Difference between revisions of "STAC Fryer"

From Waalt
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Fryer, Alexander '''  
 
''' Fryer, Alexander '''  
 
*STAC 5/F21/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Alexander Fryer v John Fryer, John Stockman et al
 
*STAC 5/F21/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Alexander Fryer v John Fryer, John Stockman et al
Line 10: Line 14:
 
*STAC 5/F19/16 - I D - - Agnes Fryer v John Warren
 
*STAC 5/F19/16 - I D - - Agnes Fryer v John Warren
 
*STAC 5/F14/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v Geoffery Spynke, John Dale
 
*STAC 5/F14/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v Geoffery Spynke, John Dale
 +
*STAC 5/F25/6 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Elizabeth Fryer v John Warren, Jeffry Spynck et al
  
 
''' Fryers, Edmund '''
 
''' Fryers, Edmund '''
*STAC 5/F3/8 - B - 38 Eliz - Edmund Fryers v Robert Sylvester.
+
*STAC 5/F3/8 - B - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v Robert Sylvester
Edmund Fryers gent. of Kencott Oxonfordshire. That whereas one Robert Silvester late of Burford in the co aforesaid clothier deceased. Land in Burford.
+
**see [[STAC co Oxford]]
*STAC 5/F6/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Edmond Fryers v James Hiche, Richard Palmer et al
 
*STAC 5/F23/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch et al
 
*STAC 5/F28/7 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Edmond Fryers v John Yate, Richard Palmer et al
 
*STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett
 
  
''' Fryer, Elizabeth '''
+
''' Fryers, Edmund '''
*STAC 5/F25/6 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Elizabeth Fryer v John Warren, Jeffry Spynck et al
+
*STAC 5/F23/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch et al
 +
*STAC 5/F28/7 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v John Yate, Richard Palmer et al
 +
*STAC 5/F6/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v James Hiche, Richard Palmer et al
 +
*STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett
 +
**see [[STAC co Oxford]]
  
 
''' Fryer, Cecily & Humfry '''
 
''' Fryer, Cecily & Humfry '''
*STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al
+
*STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Denbigh - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Denbigh]]
  
 
''' Fryer, Germain '''  
 
''' Fryer, Germain '''  
*STAC 5/F11/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - German Fryer v William Worthington, Walter Agar et al. (German Fryer of London gent . . lease of a house and garden in Clerkenwell of Mystres Coxe widowe for 8lii by the year.  William Worthington esquire Walter agar Citized & lynnen draper of London Robert Bigges alias Dibdale & William Skynner vittler)
+
*STAC 5/F11/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - London - German Fryer v William Worthington, Walter Agar et al
 +
**see [[STAC co London]]
  
 
''' Fryer, Humphrey '''
 
''' Fryer, Humphrey '''
Line 37: Line 44:
  
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
''' Attorney General '''
*STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
+
*STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
*STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - AG v Anthony Fryer
+
*STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
+
*STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford  
 +
*STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise
 +
**see [[STAC co Norfolk]]
  
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections:'''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 41r. Forging and altering of court rolls concerning certain customs. Fryer, plaintiff; Fryer, defendant: for forgery and altering of certain court rolls concerning certain customs of the manor of Temple Wycombe which was dismissed for want of sufficient proof. Michaelmas 27 Elizabeth (kk)

Revision as of 09:48, 16 August 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Fryer, Alexander

  • STAC 5/F21/16 - B - 38 Eliz - Alexander Fryer v John Fryer, John Stockman et al

Fryer Anthony

  • STAC 5/F19/8 - B A - 39 Eliz - Anthony Fryer v Richard Astely et al

Fryer, Agnes

  • STAC 5/F15/39 - I D - - Agnes Fyer v Thomas Frost, William Frost
  • STAC 5/F27/33 - I D - 32 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v John Warren et al
  • STAC 5/F19/16 - I D - - Agnes Fryer v John Warren
  • STAC 5/F14/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - Agnes Fryer v Geoffery Spynke, John Dale
  • STAC 5/F25/6 - C I D - 32 Eliz - Elizabeth Fryer v John Warren, Jeffry Spynck et al

Fryers, Edmund

  • STAC 5/F3/8 - B - 38 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v Robert Sylvester

Fryers, Edmund

  • STAC 5/F23/37 - B A - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch et al
  • STAC 5/F28/7 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v John Yate, Richard Palmer et al
  • STAC 5/F6/2 - I D - 39 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmond Fryers v James Hiche, Richard Palmer et al
  • STAC 5/F1/13 - I D C - 41 Eliz - Oxfordshire - Edmund Fryers v John Yate, James Hitch, Richard Palmer, Edward Joyes, Thomas Everett

Fryer, Cecily & Humfry

  • STAC 5/F25/12 - B A C - 32 Eliz - Denbigh - Cecily Fryer, Humfry Fryer v William Bishop of St Asaph, Piers Knowlesly et al

Fryer, Germain

  • STAC 5/F11/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - London - German Fryer v William Worthington, Walter Agar et al

Fryer, Humphrey

  • STAC 5/F20/26 - B A - 30 Eliz - Humphrey Fryer v John Whitcomb, William Elbright et al
  • STAC 5/F22/24 - I D - 30 Eliz - Humphry Fryer v Thomas Kye et al

Fryer, James

  • STAC 5/F27/14 - Rn - 43 Eliz - James Fryer v James Thompson, Richard Dewgill et al
  • STAC 5/F21/10 - C I D - 43 Eliz - James Fryer v Thomas Hardcastle et al

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A25/10 - B - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer, Edward Eden, Richard Abraham et al
  • STAC 5/A37/27 - I - - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer
  • STAC 5/A6/36 - I D - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Fryer et al, Mayors etc of Thetford
  • STAC 5/A3/17 - A - 28 Eliz - Norfolk - AG v Anthony Frise

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 41r. Forging and altering of court rolls concerning certain customs. Fryer, plaintiff; Fryer, defendant: for forgery and altering of certain court rolls concerning certain customs of the manor of Temple Wycombe which was dismissed for want of sufficient proof. Michaelmas 27 Elizabeth (kk)