Difference between revisions of "STAC Rookewood"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Rockewood, Clement ''' | ''' Rockewood, Clement ''' | ||
*STAC 5/R39/38 - B A - 32 Eliz - Clement Rookewood v Edmund Cozin, John Flower et al | *STAC 5/R39/38 - B A - 32 Eliz - Clement Rookewood v Edmund Cozin, John Flower et al | ||
*STAC 5/R10/1 - I D - 32 Eliz - Clement Ruckwood, Christopher Nayler v Edmund Cozyn, John Flower | *STAC 5/R10/1 - I D - 32 Eliz - Clement Ruckwood, Christopher Nayler v Edmund Cozyn, John Flower | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Rockewood, Clement ''' | ||
*STAC 5/R8/9 - B A Rn - 37 Eliz - Clement Rockwoode v Robert Cuthbert, [blank] Courtuall et uxor | *STAC 5/R8/9 - B A Rn - 37 Eliz - Clement Rockwoode v Robert Cuthbert, [blank] Courtuall et uxor | ||
*STAC 5/R27/37 - I D - 37 Eliz - Clement Rockewood v Robert Cutbert | *STAC 5/R27/37 - I D - 37 Eliz - Clement Rockewood v Robert Cutbert | ||
Line 11: | Line 17: | ||
''' Rookewood, Thomas ''' | ''' Rookewood, Thomas ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/R39/10 - B - 39 Eliz - Thomas Rookewood v Thomas Mansell et al | + | *STAC 5/R39/10 - B - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Thomas Mansell et al |
− | *STAC 5/R11/38 - B - 39 Eliz - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Permiter, Richard Wicksted et al | + | |
+ | ''' Rookewood, Thomas ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/R11/38 - B - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Permiter, Richard Wicksted et al | ||
*STAC 5/R1/5 - A Rn C D - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewoode v Henry Parmyter, John Brudge, Richard Wickested | *STAC 5/R1/5 - A Rn C D - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewoode v Henry Parmyter, John Brudge, Richard Wickested | ||
− | *STAC 5/R10/5 - A - 39 Eliz - Thomas Rookewood v Richard Wickstede et al | + | *STAC 5/R10/5 - A - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Richard Wickstede et al |
− | *STAC 5/R16/12 - I - 39 Eliz - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Parmyter | + | *STAC 5/R16/12 - I - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Parmyter |
− | *STAC 5/R7/38 - I D - 39 Eliz - Thomas Rookwood v Richard Permiter, Richard Wicksteede et al | + | *STAC 5/R7/38 - I D - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookwood v Richard Permiter, Richard Wicksteede et al |
− | *STAC 5/R8/14 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Thomas Rookewoode v Henry Parmiter, Thomas Weeksteed et al | + | *STAC 5/R8/14 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewoode v Henry Parmiter, Thomas Weeksteed et al |
− | *STAC 5/R31/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Paranyter | + | *STAC 5/R31/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Paranyter |
− | *STAC 7/28/22 - - - Thomas Rookwood v Henry Permiter et al | + | *STAC 7/28/22 - - - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookwood v Henry Permiter et al |
+ | **see [[STAC co Gloucester]] | ||
''' Rookewood, William ''' | ''' Rookewood, William ''' | ||
Line 25: | Line 34: | ||
*STAC 5/R20/34 - B A C I D - 28 Eliz - William Rookewood v Francis Shillings, Nicholas Rust et al | *STAC 5/R20/34 - B A C I D - 28 Eliz - William Rookewood v Francis Shillings, Nicholas Rust et al | ||
*STAC 5/R23/21 - A - 28 Eliz - William Rookewood v Francis Shillinge | *STAC 5/R23/21 - A - 28 Eliz - William Rookewood v Francis Shillinge | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
− | * | + | *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 37v. The like against a 3rd person not party to the suit. Guy committed and paid costs for inserting into his answer slanderous and impertinent matter at one Rockwood’s suit against one William Rockwood the solicitor of the cause not party to the suit. Trinity 33 Elizabeth (kk) |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 10:12, 6 June 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Rockewood, Clement
- STAC 5/R39/38 - B A - 32 Eliz - Clement Rookewood v Edmund Cozin, John Flower et al
- STAC 5/R10/1 - I D - 32 Eliz - Clement Ruckwood, Christopher Nayler v Edmund Cozyn, John Flower
Rockewood, Clement
- STAC 5/R8/9 - B A Rn - 37 Eliz - Clement Rockwoode v Robert Cuthbert, [blank] Courtuall et uxor
- STAC 5/R27/37 - I D - 37 Eliz - Clement Rockewood v Robert Cutbert
- STAC 5/R18/18 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Clement Rookewood v Richard Cuthbert
Rookewood, John
- STAC 5/R22/23 - B A - 33 Eliz - John Rookewood et al v John Gye, Nicholas Harte et al
- STAC 5/R8/37 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Rookewood et al v John Gye et uxor
Rookewood, Thomas
- STAC 5/R39/10 - B - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Thomas Mansell et al
Rookewood, Thomas
- STAC 5/R11/38 - B - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Permiter, Richard Wicksted et al
- STAC 5/R1/5 - A Rn C D - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewoode v Henry Parmyter, John Brudge, Richard Wickested
- STAC 5/R10/5 - A - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Richard Wickstede et al
- STAC 5/R16/12 - I - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Parmyter
- STAC 5/R7/38 - I D - 39 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookwood v Richard Permiter, Richard Wicksteede et al
- STAC 5/R8/14 - C I D - 40 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewoode v Henry Parmiter, Thomas Weeksteed et al
- STAC 5/R31/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookewood v Henry Paranyter
- STAC 7/28/22 - - - Gloucestershire - Thomas Rookwood v Henry Permiter et al
Rookewood, William
- STAC 5/R25/32 - B - 28 Eliz - William Rockewood v Francis Shillinge, William Grene et al
- STAC 5/R20/34 - B A C I D - 28 Eliz - William Rookewood v Francis Shillings, Nicholas Rust et al
- STAC 5/R23/21 - A - 28 Eliz - William Rookewood v Francis Shillinge
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 37v. The like against a 3rd person not party to the suit. Guy committed and paid costs for inserting into his answer slanderous and impertinent matter at one Rockwood’s suit against one William Rockwood the solicitor of the cause not party to the suit. Trinity 33 Elizabeth (kk)