Difference between revisions of "STAC Rowse"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
'''Rowse, Anthony ''' | '''Rowse, Anthony ''' | ||
Line 15: | Line 16: | ||
''' Rowse, John ''' | ''' Rowse, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/R42/32 - I D - - John Rowse v Nicholas Adams | *STAC 5/R42/32 - I D - - John Rowse v Nicholas Adams | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Rowse, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/R38/26 - B - - John Rowse v Christopher Joysling, William Todd et al | *STAC 5/R38/26 - B - - John Rowse v Christopher Joysling, William Todd et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Rowse, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/R40/5 - I D - 5 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbelly et al | *STAC 5/R40/5 - I D - 5 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbelly et al | ||
*STAC 5/R10/35 - D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbelby | *STAC 5/R10/35 - D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbelby | ||
*STAC 5/R6/39 - I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymblebie | *STAC 5/R6/39 - I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymblebie | ||
*STAC 5/R6/15 - I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbleby | *STAC 5/R6/15 - I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbleby | ||
− | *STAC 5/R8/26 - C I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thimbleby. Report [[STAC 5/R8/26r]] | + | *STAC 5/R8/26 - C I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thimbleby. |
+ | **Report [[STAC 5/R8/26r]] | ||
*STAC 7/28/24 - - - John Rowsse v Thymbilby | *STAC 7/28/24 - - - John Rowsse v Thymbilby | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Rowse, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/R19/25 - B - 9 Eliz - John Rowse v William Rowney, Richard Whatcote et al | *STAC 5/R19/25 - B - 9 Eliz - John Rowse v William Rowney, Richard Whatcote et al | ||
Line 35: | Line 43: | ||
''' Rowse, William ''' | ''' Rowse, William ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R3/31 - B - 38 Eliz - | + | *STAC 5/R3/31 - B - 38 Eliz - Cornwall - William Rowse v Degorye Proute, Robert Beare, Degorye Trewen, Robert Mayne et al |
+ | **see [[STAC co Cornwall]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Rowse, William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/R22/40 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - William Rowse, Antony Statforde et al v Sir Robert Throckmorton, Michael Fox et al | *STAC 5/R22/40 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - William Rowse, Antony Statforde et al v Sir Robert Throckmorton, Michael Fox et al | ||
*STAC 5/R19/31 - Rr - 41 Eliz - William Rowse, Antony Stratford et al v Sir Arthur Throckmorton | *STAC 5/R19/31 - Rr - 41 Eliz - William Rowse, Antony Stratford et al v Sir Arthur Throckmorton | ||
*STAC 5/R5/27 - I D - 40 Eliz - William Rous et al v Sir Arthur Throgmorton | *STAC 5/R5/27 - I D - 40 Eliz - William Rous et al v Sir Arthur Throgmorton | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
+ | *see [[STAC Roos]] and [[STAC Rous]] and [[STAC Rosse]] and [[STAC Russe]] | ||
*Rowse v Thimbleby | *Rowse v Thimbleby | ||
**Fine paid 30 November 1562 TNA E159/344 Michaelmas Term, 4-5 Elizabeth | **Fine paid 30 November 1562 TNA E159/344 Michaelmas Term, 4-5 Elizabeth | ||
Line 82: | Line 63: | ||
***From George Calton of the City of London, yeoman, for his fine: £5. | ***From George Calton of the City of London, yeoman, for his fine: £5. | ||
**These fines are assessed upon them for forging and counterfeiting of certain writings and leases touching Rowse, complainant, and the said parties, defendants. | **These fines are assessed upon them for forging and counterfeiting of certain writings and leases touching Rowse, complainant, and the said parties, defendants. | ||
− |
Revision as of 10:32, 6 June 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Rowse, Anthony
- STAC 5/R2/13 - B A - Easter 33 Eliz - Anthony Rowse, Richard Wood, Mary Fytz v Bennet Littlejohn, James Serjeant, Mark Piers, William Lane
- STAC 5/R24/23 - I D - 33 Eliz - Antony Rous, Richard Wood et al v John Bennet Little
Rowse, Dionis
- STAC 5/R2/35 - B A - Trin 39 Eliz - Dionis Rowse v Laurence Grosse, William Yeldinge
Rowse, Henry
- STAC 5/R23/31 - B A - 38 Eliz - Henry Rowse v John Coryn, Thomas Roberte et al
- STAC 5/R37/4 - I D - 38 Eliz - Henry Rowse v John Coryn
Rowse, John
- STAC 5/R42/32 - I D - - John Rowse v Nicholas Adams
Rowse, John
- STAC 5/R38/26 - B - - John Rowse v Christopher Joysling, William Todd et al
Rowse, John
- STAC 5/R40/5 - I D - 5 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbelly et al
- STAC 5/R10/35 - D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbelby
- STAC 5/R6/39 - I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymblebie
- STAC 5/R6/15 - I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thymbleby
- STAC 5/R8/26 - C I D - 4 Eliz - John Rowse v Richard Thimbleby.
- Report STAC 5/R8/26r
- STAC 7/28/24 - - - John Rowsse v Thymbilby
Rowse, John
- STAC 5/R19/25 - B - 9 Eliz - John Rowse v William Rowney, Richard Whatcote et al
Rowse, Reynold
- STAC 5/R9/20 - B A C I D - 27 Eliz - Reynold Rowse v Robert Artys, Robert Garrarde et al
- STAC 5/R35/19 - Rn - - Reynold Rous v Robert Artys, William Ungle et al
- STAC 5/R5/17 - I D - 28 Eliz - William Rous v Robert Artys, William Cutlynge et al
Rowse, Thomas
- STAC 5/R8/28 - B A C I D - 39 Eliz - Thomas Rowse v Nicholas Helhowse
- STAC 5/R7/37 - I D - 39 Eliz - Thomas Rowse v Nicholas Helhowse
- STAC 5/R18/1 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Thomas Rows v Nicholas Hethouse
Rowse, William
- STAC 5/R3/31 - B - 38 Eliz - Cornwall - William Rowse v Degorye Proute, Robert Beare, Degorye Trewen, Robert Mayne et al
- see STAC co Cornwall
Rowse, William
- STAC 5/R22/40 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - William Rowse, Antony Statforde et al v Sir Robert Throckmorton, Michael Fox et al
- STAC 5/R19/31 - Rr - 41 Eliz - William Rowse, Antony Stratford et al v Sir Arthur Throckmorton
- STAC 5/R5/27 - I D - 40 Eliz - William Rous et al v Sir Arthur Throgmorton
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- see STAC Roos and STAC Rous and STAC Rosse and STAC Russe
- Rowse v Thimbleby
- Fine paid 30 November 1562 TNA E159/344 Michaelmas Term, 4-5 Elizabeth
- From Richard Thymolbie of Thimbleby, Lincs, armiger: 500 marks.
- From William Charnocke of the City of Westminster, gent, for his fine: 100 marks.
- These fines are for certain falsehoods and forgeries by them committed in Rowses matter.
- Fine Paid 5 February 1562/3 TNA E159/344 Hilary Term, 5 Elizabeth
- From Richard Thymilbie of Thimbleby, Lincs, armiger, for his fine: £100.
- From Thomas Parkyns of Plymouth, gent: £20.
- From George Calton of the City of London, yeoman, for his fine: £5.
- These fines are assessed upon them for forging and counterfeiting of certain writings and leases touching Rowse, complainant, and the said parties, defendants.
- Fine paid 30 November 1562 TNA E159/344 Michaelmas Term, 4-5 Elizabeth