STAC Gittins

From Rpalmer
Revision as of 05:46, 12 May 2019 by Hgood (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Gittyns, Roger

  • STAC 5/G21/17 - B - 35 Eliz - Roger Gittyns v James Cooke, John Elkins et al

Gittins, Edmund

  • STAC 5/G3/25 - B A - 12 Eliz - Shropshire - Edmund Gyttins v Roger Jones alias Mercer, William Petton, Henry ap Howell et al
  • STAC 5/G22/26 - I D - 12 Eliz - Shropshire - Edmund Gittins v Roger Jones alias Merrer, Harry ap Powell

Gittins, Edmund

  • STAC 5/G43/39 - B A C - 21 Eliz - Edmond Gittons v Thomas Cleyton Sr, Thomas Cleyton Jr, Thomas Jaxe
  • STAC 5/G8/36 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edmond Gittens v Thomas Cleyton

Gittins, Edmund

Gyttins, Richard

  • STAC 5/G32/32 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Richard Gyttyns et al v James Clyffford et al
  • STAC 5/G29/26 - I D - 37 Eliz - Richard Gittins, John Dawes, Margaret Dawes v James Clifford, Rowland Wilcox et al
  • STAC 5/G3/13 - B A Dr C I D - 35 Eliz - Richard Gyttyns, John Dawes et uxor, Reginald Roe v James Clyfford, Rowland Wilcox, Edmund Bayly, Mary Mounslow, Edmund Wilcox et al
  • STAC 5/G5/9 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Richard Gitkins, John Dawes et uxor, Reginald Roe v James Clifford, Rowland Wilcox, Edmond Wilcocks et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 13v. Riot punished by the justices of peace and yet punished again here. Attorney Rex, plaintiff; Roger Gittens et al, defendants: riot in the night, for carrying away forcibly and the defendants being committed by the justices of peace in the country, and indicted and found guilty for the same, yet were they punished here again deeply. Michaelmas 37 Elizabeth (kk)