Difference between revisions of "STAC Gittins"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | <BR> <BR> | ||
| + | |||
''' Gittyns, Roger ''' | ''' Gittyns, Roger ''' | ||
*STAC 5/G21/17 - B - 35 Eliz - Roger Gittyns v James Cooke, John Elkins et al | *STAC 5/G21/17 - B - 35 Eliz - Roger Gittyns v James Cooke, John Elkins et al | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Gittins, Edmund ''' | ||
| + | *STAC 5/G3/25 - B A - 12 Eliz - Shropshire - Edmund Gyttins v Roger Jones alias Mercer, William Petton, Henry ap Howell et al | ||
| + | *STAC 5/G22/26 - I D - 12 Eliz - Shropshire - Edmund Gittins v Roger Jones alias Merrer, Harry ap Powell | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Shropshire]] | ||
''' Gittins, Edmund ''' | ''' Gittins, Edmund ''' | ||
*STAC 5/G43/39 - B A C - 21 Eliz - Edmond Gittons v Thomas Cleyton Sr, Thomas Cleyton Jr, Thomas Jaxe | *STAC 5/G43/39 - B A C - 21 Eliz - Edmond Gittons v Thomas Cleyton Sr, Thomas Cleyton Jr, Thomas Jaxe | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
*STAC 5/G8/36 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edmond Gittens v Thomas Cleyton | *STAC 5/G8/36 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edmond Gittens v Thomas Cleyton | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''' Gittins, Edmund ''' | ||
*STAC 7/2/45 - - - Shropshire - Edmund Gittens v Francis Cressett | *STAC 7/2/45 - - - Shropshire - Edmund Gittens v Francis Cressett | ||
| + | **see [[STAC co Shropshire]] | ||
''' Gyttins, Richard ''' | ''' Gyttins, Richard ''' | ||
| Line 16: | Line 26: | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
| − | + | *Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 13v. Riot punished by the justices of peace and yet punished again here. Attorney Rex, plaintiff; Roger Gittens et al, defendants: riot in the night, for carrying away forcibly and the defendants being committed by the justices of peace in the country, and indicted and found guilty for the same, yet were they punished here again deeply. Michaelmas 37 Elizabeth (kk) | |
| − | * | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 10:46, 12 May 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Gittyns, Roger
- STAC 5/G21/17 - B - 35 Eliz - Roger Gittyns v James Cooke, John Elkins et al
Gittins, Edmund
- STAC 5/G3/25 - B A - 12 Eliz - Shropshire - Edmund Gyttins v Roger Jones alias Mercer, William Petton, Henry ap Howell et al
- STAC 5/G22/26 - I D - 12 Eliz - Shropshire - Edmund Gittins v Roger Jones alias Merrer, Harry ap Powell
Gittins, Edmund
- STAC 5/G43/39 - B A C - 21 Eliz - Edmond Gittons v Thomas Cleyton Sr, Thomas Cleyton Jr, Thomas Jaxe
- STAC 5/G8/36 - I D - 21 Eliz - Edmond Gittens v Thomas Cleyton
Gittins, Edmund
- STAC 7/2/45 - - - Shropshire - Edmund Gittens v Francis Cressett
Gyttins, Richard
- STAC 5/G32/32 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Richard Gyttyns et al v James Clyffford et al
- STAC 5/G29/26 - I D - 37 Eliz - Richard Gittins, John Dawes, Margaret Dawes v James Clifford, Rowland Wilcox et al
- STAC 5/G3/13 - B A Dr C I D - 35 Eliz - Richard Gyttyns, John Dawes et uxor, Reginald Roe v James Clyfford, Rowland Wilcox, Edmund Bayly, Mary Mounslow, Edmund Wilcox et al
- STAC 5/G5/9 - Rn - 36 Eliz - Richard Gitkins, John Dawes et uxor, Reginald Roe v James Clifford, Rowland Wilcox, Edmond Wilcocks et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 13v. Riot punished by the justices of peace and yet punished again here. Attorney Rex, plaintiff; Roger Gittens et al, defendants: riot in the night, for carrying away forcibly and the defendants being committed by the justices of peace in the country, and indicted and found guilty for the same, yet were they punished here again deeply. Michaelmas 37 Elizabeth (kk)
