Difference between revisions of "STAC Marke"

From Waalt
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Marks, John'''
 
''' Marks, John'''
 
*STAC 5/M29/8 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 16 Eliz - John Marks v Edward Forster
 
*STAC 5/M29/8 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 16 Eliz - John Marks v Edward Forster
Line 14: Line 18:
 
*STAC 5/M49/18 - C I D - 15 Eliz - Richard Marks v William Hamon, Robert Clough
 
*STAC 5/M49/18 - C I D - 15 Eliz - Richard Marks v William Hamon, Robert Clough
 
*STAC 5/M12/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Richard Markes v Robert Clough
 
*STAC 5/M12/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Richard Markes v Robert Clough
*STAC 5/M36/8 - B A - 16 Eliz - Richard Marks v Ambrose Newby, William Hammond
+
 
 +
''' Markes, Richard'''
 +
*STAC 5/M36/8 - B A - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Richard Marks v Ambrose Newby, William Hammond
 
*STAC 5/M1/39 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Richard Markes v Ambrose Newbie et al
 
*STAC 5/M1/39 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Richard Markes v Ambrose Newbie et al
 +
**see [[STAC co York ER]]
  
 
''' Marke, William'''
 
''' Marke, William'''
Line 21: Line 28:
 
*STAC 5/M33/14 - B A C I D - 28 Eliz - William Marke v Richard Hoblin, John Epplet
 
*STAC 5/M33/14 - B A C I D - 28 Eliz - William Marke v Richard Hoblin, John Epplet
  
''' Bevan Case Index '''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
*Marke v Carminowe - STAC 5/M4/16, STAC 5/M9/11
 
*Marke v Foster - STAC 5/M29/8, STAC 5/M48/28
 
*Marke v Hammond - STAC 5/M24/35, STAC 5/M29/17, STAC 5/M6/33, STAC 5/M12/34, STAC 5/M16/8, STAC 5/M49/18
 
*Marke v Hoblin - STAC 5/M18/4, STAC 5/M33/14
 
*Marke v Newby - STAC 5/M36/8, STAC 5/M1/39
 
 
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
*STAC 5/M1/39 - Deposition of Ambrose Newbye of Ricall co York ER gent. Interrogatories to Ambrose Newbie one of the defendants to the Bill of Complaint of Richard Markes Compl. Inprimis whether have you heard Peter Tompson at any time refuse to pay to William Hamond Esquire the fine whereof the said 14 acres of copyhold now in question was seized yea or no.
 

Latest revision as of 19:30, 24 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Marks, John

  • STAC 5/M29/8 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 16 Eliz - John Marks v Edward Forster
  • STAC 5/M48/28 - I D - 16 Eliz - John Markes v Edward Foster

Marke, Peter

  • STAC 5/M4/16 - B A - 32 Eliz - Peter Marke v George Carmynave, Oliver Carmynave, Thomas Carmynave, John Stowell, John Eady et al
  • STAC 5/M9/11 - I D - 32 Eliz - Peter Marke v John Stowell

Markes, Richard

  • STAC 5/M24/35 - B - 14 Eliz - Richard Markes v William Hamon, Richard Casson
  • STAC 5/M16/8 - A Rn Rr - 12 Eliz - Richard Markes v William Hammond, Richard Casson et al
  • STAC 5/M6/33 - I D - 14 Eliz - Richard Markes v Richard Casson
  • STAC 5/M29/17 - B A C I D - 14 Eliz - Richard Marks v William Hammond et al
  • STAC 5/M49/18 - C I D - 15 Eliz - Richard Marks v William Hamon, Robert Clough
  • STAC 5/M12/34 - I D - 14 Eliz - Richard Markes v Robert Clough

Markes, Richard

  • STAC 5/M36/8 - B A - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Richard Marks v Ambrose Newby, William Hammond
  • STAC 5/M1/39 - I D - 16 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Richard Markes v Ambrose Newbie et al

Marke, William

  • STAC 5/M18/4 - B - 26 Eliz - William Marke v Richard Hoblin
  • STAC 5/M33/14 - B A C I D - 28 Eliz - William Marke v Richard Hoblin, John Epplet

Notes, Additions and Corrections