Difference between revisions of "STAC Dawber"

From Waalt
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Dawber, Henry '''
 
''' Dawber, Henry '''
 
*STAC 5/D26/20 - B Dr - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Dawber v Richard Roughly, William Cowly, Jane Taylor, Jane Tarbocke
 
*STAC 5/D26/20 - B Dr - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Dawber v Richard Roughly, William Cowly, Jane Taylor, Jane Tarbocke
 +
**see [[STAC co Lancaster]]
  
 
''' Dawber, William '''
 
''' Dawber, William '''
 
*STAC 5/D28/26 - B A - 38 Eliz - William Dawber v Thomas Yaites
 
*STAC 5/D28/26 - B A - 38 Eliz - William Dawber v Thomas Yaites
  
''' Bevan Case Index '''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
*Dawber v Roughly - STAC 5/D26/20
 
*Dawber v Yate - STAC 5/D28/26
 
 
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
*STAC 5/D26/20 - Estranged couple. Husband employed male witch to harm wife’s unborn child. Child died. Star Chamber found no jurisdiction. Add 37045 f2 Described in Legal Miscellany 14 Feb 2018 https://legalhistorymiscellany.com/2018/02/14/elizabethan-witchcraft/
 

Latest revision as of 12:06, 8 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Dawber, Henry

  • STAC 5/D26/20 - B Dr - 35 Eliz - Lancashire - Henry Dawber v Richard Roughly, William Cowly, Jane Taylor, Jane Tarbocke

Dawber, William

  • STAC 5/D28/26 - B A - 38 Eliz - William Dawber v Thomas Yaites

Notes, Additions and Corrections