Difference between revisions of "STAC Delabere"
From Waalt
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
| + | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
| + | |||
''' Delabere, John ''' | ''' Delabere, John ''' | ||
*STAC 5/D37/2 - A - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Sir Michael Blunt, Thomas Carwarden et al | *STAC 5/D37/2 - A - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Sir Michael Blunt, Thomas Carwarden et al | ||
| Line 9: | Line 12: | ||
*STAC 5/D5/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Thomas Carwarden | *STAC 5/D5/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Thomas Carwarden | ||
*STAC 5/D41/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Thompson, Richard Bell et al | *STAC 5/D41/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Thompson, Richard Bell et al | ||
| − | *STAC 5/D23/26 - B A Rr C I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John DelaBere v William Huddleston, Richard Bell, Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al | + | *STAC 5/D23/26 - B A Rr C I D - 40 Eliz - [[STAC co Cumberland]] [[STAC co Lancaster]] - John DelaBere v William Huddleston, Richard Bell, Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al |
*STAC 5/D42/23 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Huddleston, Francis Tayler et al | *STAC 5/D42/23 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Huddleston, Francis Tayler et al | ||
*STAC 5/D17/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al | *STAC 5/D17/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al | ||
| Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
*STAC 7/2/22 - TNA Notes: Santon etc: Forgery of title deeds to lands late of Sir John Huddlestone, and assault | *STAC 7/2/22 - TNA Notes: Santon etc: Forgery of title deeds to lands late of Sir John Huddlestone, and assault | ||
| − | * | + | *STAC 5/D3/23 - In Camera Stellata . . . secundo die Iunij Anno Regni domine nostre Regine Elizabethe xxvj. Mr Attorney Generall is required by this honourable court to consider whether the defs to Richard Delabre have sufficiently answered the interrogatories ministered to them by the same Delabre or not. And if he shall find that they have not so done and so certify, then it is ordered that they shall make such further answer to the same as Mr Attorney shall think meet. And it is herewith ordered that process thall be awarded against so many persons, as by the reurn of the sheriff of Hereford have committed in Reskus upon the apprehension of Roger Gybbes and others upon an attachment awarded out of this court And the said Mr Attorney having considered thereof accordingly hathe certified as followerth viz. [list of deponents and refusals] |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 12:33, 3 December 2018
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Delabere, John
- STAC 5/D37/2 - A - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Sir Michael Blunt, Thomas Carwarden et al
- STAC 5/D14/29 - B A Rn - 28 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michael Blunt et uxor
- STAC 5/D32/27 - I D - 11 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michael Blunt
- STAC 5/D4/10 - B A - Hil 28 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Sowthwell, William Shelley
- STAC 5/D1/9 - I D - 28 Eliz - John Delaber v Richard Southwell
- STAC 5/D4/8 - B - 32 Eliz - John Delabere v Charles Lister, Michell Blunt, Roger Vaughan, Thomas Carradine et al
- STAC 5/D18/34 - I D A - 32 Eliz - John Deldbere v William Gytto et Sr M B et al
- STAC 5/D5/32 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Delabere v Thomas Carwarden
- STAC 5/D41/18 - Rn - 42 Eliz - John Delabere v Richard Thompson, Richard Bell et al
- STAC 5/D23/26 - B A Rr C I D - 40 Eliz - STAC co Cumberland STAC co Lancaster - John DelaBere v William Huddleston, Richard Bell, Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
- STAC 5/D42/23 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Huddleston, Francis Tayler et al
- STAC 5/D17/11 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
- STAC 5/D8/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
- STAC 5/D35/1 - I D - Mich 40/41 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
- STAC 5/D36/20 - B A Rr C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston et al
- STAC 5/D28/15 - D C - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston et al
- STAC 5/D22/24 - C I D - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Hudleston, Francis Taylor et al
- STAC 5/D38/52 - R - 42 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v Francis Taylor, Hugh Askewe et al
- STAC 5/D38/53 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Cumberland Lancaster - John Delabere v William Huddleston, Francis Taylor et al
- STAC 7/2/22 - - - Cumberland Lancaster - John De la Bere v William Huddlestone, Thomas Flemmynge et al
Delabere, Richard
- STAC 5/D33/12 - B A C I D - 23 Eliz - Richard Delabere v John Gibbes et al
- STAC 7/20/20 - - - Richard Delabere v John Gybbes
- STAC 5/D3/23 - B A C I D - 26 Eliz - Richard Dalabere v George Scudamore, Richard Scudamore, William Scudamore, Roger Gibbs, John Noblets et al
- STAC 5/D39/46 - D - 25 Eliz - Richard Delabere v Richard Scudamore, Roger Vaughan, John Alford et al
- STAC 5/D20/39 - I - 24 Eliz - Richard Delabere v George Scudamore et al
- STAC 5/D13/26 - B - 26 Eliz - Richard Delabere v George Scudamore, Richard Scudamore et al
Bevan Case Index
- Delabere v Gibbs - STAC 5/D33/12, STAC 7/20/20
- Delabere v Gytto - STAC 5/D18/34
- Delabere v Huddleston - STAC 5/D23/26, STAC 5/D36/20, STAC 7/2/22, STAC 5/D5/32, STAC 5/D8/24, STAC 5/D17/11, STAC 5/D22/24, STAC 5/D28/15, STAC 5/D35/1, STAC 5/D38/52, STAC 5/D38/53, STAC 5/D41/18, STAC 5/D42/23
- Delabere v Lyster - STAC 5/D4/8, STAC 5/D14/29, STAC 5/D32/27, STAC 5/D37/2
- Delabere v Scudamore - STAC 5/D3/23, STAC 5/D13/26, STAC 5/D20/39, STAC 5/D39/46
- Delabere v Southwell - STAC 5/D4/10, STAC 5/D1/9
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 7/2/22 - TNA Notes: Santon etc: Forgery of title deeds to lands late of Sir John Huddlestone, and assault
- STAC 5/D3/23 - In Camera Stellata . . . secundo die Iunij Anno Regni domine nostre Regine Elizabethe xxvj. Mr Attorney Generall is required by this honourable court to consider whether the defs to Richard Delabre have sufficiently answered the interrogatories ministered to them by the same Delabre or not. And if he shall find that they have not so done and so certify, then it is ordered that they shall make such further answer to the same as Mr Attorney shall think meet. And it is herewith ordered that process thall be awarded against so many persons, as by the reurn of the sheriff of Hereford have committed in Reskus upon the apprehension of Roger Gybbes and others upon an attachment awarded out of this court And the said Mr Attorney having considered thereof accordingly hathe certified as followerth viz. [list of deponents and refusals]
