Difference between revisions of "STAC Newdigate"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Newdegate, John ''' | ''' Newdegate, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/N14/33 - B A - 25 Eliz - John Newdegate v Emanuell Maunsell | *STAC 5/N14/33 - B A - 25 Eliz - John Newdegate v Emanuell Maunsell | ||
*STAC 5/N12/37 - C I D - 25 Eliz - John Newdegate v Emanuel Maunsell | *STAC 5/N12/37 - C I D - 25 Eliz - John Newdegate v Emanuel Maunsell | ||
− | *STAC 5/N9/27 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - John Newdigate v Thomas Wythers, Edward Chubnall, Robert Vawse et al | + | |
+ | ''' Newdegate, John ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/N9/27 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - John Newdigate v Thomas Wythers, Edward Chubnall, Robert Vawse et al | ||
*STAC 5/N14/39 - B - - John Newdygate v John Wedon, Richard Stronge | *STAC 5/N14/39 - B - - John Newdygate v John Wedon, Richard Stronge | ||
*STAC 5/N17/16 - B - - John Newdigate v Thomas Creane | *STAC 5/N17/16 - B - - John Newdigate v Thomas Creane | ||
Line 8: | Line 14: | ||
''' Newdigate, Robert ''' | ''' Newdigate, Robert ''' | ||
*STAC 5/N1/7 - B A Rn - 19 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate, Robert Pynchmore v John Earl of Kent, John Manneering, Gyles Blofeld, Richard Salter, John Dytchefeild, John Paul et al | *STAC 5/N1/7 - B A Rn - 19 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate, Robert Pynchmore v John Earl of Kent, John Manneering, Gyles Blofeld, Richard Salter, John Dytchefeild, John Paul et al | ||
− | *STAC 5/N5/9 - I D - 19 Eliz - Robert Newdigate, Robert Pynchmor v John Dytchfield, Richard Salter et al | + | *STAC 5/N5/9 - I D - 19 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate, Robert Pynchmor v John Dytchfield, Richard Salter et al |
− | *STAC 5/N3/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Robert Newdegate, Robert Pynchenor v Henry Earl of Kent | + | *STAC 5/N3/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdegate, Robert Pynchenor v Henry Earl of Kent |
− | *STAC 5/N2/15 - I D - 20 Eliz - Robert Nudygale, Robert Pinchmore v Henry Earl of Kent | + | *STAC 5/N2/15 - I D - 20 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Nudygale, Robert Pinchmore v Henry Earl of Kent |
+ | **see [[STAC co Bedford]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Newdigate, Robert ''' | ||
*STAC 5/N14/27 - B A I D - 37 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Richard Conquest | *STAC 5/N14/27 - B A I D - 37 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Richard Conquest | ||
*STAC 5/N8/21 - I D - 36 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Richard Conquest | *STAC 5/N8/21 - I D - 36 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Richard Conquest | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Newdigate, Robert ''' | ||
*STAC 5/N1/15 - B - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v, Adam Amps et uxor, Thomas Leapor | *STAC 5/N1/15 - B - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v, Adam Amps et uxor, Thomas Leapor | ||
− | *STAC 5/N10/16 - A I - 37 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Thomas Leaper et al | + | *STAC 5/N10/16 - A I - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v Thomas Leaper et al |
− | *STAC 5/N16/30 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Thomas Leaper, Adam Amps | + | *STAC 5/N16/30 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v Thomas Leaper, Adam Amps |
− | *STAC 5/N5/6 - A Rn - 37 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v William Ampes et al | + | *STAC 5/N5/6 - A Rn - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v William Ampes et al |
− | *STAC 5/N13/34 - I D - 37 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v William Mann | + | *STAC 5/N13/34 - I D - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v William Mann |
− | *STAC 5/N15/25 - I D - 37 Eliz - Robert Newdegate v Adam Amps | + | *STAC 5/N15/25 - I D - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdegate v Adam Amps |
− | *STAC 5/N2/34 - I D - 38 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Adam Ampes | + | *STAC 5/N2/34 - I D - 38 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v Adam Ampes |
− | + | **see [[STAC co Bedford]] | |
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
*STAC 5/N14/27 - Tr 36 Eliz fo. 235 - Newdgate plt Conquest deft for incerting into his Answer frivolous scornefull & impertinent matter against the plt and his Father Dec’ Justice Walmesley to Consider thereof and to Certifie. An Order both for the Defts punishment & Costes to the plt for his unnecessarie Charges. BL Harley 2143 f.9 | *STAC 5/N14/27 - Tr 36 Eliz fo. 235 - Newdgate plt Conquest deft for incerting into his Answer frivolous scornefull & impertinent matter against the plt and his Father Dec’ Justice Walmesley to Consider thereof and to Certifie. An Order both for the Defts punishment & Costes to the plt for his unnecessarie Charges. BL Harley 2143 f.9 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 09:26, 29 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Newdegate, John
- STAC 5/N14/33 - B A - 25 Eliz - John Newdegate v Emanuell Maunsell
- STAC 5/N12/37 - C I D - 25 Eliz - John Newdegate v Emanuel Maunsell
Newdegate, John
- STAC 5/N9/27 - B Dr - 28 Eliz - John Newdigate v Thomas Wythers, Edward Chubnall, Robert Vawse et al
- STAC 5/N14/39 - B - - John Newdygate v John Wedon, Richard Stronge
- STAC 5/N17/16 - B - - John Newdigate v Thomas Creane
Newdigate, Robert
- STAC 5/N1/7 - B A Rn - 19 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate, Robert Pynchmore v John Earl of Kent, John Manneering, Gyles Blofeld, Richard Salter, John Dytchefeild, John Paul et al
- STAC 5/N5/9 - I D - 19 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate, Robert Pynchmor v John Dytchfield, Richard Salter et al
- STAC 5/N3/14 - I D - 20 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdegate, Robert Pynchenor v Henry Earl of Kent
- STAC 5/N2/15 - I D - 20 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Nudygale, Robert Pinchmore v Henry Earl of Kent
- see STAC co Bedford
Newdigate, Robert
- STAC 5/N14/27 - B A I D - 37 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Richard Conquest
- STAC 5/N8/21 - I D - 36 Eliz - Robert Newdigate v Richard Conquest
Newdigate, Robert
- STAC 5/N1/15 - B - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v, Adam Amps et uxor, Thomas Leapor
- STAC 5/N10/16 - A I - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v Thomas Leaper et al
- STAC 5/N16/30 - Rr - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v Thomas Leaper, Adam Amps
- STAC 5/N5/6 - A Rn - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v William Ampes et al
- STAC 5/N13/34 - I D - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v William Mann
- STAC 5/N15/25 - I D - 37 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdegate v Adam Amps
- STAC 5/N2/34 - I D - 38 Eliz - Bedfordshire - Robert Newdigate v Adam Ampes
- see STAC co Bedford
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/N14/27 - Tr 36 Eliz fo. 235 - Newdgate plt Conquest deft for incerting into his Answer frivolous scornefull & impertinent matter against the plt and his Father Dec’ Justice Walmesley to Consider thereof and to Certifie. An Order both for the Defts punishment & Costes to the plt for his unnecessarie Charges. BL Harley 2143 f.9