Difference between revisions of "STAC Sherington"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Sharington, Anne ''' | ''' Sharington, Anne ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S63/11 - B A - 23 Eliz - Ann Sharington v William Bruncker, Edward Bentley | *STAC 5/S63/11 - B A - 23 Eliz - Ann Sharington v William Bruncker, Edward Bentley | ||
| Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
''' Sherington, George ''' | ''' Sherington, George ''' | ||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/S38/12 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - George Sherrington v Adam Dodson, Richard Brereton et al | *STAC 5/S38/12 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - George Sherrington v Adam Dodson, Richard Brereton et al | ||
| Line 23: | Line 26: | ||
*STAC 5/S30/22 - I D - 16 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley | *STAC 5/S30/22 - I D - 16 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley | ||
*STAC 5/S73/39 - I D - 17 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldersly | *STAC 5/S73/39 - I D - 17 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldersly | ||
| + | *STAC 5/S46/24 - I D - 18 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Thurston Tyldesly | ||
| + | *STAC 7/29/23 - - - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tildesley et al | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Sherington, Gilbert ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/S37/19 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - George Sherington v Thomas Tyldesly, William Holland et al | ||
*STAC 7/15/27 - - - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley | *STAC 7/15/27 - - - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley | ||
| − | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/S71/39 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Hollande, Thomas Tyldesly et al |
| + | *STAC 5/S83/3 - Rn I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland, Peter Holland et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/S11/1 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland | ||
| + | *STAC 5/S24/7 - I D - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Thurston Tadesley, Edward Tildesley et al | ||
| + | **[[STAC co Lancaster]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Sherington, Gilbert ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/S82/8 - B A I D - 26 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Olyver Talior, Oliver Derbyshire et al | ||
*STAC 5/S70/34 - B A - 24 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Sir John Radcliffe, Richard Brereton et al | *STAC 5/S70/34 - B A - 24 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Sir John Radcliffe, Richard Brereton et al | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ''' Sherington, Gilbert ''' | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/S4/23 - B A Rn C I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherrington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentine, William Stirroppe, Thomas Edge et al | *STAC 5/S4/23 - B A Rn C I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherrington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentine, William Stirroppe, Thomas Edge et al | ||
*STAC 5/S66/27 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Ellis Haye, William Styrroppe et al | *STAC 5/S66/27 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Ellis Haye, William Styrroppe et al | ||
| Line 42: | Line 53: | ||
*STAC 5/S12/12 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Richard Newton et al | *STAC 5/S12/12 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Richard Newton et al | ||
*STAC 5/S69/9 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, William Styrrop et al | *STAC 5/S69/9 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, William Styrrop et al | ||
| + | **[[STAC co Lancaster]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Sharington, Henry ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/S68/9 - B A - - Henry Sharington v John Pye, Robert Vysard et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/S10/22 - I D - 4 Eliz - Henry Sharington v John Pye, Robert Ffesaird, Henry Banks et al | ||
''' Sharington, Henry ''' | ''' Sharington, Henry ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S76/40 - B A Rn Rr - - Henry Sherington v William Roper, Francis Bayntun et al | *STAC 5/S76/40 - B A Rn Rr - - Henry Sherington v William Roper, Francis Bayntun et al | ||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/S10/37 - I D - 6 Eliz - Henry Sherington v Francis Bainton et al | *STAC 5/S10/37 - I D - 6 Eliz - Henry Sherington v Francis Bainton et al | ||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/S15/39 - I D - 7 Eliz - Henry Sheryngton v Francis Baynton et al | *STAC 5/S15/39 - I D - 7 Eliz - Henry Sheryngton v Francis Baynton et al | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Sharington, Henry ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S36/5 - B - 10 Eliz - Henry Sharrington v Edward Baynard, Robert Chaberldyn et al | *STAC 5/S36/5 - B - 10 Eliz - Henry Sharrington v Edward Baynard, Robert Chaberldyn et al | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Sharington, Henry ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S58/16 - B - 12 Eliz - Henry Sharington v William Walker, John Jackson et al | *STAC 5/S58/16 - B - 12 Eliz - Henry Sharington v William Walker, John Jackson et al | ||
| Line 57: | Line 75: | ||
''' Sherington, William ''' | ''' Sherington, William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S52/18 - B A - 17 Eliz - William Sherington v Robert Raynolds | *STAC 5/S52/18 - B A - 17 Eliz - William Sherington v Robert Raynolds | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Sherington, William ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/S5/24 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - William Sherrington v John Wood, William Fulwood, John Bent | ||
*STAC 5/S22/5 - A - 23 Eliz - William Sherington v Thomas Smith, Edward Bodye et al | *STAC 5/S22/5 - A - 23 Eliz - William Sherington v Thomas Smith, Edward Bodye et al | ||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/S83/22 - A - - William Sherington v John Wood, William Fulwood | *STAC 5/S83/22 - A - - William Sherington v John Wood, William Fulwood | ||
*STAC 5/S76/4 - Rr - 23 Eliz - William Sherington v John Wood, William Fullwood et al | *STAC 5/S76/4 - Rr - 23 Eliz - William Sherington v John Wood, William Fullwood et al | ||
| Line 68: | Line 88: | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
| − | *STAC 5/A26/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - AG v Gilbert Sherington | + | *STAC 5/A26/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington |
| − | *STAC 5/A11/22 - A - 33 Eliz - AG v Gilbert Sherington | + | *STAC 5/A11/22 - A - 33 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington |
*STAC 5/A7/40 - I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherrington | *STAC 5/A7/40 - I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherrington | ||
*STAC 5/A6/33 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherrington | *STAC 5/A6/33 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherrington | ||
| − | *STAC 5/A51/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - AG v Gilbert Sherington | + | *STAC 5/A51/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington |
| + | **see [[STAC co Lancaster]] | ||
''' Almoner''' | ''' Almoner''' | ||
*STAC 5/A18 /7 - B - 2 Eliz - Almoner v Sir Henry Sherington, Ralph Cawley | *STAC 5/A18 /7 - B - 2 Eliz - Almoner v Sir Henry Sherington, Ralph Cawley | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*ODNB Fulwood [Fullwood], William (d. 1593), by Cathy Shrank. STAC 5 B35/29; B102/28; F5/27; F.6/3; F.8/7; F.27/23; F29/39; G9/19 G37/21; S5/24. S.23/3; S.25/7; S.29/40; S.76/4; S.83/22. Fulwood himself appeared in at least four cases in the court of Star Chamber. In 1574 he was accused of conspiracy against a painter, Raphe Brooke, a case to which Fulwood returned in 1589 when he vindicated himself by publishing A Spectacle for Perjurers, printed by Alde, comprising a perjured deposition of one John Jones, whose earlier perjury had condemned Fulwood and his co-defendant, John Doughtie, in 1574. In 1580 Fulwood was charged with inducing one Henry Franckland to write his will in Fulwood's favour (despite Fulwood's apparent responsibility for Franckland's imprisonment in the Fleet). That year he was also accused of wrongfully acquiring the rents of properties in the London parish of St Sepulchre, where Fulwood dwelt in Long Lane. During the prolonged course of this case (which also involved proceedings in the court of wards, chancery, and Guildhall), Fulwood appeared before the queen's bench charged with the stabbing and attempted murder of the key witness, Thomas Walbutt, a defrocked minister castigated in Robert Crowley's Apologye or defence of those Englishe wryters and prechers which Cerberus the thre headed dog of hell chargeth with false doctryne (1566). Fulwood's hasty temper is also apparent from the fourth case brought before the Star Chamber, where in 1590 he refuted a charge of assault on London pewterer John Gaskyn. Gaskyn had been accused by Fulwood of manufacturing false-bottomed tankards, and of manhandling Fulwood's wife, Anne, daughter of the London brewer John Wood. see also [[STAC Brooke]] [[STAC Fullwood]] [[STAC Grimsditch]] | *ODNB Fulwood [Fullwood], William (d. 1593), by Cathy Shrank. STAC 5 B35/29; B102/28; F5/27; F.6/3; F.8/7; F.27/23; F29/39; G9/19 G37/21; S5/24. S.23/3; S.25/7; S.29/40; S.76/4; S.83/22. Fulwood himself appeared in at least four cases in the court of Star Chamber. In 1574 he was accused of conspiracy against a painter, Raphe Brooke, a case to which Fulwood returned in 1589 when he vindicated himself by publishing A Spectacle for Perjurers, printed by Alde, comprising a perjured deposition of one John Jones, whose earlier perjury had condemned Fulwood and his co-defendant, John Doughtie, in 1574. In 1580 Fulwood was charged with inducing one Henry Franckland to write his will in Fulwood's favour (despite Fulwood's apparent responsibility for Franckland's imprisonment in the Fleet). That year he was also accused of wrongfully acquiring the rents of properties in the London parish of St Sepulchre, where Fulwood dwelt in Long Lane. During the prolonged course of this case (which also involved proceedings in the court of wards, chancery, and Guildhall), Fulwood appeared before the queen's bench charged with the stabbing and attempted murder of the key witness, Thomas Walbutt, a defrocked minister castigated in Robert Crowley's Apologye or defence of those Englishe wryters and prechers which Cerberus the thre headed dog of hell chargeth with false doctryne (1566). Fulwood's hasty temper is also apparent from the fourth case brought before the Star Chamber, where in 1590 he refuted a charge of assault on London pewterer John Gaskyn. Gaskyn had been accused by Fulwood of manufacturing false-bottomed tankards, and of manhandling Fulwood's wife, Anne, daughter of the London brewer John Wood. see also [[STAC Brooke]] [[STAC Fullwood]] [[STAC Grimsditch]] | ||
| − | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/S64/17 – Lancashire (dk) |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 09:58, 7 June 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Sharington, Anne
- STAC 5/S63/11 - B A - 23 Eliz - Ann Sharington v William Bruncker, Edward Bentley
- STAC 5/S11/23 - I D - 24 Eliz - Dame Anne Sharington v William Bronker et al
Sherington, Catherine & Francis
- STAC 5/S79/30 - B - - Catherine Sheryngton, Francis Sheryngton v William Orrell, James Atherton et al
- STAC 5/S31/33 - B A - 17 Eliz - Katherine Sheringham, Francis Sherington v John Orrell, James Turner et al
- STAC 5/S34/36 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Catherine Sherington v Thomas Dawber, William Orrell et al
- STAC 5/S38/30 - I D - 43 Eliz - Katherine Sherington v William Orrell
- STAC 5/S64/17 - I D - 44 Eliz - Catherine Sherington v Alexander Orrell, George Bordman
Sherington, Francis
- STAC 5/S20/4 - B - 15 Eliz - Francis Sherington v Thomas Powell, Thomas Tutchett et al
Sherington, George
- STAC 5/S38/12 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - George Sherrington v Adam Dodson, Richard Brereton et al
Sherington, Gilbert
- STAC 5/S11/21 - I D - 6 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Thurstan Tildeslye, William Tildeslye
- STAC 5/S14/34 - I - 10 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley, Thomas Tyldesley
- STAC 5/S39/40 - I D - 16 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Christopher Anderton, Edward Tyldesley et al
- STAC 5/S30/22 - I D - 16 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley
- STAC 5/S73/39 - I D - 17 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldersly
- STAC 5/S46/24 - I D - 18 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Thurston Tyldesly
- STAC 7/29/23 - - - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tildesley et al
Sherington, Gilbert
- STAC 5/S37/19 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - George Sherington v Thomas Tyldesly, William Holland et al
- STAC 7/15/27 - - - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Edward Tyldesley
- STAC 5/S71/39 - I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Hollande, Thomas Tyldesly et al
- STAC 5/S83/3 - Rn I D - 25 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland, Peter Holland et al
- STAC 5/S11/1 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v William Holland
- STAC 5/S24/7 - I D - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Thurston Tadesley, Edward Tildesley et al
Sherington, Gilbert
- STAC 5/S82/8 - B A I D - 26 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Olyver Talior, Oliver Derbyshire et al
- STAC 5/S70/34 - B A - 24 Eliz - Gilbert Sherington v Sir John Radcliffe, Richard Brereton et al
Sherington, Gilbert
- STAC 5/S4/23 - B A Rn C I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherrington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentine, William Stirroppe, Thomas Edge et al
- STAC 5/S66/27 - B A Rn - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Ellis Haye, William Styrroppe et al
- STAC 5/S60/35 - I D - 26 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentyne
- STAC 5/S44/26 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Thomas Valentyne et al
- STAC 5/S35/23 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
- STAC 5/S18/22 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
- STAC 5/S18/35 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton
- STAC 5/S17/37 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton et al
- STAC 5/S12/12 - I D - 27 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, Richard Newton et al
- STAC 5/S69/9 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - Lancashire - Gilbert Sherington v Richard Brereton, William Styrrop et al
Sharington, Henry
- STAC 5/S68/9 - B A - - Henry Sharington v John Pye, Robert Vysard et al
- STAC 5/S10/22 - I D - 4 Eliz - Henry Sharington v John Pye, Robert Ffesaird, Henry Banks et al
Sharington, Henry
- STAC 5/S76/40 - B A Rn Rr - - Henry Sherington v William Roper, Francis Bayntun et al
- STAC 5/S10/37 - I D - 6 Eliz - Henry Sherington v Francis Bainton et al
- STAC 5/S15/39 - I D - 7 Eliz - Henry Sheryngton v Francis Baynton et al
Sharington, Henry
- STAC 5/S36/5 - B - 10 Eliz - Henry Sharrington v Edward Baynard, Robert Chaberldyn et al
Sharington, Henry
- STAC 5/S58/16 - B - 12 Eliz - Henry Sharington v William Walker, John Jackson et al
Sherington, Thomas
- STAC 5/S59/4 - B - 20 Eliz - Thomas Sherington v John Olton
Sherington, William
- STAC 5/S52/18 - B A - 17 Eliz - William Sherington v Robert Raynolds
Sherington, William
- STAC 5/S5/24 - B A Rn Rr - Hil 24 Eliz - William Sherrington v John Wood, William Fulwood, John Bent
- STAC 5/S22/5 - A - 23 Eliz - William Sherington v Thomas Smith, Edward Bodye et al
- STAC 5/S83/22 - A - - William Sherington v John Wood, William Fulwood
- STAC 5/S76/4 - Rr - 23 Eliz - William Sherington v John Wood, William Fullwood et al
- STAC 5/S29/4 - I D - 24 Eliz - William Sherington v John Bent
- STAC 5/S25/7 - I D - 25 Eliz - William Sherington v John Wood, William Fullwoode
- STAC 5/S29/40 - I - - William Shearington v John Wood, William Fullwood et al
- STAC 5/S23/3 - I D - 26 Eliz - William Sherrington v William Fulwoode, John Wood et al
- STAC 7/29/24 - - - William Sherington v William Fulwood et al
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A26/36 - I D - 33 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington
- STAC 5/A11/22 - A - 33 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington
- STAC 5/A7/40 - I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherrington
- STAC 5/A6/33 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherrington
- STAC 5/A51/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - AG v Gilbert Sherington
Almoner
- STAC 5/A18 /7 - B - 2 Eliz - Almoner v Sir Henry Sherington, Ralph Cawley
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- ODNB Fulwood [Fullwood], William (d. 1593), by Cathy Shrank. STAC 5 B35/29; B102/28; F5/27; F.6/3; F.8/7; F.27/23; F29/39; G9/19 G37/21; S5/24. S.23/3; S.25/7; S.29/40; S.76/4; S.83/22. Fulwood himself appeared in at least four cases in the court of Star Chamber. In 1574 he was accused of conspiracy against a painter, Raphe Brooke, a case to which Fulwood returned in 1589 when he vindicated himself by publishing A Spectacle for Perjurers, printed by Alde, comprising a perjured deposition of one John Jones, whose earlier perjury had condemned Fulwood and his co-defendant, John Doughtie, in 1574. In 1580 Fulwood was charged with inducing one Henry Franckland to write his will in Fulwood's favour (despite Fulwood's apparent responsibility for Franckland's imprisonment in the Fleet). That year he was also accused of wrongfully acquiring the rents of properties in the London parish of St Sepulchre, where Fulwood dwelt in Long Lane. During the prolonged course of this case (which also involved proceedings in the court of wards, chancery, and Guildhall), Fulwood appeared before the queen's bench charged with the stabbing and attempted murder of the key witness, Thomas Walbutt, a defrocked minister castigated in Robert Crowley's Apologye or defence of those Englishe wryters and prechers which Cerberus the thre headed dog of hell chargeth with false doctryne (1566). Fulwood's hasty temper is also apparent from the fourth case brought before the Star Chamber, where in 1590 he refuted a charge of assault on London pewterer John Gaskyn. Gaskyn had been accused by Fulwood of manufacturing false-bottomed tankards, and of manhandling Fulwood's wife, Anne, daughter of the London brewer John Wood. see also STAC Brooke STAC Fullwood STAC Grimsditch
- STAC 5/S64/17 – Lancashire (dk)
