Difference between revisions of "STAC Pembroke"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ||
*STAC 5/P66/5 - B Rn - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Arnold, Evan Harry et al | *STAC 5/P66/5 - B Rn - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Arnold, Evan Harry et al | ||
*STAC 5/P60/39 - A - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Arnold, Evan Harry et al | *STAC 5/P60/39 - A - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Arnold, Evan Harry et al | ||
*STAC 5/P12/11 - I D - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v George ap Robert, Thomas ap Robert et al | *STAC 5/P12/11 - I D - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v George ap Robert, Thomas ap Robert et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/P45/16 - I D - Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v George Aprobert, Thomas Arnold | ||
*STAC 5/P12/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Yorothe, Walter Harvy et al | *STAC 5/P12/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Yorothe, Walter Harvy et al | ||
− | *STAC 7/27/25 - - - Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Yerowthe et al | + | *STAC 7/27/25 - - - Monmouth - Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Yerowthe et al |
− | |||
*STAC 5/P38/29 - B - - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v William Proberts et al | *STAC 5/P38/29 - B - - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v William Proberts et al | ||
*STAC 5/P28/11 - B A - 21 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Gorouth, John ap John | *STAC 5/P28/11 - B A - 21 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Gorouth, John ap John | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Monmouth]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ||
*STAC 5/P58/28 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Dyo ap Richard, Ievan Gibbon Howell | *STAC 5/P58/28 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Dyo ap Richard, Ievan Gibbon Howell | ||
*STAC 5/P20/15 - B A - 26 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Dyo Pritchard, John Dyo Pritchard et al | *STAC 5/P20/15 - B A - 26 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Dyo Pritchard, John Dyo Pritchard et al | ||
*STAC 5/P51/39 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Lawrans, Morgan Rosser et al | *STAC 5/P51/39 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Lawrans, Morgan Rosser et al | ||
*STAC 5/P35/15 - I D - 27 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v George Maunsell, Antony Maunsell | *STAC 5/P35/15 - I D - 27 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v George Maunsell, Antony Maunsell | ||
− | * | + | **see [[STAC co Glamorgan]] |
− | *STAC | ||
''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ||
*STAC 5/P63/6 - B - - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Antony Stillman, Cristopher Bennet et al | *STAC 5/P63/6 - B - - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Antony Stillman, Cristopher Bennet et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ||
*STAC 5/P58/39 - B A - 16 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Billing | *STAC 5/P58/39 - B A - 16 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Billing | ||
*STAC 5/P10/40 - I D - 16 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v John Billinge | *STAC 5/P10/40 - I D - 16 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v John Billinge | ||
*STAC 5/P56/4 - C I D - 17 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Bilding | *STAC 5/P56/4 - C I D - 17 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Bilding | ||
*STAC 5/P66/13 - Rn - - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Billinge | *STAC 5/P66/13 - Rn - - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Billinge | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ||
*STAC 5/P26/28 - B - - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Miles Button, Matthew Griffeth | *STAC 5/P26/28 - B - - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Miles Button, Matthew Griffeth | ||
*STAC 5/P56/10 - B A Rn Rr - 25 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Myles Button | *STAC 5/P56/10 - B A Rn Rr - 25 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Myles Button | ||
Line 26: | Line 36: | ||
*STAC 5/P44/14 - I D - 26 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Myles Button | *STAC 5/P44/14 - I D - 26 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Myles Button | ||
*STAC 5/P16/30 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Miles Button | *STAC 5/P16/30 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Miles Button | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ||
*STAC 5/P6/36 - B A Rn C I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Sir Henry Barklay, John Parsons, Tristram Jacob, John Syms Sr, John Syms Jr | *STAC 5/P6/36 - B A Rn C I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Sir Henry Barklay, John Parsons, Tristram Jacob, John Syms Sr, John Syms Jr | ||
*STAC 5/P48/31 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Parsons | *STAC 5/P48/31 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Parsons | ||
Line 31: | Line 43: | ||
*STAC 5/P10/17 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Syms Sr, John Syms Jr, Edward Labram | *STAC 5/P10/17 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Syms Sr, John Syms Jr, Edward Labram | ||
*STAC 5/P1/2 - I D - 36 Eliz - Earl of Pembroke v Tristram Jacobbe alias Morrys | *STAC 5/P1/2 - I D - 36 Eliz - Earl of Pembroke v Tristram Jacobbe alias Morrys | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Earl of Pembroke ''' | ||
*STAC 5/P62/32 - B A - 41 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Maurice Willowes, Roger Browne et al | *STAC 5/P62/32 - B A - 41 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Maurice Willowes, Roger Browne et al | ||
*STAC 5/P59/36 - I D - 41 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Maurice Willowes et al | *STAC 5/P59/36 - I D - 41 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Maurice Willowes et al | ||
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
+ | *Report Hawarde p.29 - 30 Jan 38 Eliz. In Camera Stellata, 30 Januarij 38 Elizabeth [1595-6], coram consilio predicto, excepto Johanne Fortescue. B. de Londres fuit present ore. It was moved by the Earl of Pembroke v. Sir Henry Bartlet, that whereas it was ordered by the Court that Sir Bartlett H. Bartlet and divers others should pay the costs, when the Earl came to levy the costs he was resisted by force by Sir H. Bartlet and others. It was ordered that Sir H. Bartlet should make answer to this Court in person; for it was agreed that every one ought to have notice of the orders of this Court, and if any be grieved thereby, he should seek a remedy in the Court, and not resist the order, for this is a contempt. |
Revision as of 08:43, 1 June 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Earl of Pembroke
- STAC 5/P66/5 - B Rn - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Arnold, Evan Harry et al
- STAC 5/P60/39 - A - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Arnold, Evan Harry et al
- STAC 5/P12/11 - I D - 18 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v George ap Robert, Thomas ap Robert et al
- STAC 5/P45/16 - I D - Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v George Aprobert, Thomas Arnold
- STAC 5/P12/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Yorothe, Walter Harvy et al
- STAC 7/27/25 - - - Monmouth - Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Yerowthe et al
- STAC 5/P38/29 - B - - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v William Proberts et al
- STAC 5/P28/11 - B A - 21 Eliz - Monmouth - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Gorouth, John ap John
- see STAC co Monmouth
Earl of Pembroke
- STAC 5/P58/28 - B A C I D - 25 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Dyo ap Richard, Ievan Gibbon Howell
- STAC 5/P20/15 - B A - 26 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Thomas Dyo Pritchard, John Dyo Pritchard et al
- STAC 5/P51/39 - B A Rn C I D - 28 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Lawrans, Morgan Rosser et al
- STAC 5/P35/15 - I D - 27 Eliz - Glamorgan - Henry Earl of Pembroke v George Maunsell, Antony Maunsell
Earl of Pembroke
- STAC 5/P63/6 - B - - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Antony Stillman, Cristopher Bennet et al
Earl of Pembroke
- STAC 5/P58/39 - B A - 16 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Billing
- STAC 5/P10/40 - I D - 16 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v John Billinge
- STAC 5/P56/4 - C I D - 17 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Bilding
- STAC 5/P66/13 - Rn - - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Billinge
Earl of Pembroke
- STAC 5/P26/28 - B - - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Miles Button, Matthew Griffeth
- STAC 5/P56/10 - B A Rn Rr - 25 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Myles Button
- STAC 5/P59/12 - C I D - 26 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Miles Button
- STAC 5/P44/14 - I D - 26 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Myles Button
- STAC 5/P16/30 - C I D - 27 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Miles Button
Earl of Pembroke
- STAC 5/P6/36 - B A Rn C I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Sir Henry Barklay, John Parsons, Tristram Jacob, John Syms Sr, John Syms Jr
- STAC 5/P48/31 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Parsons
- STAC 5/P23/26 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v Sir Henry Barkley, John Symms et al
- STAC 5/P10/17 - I D - 36 Eliz - Henry Earl of Pembroke v John Syms Sr, John Syms Jr, Edward Labram
- STAC 5/P1/2 - I D - 36 Eliz - Earl of Pembroke v Tristram Jacobbe alias Morrys
Earl of Pembroke
- STAC 5/P62/32 - B A - 41 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Maurice Willowes, Roger Browne et al
- STAC 5/P59/36 - I D - 41 Eliz - Henry, Earl of Pembroke v Maurice Willowes et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Report Hawarde p.29 - 30 Jan 38 Eliz. In Camera Stellata, 30 Januarij 38 Elizabeth [1595-6], coram consilio predicto, excepto Johanne Fortescue. B. de Londres fuit present ore. It was moved by the Earl of Pembroke v. Sir Henry Bartlet, that whereas it was ordered by the Court that Sir Bartlett H. Bartlet and divers others should pay the costs, when the Earl came to levy the costs he was resisted by force by Sir H. Bartlet and others. It was ordered that Sir H. Bartlet should make answer to this Court in person; for it was agreed that every one ought to have notice of the orders of this Court, and if any be grieved thereby, he should seek a remedy in the Court, and not resist the order, for this is a contempt.