Difference between revisions of "STAC Delabere"

From Waalt
Line 1: Line 1:
 
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
  
 
''' Delabere, John '''   
 
''' Delabere, John '''   
 +
*STAC 5/D4/8 - B - 32 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michell Blunt, Roger Vaughan, Thomas Carradine et al
 
*STAC 5/D37/2 - A - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Sir Michael Blunt, Thomas Carwarden et al
 
*STAC 5/D37/2 - A - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Sir Michael Blunt, Thomas Carwarden et al
 +
*STAC 5/D18/34 - I D A - 32 Eliz - John Deldbere v William Gytto et Sir Michell Blunt et al
 
*STAC 5/D14/29 - B A Rn - 28 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michael Blunt et uxor
 
*STAC 5/D14/29 - B A Rn - 28 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michael Blunt et uxor
 
*STAC 5/D32/27 - I D - 11 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michael Blunt
 
*STAC 5/D32/27 - I D - 11 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michael Blunt
 +
*STAC 5/D5/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Thomas Carwarden
 +
 +
''' Delabere, John ''' 
 
*STAC 5/D4/10 - B A - Hil 28 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Sowthwell, William Shelley
 
*STAC 5/D4/10 - B A - Hil 28 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Sowthwell, William Shelley
 
*STAC 5/D1/9 - I D -  28 Eliz - John Delaber v Richard Southwell  
 
*STAC 5/D1/9 - I D -  28 Eliz - John Delaber v Richard Southwell  
*STAC 5/D4/8 - B - 32 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michell Blunt, Roger Vaughan, Thomas Carradine et al
+
 
*STAC 5/D18/34 - I D A - 32 Eliz - John Deldbere v William Gytto et Sr M B et al
+
''' Delabere, John ''' 
*STAC 5/D5/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Thomas Carwarden
 
 
*STAC 5/D41/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Thompson, Richard Bell et al
 
*STAC 5/D41/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Thompson, Richard Bell et al
*STAC 5/D23/26 - B A Rr C I D - 40 Eliz - [[STAC co Cumberland]] [[STAC co Lancaster]] - John DelaBere v William Huddleston, Richard Bell, Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
+
 
 +
''' Delabere, John ''' 
 +
*STAC 5/D23/26 - B A Rr C I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John DelaBere v William Huddleston, Richard Bell, Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
 
*STAC 5/D42/23 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Huddleston, Francis Tayler et al
 
*STAC 5/D42/23 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Huddleston, Francis Tayler et al
 
*STAC 5/D17/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
 
*STAC 5/D17/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
Line 18: Line 25:
 
*STAC 5/D35/1 - I D - Mich 40/41 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
 
*STAC 5/D35/1 - I D - Mich 40/41 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
 
*STAC 5/D36/20 - B A Rr C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
 
*STAC 5/D36/20 - B A Rr C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
*STAC 5/D28/15 - D C - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
+
*STAC 5/D28/15 - C D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
 
*STAC 5/D22/24 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston, Francis Taylor et al
 
*STAC 5/D22/24 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston, Francis Taylor et al
 
*STAC 5/D38/52 - R - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
 
*STAC 5/D38/52 - R - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
 
*STAC 5/D38/53 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston, Francis Taylor et al
 
*STAC 5/D38/53 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston, Francis Taylor et al
 
*STAC 7/2/22 - - - Cumberland Lancaster - John De la Bere v William Huddlestone, Thomas Flemmynge et al
 
*STAC 7/2/22 - - - Cumberland Lancaster - John De la Bere v William Huddlestone, Thomas Flemmynge et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Cumberland]] and [[STAC co Lancaster]]
  
 
''' Delabere, Richard '''  
 
''' Delabere, Richard '''  
 
*STAC 5/D33/12 - B A C I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Delabere v John Gibbes et al
 
*STAC 5/D33/12 - B A C I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Delabere v John Gibbes et al
 
*STAC 7/20/20 - - - Richard Delabere v John Gybbes
 
*STAC 7/20/20 - - - Richard Delabere v John Gybbes
 +
 +
''' Delabere, Richard '''
 
*STAC 5/D3/23 - B A C I D - 26 Eliz - Richard Dalabere v George Scudamore, Richard Scudamore, William Scudamore, Roger Gibbs, John Noblets et al
 
*STAC 5/D3/23 - B A C I D - 26 Eliz - Richard Dalabere v George Scudamore, Richard Scudamore, William Scudamore, Roger Gibbs, John Noblets et al
 
*STAC 5/D39/46 - D - 25 Eliz - Richard Delabere v Richard Scudamore, Roger Vaughan, John Alford et al
 
*STAC 5/D39/46 - D - 25 Eliz - Richard Delabere v Richard Scudamore, Roger Vaughan, John Alford et al
Line 41: Line 51:
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
*STAC 7/2/22 - TNA Notes: Santon etc: Forgery of title deeds to lands late of Sir John Huddlestone, and assault
 
 
*STAC 5/D3/23 - In Camera Stellata . . . secundo die Iunij Anno Regni domine nostre Regine Elizabethe xxvj. Mr Attorney Generall is required by this honourable court to consider whether the defs to Richard Delabre have sufficiently answered the interrogatories ministered to them by the same Delabre or not. And if he shall find that they have not so done and so certify, then it is ordered that they shall make such further answer to the same as Mr Attorney  shall think meet. And it is herewith ordered that process thall be awarded against so many persons, as by the reurn of the sheriff of Hereford have committed in Reskus upon the apprehension of Roger Gybbes and others upon an attachment awarded out of this court And the said Mr Attorney having considered thereof accordingly hathe certified as followerth viz. [list of deponents and refusals]
 
*STAC 5/D3/23 - In Camera Stellata . . . secundo die Iunij Anno Regni domine nostre Regine Elizabethe xxvj. Mr Attorney Generall is required by this honourable court to consider whether the defs to Richard Delabre have sufficiently answered the interrogatories ministered to them by the same Delabre or not. And if he shall find that they have not so done and so certify, then it is ordered that they shall make such further answer to the same as Mr Attorney  shall think meet. And it is herewith ordered that process thall be awarded against so many persons, as by the reurn of the sheriff of Hereford have committed in Reskus upon the apprehension of Roger Gybbes and others upon an attachment awarded out of this court And the said Mr Attorney having considered thereof accordingly hathe certified as followerth viz. [list of deponents and refusals]
 
*STAC 5/D5/32 - Interrogatories to be ministered to Thomas Carwarden deft to bill of John Delabere complt, include: Was the said bill exhibited against William Gitto in the names of  Charles Lister and Michell Blonnte drawn by the said Gitto's advise or consent or was the said Gitto willing that any such bill should be exhibited against him. Did the said Gitto depose to the said bill or at the Assises, voluntarily, or was he procured thereunto. By whose means was the said Gitto produced to depose in this court or at the said Assises, and what reward has he obtained from Charles Lister or Michell Blonnt or any the tenants of the said Charles Lister. (dk)
 
*STAC 5/D5/32 - Interrogatories to be ministered to Thomas Carwarden deft to bill of John Delabere complt, include: Was the said bill exhibited against William Gitto in the names of  Charles Lister and Michell Blonnte drawn by the said Gitto's advise or consent or was the said Gitto willing that any such bill should be exhibited against him. Did the said Gitto depose to the said bill or at the Assises, voluntarily, or was he procured thereunto. By whose means was the said Gitto produced to depose in this court or at the said Assises, and what reward has he obtained from Charles Lister or Michell Blonnt or any the tenants of the said Charles Lister. (dk)

Revision as of 12:15, 8 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Delabere, John

  • STAC 5/D4/8 - B - 32 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michell Blunt, Roger Vaughan, Thomas Carradine et al
  • STAC 5/D37/2 - A - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Sir Michael Blunt, Thomas Carwarden et al
  • STAC 5/D18/34 - I D A - 32 Eliz - John Deldbere v William Gytto et Sir Michell Blunt et al
  • STAC 5/D14/29 - B A Rn - 28 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michael Blunt et uxor
  • STAC 5/D32/27 - I D - 11 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michael Blunt
  • STAC 5/D5/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Thomas Carwarden

Delabere, John

  • STAC 5/D4/10 - B A - Hil 28 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Sowthwell, William Shelley
  • STAC 5/D1/9 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Delaber v Richard Southwell

Delabere, John

  • STAC 5/D41/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Thompson, Richard Bell et al

Delabere, John

  • STAC 5/D23/26 - B A Rr C I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John DelaBere v William Huddleston, Richard Bell, Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
  • STAC 5/D42/23 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Huddleston, Francis Tayler et al
  • STAC 5/D17/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
  • STAC 5/D8/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
  • STAC 5/D35/1 - I D - Mich 40/41 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
  • STAC 5/D36/20 - B A Rr C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
  • STAC 5/D28/15 - C D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
  • STAC 5/D22/24 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston, Francis Taylor et al
  • STAC 5/D38/52 - R - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
  • STAC 5/D38/53 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston, Francis Taylor et al
  • STAC 7/2/22 - - - Cumberland Lancaster - John De la Bere v William Huddlestone, Thomas Flemmynge et al

Delabere, Richard

  • STAC 5/D33/12 - B A C I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Delabere v John Gibbes et al
  • STAC 7/20/20 - - - Richard Delabere v John Gybbes

Delabere, Richard

  • STAC 5/D3/23 - B A C I D - 26 Eliz - Richard Dalabere v George Scudamore, Richard Scudamore, William Scudamore, Roger Gibbs, John Noblets et al
  • STAC 5/D39/46 - D - 25 Eliz - Richard Delabere v Richard Scudamore, Roger Vaughan, John Alford et al
  • STAC 5/D20/39 - I - 24 Eliz - Richard Delabere v George Scudamore et al
  • STAC 5/D13/26 - B - 26 Eliz - Richard Delabere v George Scudamore, Richard Scudamore et al

Bevan Case Index

  • Delabere v Gibbs - STAC 5/D33/12, STAC 7/20/20
  • Delabere v Gytto - STAC 5/D18/34
  • Delabere v Huddleston - STAC 5/D23/26, STAC 5/D36/20, STAC 7/2/22, STAC 5/D5/32, STAC 5/D8/24, STAC 5/D17/11, STAC 5/D22/24, STAC 5/D28/15, STAC 5/D35/1, STAC 5/D38/52, STAC 5/D38/53, STAC 5/D41/18, STAC 5/D42/23
  • Delabere v Lyster - STAC 5/D4/8, STAC 5/D14/29, STAC 5/D32/27, STAC 5/D37/2
  • Delabere v Scudamore - STAC 5/D3/23, STAC 5/D13/26, STAC 5/D20/39, STAC 5/D39/46
  • Delabere v Southwell - STAC 5/D4/10, STAC 5/D1/9

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/D3/23 - In Camera Stellata . . . secundo die Iunij Anno Regni domine nostre Regine Elizabethe xxvj. Mr Attorney Generall is required by this honourable court to consider whether the defs to Richard Delabre have sufficiently answered the interrogatories ministered to them by the same Delabre or not. And if he shall find that they have not so done and so certify, then it is ordered that they shall make such further answer to the same as Mr Attorney shall think meet. And it is herewith ordered that process thall be awarded against so many persons, as by the reurn of the sheriff of Hereford have committed in Reskus upon the apprehension of Roger Gybbes and others upon an attachment awarded out of this court And the said Mr Attorney having considered thereof accordingly hathe certified as followerth viz. [list of deponents and refusals]
  • STAC 5/D5/32 - Interrogatories to be ministered to Thomas Carwarden deft to bill of John Delabere complt, include: Was the said bill exhibited against William Gitto in the names of Charles Lister and Michell Blonnte drawn by the said Gitto's advise or consent or was the said Gitto willing that any such bill should be exhibited against him. Did the said Gitto depose to the said bill or at the Assises, voluntarily, or was he procured thereunto. By whose means was the said Gitto produced to depose in this court or at the said Assises, and what reward has he obtained from Charles Lister or Michell Blonnt or any the tenants of the said Charles Lister. (dk)