Difference between revisions of "STAC Croft"
From Waalt
(note 5/C78/20) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Croft, Ann ''' | ''' Croft, Ann ''' | ||
*STAC 5/C42/20 - B A Rn - 29 Eliz - Ann Crofts v William Dorman, Thomas Newton et al | *STAC 5/C42/20 - B A Rn - 29 Eliz - Ann Crofts v William Dorman, Thomas Newton et al | ||
Line 14: | Line 18: | ||
''' Croft, James ''' | ''' Croft, James ''' | ||
*STAC 5/C68/6 - B - 16 Eliz - James Crofte v Edward Hide, Edward Knappe et al | *STAC 5/C68/6 - B - 16 Eliz - James Crofte v Edward Hide, Edward Knappe et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Croft, James ''' | ||
*STAC 5/C36/11 - B A - 24 Eliz - Sir James Croft v Thomas Hyett, John Holland, Henry Powle et al | *STAC 5/C36/11 - B A - 24 Eliz - Sir James Croft v Thomas Hyett, John Holland, Henry Powle et al | ||
*STAC 5/C75/23 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir James Croft v John Holland | *STAC 5/C75/23 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir James Croft v John Holland | ||
− | *STAC 5/C78/20 - B - 32 Eliz - -James Croftes v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Cuthbert Raynold et al | + | |
− | *STAC 5/C67/10 - I D - 32 Eliz - James Croft v Cuthbert Reynolds, James Blower | + | ''' Croft, James ''' |
− | *STAC 5/C69/11 - A - 32 Eliz - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln Robert Blower et al | + | *STAC 5/C78/20 - B - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croftes v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Cuthbert Raynold et al |
− | *STAC 5/C70/11 - A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Christopher Cowley et al | + | *STAC 5/C67/10 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croft v Cuthbert Reynolds, James Blower |
− | *STAC 5/C19/36 - B - 35 Eliz - James Crofte v Henry Earl of Lincolne, John Whitchcote et al | + | *STAC 5/C69/11 - A - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln Robert Blower et al |
− | *STAC | + | *STAC 5/C70/11 - A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Christopher Cowley et al |
− | + | *STAC 5/C71/8 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croft v Roger Fullshaw | |
+ | *STAC 5/C19/36 - B - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofte v Henry Earl of Lincolne, John Whitchcote et al | ||
+ | **[[STAC co Oxford]] | ||
+ | |||
''' Croft, Robert ''' | ''' Croft, Robert ''' | ||
*STAC 5/C46/2 - I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Croft v Robert Chapman | *STAC 5/C46/2 - I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Croft v Robert Chapman | ||
Line 32: | Line 41: | ||
*STAC 5/C65/6 - B - 13 Eliz - Thomas Croft v Charles Fox, John Jennings, others | *STAC 5/C65/6 - B - 13 Eliz - Thomas Croft v Charles Fox, John Jennings, others | ||
*STAC 5/C65/3 - B - 20 Eliz - Thomas Crofte v John Boier | *STAC 5/C65/3 - B - 20 Eliz - Thomas Crofte v John Boier | ||
− | *STAC 5/C66/16 - A - 33 Eliz - Thomas Crofts v Thomas Cannam, Robert Barrett | + | |
− | *STAC 5/C31/14 - I D - 33 Eliz - Thomas Crofts v Christopher Gascoygne, Thomas Cannam, William Davye et al | + | ''' Croft, Thomas ''' |
− | *STAC 5/C4/6 - I Dn C - 34 Eliz - Thomas Croftes v Christopher Gascoigne, Henrie Baller, John Bower et al | + | *STAC 5/C66/16 - A - 33 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Crofts v Thomas Cannam, Robert Barrett |
+ | *STAC 5/C31/14 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Crofts v Christopher Gascoygne, Thomas Cannam, William Davye et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/C4/6 - I Dn C - 34 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Croftes v Christopher Gascoigne, Henrie Baller, John Bower et al | ||
*STAC 5/C14/40 - A - 33 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Croftes v John Garnham, Richard Garnham, Thomas Botteley et al | *STAC 5/C14/40 - A - 33 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Croftes v John Garnham, Richard Garnham, Thomas Botteley et al | ||
+ | **[[STAC co Sussex]] | ||
''' Attorney General ''' | ''' Attorney General ''' | ||
Line 56: | Line 68: | ||
*Attorney General v Croft - STAC 5/A14/28, STAC 5/A9/36 | *Attorney General v Croft - STAC 5/A14/28, STAC 5/A9/36 | ||
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 11:13, 28 April 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Croft, Ann
- STAC 5/C42/20 - B A Rn - 29 Eliz - Ann Crofts v William Dorman, Thomas Newton et al
- STAC 5/C71/30 - I D - 29 Eliz - Ann Crofts v John Pallett, Thomas Newton et al
- STAC 5/C28/16 - I D - 30 Eliz - Ann Croffts v Thomas Dorman Sr et al
- STAC 5/C80/16 - Rn - 28 Eliz - Ann Crofts v Thomas Dorman, John Pallett et al
Croft, Edmond
- STAC 5/C16/38 - B A - 27 Eliz - Edmond Crofte v Har: Acton, Roger Acton, John Steward et al
- STAC 5/C16/33 - B A Dr - 33 Eliz - Edmonde Crofte v Frances Acton, John Acton, Henry Acton et al
- STAC 5/C27/15 - I D - 34 Eliz - Edmond Croft v John Acton, Meredeth Heath, George Ellens et al
- STAC 5/C44/28 - I D - 27 Eliz - Edmund Croft v John Acton, Frances Acton et al
- STAC 5/C45/19 - Rn - 35 Eliz - Edmond Crofts v John Acton, Francis Acton, Meredith Heath et al
Croft, James
- STAC 5/C68/6 - B - 16 Eliz - James Crofte v Edward Hide, Edward Knappe et al
Croft, James
- STAC 5/C36/11 - B A - 24 Eliz - Sir James Croft v Thomas Hyett, John Holland, Henry Powle et al
- STAC 5/C75/23 - I D - 24 Eliz - Sir James Croft v John Holland
Croft, James
- STAC 5/C78/20 - B - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croftes v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Cuthbert Raynold et al
- STAC 5/C67/10 - I D - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croft v Cuthbert Reynolds, James Blower
- STAC 5/C69/11 - A - 32 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln Robert Blower et al
- STAC 5/C70/11 - A Rn C I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofts v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Christopher Cowley et al
- STAC 5/C71/8 - I D - 33 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Croft v Roger Fullshaw
- STAC 5/C19/36 - B - 35 Eliz - Oxfordshire - James Crofte v Henry Earl of Lincolne, John Whitchcote et al
Croft, Robert
- STAC 5/C46/2 - I D - 29 Eliz - Robert Croft v Robert Chapman
- STAC 5/C65/12 - C I D - 30 Eliz - Robert Crofte v Robert Chapman et al
- STAC 5/C73/12 - I D - 31 Eliz - Robert Croft v Robert Chapman, Edmund Russell
- STAC 5/C58/31 - I D - 31 Eliz - Robert Craste v Robert Chapman, Thomas Farmer et al
Croft, Thomas
- STAC 5/C65/6 - B - 13 Eliz - Thomas Croft v Charles Fox, John Jennings, others
- STAC 5/C65/3 - B - 20 Eliz - Thomas Crofte v John Boier
Croft, Thomas
- STAC 5/C66/16 - A - 33 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Crofts v Thomas Cannam, Robert Barrett
- STAC 5/C31/14 - I D - 33 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Crofts v Christopher Gascoygne, Thomas Cannam, William Davye et al
- STAC 5/C4/6 - I Dn C - 34 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Croftes v Christopher Gascoigne, Henrie Baller, John Bower et al
- STAC 5/C14/40 - A - 33 Eliz - Sussex - Thomas Croftes v John Garnham, Richard Garnham, Thomas Botteley et al
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A14/28 - B A - 27 Eliz - AG v Francis Crofte, Miles Showter et al
- STAC 5/A9/36 - D - 27 Eliz - AG v Sir James Crofte
Bevan Case Index
- Croft v Acton - STAC 5/C16/33, STAC 5/C16/38, STAC 5/C27/15, STAC 5/C44/28, STAC 5/C45/19
- Croft v Boyer - STAC 5/C65/3
- Croft v Canham - STAC 5/C66/16
- Croft v Chapman - STAC 5/C46/2, STAC 5/C58/31, STAC 5/C65/12, STAC 5/C73/12
- Croft v Dorman - STAC 5/C42/20, STAC 5/C28/16, STAC 5/C71/30, STAC 5/C80/16
- Croft v Earl of Lincoln - STAC 5/C19/36, STAC 5/C78/20, STAC 5/C67/10, STAC 5/C69/11, STAC 5/C70/11
- Croft v Fox - STAC 5/C65/6
- Croft v Fulshaw - STAC 5/C71/8
- Croft v Garnham - STAC 5/C14/40
- Croft v Gascoigne - STAC 5/C4/6, STAC 5/C31/14
- Croft v Hyatt - STAC 5/C36/11, STAC 5/C75/23
- Croft v Hyde - STAC 5/C68/6
- Attorney General v Croft - STAC 5/A14/28, STAC 5/A9/36
Notes, Additions and Corrections: