Difference between revisions of "STAC Roos"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
'''Roos, '''  
 
'''Roos, '''  
 
*STAC 7/28/23 - - - Roos v Brian Denman  
 
*STAC 7/28/23 - - - Roos v Brian Denman  
Line 7: Line 11:
 
'''Roos, Peter'''  
 
'''Roos, Peter'''  
 
*STAC 5/R32/1 - B A - 18 Eliz - Peter Roos v Thomas Broke, Stephen Hakin et al
 
*STAC 5/R32/1 - B A - 18 Eliz - Peter Roos v Thomas Broke, Stephen Hakin et al
 +
 +
'''Roos, Peter'''
 
*STAC 5/R11/33 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v William Cardynall, John Anderson
 
*STAC 5/R11/33 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v William Cardynall, John Anderson
 
*STAC 5/R36/15 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v William Cardinall
 
*STAC 5/R36/15 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v William Cardinall
*STAC 5/R22/11 - I D - 35 Eliz - Peter Roos v Richard Watson, William Clerk et al
+
*STAC 5/R22/11 - I D - 35 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v Richard Watson, William Clerk et al
 +
*STAC 10/1/132 - I - - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v Cardinall
 +
**see [[STAC co Nottingham]]
 +
 
 +
'''Roos, Peter'''
 
*STAC 5/R18/29 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Peter Roos v Henry Kendall
 
*STAC 5/R18/29 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Peter Roos v Henry Kendall
 +
 +
'''Roos, Peter'''
 
*STAC 5/R4/17 - B - 39 Eliz - Peter Roos v Thomas Adwicke, Nicholas Adwicke
 
*STAC 5/R4/17 - B - 39 Eliz - Peter Roos v Thomas Adwicke, Nicholas Adwicke
*STAC 10/1/132 - I - - Peter Roos
 
  
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
''' Attorney General '''
*STAC 5/A27/16 - B A Rr C I D - 34 Eliz - AG v Peter Rosse (or Roos), William Sutton, John Bassett
+
*STAC 5/A27/16 - B A Rr C I D - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - AG v Peter Rosse (or Roos), William Sutton, John Bassett
*STAC 5/A26/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - AG v Peter Roos
+
*STAC 5/A26/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - AG v Peter Roos
 
*STAC 7/10/20 - - - Nottinghamshire - AG (John Popham) v Peter Roos
 
*STAC 7/10/20 - - - Nottinghamshire - AG (John Popham) v Peter Roos
*STAC 7/10/20 - - - Nottinghamshire - AG v Peter Roos
+
**see [[STAC co Nottingham]]
 
+
''' Bevan Case Index '''
+
*Rouse v Adams - STAC 5/R42/32 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Adwicke - STAC 5/R4/17
+
*Rouse v Artys - STAC 5/R9/20, STAC 5/R35/19, STAC 5/R5/17 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Arundell - STAC 5/R31/33 see [[STAC Rous]]
+
*Rouse v Brooke - STAC 5/R32/1
+
*Rouse v Burton - STAC 5/R19/8 see [[STAC Rosse]]
+
*Rouse v Cardinall - STAC 5/R11/33, STAC 5/R36/15
+
*Rouse v Chamock - STAC 5/R38/35 see [[STAC Rous]]
+
*Rouse v Coryn - STAC 5/R23/31, STAC 5/R37/4 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Dacre - STAC 5/R32/12 see [[STAC Rosse]]
+
*Rouse v Denman - STAC 7/28/23
+
*Rouse v Franklin - STAC 5/R40/7, STAC 5/R43/10 see [[STAC Russe]]
+
*Rouse v Grosse - STAC 5/R2/35 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Helhouse - STAC 5/R8/28, STAC 5/R7/37, STAC 5/R18/1 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Herbert - STAC 5/R13/12 see [[STAC Rosse]]
+
*Rouse v Johnson - STAC 5/R4/10 see [[STAC Rosse]]
+
*Rouse v Josselyn - STAC 5/R38/26 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Keble - STAC 5/R30/19, STAC 5/R37/30 see [[STAC Rous]]
+
*Rouse v Kendall - STAC 5/R18/29
+
*Rouse v Kinder - STAC 5/R22/26
+
*Rouse v Littlejohn - STAC 5/R2/13, STAC 5/R24/23 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Prowse - STAC 5/R3/31 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Rouse - STAC 5/R32/40 see [[STAC Rous]]
+
*Rouse v Rowney - STAC 5/R19/25 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Shinkwin - STAC 5/R30/6, STAC 5/R1/21, STAC 5/R9/24, STAC 5/R18/13, STAC 5/R24/15 see [[STAC Rosse]]
+
*Rouse v Thimbleby - STAC 5/R6/15, STAC 5/R6/39, STAC 5/R8/26, STAC 5/R10/35, STAC 5/R40/5, STAC 7/28/24 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Throckmorton - STAC 5/R22/40, STAC 5/R5/27, STAC 5/R19/31 see [[STAC Rowse]]
+
*Rouse v Watson - STAC 5/R22/11
+
*Rouse v Williams - STAC 5/R30/9 see [[STAC Rous]]
+
*Attorney General v Rouse - STAC 5/A27/16, STAC 5/A26/21, STAC 7/10/20
+
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
*STAC 10/1/132 TNA Note. Interrogatories to be put to Anthony Yates, John Moody and Ralph Bennett on behalf of Peter Roos, esquire, probably from the case Roos v Cardinall, since the Nottinghamshire JP William Cardinall in mentioned many times in the document. The case concerned an alleged crime spree by 6 or 7 score of Egyptians [gypsies] in Elkesley, Tuxford and East Markham on the Great North Road in Nottinghamshire, as they travelled towards Lincoln.
+
*see [[STAC Rowse]] and [[STAC Rous]] and [[STAC Rosse]] and [[STAC Russe]]
*STAC 7/10/19 - TNA Note: Release of gipsies arrested.
+

Latest revision as of 04:13, 6 June 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Roos,

  • STAC 7/28/23 - - - Roos v Brian Denman

Roos, Henry

  • STAC 5/R22/26 - B A - 40 Eliz - Henry Roos v William Kynder, Robert Blagne et al

Roos, Peter

  • STAC 5/R32/1 - B A - 18 Eliz - Peter Roos v Thomas Broke, Stephen Hakin et al

Roos, Peter

  • STAC 5/R11/33 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v William Cardynall, John Anderson
  • STAC 5/R36/15 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v William Cardinall
  • STAC 5/R22/11 - I D - 35 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v Richard Watson, William Clerk et al
  • STAC 10/1/132 - I - - Nottinghamshire - Peter Roos v Cardinall

Roos, Peter

  • STAC 5/R18/29 - B Dr - 37 Eliz - Peter Roos v Henry Kendall

Roos, Peter

  • STAC 5/R4/17 - B - 39 Eliz - Peter Roos v Thomas Adwicke, Nicholas Adwicke

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A27/16 - B A Rr C I D - 34 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - AG v Peter Rosse (or Roos), William Sutton, John Bassett
  • STAC 5/A26/21 - I D - 33 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - AG v Peter Roos
  • STAC 7/10/20 - - - Nottinghamshire - AG (John Popham) v Peter Roos

Notes, Additions and Corrections