edward v David Morgan
- STAC 5/E3/30 - I D - 37 Eliz - Richard ap John ap Edward, Edward Morgan v Richard Corbett alias Corbert
- STAC 5/E14/3 - Rn - 38 Eliz - Richard ap Edward, Edward Morgan v Richard Corbett et uxor, Gruff ap Morice et al
- STAC 5/M57/37 - A - 37 Eliz - Morgan Ap John Ap Edward v Richard Corbett
- STAC 5/E4/40 - I D - 13 Eliz - Meredith ap Edward v James Eaton
- STAC 5/E8/30 - B A C - 13 Eliz - Meredith ap Edward v Edward Eyton, Robert ap Howell et al
- STAC 5/E8/37 - I D - 22 Eliz - Robert ap Edward v David Hanmer, Robert Stanney et al
- STAC 5/E11/39 - B A Rn Rr - 22 Eliz - Robert ap Edwards v Robert Slaney, Robert ap Richard, David Hanmer et al
- STAC 5/E16/14 - B A C - 30 Eliz - Watkin ap Edward v Morris Griffith, Jenn’ Myle
ap Edward
- STAC 7/1/2 - B - - Denbigh - Ap Edward v William Lewis, William ap Lewis ap Robert
- see STAC co Denbigh
ap Ellice
- STAC 5/E4/3 - I - 41 Eliz - Morice ap John ap Ellice v Robert ap Jevan Griffith, Robert ap John Belynyth.
- STAC 5/E5/37 - B - 37 Eliz - Morris ap John ap Ellis v Cadwallader Watkyn, Watkyn ap Edward et al.
- STAC 5/E15/35 - B A - 44 Eliz - Morris ap John Ellis v Robert ap Jenn’ et al
- STAC 5/E16/32 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Ellice ap John ap Morice v Jenn’ Robert Griffith, John ap Robert Velmth
Margaret verch Evan
- STAC 5/E1/25 - B C A - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v John David ap Howell, Robert Lewis, William ap William, Evan ap David ap Howell, William Vaughan ap Morrice et al
- STAC 5/E5/34 - B A C - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evane v Griffith ap Nicholas, Lowcie Lewes
- STAC 5/E8/35 - B A - 35 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v John David ap Howell et al
- STAC 5/E13/27 - I D - 36 Eliz - Caernarvon - Margaret verch Evan v William ap William et al
ap Evan
- STAC 5/E6/6 - I D - 32 Eliz - David ap Evan v David Edwards
- STAC 5/E7/24 - B A - 37 Eliz - William ap Evan v Thomas Lawrence, Richard Boydon et al
- STAC 5/E12/15 - I D - 33 Eliz - David ap Evan v David Loyd ap Griff, David Edwards, Henry Owen
Elyssa ap Roland
- STAC 5/E2/18 - B - 39 Eliz - Elyssa ap Roland v Cadwallader Price, William Gloucester, David ap William Gloucester, William Wyn et al.
Edmond
- STAC 5/E16/9 - B A - 21 Eliz - Edmond ap R’ ap Lewis v William Vaughan
John Eignon ap Thomas
- STAC 5/E16/6 - B - 18 Eliz - v William James, William ap Jenn’ et al
Bevan Case Index
- Ap Edward v Eaton - STAC 5/E8/30, STAC 5/E4/40
- Ap Edward v Griffith - STAC 5/E16/14
- Ap Edward v Lloyd - STAC 5/E1/16
- Ap Edward v Morgan - STAC 5/E3/27
- Ap Edward v Lewis - STAC 7/1/2
- Ap Edwards v Ap Cadwallader - STAC 5/E15/29
- Ap Edwards v Hanmer - STAC 5/E8/37
- Ap Evan v Edwards - STAC 5/E6/6, STAC 5/E12/15
- Ap Evan v Lawrence - STAC 5/E7/24
- Ap John v Ap Jevan - STAC 5/E15/35, STAC 5/E4/3
- Ap John v Watkins - STAC 5/E5/37
- Ap Lewis v Vaughan - STAC 5/E16/9
- Ap Morice v Griffith - STAC 5/E16/32
- Ap Roland v Price - STAC 5/E2/18
- Ap Thomas v James - STAC 5/E16/6
- Morgan v Corbet - STAC 5/M57/37, STAC 5/E3/30, STAC 5/E14/3
- Verch Evan v Ap Howell - STAC 5/E1/25, STAC 5/E8/35, STAC 5/E13/27
- Verch Evan v Ap Nicholas - STAC 5/E5/34
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 52r. A writ of privilege to discharge one that made affidavit being neither plaintiff nor defendant. Ed ap Prichard, plaintiff; Ed ap Williams et al, defendants: one Cook being arrested at the defendant’s suit Williams at such time as one Wood attended to make affidavit for serving of process of this court in this cause was discharged by writ of privilege of imprisonment and action. Hillary 35 Elizabeth (kk)
