Difference between revisions of "STAC Leigh"
From Waalt
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Leigh, Alice ''' | ''' Leigh, Alice ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/L46/39 - B A - 22 Eliz - Dame Alice Leigh v Thomas Dyne, Andrew Ognell et al | + | *STAC 5/L46/39 - B A - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Dame Alice Leigh v Thomas Dyne, Andrew Ognell et al |
− | *STAC 5/L5/5 - I D - 23 Eliz - Dame Alice Leighe v Thomas Shackispiere, Humphrey Katherymes | + | *STAC 5/L5/5 - I D - 23 Eliz - Warwickshire - Dame Alice Leighe v Thomas Shackispiere, Humphrey Katherymes |
− | *STAC 5/L7/22 - I D - 20 Eliz - Dame Alice Leigh v John Lightfoote et al | + | *STAC 5/L7/22 - I D - 20 Eliz - Warwickshire - Dame Alice Leigh v John Lightfoote et al |
+ | **[[STAC co Warwick]] | ||
''' Leigh, Edward ''' | ''' Leigh, Edward ''' | ||
− | |||
*STAC 5/L29/18 - D - 23 Eliz - Edward Leigh v John Astley | *STAC 5/L29/18 - D - 23 Eliz - Edward Leigh v John Astley | ||
*STAC 5/L30/30 - B A C - 28 Eliz - Edward Leigh v Thomas Tyldysley, Ranold Seddon et al | *STAC 5/L30/30 - B A C - 28 Eliz - Edward Leigh v Thomas Tyldysley, Ranold Seddon et al | ||
*STAC 5/L2/2 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 29 Eliz - Edward Leighe v Edward Penne, Richard Sherley alias Cooke, Thomas Flemming, Robert Devall, Roger Amkins, Richard Edwards | *STAC 5/L2/2 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 29 Eliz - Edward Leighe v Edward Penne, Richard Sherley alias Cooke, Thomas Flemming, Robert Devall, Roger Amkins, Richard Edwards | ||
*STAC 5/L44/1 - I D - 29 Eliz - Edward Lighe v Edward Penn, Roger Awkyn et al | *STAC 5/L44/1 - I D - 29 Eliz - Edward Lighe v Edward Penn, Roger Awkyn et al | ||
− | *STAC 5/L25/ | + | *STAC 5/L25/2 - B A - 33 Eliz - Edward Leigh v John Wollaston, John Holte et al |
+ | *STAC 5/L40/24 - I D - 33 Eliz - Edward Leigh v John Holte, Richard Hope et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L49/13 - A - 33 Eliz - Edward Leighe v John Reynold, John Pare et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L41/3 - I D - 33 Eliz - Edward Leighe v John Reignolds, John Pare et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L20/9 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Legh v Henry Rolston | ||
*STAC 5/L16/28 - B A - 29 Eliz - Edward Leigh v Richard Hawkes, Hilary Hawkes et al | *STAC 5/L16/28 - B A - 29 Eliz - Edward Leigh v Richard Hawkes, Hilary Hawkes et al | ||
*STAC 5/L42/36 - John Lord Lumley v John Lawson NOTE this bundle has stitched up with it some Interrs & depositions taken at Walsall for Edward Leigh v Richard Hawks et al | *STAC 5/L42/36 - John Lord Lumley v John Lawson NOTE this bundle has stitched up with it some Interrs & depositions taken at Walsall for Edward Leigh v Richard Hawks et al | ||
Line 24: | Line 32: | ||
*STAC 5/L21/33 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Legh v John Woolaston, Richard Hawks et al | *STAC 5/L21/33 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Legh v John Woolaston, Richard Hawks et al | ||
*STAC 5/L42/26 - A C I D - 32 Eliz - Edward Leighe v Thomas Harte, Robert Badge et al | *STAC 5/L42/26 - A C I D - 32 Eliz - Edward Leighe v Thomas Harte, Robert Badge et al | ||
− | + | ||
− | *STAC | + | ''' Leigh, Edward ''' |
− | + | *STAC 7/13/36 - - - Staffordshire - Edward Leighe v Richard Hanks, Hilary Hanks | |
− | *STAC 5/ | + | *STAC 5/L25/38 - I D - 23 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Leghe v Richard Hancks et al |
− | *STAC | + | **[[STAC co Stafford]] |
''' Leigh, Gilbert ''' | ''' Leigh, Gilbert ''' | ||
Line 80: | Line 88: | ||
*STAC 5/L19/18 - I D - 9 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Thomas Massye | *STAC 5/L19/18 - I D - 9 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Thomas Massye | ||
*STAC 5/L29/22 - I D - 9 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Thomas Massye | *STAC 5/L29/22 - I D - 9 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Thomas Massye | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*STAC 5/L44/10 - C I D - 11 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Randal Arrowsmyth, Raffe Leigh et al | *STAC 5/L44/10 - C I D - 11 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Randal Arrowsmyth, Raffe Leigh et al | ||
*STAC 5/L31/25 - B - 21 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Arnold Lowbury, Richard Ranscrope | *STAC 5/L31/25 - B - 21 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Arnold Lowbury, Richard Ranscrope | ||
Line 90: | Line 94: | ||
*STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 40 Eliz - Robert Leighe v James Jeve, William Newman | *STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 40 Eliz - Robert Leighe v James Jeve, William Newman | ||
*STAC 5/L18/16 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Robert Danges | *STAC 5/L18/16 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Robert Danges | ||
− | |||
− | |||
*STAC 5/L13/35 - B A - 40 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Robert Wroth, Michael Draper et al | *STAC 5/L13/35 - B A - 40 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Robert Wroth, Michael Draper et al | ||
*STAC 5/L20/39 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Robert Wrothe | *STAC 5/L20/39 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Robert Wrothe | ||
Line 97: | Line 99: | ||
*STAC 5/L9/4 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Sir Robert Wrothe et al | *STAC 5/L9/4 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Sir Robert Wrothe et al | ||
*STAC 5/L33/5 - I D - 31 Eliz - Robert Legh v Robert Wrothe | *STAC 5/L33/5 - I D - 31 Eliz - Robert Legh v Robert Wrothe | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Leigh, Robert ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L42/31 - B A Rn - 41 Eliz - Essex - Robert Leighe v Thomas Hedgman | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L6/12 - I D - 41 Eliz - Essex - Robert Leighe v Thomas Hedgman, Reynold Player et al | ||
+ | **[[STAC co Essex]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Leigh, Robert ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L30/36 - B - 10 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Leighe v John Norbury, Robert Hyde et al | ||
+ | *STAC 7/13/14 - - - Cheshire - Robert Legh v John Norburye, Robert Hyde | ||
+ | *STAC 7/25/15 - - - Cheshire - Leighe v John Norbury | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L26/5 - I D - - Cheshire - Robert Legh v Robert Hyde | ||
+ | **[[STAC co Chester]] | ||
''' Leigh, Thomas ''' | ''' Leigh, Thomas ''' | ||
Line 102: | Line 116: | ||
*STAC 5/L49/14 - A - - Thomas Leigh, George Allan et al v George Newport | *STAC 5/L49/14 - A - - Thomas Leigh, George Allan et al v George Newport | ||
*STAC 5/L11/35 - I D - 1 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Richard Legh et al | *STAC 5/L11/35 - I D - 1 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Richard Legh et al | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*STAC 5/L38/9 - B A Rn Rr - - Thomas Leigh v Thomas Hawes, William Ladd et al | *STAC 5/L38/9 - B A Rn Rr - - Thomas Leigh v Thomas Hawes, William Ladd et al | ||
*STAC 5/L40/7 - I D - 11 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Thomas Hawes, John Hawes et al | *STAC 5/L40/7 - I D - 11 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Thomas Hawes, John Hawes et al | ||
Line 114: | Line 125: | ||
*STAC 5/L43/27 - B A Rn I D - 25 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Richard Lee, Thomas Dytchfeild et al | *STAC 5/L43/27 - B A Rn I D - 25 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Richard Lee, Thomas Dytchfeild et al | ||
*STAC 5/L19/20 - I D - 25 Eliz - Thomas Leygh v Thomas Dychefield, John Shawe | *STAC 5/L19/20 - I D - 25 Eliz - Thomas Leygh v Thomas Dychefield, John Shawe | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Leigh, Thomas ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L37/10 - B A Rn Rr - 11 Eliz - Cheshire - Thomas Leighe v Philip Oldfeild, Richard Stonely et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L33/16 - I D - 13 Eliz - Cheshire - Thomas Leigh v Philip Oldfield | ||
+ | *STAC 7/13/20 - - - Cheshire - Thomas Leigh v Philip Oldfeild, Richard Stoneley | ||
+ | **[[STAC co Chester]] | ||
''' Leigh, William ''' | ''' Leigh, William ''' | ||
*STAC 5/L31/21 - B - - William Leighe v George Awcock, Elizabeth Darby et al | *STAC 5/L31/21 - B - - William Leighe v George Awcock, Elizabeth Darby et al | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*STAC 5/L31/9 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - William Leighe v Robert Weare, Henry Wallis, Peter Wallis et al | *STAC 5/L31/9 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - William Leighe v Robert Weare, Henry Wallis, Peter Wallis et al | ||
*STAC 5/L27/14 - I D - 32 Eliz - William Leigh v Robert Weare | *STAC 5/L27/14 - I D - 32 Eliz - William Leigh v Robert Weare | ||
*STAC 5/L19/10 - B A C - 35 Eliz - William Leigh v Mary Trevisick, Thomas Trevisick, Alice Cuttmore | *STAC 5/L19/10 - B A C - 35 Eliz - William Leigh v Mary Trevisick, Thomas Trevisick, Alice Cuttmore | ||
*STAC 5/L47/3 - B - 34 Eliz - William Leight v Thomas Trevisicke, John Hornychurch et al | *STAC 5/L47/3 - B - 34 Eliz - William Leight v Thomas Trevisicke, John Hornychurch et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Leigh, William ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L14/28 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - Cheshire - William Leighe, John Leighe v Thomas Simpson, Philkin et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/L10/34 - Rr - 30 Eliz - Cheshire - William Leigh, John Leigh v Thomas Simpson, Peter Philkin | ||
+ | *STAC 7/13/19 - - - Cheshire - William Leighe, John Leighe v Thomas Sympson, Peter Philkyne | ||
+ | **[[STAC co Chester]] | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
Line 240: | Line 260: | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
*see also [[STAC Lee]] | *see also [[STAC Lee]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*STAC 5/L11/35 - [Thomas] Lee plt Lee deft The plt dyed before Cond’ executed & Mr Atturney ordered to prosecute The Cause & the Com’ to be renewed to the former Commissioners. BL Harley 2143 f.10v - P 2 Eliz. | *STAC 5/L11/35 - [Thomas] Lee plt Lee deft The plt dyed before Cond’ executed & Mr Atturney ordered to prosecute The Cause & the Com’ to be renewed to the former Commissioners. BL Harley 2143 f.10v - P 2 Eliz. | ||
− | |||
*STAC 5/L42/36 - John Lord Lumley v John Lawson NOTE this bundle has stitched up with it some Interrs & depositions taken at Walsall for Edward Leigh v Richard Hawks et al | *STAC 5/L42/36 - John Lord Lumley v John Lawson NOTE this bundle has stitched up with it some Interrs & depositions taken at Walsall for Edward Leigh v Richard Hawks et al | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 10:17, 23 April 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Leigh, Alice
- STAC 5/L46/39 - B A - 22 Eliz - Warwickshire - Dame Alice Leigh v Thomas Dyne, Andrew Ognell et al
- STAC 5/L5/5 - I D - 23 Eliz - Warwickshire - Dame Alice Leighe v Thomas Shackispiere, Humphrey Katherymes
- STAC 5/L7/22 - I D - 20 Eliz - Warwickshire - Dame Alice Leigh v John Lightfoote et al
Leigh, Edward
- STAC 5/L29/18 - D - 23 Eliz - Edward Leigh v John Astley
- STAC 5/L30/30 - B A C - 28 Eliz - Edward Leigh v Thomas Tyldysley, Ranold Seddon et al
- STAC 5/L2/2 - B A Rn Rr C I D - 29 Eliz - Edward Leighe v Edward Penne, Richard Sherley alias Cooke, Thomas Flemming, Robert Devall, Roger Amkins, Richard Edwards
- STAC 5/L44/1 - I D - 29 Eliz - Edward Lighe v Edward Penn, Roger Awkyn et al
- STAC 5/L25/2 - B A - 33 Eliz - Edward Leigh v John Wollaston, John Holte et al
- STAC 5/L40/24 - I D - 33 Eliz - Edward Leigh v John Holte, Richard Hope et al
- STAC 5/L49/13 - A - 33 Eliz - Edward Leighe v John Reynold, John Pare et al
- STAC 5/L41/3 - I D - 33 Eliz - Edward Leighe v John Reignolds, John Pare et al
- STAC 5/L20/9 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Legh v Henry Rolston
- STAC 5/L16/28 - B A - 29 Eliz - Edward Leigh v Richard Hawkes, Hilary Hawkes et al
- STAC 5/L42/36 - John Lord Lumley v John Lawson NOTE this bundle has stitched up with it some Interrs & depositions taken at Walsall for Edward Leigh v Richard Hawks et al
- STAC 5/L36/11 - I D - - Edward Leigh v Richard Hawkes
- STAC 5/L12/34 - I D - 29 Eliz - Edward Leigh v Richard Hawkes, Hillary Hawkes
- STAC 5/L4/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - Edward Leghe v Richard Hawks, Hillary Hawks et al
- STAC 5/L27/34 - I D - 33 Eliz - Edward Leghe v Richard Hawks, Hillary Hawks
- STAC 5/L21/14 - I D - 35 Eliz - Edward Leighe v Richard Hawkes et al
- STAC 5/L22/12 - I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Leghe v Richard Hawkes et al
- STAC 5/L5/32 - D - 34 Eliz - Edward Leighe v Richard Hawkes, John Wollaston, Thomas Harte et al
- STAC 5/L12/18 - I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Leghe v Richard Hawks, John Wollaston et al
- STAC 5/L5/13 - I D - 32 Eliz - Edward Leigh v Thomas Hart, Robert Badger et al
- STAC 5/L21/33 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Edward Legh v John Woolaston, Richard Hawks et al
- STAC 5/L42/26 - A C I D - 32 Eliz - Edward Leighe v Thomas Harte, Robert Badge et al
Leigh, Edward
- STAC 7/13/36 - - - Staffordshire - Edward Leighe v Richard Hanks, Hilary Hanks
- STAC 5/L25/38 - I D - 23 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Leghe v Richard Hancks et al
Leigh, Gilbert
- STAC 5/L44/14 - B A - 45 Eliz - Gilbert Leigh v Thomas Brand, Bryan Smith et al
- STAC 5/L38/33 - I D - 45 Eliz - Gilbert Leigh v Michael Bentler
Leighe, George
- STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 43 Eliz - George Leighe v Robert Lyon
- STAC 5/L4/19 - B Dr Rn - Hil 41 Eliz - George Leighe v Richard Hayes
Leigh, John
- STAC 5/L38/28 - B - - John Leigh v John Harrison, Thomas Swynton et al
- STAC 5/L47/28 - B A - - Sir John Leigh v John Hillinge, John Hutchins
- STAC 5/L6/16 - I D - 4 Eliz - John Leigh v Henry Hylling, John Hutchins
- STAC 5/L11/2 - B A Rn C I D - 15 Eliz - John Leigh v William Geeslinge, William Thorley et al
- STAC 5/L12/3 - B - 15 Eliz - John Leigh et uxor v Henry Whitfield
- STAC 5/L24/26 - I D - 15 Eliz - John Legh v Edward Caterall, Olyver Gerrard et al
- STAC 5/L10/27 - B Dr A Rn - 29 Eliz - John Leigh v James Hanson Sr, James Hanson Jr, Whalley
- STAC 5/L19/36 - B A - 34 Eliz - John Ligh v Cristopher Low, Hugh Harryson
- STAC 5/L35/21 - I D - 34 Eliz - John Leighe v Cristopher Lowe, Hugh Harrison et al
- STAC 5/L46/10 - Rn C I D - 36 Eliz - John Leigh v Sir Edward Phiton, Thomas Hammond
- STAC 5/L11/11 - I D - 34 Eliz - John Leigh v Sir Edward Phiton, Thomas Hamond
Leigh, Olliphe
- STAC 5/L35/34 - B A Dr - 43 Eliz - Olliphe Leigh v Thomas Greneham, Richard Walker et al
- STAC 5/L38/32 - I D - 43 Eliz - Sir Olliphe Leigh v Thomas Grenham
- STAC 5/L11/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Olive Leigh v Richard Walker
- STAC 5/L27/24 - I D - 43 Eliz - Sir Oliph Leigh v Matthew Baker
Leigh, Peter
- STAC 5/L38/20 - B A - - Peter Leigh v Hugh Gawdye, James Webster et al
- STAC 5/L44/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Peter Lee v Hugh Gandie, James Webster et al
- STAC 5/L18/24 - B A Rn Rr - 32 Eliz - Peter Leigh v Edmund Joydrell, Leonard Bertt et al
- STAC 5/L25/35 - I D - 32 Eliz - Peter Leigh v James Joydrell, Leonard Bennet et al
- STAC 5/L37/4 - B A - 39 Eliz - Peter Leighe v Raynold Adshed, John Pott et al
- STAC 5/L43/15 - B A - 43 Eliz - Sir Peter Leighe v Reignold Adshed, Edward Jackson et al
- STAC 5/L8/7 - I D - 39 Eliz - Peter Leigh v Reynold Adshed
- STAC 5/L28/8 - I D - 43 Eliz - Sir Peter Leigh v Reynold Adshed, Edward Jackson
- STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 41 Eliz - Peter Leigh v John Wade, Arnold Atkins et al
- STAC 5/L22/33 - B A - 42 Eliz - Peter Leigh v Thomas Richardes, John James et al
- STAC 5/L30/32 - B A - 45 Eliz - Sir Peter Leighe v Henry Eccleston, Thomas Eccleston, Thomas Barnes et al
- STAC 5/L14/30 - I D - 44 Eliz - Sir Peter Leigh v Thomas Eccleston, Henry Eccleston et al
Leigh, Richard
- STAC 5/L49/16 - B - - Richard Leige v Ellice Stempe, Edward Harbert et al
- STAC 5/L9/36 - A - 38 Eliz - Richard Leigh v Thomas Jennings et al
Leigh, Robert
- STAC 5/L22/7 - B A Rn C I D - 9 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Richard Spurstow, John Garrett et al
- STAC 5/L41/12 - I D - - Robert Legh v Richard Spurstowe, John Garnett et al
- STAC 5/L19/18 - I D - 9 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Thomas Massye
- STAC 5/L29/22 - I D - 9 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Thomas Massye
- STAC 5/L44/10 - C I D - 11 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Randal Arrowsmyth, Raffe Leigh et al
- STAC 5/L31/25 - B - 21 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Arnold Lowbury, Richard Ranscrope
- STAC 5/L11/28 - B A Rn Rr - 30 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Clement Stonard, George Campion et al
- STAC 5/L37/29 - I D - 31 Eliz - Robert Legh v Clement Stonard, Robert Wroth et al
- STAC 5/L47/6 - B - 40 Eliz - Robert Leighe v James Jeve, William Newman
- STAC 5/L18/16 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Robert Danges
- STAC 5/L13/35 - B A - 40 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Robert Wroth, Michael Draper et al
- STAC 5/L20/39 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Robert Wrothe
- STAC 5/L8/13 - I D - 42 Eliz - Robert Leigh v Sir Robert Wrothe
- STAC 5/L9/4 - I D - 41 Eliz - Robert Leighe v Sir Robert Wrothe et al
- STAC 5/L33/5 - I D - 31 Eliz - Robert Legh v Robert Wrothe
Leigh, Robert
- STAC 5/L42/31 - B A Rn - 41 Eliz - Essex - Robert Leighe v Thomas Hedgman
- STAC 5/L6/12 - I D - 41 Eliz - Essex - Robert Leighe v Thomas Hedgman, Reynold Player et al
Leigh, Robert
- STAC 5/L30/36 - B - 10 Eliz - Cheshire - Robert Leighe v John Norbury, Robert Hyde et al
- STAC 7/13/14 - - - Cheshire - Robert Legh v John Norburye, Robert Hyde
- STAC 7/25/15 - - - Cheshire - Leighe v John Norbury
- STAC 5/L26/5 - I D - - Cheshire - Robert Legh v Robert Hyde
Leigh, Thomas
- STAC 5/L47/29 - B A Rn - - Thomas Leigh v Henry Wolshed
- STAC 5/L49/14 - A - - Thomas Leigh, George Allan et al v George Newport
- STAC 5/L11/35 - I D - 1 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Richard Legh et al
- STAC 5/L38/9 - B A Rn Rr - - Thomas Leigh v Thomas Hawes, William Ladd et al
- STAC 5/L40/7 - I D - 11 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Thomas Hawes, John Hawes et al
- STAC 5/L16/7 - C I D - 11 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Thomas Hawse et al
- STAC 5/L46/7 - B A - 12 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Adam Bowker, Robert Monford et al
- STAC 5/L7/6 - I D - 14 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Adam Bowker, Robert Momford
- STAC 5/L10/32 - B - 14 Eliz - Thomas Leigh et uxor v Matthew Redman
- STAC 5/L32/2 - B - 14 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Ellen Cleave, Thomas Cleave
- STAC 5/L43/27 - B A Rn I D - 25 Eliz - Thomas Leigh v Richard Lee, Thomas Dytchfeild et al
- STAC 5/L19/20 - I D - 25 Eliz - Thomas Leygh v Thomas Dychefield, John Shawe
Leigh, Thomas
- STAC 5/L37/10 - B A Rn Rr - 11 Eliz - Cheshire - Thomas Leighe v Philip Oldfeild, Richard Stonely et al
- STAC 5/L33/16 - I D - 13 Eliz - Cheshire - Thomas Leigh v Philip Oldfield
- STAC 7/13/20 - - - Cheshire - Thomas Leigh v Philip Oldfeild, Richard Stoneley
Leigh, William
- STAC 5/L31/21 - B - - William Leighe v George Awcock, Elizabeth Darby et al
- STAC 5/L31/9 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - William Leighe v Robert Weare, Henry Wallis, Peter Wallis et al
- STAC 5/L27/14 - I D - 32 Eliz - William Leigh v Robert Weare
- STAC 5/L19/10 - B A C - 35 Eliz - William Leigh v Mary Trevisick, Thomas Trevisick, Alice Cuttmore
- STAC 5/L47/3 - B - 34 Eliz - William Leight v Thomas Trevisicke, John Hornychurch et al
Leigh, William
- STAC 5/L14/28 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - Cheshire - William Leighe, John Leighe v Thomas Simpson, Philkin et al
- STAC 5/L10/34 - Rr - 30 Eliz - Cheshire - William Leigh, John Leigh v Thomas Simpson, Peter Philkin
- STAC 7/13/19 - - - Cheshire - William Leighe, John Leighe v Thomas Sympson, Peter Philkyne
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A56/6 - C I D - 2 Eliz - AG v Richard Legh, John Wilkinson, Henry Astley et al
Bevan Case Index
- Lee v [unknown] - STAC 7/25/9, STAC 7/25/10 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Adshed - STAC 5/L37/4, STAC 5/L43/15, STAC 5/L8/7, STAC 5/L28/8
- Lee v Alcock - STAC 5/L31/21
- Lee v Allen - STAC 5/L11/7, STAC 5/L28/33, STAC 5/L30/12 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Ap Rice - STAC 5/L38/7 see STAC Lye
- Lee v Arrowsmith - STAC 5/L44/10
- Lee v Ashton - STAC 5/K3/37, see STAC Kelley
- Lee v Ashton - STAC 5/L2/17, STAC 5/L4/22, STAC 5/L19/19 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Astley - STAC 5/L29/18
- Lee v Bayly - STAC 5/O9/12, STAC 5/L8/31 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Blackwall - STAC 5/L12/35 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Bowker - STAC 5/L46/7, STAC 5/L7/6
- Lee v Brand - STAC 5/L44/14, STAC 5/L38/33
- Lee v Burton - STAC 5/L3/1, STAC 5/L48/36, STAC 5/L7/9, STAC 5/L11/14, STAC 5/L14/7 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Caterall - STAC 5/L24/26
- Lee v Chappell - STAC 5/W71/7, STAC 5/L7/5, STAC 5/L30/4, STAC 5/L40/27 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Cleve - STAC 5/L32/2
- Lee v Clifton - STAC 5/L34/33 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Coningsby - STAC 5/L39/17 see STAC Lye
- Lee v Cooper - STAC 5/L32/21, STAC 5/L23/24, STAC 5/L40/18 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Cross - STAC 5/L14/15, STAC 5/L5/20, STAC 5/L11/38, STAC 5/L44/26, STAC 5/L47/6 see STAC Ley
- Lee v Danges - STAC 5/L18/16
- Lee v Dell - STAC 5/L16/30, STAC 5/L23/18 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Dodson - STAC 5/L24/37, STAC 5/L26/36, STAC 5/L8/29, STAC 7/25/8 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Dyne - STAC 5/L46/39
- Lee v Eccleston - STAC 5/L30/32, STAC 5/L14/30
- Lee v Farrand - STAC 5/L14/18, STAC 5/L5/3, STAC 5/L27/20, STAC 5/L37/9 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Fitton - STAC 5/L11/11, STAC 5/L46/10
- Lee v Foljambe - STAC 5/L42/13 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Gawdy - STAC 5/L38/20, STAC 5/L44/36
- Lee v Gosling - STAC 5/L11/2
- Lee v Greenham - STAC 5/L35/34, STAC 5/L11/36, STAC 5/L27/24, STAC 5/L38/32
- Lee v Hanson - STAC 5/L10/27
- Lee v Harcourt - STAC 5/L42/6, STAC 5/L10/3 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Harrison - STAC 5/L38/28
- Lee v Hawes - STAC 5/L38/9, STAC 5/L16/7, STAC 5/L40/7
- Lee v Hawkes - STAC 5/L16/28, STAC 7/13/36, STAC 5/L4/32, STAC 5/L5/13, STAC 5/L5/32, STAC 5/L12/18, STAC 5/L12/34, STAC 5/L21/14, STAC 5/L21/33, STAC 5/L22/12, STAC 5/L25/38, STAC 5/L27/34, STAC 5/L36/11, STAC 5/L42/26
- Lee v Hayes - STAC 5/L4/19
- Lee v Hayter - STAC 5/L48/14 see STAC Ley
- Lee v Hedgman - STAC 5/L42/31, STAC 5/L6/12
- Lee v Hilling - STAC 5/L47/28, STAC 5/L6/16
- Lee v Hogan - STAC 5/L23/14, STAC 5/L13/38, STAC 5/L21/9, STAC 5/L24/11 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Holmes - STAC 5/L21/38 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Homersley - STAC 5/L35/31, STAC 5/L19/14 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Honeychurch - STAC 5/L46/13, STAC 5/L11/26, STAC 5/L26/19 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Jeve - STAC 5/L47/6
- Lee v Jodrell - STAC 5/L18/24, STAC 5/L25/35
- Lee v Jordan - STAC 5/L44/9 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Kenrick - STAC 5/L25/21, STAC 5/L43/13 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Kitchin - STAC 5/L12/16 see STAC Ley
- Lee v Lee - STAC 5/L43/27, STAC 5/L19/20
- Lee v Legh - STAC 5/L11/35
- Lee v Leveson - STAC 5/L8/17 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Lightfoot - STAC 5/L7/22
- Lee v Lovell - STAC 5/L10/24 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Lowbury - STAC 5/L31/25
- Lee v Lowe - STAC 5/L19/36, STAC 5/L35/21 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Lyons - STAC 5/L47/6,
- Lee v Lyons - STAC 5/L1/15 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Mainwaring - STAC 5/L28/35 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Markham - STAC 5/L31/23 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Newbold - STAC 5/L34/19 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Newport - STAC 5/L49/14
- Lee v Newton - STAC 5/L46/29, STAC 5/L40/39 see STAC Lye
- Lee v Nicholls - STAC 5/L26/10, STAC 5/L7/17, STAC 5/L41/11 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Norbury - STAC 5/L30/36, STAC 7/13/14, STAC 5/L26/5, STAC 7/25/15
- Lee v Norwood - STAC 5/L13/17, STAC 5/L18/17 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Oldfield - STAC 5/L37/10, STAC 5/L33/16, STAC 7/13/20
- Lee v Over - STAC 5/L49/11 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Parker - STAC 5/L31/35, STAC 5/L37/22 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Paynter - STAC 5/L30/10, STAC 5/L8/21, STAC 7/25/39 see STAC Lye
- Lee v Penn - STAC 5/L2/2, STAC 5/L44/1
- Lee v Pine - STAC 5/L1/16, STAC 5/L41/31, STAC 5/L9/31, STAC 5/L28/2 see STAC Ley
- Lee v Poynton - STAC 5/L6/29 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Preston - STAC 5/L26/14, STAC 5/L46/18 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Redman - STAC 5/L10/32
- Lee v Reeve - STAC 5/L32/13 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Reynolds - STAC 5/L41/3, STAC 5/L49/13, STAC 5/L22/33
- Lee v Rolleston - STAC 5/L20/9
- Lee v Ryles - STAC 5/L27/29 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Sabern - STAC 5/L44/16, STAC 5/L6/32 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Shakespeare - STAC 5/L5/5
- Lee v Shemeld - STAC 5/L10/23, STAC 5/L12/25, STAC 5/L19/12 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Simpson - STAC 5/L14/28, STAC 5/L10/34, STAC 7/13/19
- Lee v Smith - STAC 5/L25/26, STAC 5/L10/8, STAC 5/L10/10, STAC 5/L21/6, STAC 5/L22/9 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Spurstow - STAC 5/L22/7, STAC 5/L19/18, STAC 5/L29/22, STAC 5/L41/12
- Lee v St Spire - STAC 5/L13/23, STAC 5/L34/22, STAC 5/L48/40 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Stamp - STAC 5/L49/16, STAC 5/L9/36
- Lee v Stonard - STAC 5/L11/28, STAC 5/L37/29
- Lee v Strelley - STAC 5/L1/38, STAC 5/L2/39, STAC 5/L19/6, STAC 5/L39/21, STAC 5/L39/29, STAC 5/L15/21 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Tanfield - STAC 5/L45/23, STAC 5/L8/5, STAC 5/L12/20, STAC 5/L34/35, STAC 5/L35/4 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Terry - STAC 5/L28/39 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Tildesley - STAC 5/L30/30
- Lee v Trevisicke - STAC 5/L19/10, STAC 5/L47/3
- Lee v Wade - STAC 5/L47/6
- Lee v Wardell - STAC 5/L46/28 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Ware - STAC 5/L31/9, STAC 5/L27/14
- Lee v Waters - STAC 5/L29/13 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Whitfield - STAC 5/L12/3
- Lee v Wollaston - STAC 5/L25/2, STAC 5/L40/24
- Lee v Wolshed - STAC 5/L47/29
- Lee v Woolridge - STAC 5/L15/20, STAC 5/L5/16, STAC 5/L7/35, STAC 5/L8/6, STAC 5/L20/36, STAC 5/L36/31, STAC 5/L38/5, STAC 5/L39/16, STAC 5/L40/3, STAC 5/L43/33 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Worlich - STAC 5/L32/31, see STAC Lee
- Lee v Wroth - STAC 5/L13/35, STAC 5/L8/13, STAC 5/L9/4, STAC 5/L20/39, STAC 5/L33/5
- Lee v Wyndham - STAC 5/L1/5 see STAC Ley
- Lee v Wynett - STAC 5/L31/6 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Young - STAC 5/L35/1, STAC 5/L8/18 see STAC Lee
- Lee v Younger - STAC 5/L39/35 see STAC Lee
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- see also STAC Lee
- STAC 5/L11/35 - [Thomas] Lee plt Lee deft The plt dyed before Cond’ executed & Mr Atturney ordered to prosecute The Cause & the Com’ to be renewed to the former Commissioners. BL Harley 2143 f.10v - P 2 Eliz.
- STAC 5/L42/36 - John Lord Lumley v John Lawson NOTE this bundle has stitched up with it some Interrs & depositions taken at Walsall for Edward Leigh v Richard Hawks et al