Difference between revisions of "STAC Saunders"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
''' Saunders, Alice ''' | ''' Saunders, Alice ''' | ||
Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
*STAC 5/S55/2 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Sander, Walter Roode et al v Richard Berrye | *STAC 5/S55/2 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Sander, Walter Roode et al v Richard Berrye | ||
*STAC 5/S6/13 - B A - 21 Eliz - John Saunder v Richard Berry | *STAC 5/S6/13 - B A - 21 Eliz - John Saunder v Richard Berry | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Saunder, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S85/40 - B - 21 Eliz - John Saunders v George Ellison | *STAC 5/S85/40 - B - 21 Eliz - John Saunders v George Ellison | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Saunder, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S54/28 - B A - 33 Eliz - John Saunders v Martyn Trott, Samuel Newce | *STAC 5/S54/28 - B A - 33 Eliz - John Saunders v Martyn Trott, Samuel Newce | ||
*STAC 5/S70/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Saunders v Martyn Trott | *STAC 5/S70/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Saunders v Martyn Trott | ||
− | *STAC 5/S81/7 - I D - 33 Eliz - Anne Soame, Jane Lehmite, John Sanders et al v Martyn Trotte | + | *STAC 5/S81/7 - I D - 33 Eliz - Anne Soame, Jane Lehmite, John Sanders et al v Martyn Trotte |
''' Saunders, Michael ''' | ''' Saunders, Michael ''' | ||
Line 36: | Line 41: | ||
*STAC 5/S37/8 - B A Rn Rr - 32 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Duncombe, John Shewbrooke | *STAC 5/S37/8 - B A Rn Rr - 32 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Duncombe, John Shewbrooke | ||
*STAC 5/S55/9 - I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Saunders, Richard Saunders v William Duncombe, John Sebrook | *STAC 5/S55/9 - I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Saunders, Richard Saunders v William Duncombe, John Sebrook | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Saunders Richard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S73/26 - B A - 33 Eliz - Richard Sanders v John Browne Sr, John Browne, William Leigh et al | *STAC 5/S73/26 - B A - 33 Eliz - Richard Sanders v John Browne Sr, John Browne, William Leigh et al | ||
*STAC 5/S66/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Saunders v John Brown, Peter Lea et al | *STAC 5/S66/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Saunders v John Brown, Peter Lea et al | ||
*STAC 5/S58/4 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Sanders v John Browne | *STAC 5/S58/4 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Sanders v John Browne | ||
*STAC 5/S39/19 - I D - 34 Eliz - Richard Sawnders v John Browne, Peter Lee et al | *STAC 5/S39/19 - I D - 34 Eliz - Richard Sawnders v John Browne, Peter Lee et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Saunders Richard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S76/12 - B - 41 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Stone, Thomas Fuller et al | *STAC 5/S76/12 - B - 41 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Stone, Thomas Fuller et al | ||
*STAC 5/S34/34 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Sanders v Ellen Stone, Christian Kettle | *STAC 5/S34/34 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Sanders v Ellen Stone, Christian Kettle | ||
Line 50: | Line 59: | ||
''' Saunders, Thomas ''' | ''' Saunders, Thomas ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S28/22 - B - - Thomas Sanders v Henry Reve, Thomas Illinge et al | *STAC 5/S28/22 - B - - Thomas Sanders v Henry Reve, Thomas Illinge et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Saunders, Thomas ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S16/13 - B A - 29 Eliz - Thomas Saunders v Lawrence Meredale, Humfrey Holte | *STAC 5/S16/13 - B A - 29 Eliz - Thomas Saunders v Lawrence Meredale, Humfrey Holte | ||
Line 64: | Line 75: | ||
*STAC 5/S73/11 - I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v John Hemshawe, Christopher Hames et al | *STAC 5/S73/11 - I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v John Hemshawe, Christopher Hames et al | ||
*STAC 5/S66/29 - I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v John Henshawe, William Puttock et al | *STAC 5/S66/29 - I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v John Henshawe, William Puttock et al | ||
− | **[[STAC co Sussex]] | + | **see [[STAC co Sussex]] |
''' Saunder, William ''' | ''' Saunder, William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S1/31 - B - Hil 9 Eliz - William Saunder v Thomas Gregory | *STAC 5/S1/31 - B - Hil 9 Eliz - William Saunder v Thomas Gregory | ||
*STAC 5/S1/32 - B - Hil 9 Eliz - William Saunder v Antony Gattonbye | *STAC 5/S1/32 - B - Hil 9 Eliz - William Saunder v Antony Gattonbye | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Saunder, William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S9/35 - I D - 19 Eliz - William Saunders v Walter Morgan Wolfe | *STAC 5/S9/35 - I D - 19 Eliz - William Saunders v Walter Morgan Wolfe | ||
*STAC 5/S32/15 - I D - 19 Eliz - William Saunders v Reynold Williams | *STAC 5/S32/15 - I D - 19 Eliz - William Saunders v Reynold Williams | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Saunder, William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S67/11 - B - - William Saunders v William Fyfe, Joan Fyfe, James Saunders | *STAC 5/S67/11 - B - - William Saunders v William Fyfe, Joan Fyfe, James Saunders | ||
*STAC 5/S83/18 - A - 29 Eliz - William Saunders v William Fyse et al | *STAC 5/S83/18 - A - 29 Eliz - William Saunders v William Fyse et al | ||
*STAC 5/S25/25 - I D - 29 Eliz - William Sanders v William Fyne | *STAC 5/S25/25 - I D - 29 Eliz - William Sanders v William Fyne | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Saunder, William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/S48/40 - Rn - 41 Eliz - William Saunder v William Shute, Roger Howe | *STAC 5/S48/40 - Rn - 41 Eliz - William Saunder v William Shute, Roger Howe | ||
Line 80: | Line 97: | ||
*STAC 5/A35/16 - I D - 44 Eliz - Northamptonshire - AG v William Saunders, Robert Bishop, Richard Hartpole et al | *STAC 5/A35/16 - I D - 44 Eliz - Northamptonshire - AG v William Saunders, Robert Bishop, Richard Hartpole et al | ||
*STAC 7/10/14 - - - Northamptonshire - AG (Edward Coke) v William Saunders et al | *STAC 7/10/14 - - - Northamptonshire - AG (Edward Coke) v William Saunders et al | ||
− | **[[STAC co Northampton]] | + | **see [[STAC co Northampton]] |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
Latest revision as of 12:39, 5 November 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Saunders, Alice
- STAC 5/S4/29 - B A Rn - 11 Eliz - Dame Alice Saunders v Edmund Saunders
- STAC 5/S78/23 - I D - 12 Eliz - Lady Alice Saunders v Edmond Saunder, George Heaver et al
- STAC 5/S8/25 - I D - 12 Eliz - Dame Alice Saunders v Edmund Saunders, George Heaver, William Byllyngton et al
- STAC 5/S10/36 - I D - 12 Eliz - Dame Alice Saunders v Edmund Saunder
Saunders, Edward
- STAC 5/S52/12 - B A - 35 Eliz - Edward Saunders v Francis Westley
- STAC 5/S5/21 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Edward Saunders v Francis Westley
- STAC 5/S30/11 - I D - 35 Eliz - Edward Sauners v Francis Westley
Saunder, John
- STAC 5/S28/38 - B - 19 Eliz - John Sander, Walter Rood et al v Richard Berry alias Bury
- STAC 5/S40/19 - C I D - 20 Eliz - John Sanders et al v Richard Burge
- STAC 5/S55/2 - I D - 20 Eliz - John Sander, Walter Roode et al v Richard Berrye
- STAC 5/S6/13 - B A - 21 Eliz - John Saunder v Richard Berry
Saunder, John
- STAC 5/S85/40 - B - 21 Eliz - John Saunders v George Ellison
Saunder, John
- STAC 5/S54/28 - B A - 33 Eliz - John Saunders v Martyn Trott, Samuel Newce
- STAC 5/S70/18 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Saunders v Martyn Trott
- STAC 5/S81/7 - I D - 33 Eliz - Anne Soame, Jane Lehmite, John Sanders et al v Martyn Trotte
Saunders, Michael
- STAC 5/S7/24 - B - 38 Eliz - Michael Saunders v Edward Barnhouse, William Smith
Saunders, Millicent
- STAC 5/S80/1 - B - 44 Eliz - Millecent Saunders, Thomas Wright v Marmaduke Dawney, William Gardyner et al
Sander, Nicholas
- STAC 5/S53/20 - B A Rn - 30 Eliz - Nicholas Sander v Nicholas Fenner, Beattrice Fenner, Alice Fenner
- STAC 5/S76/15 - I D - 30 Eliz - Nicholas Saunder v Alice Venner, Nicholas Venner, Bettrice Venner
Saunders Richard
- STAC 5/S37/8 - B A Rn Rr - 32 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Duncombe, John Shewbrooke
- STAC 5/S55/9 - I D - 32 Eliz - Thomas Saunders, Richard Saunders v William Duncombe, John Sebrook
Saunders Richard
- STAC 5/S73/26 - B A - 33 Eliz - Richard Sanders v John Browne Sr, John Browne, William Leigh et al
- STAC 5/S66/13 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Saunders v John Brown, Peter Lea et al
- STAC 5/S58/4 - I D - 33 Eliz - Richard Sanders v John Browne
- STAC 5/S39/19 - I D - 34 Eliz - Richard Sawnders v John Browne, Peter Lee et al
Saunders Richard
- STAC 5/S76/12 - B - 41 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Stone, Thomas Fuller et al
- STAC 5/S34/34 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Sanders v Ellen Stone, Christian Kettle
- STAC 5/S36/21 - B A - 42 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Stone, Thomas Fuller et al
- STAC 5/S49/22 - Rn - 42 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Stone, William Kilpin et al
- STAC 5/S12/5 - I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Sanders v William Stone, Emanuel Stone
- STAC 5/S60/37 - A - 42 Eliz - Richard Saunders v William Kylpin, Thomas Fuller et al
- STAC 5/S25/6 - I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Sanders v William Kylpin, Thomas Fuller et al
Saunders, Thomas
- STAC 5/S28/22 - B - - Thomas Sanders v Henry Reve, Thomas Illinge et al
Saunders, Thomas
- STAC 5/S16/13 - B A - 29 Eliz - Thomas Saunders v Lawrence Meredale, Humfrey Holte
Sanders, Tomazin
- STAC 5/S41/25 - B - 17 Eliz - Thomazin Sanders v Thomas Redhed
Saunders, Walsingham
- STAC 5/S81/26 - B - 25 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v John Henshawe, Christopher Haynes et al. Report STAC 5/S81/26r
- STAC 5/S57/6 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v John Moake, John Henshaw et al
- STAC 5/S35/6 - I D - 25 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v William Pullock
- STAC 5/S79/27 - A Rn Rr I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v John Hanshaw, Christopher Heynes et al
- STAC 5/S65/14 - C I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v Christopher Haynes, John Henshaw et al
- STAC 5/S16/6 - I - 12 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v Christopher Haynes, John Henshawe et al
- STAC 5/S73/11 - I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Sanders v John Hemshawe, Christopher Hames et al
- STAC 5/S66/29 - I D - 26 Eliz - Sussex - Walsingham Saunders v John Henshawe, William Puttock et al
- see STAC co Sussex
Saunder, William
- STAC 5/S1/31 - B - Hil 9 Eliz - William Saunder v Thomas Gregory
- STAC 5/S1/32 - B - Hil 9 Eliz - William Saunder v Antony Gattonbye
Saunder, William
- STAC 5/S9/35 - I D - 19 Eliz - William Saunders v Walter Morgan Wolfe
- STAC 5/S32/15 - I D - 19 Eliz - William Saunders v Reynold Williams
Saunder, William
- STAC 5/S67/11 - B - - William Saunders v William Fyfe, Joan Fyfe, James Saunders
- STAC 5/S83/18 - A - 29 Eliz - William Saunders v William Fyse et al
- STAC 5/S25/25 - I D - 29 Eliz - William Sanders v William Fyne
Saunder, William
- STAC 5/S48/40 - Rn - 41 Eliz - William Saunder v William Shute, Roger Howe
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A23/34 -B A - 43 Eliz - Northamptonshire - AG v William Saunders, Robert Bishop et al
- STAC 5/A35/16 - I D - 44 Eliz - Northamptonshire - AG v William Saunders, Robert Bishop, Richard Hartpole et al
- STAC 7/10/14 - - - Northamptonshire - AG (Edward Coke) v William Saunders et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 46r. Perjury laid generally and concluded which the statute of 5 Elizabeth in the prayer of process amended by order of court. Sanders, plaintiff; Nore et al: for perjury who prayed to amendment of his bill for that the bill was laid and grounded to be committed contrary to Her Majesty’s laws and statutes, and yet in the praying of process in the same bill, praieth also that the same persons might stand to and abide such order and direction as by the laws and statutes of the 5th year of Her Majesty is provided, whereupon the plaintiff prayed that the word so continued in the conclusion of the prayer of process might be stricken out which was accordingly ordered. Michaelmas 34 Elizabeth (kk)
- STAC 5/S40/19 – ?Halberton, Devon (dk)
- STAC 5/S6/13 – Halberton, Devon - (John Saunder v Richard Berry)