Difference between revisions of "STAC Scott"

From Waalt
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Scott, George '''  
 
''' Scott, George '''  
 
*STAC 5/S70/26 - B A C I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Peter Dier, Henry Lance et al
 
*STAC 5/S70/26 - B A C I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Peter Dier, Henry Lance et al
 
*STAC 5/S85/23 - Rn - - George Scott v Peter Dyer
 
*STAC 5/S85/23 - Rn - - George Scott v Peter Dyer
 
*STAC 5/S61/30 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Peter Dyer
 
*STAC 5/S61/30 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Peter Dyer
 +
 +
''' Scott, George '''
 
*STAC 5/S30/24 - B A Rn - 20 Eliz - George Scott v John Jurden, Robert Davie et al
 
*STAC 5/S30/24 - B A Rn - 20 Eliz - George Scott v John Jurden, Robert Davie et al
 
*STAC 5/S35/4 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v John Belmey, John Jurden
 
*STAC 5/S35/4 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v John Belmey, John Jurden
 +
 +
''' Scott, George '''
 
*STAC 5/S11/18 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott, Richard Cooke v Henry Pyne, John Hatton
 
*STAC 5/S11/18 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott, Richard Cooke v Henry Pyne, John Hatton
 
*STAC 5/S38/18 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Henry Pyne
 
*STAC 5/S38/18 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Henry Pyne
Line 17: Line 25:
 
*STAC 5/S61/35 - B A - 3 Eliz - John Skott v Gabriell Pledall, Philip Stoks et al
 
*STAC 5/S61/35 - B A - 3 Eliz - John Skott v Gabriell Pledall, Philip Stoks et al
 
*STAC 5/S76/39 - I D - 3 Eliz - John Skotte v Gabriel Pledall
 
*STAC 5/S76/39 - I D - 3 Eliz - John Skotte v Gabriel Pledall
 +
 +
''' Skott, John '''
 
*STAC 5/S82/7 - B Dr - 25 Eliz - Johan Skotte v John Fisher Sr, John Fisher Jr, James Dalton et al
 
*STAC 5/S82/7 - B Dr - 25 Eliz - Johan Skotte v John Fisher Sr, John Fisher Jr, James Dalton et al
  
 
''' Scott, Jonas '''  
 
''' Scott, Jonas '''  
 +
*STAC 5/S5/34 - B A Rn - Hil 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Ryseley, Richard Brownesworde
 
*STAC 5/S74/20 - I D - 16 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Rysley, Richard Brownesword
 
*STAC 5/S74/20 - I D - 16 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Rysley, Richard Brownesword
−
*STAC 5/S5/34 - B A Rn - Hil 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Ryseley, Richard Brownesworde
 
 
*STAC 5/S26/30 - I D - 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Risely, Richard Brownsword
 
*STAC 5/S26/30 - I D - 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Risely, Richard Brownsword
 
*STAC 5/S81/28 - I D - 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Rysley, Richard Brownesward
 
*STAC 5/S81/28 - I D - 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Rysley, Richard Brownesward
Line 27: Line 37:
 
''' Scott, Michael '''
 
''' Scott, Michael '''
 
*STAC 5/S24/26 - B - 43 Eliz - Michael Scott v Adryan Scroope, Hugh Loyd et al
 
*STAC 5/S24/26 - B - 43 Eliz - Michael Scott v Adryan Scroope, Hugh Loyd et al
−
 
−
''' Scott, Peter '''
 
−
*STAC 5/S47/5 - B A - 38 Eliz - Peter Scott v John Reely, Thomas Purr et al
 
  
 
''' Scott, Robert '''
 
''' Scott, Robert '''
 
*STAC 5/S1/18 - B A - Easter 29 Eliz - Suffolk - Robert Scott v Nicholas Foxe, Thomas Neche, Robert Foxe  
 
*STAC 5/S1/18 - B A - Easter 29 Eliz - Suffolk - Robert Scott v Nicholas Foxe, Thomas Neche, Robert Foxe  
−
*STAC 5/S33/34 - I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Scott v Nicholas Foxe
+
*STAC 5/S33/34 - I D - 29 Eliz - Suffolk - Robert Scott v Nicholas Foxe
 +
**see [[STAC co Suffolk]]
  
 
''' Scott, William '''  
 
''' Scott, William '''  
 +
*STAC 5/S47/5 - B A - 38 Eliz - Peter Scott v John Reely, Thomas Purr et al
 
*STAC 5/S13/32 - I D - 37 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott v Roger Cooke, John Reilye
 
*STAC 5/S13/32 - I D - 37 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott v Roger Cooke, John Reilye
 
*STAC 5/S73/37 - Rn Rr - 38 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott, John Helyer v Thomas Parr
 
*STAC 5/S73/37 - Rn Rr - 38 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott, John Helyer v Thomas Parr
 
*STAC 5/S4/14 - Rn - 38 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott v Thomas Purr, Roger Cook, John Reely, John Purr
 
*STAC 5/S4/14 - Rn - 38 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott v Thomas Purr, Roger Cook, John Reely, John Purr
 
*STAC 5/S36/18 - A - 38 Eliz - Robert Scott, William Scott v Roger Cooke et al
 
*STAC 5/S36/18 - A - 38 Eliz - Robert Scott, William Scott v Roger Cooke et al
−
 
−
''' Bevan Case Index '''
 
−
*Scott v Cooke - STAC 5/S47/5, STAC 5/S36/18, STAC 5/S4/14, STAC 5/S13/32, STAC 5/S73/37
 
−
*Scott v Dyer - STAC 5/S70/26, STAC 5/S61/30, STAC 5/S85/23
 
−
*Scott v Fisher - STAC 5/S82/7
 
−
*Scott v Fox - STAC 5/S1/18, STAC 5/S33/34
 
−
*Scott v Hutchinson - STAC 5/S35/17
 
−
*Scott v Jordan - STAC 5/S30/24, STAC 5/S35/4
 
−
*Scott v Pleydell - STAC 5/S61/35, STAC 5/S76/39
 
−
*Scott v Pyne - STAC 5/S11/18, STAC 5/S38/18
 
−
*Scott v Risley - STAC 5/S5/34, STAC 5/S26/30, STAC 5/S74/20, STAC 5/S81/28
 
−
*Scott v Scrope - STAC 5/S24/26
 
−
*Scott v Thornton - STAC 5/S82/1
 
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections:'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections:'''  
−
*STAC 5/S1/18 - Robert Scott vicar of the Parish of Mendham co Suffolk
 
 
*STAC 5/S5/34 - Scott plt Risley et al defts the Deftes Charged with fraud and decept in subteltie allureing the plt (beeing the deftes Apprentice) to make a Lease in trust to him upon pretended freindship & under pretence of defending of his right & Lawfull title to the Landes of the Plt and for the tryall of his right therto. And for procuring the plt to make a letter of Atturney to them & to enter Recognizance of 300 li not to Revoke the same yet Converted the profitt of the Landes to their owne uses, for which decept, the Fleete, Fyned 100 markes & Risley 20 li the other Deft to reassure the Landes to the plt & not to goe out of the Fleete till they had per order & decree of the Court. BL. Harley 2143 f.8
 
*STAC 5/S5/34 - Scott plt Risley et al defts the Deftes Charged with fraud and decept in subteltie allureing the plt (beeing the deftes Apprentice) to make a Lease in trust to him upon pretended freindship & under pretence of defending of his right & Lawfull title to the Landes of the Plt and for the tryall of his right therto. And for procuring the plt to make a letter of Atturney to them & to enter Recognizance of 300 li not to Revoke the same yet Converted the profitt of the Landes to their owne uses, for which decept, the Fleete, Fyned 100 markes & Risley 20 li the other Deft to reassure the Landes to the plt & not to goe out of the Fleete till they had per order & decree of the Court. BL. Harley 2143 f.8
−
*Biography in “The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1558-1603,” ed. P.W. Hasler, 1981.
 
−
**SCOTT, Edmund, of the Middle Temple, London.
 
−
**SCOTT, John I (bef.1534-1619), of Chippenham, Wilts.
 
−
**SCOTT, John II.
 
−
**SCOTT, Reginald (c.1537-99), of Smeeth and Aldington, Kent.
 
−
**SCOTT, Sir Thomas (c.1535-94), of Scot's Hall, Smeeth, Kent.
 
−
**SCOTT, Thomas (c.1563-1610), of Scot's Hall, Smeeth, Kent.
 
−
**SCOTT, William (c.1579-aft.1611), of Godmersham, Kent.
 

Latest revision as of 09:26, 8 June 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Scott, George

  • STAC 5/S70/26 - B A C I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Peter Dier, Henry Lance et al
  • STAC 5/S85/23 - Rn - - George Scott v Peter Dyer
  • STAC 5/S61/30 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Peter Dyer

Scott, George

  • STAC 5/S30/24 - B A Rn - 20 Eliz - George Scott v John Jurden, Robert Davie et al
  • STAC 5/S35/4 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v John Belmey, John Jurden

Scott, George

  • STAC 5/S11/18 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott, Richard Cooke v Henry Pyne, John Hatton
  • STAC 5/S38/18 - I D - 20 Eliz - George Scott v Henry Pyne

Scott, Henry

  • STAC 5/S82/1 - B - 33 Eliz - Henry Scott v Robert Thornton

Scott, Janet

  • STAC 5/S35/17 - B - 23 Eliz - Jannatt Scott v William Hutchenson, James Wilson

Skott, John

  • STAC 5/S61/35 - B A - 3 Eliz - John Skott v Gabriell Pledall, Philip Stoks et al
  • STAC 5/S76/39 - I D - 3 Eliz - John Skotte v Gabriel Pledall

Skott, John

  • STAC 5/S82/7 - B Dr - 25 Eliz - Johan Skotte v John Fisher Sr, John Fisher Jr, James Dalton et al

Scott, Jonas

  • STAC 5/S5/34 - B A Rn - Hil 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Ryseley, Richard Brownesworde
  • STAC 5/S74/20 - I D - 16 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Rysley, Richard Brownesword
  • STAC 5/S26/30 - I D - 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Risely, Richard Brownsword
  • STAC 5/S81/28 - I D - 21 Eliz - Jonas Scott v Robert Rysley, Richard Brownesward

Scott, Michael

  • STAC 5/S24/26 - B - 43 Eliz - Michael Scott v Adryan Scroope, Hugh Loyd et al

Scott, Robert

  • STAC 5/S1/18 - B A - Easter 29 Eliz - Suffolk - Robert Scott v Nicholas Foxe, Thomas Neche, Robert Foxe
  • STAC 5/S33/34 - I D - 29 Eliz - Suffolk - Robert Scott v Nicholas Foxe

Scott, William

  • STAC 5/S47/5 - B A - 38 Eliz - Peter Scott v John Reely, Thomas Purr et al
  • STAC 5/S13/32 - I D - 37 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott v Roger Cooke, John Reilye
  • STAC 5/S73/37 - Rn Rr - 38 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott, John Helyer v Thomas Parr
  • STAC 5/S4/14 - Rn - 38 Eliz - William Scott, Robert Scott v Thomas Purr, Roger Cook, John Reely, John Purr
  • STAC 5/S36/18 - A - 38 Eliz - Robert Scott, William Scott v Roger Cooke et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections:

  • STAC 5/S5/34 - Scott plt Risley et al defts the Deftes Charged with fraud and decept in subteltie allureing the plt (beeing the deftes Apprentice) to make a Lease in trust to him upon pretended freindship & under pretence of defending of his right & Lawfull title to the Landes of the Plt and for the tryall of his right therto. And for procuring the plt to make a letter of Atturney to them & to enter Recognizance of 300 li not to Revoke the same yet Converted the profitt of the Landes to their owne uses, for which decept, the Fleete, Fyned 100 markes & Risley 20 li the other Deft to reassure the Landes to the plt & not to goe out of the Fleete till they had per order & decree of the Court. BL. Harley 2143 f.8
Retrieved from "https://waalt.uh.edu/index.php?title=STAC_Scott&oldid=82830"