Difference between revisions of "STAC Fryer"

From Waalt
Line 1: Line 1:
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
+
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 
<BR> <BR>
 
<BR> <BR>
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
''' Fryer, Cecily & Humfry '''
 
''' Fryer, Cecily & Humfry '''
*STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al
+
*STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Denbigh - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Denbigh]]
  
 
''' Fryer, Germain '''  
 
''' Fryer, Germain '''  

Revision as of 09:48, 16 August 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Fryer, Alexander

  • STAC 5/F21/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Alexander Fryer v John Fryer, John Stockman et al

Fryer Anthony

  • STAC 5/F19/8 - B A - 39 Eliz - Anthony Fryer v Richard Astely et al

Fryer, Agnes

  • STAC 5/F15/39 - I D - - Agnes Fyer v Thomas Frost, William Frost
  • STAC 5/F27/33 - I D - 32 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v John Warren et al
  • STAC 5/F19/16 - I D - - Agnes Fryer v John Warren
  • STAC 5/F14/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v Geoffery Spynke, John Dale
  • STAC 5/F25/6 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Elizabeth Fryer v John Warren, Jeffry Spynck et al

Fryers, Edmund

  • STAC 5/F3/8 - B - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v Robert Sylvester

Fryers, Edmund

  • STAC 5/F23/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch et al
  • STAC 5/F28/7 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v John Yate, Richard Palmer et al
  • STAC 5/F6/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v James Hiche, Richard Palmer et al
  • STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett

Fryer, Cecily & Humfry

  • STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Denbigh - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al

Fryer, Germain

  • STAC 5/F11/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - London - German Fryer v William Worthington, Walter Agar et al

Fryer, Humphrey

  • STAC 5/F20/26 - B A - 30 Eliz - Humphrey Fryer v John Whitcomb, William Elbright et al
  • STAC 5/F22/24 - I D - 30 Eliz - Humphry Fryer v Thomas Kye et al

Fryer, James

  • STAC 5/F27/14 - Rn - 43 Eliz - James Fryer v James Thompson, Richard Dewgill et al
  • STAC 5/F21/10 - C I D - 43 Eliz - James Fryer v Thomas Hardcastle et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
  • STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer
  • STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
  • STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 41r. Forging and altering of court rolls concerning certain customs. Fryer, plaintiff; Fryer, defendant: for forgery and altering of certain court rolls concerning certain customs of the manor of Temple Wycombe which was dismissed for want of sufficient proof. Michaelmas 27 Elizabeth (kk)