Difference between revisions of "STAC Croste"

From Waalt
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Croste, Robert '''  
 
''' Croste, Robert '''  
 
*STAC 5/C14/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Robert Croste v John Bellwood, William Osteler et al
 
*STAC 5/C14/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Robert Croste v John Bellwood, William Osteler et al
 
+
**[[STAC co Cambridge]]
''' Bevan Case Index  '''
 
*Croste v Bellwood - STAC 5/C14/7
 
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
*STAC 5/C14/7 - Bill of Robert Croste of Isle of Ely Cambs.
+
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 55v. Costs. Defendants charged with a riot dismissed ordered to have costs notwithstanding other defendants were convicted for the same. Croste, plaintiff; Earl of Lincoln et al: the defendants prayed costs for some defendants that were discharged upon the hearing of the matter riot whereupon the court ordered that the plaintiff should pay so many of the defendants their costs as were dismissed if it could be made appear that they were not present at the time and place when the other defendants that were convicted committed the riot. Michaelmas 35 Elizabeth (kk)

Latest revision as of 11:56, 28 April 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Croste, Robert

  • STAC 5/C14/7 - B A - 29 Eliz - Cambridgeshire - Robert Croste v John Bellwood, William Osteler et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 55v. Costs. Defendants charged with a riot dismissed ordered to have costs notwithstanding other defendants were convicted for the same. Croste, plaintiff; Earl of Lincoln et al: the defendants prayed costs for some defendants that were discharged upon the hearing of the matter riot whereupon the court ordered that the plaintiff should pay so many of the defendants their costs as were dismissed if it could be made appear that they were not present at the time and place when the other defendants that were convicted committed the riot. Michaelmas 35 Elizabeth (kk)