Difference between revisions of "STAC Thatcher"

From Waalt
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
'''Thatcher, Anne '''
 
'''Thatcher, Anne '''
*STAC 5/T10/11 - B A Rn Rr - 26 Eliz - Anne Thetcher v Edward Iseham
+
*STAC 5/T10/11 - B A Rn Rr - 26 Eliz - - Anne Thetcher v Edward Iseham
  
 
'''Thatcher, David '''
 
'''Thatcher, David '''
*STAC 5/T6/18 - I D - 27 Eliz - David Thatcher v Edward Isham
+
*STAC 5/T6/18 - I D - 27 Eliz - - David Thatcher v Edward Isham
  
 
'''Thatcher, James'''
 
'''Thatcher, James'''
*STAC 5/T32/31 - I D - 27 Eliz - James Thetcher v Henry Isham
+
*STAC 5/T27/18 - B A - 27 Eliz - - James Theacher v Henry Isham, Margery Isham
 +
*STAC 5/T32/31 - I D - 27 Eliz - - James Thetcher v Henry Isham
  
 
'''Thatcher, William'''
 
'''Thatcher, William'''
*STAC 5/T15/19 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - William Thatcher v Francis Greneham, Edward Elmer et al
+
*STAC 5/T15/19 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Francis Greneham, Edward Elmer et al
*STAC 5/T26/9 - I D - 29 Eliz - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer, Francis Greneham et al
+
*STAC 5/T26/9 - I D - 29 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer, Francis Greneham et al
*STAC 5/T22/4 - I D - 30 Eliz - William Thatcher v Francis Greeneham
+
*STAC 5/T22/4 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Francis Greeneham
*STAC 5/T37/35 - I D - 31 Eliz - William Thatcher v Elizabeth Elmar et al
+
*STAC 5/T37/35 - I D - 31 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Elizabeth Elmar et al
*STAC 5/T17/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - William Thatcher v Edward Ellmer et al
+
*STAC 5/T17/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Edward Ellmer et al
*STAC 5/T18/24 - I D - 30 Eliz - William Thatcher v John Hawes, John Nevill et al
+
*STAC 5/T18/24 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v John Hawes, John Nevill et al
*STAC 5/T19/36 - I D - 30 Eliz - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer
+
*STAC 5/T19/36 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer
*STAC 5/T31/16 - I D - 31 Eliz - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer et al
+
*STAC 5/T31/16 - I D - 31 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer et al
  
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 49v. Embracery of jurors by procuring some of them not to appear and soliciting some others to pass for him. Thatcher, plaintiff; Fores, defendant: for indirect practises in procuring certain jurors not to appear and for inveigling and seducing certain jurors that appeared to pass their verdict for him for which he was committed and 100 marks fine. Michaelmas 32 & 33 Elizabeth (kk)

Latest revision as of 10:21, 31 January 2024

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Thatcher, Anne

  • STAC 5/T10/11 - B A Rn Rr - 26 Eliz - - Anne Thetcher v Edward Iseham

Thatcher, David

  • STAC 5/T6/18 - I D - 27 Eliz - - David Thatcher v Edward Isham

Thatcher, James

  • STAC 5/T27/18 - B A - 27 Eliz - - James Theacher v Henry Isham, Margery Isham
  • STAC 5/T32/31 - I D - 27 Eliz - - James Thetcher v Henry Isham

Thatcher, William

  • STAC 5/T15/19 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Francis Greneham, Edward Elmer et al
  • STAC 5/T26/9 - I D - 29 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer, Francis Greneham et al
  • STAC 5/T22/4 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Francis Greeneham
  • STAC 5/T37/35 - I D - 31 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Elizabeth Elmar et al
  • STAC 5/T17/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Edward Ellmer et al
  • STAC 5/T18/24 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v John Hawes, John Nevill et al
  • STAC 5/T19/36 - I D - 30 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer
  • STAC 5/T31/16 - I D - 31 Eliz - - William Thatcher v Edward Elmer et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 49v. Embracery of jurors by procuring some of them not to appear and soliciting some others to pass for him. Thatcher, plaintiff; Fores, defendant: for indirect practises in procuring certain jurors not to appear and for inveigling and seducing certain jurors that appeared to pass their verdict for him for which he was committed and 100 marks fine. Michaelmas 32 & 33 Elizabeth (kk)