STAC Roos

From Rpalmer
Revision as of 12:19, 17 February 2016 by Hgood (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Roos,

  • STAC 7/28/23 - - - Roos v Brian Denman

Roos, Henry

  • STAC 5/R22/26 - B A - 40 Eliz - Henry Roos v William Kynder, Robert Blagne et al

Roos, Peter

  • STAC 5/R32/1 - B A - 18 Eliz - Peter Roos v Thomas Broke, Stephen Hakin et al
  • STAC 5/R11/33 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v William Cardynall, John Anderson
  • STAC 5/R36/15 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v William Cardinall
  • STAC 5/R22/11 - I D - 35 Eliz - Peter Roos v Richard Watson, William Clerk et al
  • STAC 5/R18/29 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Peter Roos v Henry Kendall
  • STAC 5/R4/17 - B - 39 Eliz - Peter Roos v Thomas Adwicke, Nicholas Adwicke
  • STAC 10/1/132 - I - - Peter Roos

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A27/16 - B A Rr C I D - 34 Eliz - AG v Peter Rosse (or Roos), William Sutton, John Bassett
  • STAC 5/A26/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - AG v Peter Roos
  • STAC 7/10/20 - - - Nottinghamshire - AG (John Popham) v Peter Roos
  • STAC 7/10/20 - - - Nottinghamshire - AG v Peter Roos

Bevan Case Index

  • Rouse v Adams - STAC 5/R42/32 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Adwicke - STAC 5/R4/17
  • Rouse v Artys - STAC 5/R9/20, STAC 5/R35/19, STAC 5/R5/17 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Arundell - STAC 5/R31/33 see STAC Rous
  • Rouse v Brooke - STAC 5/R32/1
  • Rouse v Burton - STAC 5/R19/8 see STAC Rosse
  • Rouse v Cardinall - STAC 5/R11/33, STAC 5/R36/15
  • Rouse v Chamock - STAC 5/R38/35 see STAC Rous
  • Rouse v Coryn - STAC 5/R23/31, STAC 5/R37/4 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Dacre - STAC 5/R32/12 see STAC Rosse
  • Rouse v Denman - STAC 7/28/23
  • Rouse v Franklin - STAC 5/R40/7, STAC 5/R43/10 see STAC Russe
  • Rouse v Grosse - STAC 5/R2/35 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Helhouse - STAC 5/R8/28, STAC 5/R7/37, STAC 5/R18/1 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Herbert - STAC 5/R13/12 see STAC Rosse
  • Rouse v Johnson - STAC 5/R4/10 see STAC Rosse
  • Rouse v Josselyn - STAC 5/R38/26 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Keble - STAC 5/R30/19, STAC 5/R37/30 see STAC Rous
  • Rouse v Kendall - STAC 5/R18/29
  • Rouse v Kinder - STAC 5/R22/26
  • Rouse v Littlejohn - STAC 5/R2/13, STAC 5/R24/23 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Prowse - STAC 5/R3/31 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Rouse - STAC 5/R32/40 see STAC Rous
  • Rouse v Rowney - STAC 5/R19/25 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Shinkwin - STAC 5/R30/6, STAC 5/R1/21, STAC 5/R9/24, STAC 5/R18/13, STAC 5/R24/15 see STAC Rosse
  • Rouse v Thimbleby - STAC 5/R6/15, STAC 5/R6/39, STAC 5/R8/26, STAC 5/R10/35, STAC 5/R40/5, STAC 7/28/24 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Throckmorton - STAC 5/R22/40, STAC 5/R5/27, STAC 5/R19/31 see STAC Rowse
  • Rouse v Watson - STAC 5/R22/11
  • Rouse v Williams - STAC 5/R30/9 see STAC Rous
  • Attorney General v Rouse - STAC 5/A27/16, STAC 5/A26/21, STAC 7/10/20

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 10/1/132 TNA Note. Interrogatories to be put to Anthony Yates, John Moody and Ralph Bennett on behalf of Peter Roos, esquire, probably from the case Roos v Cardinall, since the Nottinghamshire JP William Cardinall in mentioned many times in the document. The case concerned an alleged crime spree by 6 or 7 score of Egyptians [gypsies] in Elkesley, Tuxford and East Markham on the Great North Road in Nottinghamshire, as they travelled towards Lincoln.
  • STAC 7/10/19 - TNA Note: Release of gipsies arrested.