Difference between revisions of "STAC Hayward"
From Waalt
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | *STAC 5/H18/17 - I D - 3 Eliz - [blank] Haywarde v Francis Lawlye, Edward Lewis et al | + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder |
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H18/17 - I D - 3 Eliz - [blank] Haywarde v Francis Lawlye, Edward Lewis et al | ||
''' Hayward, Agnes ''' | ''' Hayward, Agnes ''' | ||
Line 8: | Line 13: | ||
*STAC 5/H62/21 - B A - 32 Eliz - Edward Haywarde v John Mere | *STAC 5/H62/21 - B A - 32 Eliz - Edward Haywarde v John Mere | ||
− | ''' Haward, John ''' | + | ''' Haywood / Haward, John ''' |
− | |||
*STAC 5/H37/11 - I D - 25 Eliz - John Howard v William Forsett | *STAC 5/H37/11 - I D - 25 Eliz - John Howard v William Forsett | ||
*STAC 5/H66/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Haward v William Forssett | *STAC 5/H66/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Haward v William Forssett | ||
− | + | *STAC 5/H42/26 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - John Harward v William Forcet, John Woral | |
− | |||
− | *STAC 5/ | ||
*STAC 5/H48/31 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Hayward v William Fawcett | *STAC 5/H48/31 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Hayward v William Fawcett | ||
*STAC 5/H63/21 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Hayward v William Forcett | *STAC 5/H63/21 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Hayward v William Forcett | ||
*STAC 5/H81/8 - Rr - - John Hayward v William Forcett | *STAC 5/H81/8 - Rr - - John Hayward v William Forcett | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward, John ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H3/5 - B - 31 Eliz - John Haywarde v Richard Modye, Nicholas Errington, Gabriel Cobbe, John Robyns et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Haward, John ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H70/13 - B A - 39 Eliz - Kent - John Haward v Gabriell Warcopp, Richard Rive, Thomas Rive | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Kent]] | ||
''' Hayward, Robert ''' | ''' Hayward, Robert ''' | ||
Line 25: | Line 34: | ||
''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H30/3 - B - 11 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maunsel et al | *STAC 5/H30/3 - B - 11 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maunsel et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H31/33 - B A Rn Rr - 11 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Richard Lawley et al | *STAC 5/H31/33 - B A Rn Rr - 11 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Richard Lawley et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H76/17 - B A - 17 Eliz - Montgomery - Sir Rowland Hayward v Griffyn ap Hugh, Jenan ap Richard et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H73/31 - I D - 17 Eliz - Montgomery - Sir Rowland Hayward v Griff ap Hugh, Gwyn Evn ap Richard et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H80/11 - Rn - - Montgomery - Sir Rowland Hayward v Hugh ap Gruff, Richard ap Evan et al | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Montgomery]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H41/38 - I D - 16 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v William Egeton, John Senior et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H66/21 - B A - 16 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddock, Francis Buckley | *STAC 5/H66/21 - B A - 16 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddock, Francis Buckley | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
*STAC 5/H17/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddoxe, John Mansell et al | *STAC 5/H17/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddoxe, John Mansell et al | ||
*STAC 5/H14/6 - I D - 20 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddox, John Mansill, Thomas Mansill | *STAC 5/H14/6 - I D - 20 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddox, John Mansill, Thomas Mansill | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H18/38 - B A - 21 Eliz - Sir Rowland Heywarde v John Lynger et uxor, Moris ap Meredith et al | *STAC 5/H18/38 - B A - 21 Eliz - Sir Rowland Heywarde v John Lynger et uxor, Moris ap Meredith et al | ||
*STAC 5/H15/29 - I D - 21 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v John Lyngen | *STAC 5/H15/29 - I D - 21 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v John Lyngen | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H81/13 - B - 34 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v John Lyngen et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H3/33 - B A Dr C I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Sir Walter Leuson, Thomas Huntbatche | *STAC 5/H3/33 - B A Dr C I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Sir Walter Leuson, Thomas Huntbatche | ||
− | + | ||
+ | ''' Hayward, Rowland ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H68/13 - B A - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Charles Smith, William Wright | *STAC 5/H68/13 - B A - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Charles Smith, William Wright | ||
*STAC 5/H45/27 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Haward v Charles Smith, William Bright et al | *STAC 5/H45/27 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Haward v Charles Smith, William Bright et al | ||
''' Haward, Thomas ''' | ''' Haward, Thomas ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/H57/28 - | + | *STAC 5/H57/28 - moved to [[STAC Harward]] |
+ | *STAC 5/H45/25 - B A - 38 Eliz - Thomas Hayward, John Hayward v [blank] Woodrowfe, John Pearce | ||
*STAC 5/H54/38 - I D - 38 Eliz - Thomas Hawarde v Richard Woodroffe, John Pearce, et al | *STAC 5/H54/38 - I D - 38 Eliz - Thomas Hawarde v Richard Woodroffe, John Pearce, et al | ||
Line 48: | Line 77: | ||
*STAC 5/H63/32 - B - 16 Eliz - Thomas Hayward v John Drover, William Austens et al | *STAC 5/H63/32 - B - 16 Eliz - Thomas Hayward v John Drover, William Austens et al | ||
*STAC 5/H77/34 - C I D - 18 Eliz - Thomas Hayward v John Drover, Richard Church et al | *STAC 5/H77/34 - C I D - 18 Eliz - Thomas Hayward v John Drover, Richard Church et al | ||
− | *STAC 5/H78/5 - B - - Thomas Hayward v William Austen alias Sendall et al | + | *STAC 5/H78/5 - B - - Thomas Hayward v William Austen alias Sendall et al |
− | *STAC 5/ | + | |
+ | ''' Haywood, Walter ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H15/36 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Hayward v Thomas Covert, Stephen Grey et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H63/29 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Newman, Thomas Covert et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H58/20 - I D - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haywood v Thomas Covert, Thomas Newman et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H62/15 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Heywarde v Thomas Coverte, Robert Newman | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H28/28 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Newman et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/H31/39 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Neweman, Thomas Coverte | ||
+ | *STAC 7/23/30 - - - Hampshire - Walter Heyward v Thomas Coverte et al | ||
+ | **see [[STAC co Hampshire]] | ||
''' Haywood, Walter ''' | ''' Haywood, Walter ''' | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
*STAC 5/H76/12 - I D - 34 Eliz - Walter Hayward v William Woodhatch, Henry Matthew et al | *STAC 5/H76/12 - I D - 34 Eliz - Walter Hayward v William Woodhatch, Henry Matthew et al | ||
*STAC 5/H81/26 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Walter Hayward v William Wodage, Henry Mathews et al | *STAC 5/H81/26 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Walter Hayward v William Wodage, Henry Mathews et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Haywood, Walter ''' | ||
*STAC 5/H58/23 - B A - 42 Eliz - Walter Hayward v John Scotcher, Robert Gostrede | *STAC 5/H58/23 - B A - 42 Eliz - Walter Hayward v John Scotcher, Robert Gostrede | ||
*STAC 5/H2/16 - I D - 42 Eliz - Walter Heyward v John Scothyer, Robert Costre | *STAC 5/H2/16 - I D - 42 Eliz - Walter Heyward v John Scothyer, Robert Costre | ||
*STAC 5/H10/34 - I D - 37 Eliz - Walter Haward v John Scotiere, Robert Costred | *STAC 5/H10/34 - I D - 37 Eliz - Walter Haward v John Scotiere, Robert Costred | ||
+ | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/A19/34 - Rn - 42 Eliz - AG v Bryan Heyward, Thomas Parry et al | ||
+ | *STAC 7/17/43 - - - AG v John Heyward et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/A18/26 - Rn - 37 Eliz - AG v Thomas Haywarde | ||
+ | *see also [[STAC Haywood]] | ||
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
+ | *STAC 5/H78/5 manor of Christchurch in the co of Auth | ||
− | * | + | *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 35v. Maintenance in prosecuting a suit in the Exchequer in another man’s name at his own charges. Hayward, plaintiff; Moore, defendant: for maintenance in prosecuting certain suits in Her Majesty’s court of Exchequer in the name of one Thomas Tatnall, at his own charge, but the court suspended the hearing of this cause until that court should certify the proceeding of the Exchequer there depending. Michaelmas 34 Elizabeth (kk) |
Revision as of 15:20, 3 September 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Hayward
- STAC 5/H18/17 - I D - 3 Eliz - [blank] Haywarde v Francis Lawlye, Edward Lewis et al
Hayward, Agnes
- STAC 5/H53/7 - I D - 4 Eliz - Agnes Hayward v John Woods et al
Hayward, Edward
- STAC 5/H56/39 - I D - 32 Eliz - Edward Hayward v John Merew
- STAC 5/H62/21 - B A - 32 Eliz - Edward Haywarde v John Mere
Haywood / Haward, John
- STAC 5/H37/11 - I D - 25 Eliz - John Howard v William Forsett
- STAC 5/H66/25 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Haward v William Forssett
- STAC 5/H42/26 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - John Harward v William Forcet, John Woral
- STAC 5/H48/31 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Hayward v William Fawcett
- STAC 5/H63/21 - I D - 26 Eliz - John Hayward v William Forcett
- STAC 5/H81/8 - Rr - - John Hayward v William Forcett
Hayward, John
- STAC 5/H3/5 - B - 31 Eliz - John Haywarde v Richard Modye, Nicholas Errington, Gabriel Cobbe, John Robyns et al
Haward, John
- STAC 5/H70/13 - B A - 39 Eliz - Kent - John Haward v Gabriell Warcopp, Richard Rive, Thomas Rive
- see STAC co Kent
Hayward, Robert
- STAC 5/H62/37 - I D - 26 Eliz - Robert Hayward v Francis Coleby, John Jennyngs et al
- STAC 5/H75/38 - B A Rn C I D - 26 Eliz - Robert Hayward v Francis Colbye, William Callyn, Jeffry Thomson et al
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H30/3 - B - 11 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maunsel et al
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H31/33 - B A Rn Rr - 11 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Richard Lawley et al
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H76/17 - B A - 17 Eliz - Montgomery - Sir Rowland Hayward v Griffyn ap Hugh, Jenan ap Richard et al
- STAC 5/H73/31 - I D - 17 Eliz - Montgomery - Sir Rowland Hayward v Griff ap Hugh, Gwyn Evn ap Richard et al
- STAC 5/H80/11 - Rn - - Montgomery - Sir Rowland Hayward v Hugh ap Gruff, Richard ap Evan et al
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H41/38 - I D - 16 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v William Egeton, John Senior et al
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H66/21 - B A - 16 Eliz - Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddock, Francis Buckley
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H17/23 - B A - 20 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddoxe, John Mansell et al
- STAC 5/H14/6 - I D - 20 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Thomas Maddox, John Mansill, Thomas Mansill
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H18/38 - B A - 21 Eliz - Sir Rowland Heywarde v John Lynger et uxor, Moris ap Meredith et al
- STAC 5/H15/29 - I D - 21 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v John Lyngen
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H81/13 - B - 34 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v John Lyngen et al
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H3/33 - B A Dr C I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Sir Walter Leuson, Thomas Huntbatche
Hayward, Rowland
- STAC 5/H68/13 - B A - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Hayward v Charles Smith, William Wright
- STAC 5/H45/27 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sir Rowland Haward v Charles Smith, William Bright et al
Haward, Thomas
- STAC 5/H57/28 - moved to STAC Harward
- STAC 5/H45/25 - B A - 38 Eliz - Thomas Hayward, John Hayward v [blank] Woodrowfe, John Pearce
- STAC 5/H54/38 - I D - 38 Eliz - Thomas Hawarde v Richard Woodroffe, John Pearce, et al
Hayward, Thomas
- STAC 5/H51/31 - B A Rn C I D - 13 Eliz - Thomas Hayward v William Austin alias Sandall, John Drover et al
- STAC 5/H63/32 - B - 16 Eliz - Thomas Hayward v John Drover, William Austens et al
- STAC 5/H77/34 - C I D - 18 Eliz - Thomas Hayward v John Drover, Richard Church et al
- STAC 5/H78/5 - B - - Thomas Hayward v William Austen alias Sendall et al
Haywood, Walter
- STAC 5/H15/36 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Hayward v Thomas Covert, Stephen Grey et al
- STAC 5/H63/29 - B A - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Newman, Thomas Covert et al
- STAC 5/H58/20 - I D - 33 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haywood v Thomas Covert, Thomas Newman et al
- STAC 5/H62/15 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Heywarde v Thomas Coverte, Robert Newman
- STAC 5/H28/28 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Newman et al
- STAC 5/H31/39 - I D - 36 Eliz - Hampshire - Walter Haward v John Neweman, Thomas Coverte
- STAC 7/23/30 - - - Hampshire - Walter Heyward v Thomas Coverte et al
Haywood, Walter
- STAC 5/H76/12 - I D - 34 Eliz - Walter Hayward v William Woodhatch, Henry Matthew et al
- STAC 5/H81/26 - Rn - 34 Eliz - Walter Hayward v William Wodage, Henry Mathews et al
Haywood, Walter
- STAC 5/H58/23 - B A - 42 Eliz - Walter Hayward v John Scotcher, Robert Gostrede
- STAC 5/H2/16 - I D - 42 Eliz - Walter Heyward v John Scothyer, Robert Costre
- STAC 5/H10/34 - I D - 37 Eliz - Walter Haward v John Scotiere, Robert Costred
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A19/34 - Rn - 42 Eliz - AG v Bryan Heyward, Thomas Parry et al
- STAC 7/17/43 - - - AG v John Heyward et al
- STAC 5/A18/26 - Rn - 37 Eliz - AG v Thomas Haywarde
- see also STAC Haywood
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/H78/5 manor of Christchurch in the co of Auth
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 35v. Maintenance in prosecuting a suit in the Exchequer in another man’s name at his own charges. Hayward, plaintiff; Moore, defendant: for maintenance in prosecuting certain suits in Her Majesty’s court of Exchequer in the name of one Thomas Tatnall, at his own charge, but the court suspended the hearing of this cause until that court should certify the proceeding of the Exchequer there depending. Michaelmas 34 Elizabeth (kk)