Difference between revisions of "STAC Skinner"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' Skinner, Danyel ''' | ''' Skinner, Danyel ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S81/6 - B - 42 Eliz - Danyel Skynner v John Greensdin, Valentyne Skynner et al | *STAC 5/S81/6 - B - 42 Eliz - Danyel Skynner v John Greensdin, Valentyne Skynner et al | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
''' Skynner, George ''' | ''' Skynner, George ''' | ||
Line 12: | Line 9: | ||
*STAC 5/S70/11 - I D - 7 Eliz - John Skynner v William Myller, John Speck et al | *STAC 5/S70/11 - I D - 7 Eliz - John Skynner v William Myller, John Speck et al | ||
− | ''' Skynner , Richard ''' | + | ''' Skynner, Richard ''' |
*STAC 5/S1/28 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Skynner et uxor, Robert Smith, Johanna Hutchins, Richard Pears et al v Thomas Harris, William Kirfugdes, Elenor Cooke, John Edney, William Richards | *STAC 5/S1/28 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Skynner et uxor, Robert Smith, Johanna Hutchins, Richard Pears et al v Thomas Harris, William Kirfugdes, Elenor Cooke, John Edney, William Richards | ||
− | *STAC 7/5/21 - - - Devon - Richard Skynner | + | *STAC 7/5/21 - - - Devon - Richard Skynner et Friswell uxor, et William filius et al v Eleanor Cooke, Thomas Harrys, William Kyrforde, John Edney, William Richards |
+ | *STAC 5/S79/8 - I D - 22 Eliz - Friswell Skynner, Richard Skynner, Robert Smyth v Thomas Harris, William Kyrford, Elenor Cooke et al | ||
*STAC 5/S30/27 - I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Skinner Robert Smith et al v Thomas Harris, Eleanor Cooke et al | *STAC 5/S30/27 - I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Skinner Robert Smith et al v Thomas Harris, Eleanor Cooke et al | ||
*STAC 5/S66/9 - I D - 24 Eliz - Richard Skinner v William Kirsford et al | *STAC 5/S66/9 - I D - 24 Eliz - Richard Skinner v William Kirsford et al | ||
*STAC 5/S30/37 - B A - 29 Eliz - Richard Skinner v Edward Langdon, Thomas Frances | *STAC 5/S30/37 - B A - 29 Eliz - Richard Skinner v Edward Langdon, Thomas Frances | ||
− | *STAC 5/S2/17 - B A C - 33 Eliz - Richard Skynner et | + | *STAC 5/S2/17 - B A C - 33 Eliz - Richard Skynner et al v John Cooke |
''' Skynner, Roger ''' | ''' Skynner, Roger ''' | ||
Line 47: | Line 45: | ||
*STAC 5/A22/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - Almoner v George Skynner et al | *STAC 5/A22/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - Almoner v George Skynner et al | ||
*STAC 5/A13 /29 - B A - 23 Eliz - Almoner v William Skynner | *STAC 5/A13 /29 - B A - 23 Eliz - Almoner v William Skynner | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bevan Case Index ''' | ||
+ | *Skinner v Browne - STAC 5/S36/15 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Cooke - STAC 5/S2/17, STAC 7/5/21, STAC 5/S1/28, STAC 5/S30/27, STAC 5/S66/9, STAC 5/S74/7, STAC 5/S79/8 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Greensden - STAC 5/S81/6 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Grizell - STAC 5/S77/35 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Langdon - STAC 5/S30/37 | ||
+ | *Skinner v London - STAC 5/S25/20, STAC 5/S70/11 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Ludford - STAC 5/S55/30, STAC 5/S61/29, STAC 5/S24/16, STAC 5/S56/33, STAC 5/S67/6 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Richards - STAC 5/S51/31 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Throckmorton - STAC 5/S35/39, STAC 5/S41/16 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Tibbotts - STAC 5/S67/31, STAC 5/S85/19 | ||
+ | *Skinner v Wilstrop - STAC 5/S15/14, STAC 5/S24/18, STAC 5/S11/39, STAC 5/S15/20, STAC 5/S28/14, STAC 5/S68/27 | ||
+ | *Queen's Almoner v Skinner - STAC 5/A5/39, STAC 5/A13/29, STAC 5/A22/15 | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/S1/28 - Harrys a deft at the suite of Skinner plt for incerting Matter of Defamacion & slaunder into his answer against Neale a Counsellor at Lawe noe partie to that suite Compleyned of Harrys att the heareing of the Cause desired further day and assented not to take any advantage of the pardon ensewing att the heareing thereof which Cause afterwards Comeing to a heareing the Court would not sentence his offence for that the pardon had discharged the same notwithstanding Harris Consent to the Contrarie which otherwise they would have donne. BL Harley 2143 f.9 | ||
*STAC 5/A5/39 - Elizabeth Byllinge late of Dadington Oxfordshire, felo de se | *STAC 5/A5/39 - Elizabeth Byllinge late of Dadington Oxfordshire, felo de se | ||
*STAC 7/5/21 - TNA Note: Corruption of a jury and perjury in a suit for lands, etc, in Up-Ottery and Church Stanton | *STAC 7/5/21 - TNA Note: Corruption of a jury and perjury in a suit for lands, etc, in Up-Ottery and Church Stanton |
Revision as of 15:30, 5 June 2016
Skinner, Danyel
- STAC 5/S81/6 - B - 42 Eliz - Danyel Skynner v John Greensdin, Valentyne Skynner et al
Skynner, George
- STAC 5/S36/15 - B - 37 Eliz - George Skynner v John Brown, Antony Frere et al
Skynner, John
- STAC 5/S25/20 - B A Rn - - John Skynner v John London, William Mylles et al
- STAC 5/S70/11 - I D - 7 Eliz - John Skynner v William Myller, John Speck et al
Skynner, Richard
- STAC 5/S1/28 - C I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Skynner et uxor, Robert Smith, Johanna Hutchins, Richard Pears et al v Thomas Harris, William Kirfugdes, Elenor Cooke, John Edney, William Richards
- STAC 7/5/21 - - - Devon - Richard Skynner et Friswell uxor, et William filius et al v Eleanor Cooke, Thomas Harrys, William Kyrforde, John Edney, William Richards
- STAC 5/S79/8 - I D - 22 Eliz - Friswell Skynner, Richard Skynner, Robert Smyth v Thomas Harris, William Kyrford, Elenor Cooke et al
- STAC 5/S30/27 - I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Skinner Robert Smith et al v Thomas Harris, Eleanor Cooke et al
- STAC 5/S66/9 - I D - 24 Eliz - Richard Skinner v William Kirsford et al
- STAC 5/S30/37 - B A - 29 Eliz - Richard Skinner v Edward Langdon, Thomas Frances
- STAC 5/S2/17 - B A C - 33 Eliz - Richard Skynner et al v John Cooke
Skynner, Roger
- STAC 5/S51/31 - B A C - 45 Eliz - Roger Skynner v Roger Richard
Skynner, Thomas
- STAC 5/S15/14 - B A Rn - 27 Eliz - Thomas Skynner v Charles Willshoppe, Robert Snawsell et al
- STAC 5/S24/18 - B A - 27 Eliz - Thomas Skynner v Charles Willestroppe, Robert Snawsell et al
- STAC 5/S15/20 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Thomas Skynner v Robert Snawsell, Thomas Foxe et al
- STAC 5/S68/27 - I D - 27 Eliz - Thomas Skinner v Charles Wilstroppe
- STAC 5/S11/39 - I D - 28 Eliz - Thomas Skynner v Charles Willstroppe, Robert Snawsyll et al
- STAC 5/S28/14 - I D - 29 Eliz - Thomas Skynner v Charles Wilstropp, Thomas Fox et al
Skynner, William
- STAC 5/S77/35 - B A - 12 Eliz - William Skynner v John Grisoll
- STAC 5/S61/29 - B A - 24 Eliz - William Skynner v Antony Ludford, John Horsley et al
- STAC 5/S67/6 - I D - 25 Eliz - William Skinner v John Horseley, Antony Ludford
- STAC 5/S35/39 - B A - 26 Eliz - William Skynner v Job Throckmorton, Robert Watters et al
- STAC 5/S41/16 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Skinner v Job Throckmorton
- STAC 5/S55/30 - B A Dr - 25 Eliz - William Skinner v Antony Ludford, John Horsley
- STAC 5/S56/33 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Skynner v Antony Ludford
- STAC 5/S24/16 - I D - 25 Eliz - William Skynner v Thurston Tubbes
- STAC 5/S67/31 - B A - 32 Eliz - William Skynner, John Tibbots, John Ley
- STAC 5/S85/19 - I - - William Skinner v John Tibbotts, John Ley
Almoner
- STAC 5/A5/39 - B A - Mich 21/22 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Almoner v George Skynner, William Skynner, John Linnett, Margaret Darrell, Edward Welden
- STAC 5/A22/15 - I D - 22 Eliz - Almoner v George Skynner et al
- STAC 5/A13 /29 - B A - 23 Eliz - Almoner v William Skynner
Bevan Case Index
- Skinner v Browne - STAC 5/S36/15
- Skinner v Cooke - STAC 5/S2/17, STAC 7/5/21, STAC 5/S1/28, STAC 5/S30/27, STAC 5/S66/9, STAC 5/S74/7, STAC 5/S79/8
- Skinner v Greensden - STAC 5/S81/6
- Skinner v Grizell - STAC 5/S77/35
- Skinner v Langdon - STAC 5/S30/37
- Skinner v London - STAC 5/S25/20, STAC 5/S70/11
- Skinner v Ludford - STAC 5/S55/30, STAC 5/S61/29, STAC 5/S24/16, STAC 5/S56/33, STAC 5/S67/6
- Skinner v Richards - STAC 5/S51/31
- Skinner v Throckmorton - STAC 5/S35/39, STAC 5/S41/16
- Skinner v Tibbotts - STAC 5/S67/31, STAC 5/S85/19
- Skinner v Wilstrop - STAC 5/S15/14, STAC 5/S24/18, STAC 5/S11/39, STAC 5/S15/20, STAC 5/S28/14, STAC 5/S68/27
- Queen's Almoner v Skinner - STAC 5/A5/39, STAC 5/A13/29, STAC 5/A22/15
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/S1/28 - Harrys a deft at the suite of Skinner plt for incerting Matter of Defamacion & slaunder into his answer against Neale a Counsellor at Lawe noe partie to that suite Compleyned of Harrys att the heareing of the Cause desired further day and assented not to take any advantage of the pardon ensewing att the heareing thereof which Cause afterwards Comeing to a heareing the Court would not sentence his offence for that the pardon had discharged the same notwithstanding Harris Consent to the Contrarie which otherwise they would have donne. BL Harley 2143 f.9
- STAC 5/A5/39 - Elizabeth Byllinge late of Dadington Oxfordshire, felo de se
- STAC 7/5/21 - TNA Note: Corruption of a jury and perjury in a suit for lands, etc, in Up-Ottery and Church Stanton
- Biography in “The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1558-1603,” ed. P.W. Hasler, 1981.
- SKINNER, John (c.1535-84), of Reigate, Surr.
- SKINNER, Ralph (1513/14-63), of Durham.
- SKINNER, Vincent (d.1616), of Thornton College, Lincs. and London.