Difference between revisions of "STAC Crane"
From Waalt
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
*STAC 5/C65/5 - B Dr - Thomas Crane v Thomas Bellamy, John Litcon | *STAC 5/C65/5 - B Dr - Thomas Crane v Thomas Bellamy, John Litcon | ||
− | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections:''' | |
− | |||
− | |||
* [http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/details?Uri=C8673773 STAC 10/2/9]: Thomas Crane v Henry Humberston. Assault, in Ilford, Essex. | * [http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/details?Uri=C8673773 STAC 10/2/9]: Thomas Crane v Henry Humberston. Assault, in Ilford, Essex. |
Revision as of 21:30, 16 December 2013
Crane, John
- STAC 5/C36/5 - B A R Rr - 30 Eliz - John Crane v Thomas Thomkin, Richard Richow, Richard Rawe et al
- STAC 5/C36/6 - B A - 45 Eliz - John Crane v John Roe, John Payne
- STAC 5/C77/15 - I D - 45 Eliz - John Crane, Thomas Crane v John Payne, Richard Andrewes et al
Crane, Robert
- STAC 5/C33/24 - B A Dr - 34 Eliz - Robert Crane v Richard Beckham, Andrew Sammes, Nicholas Howes et al
- STAC 5/C21/37 - I D - 33 Eliz - Robert Crane v Richard Beckham, Nicholas Howes, Thomas Beckham
Crane, Thomas
- STAC 5/C60/36 - B A Rn - 45 Eliz - Thomas Crane v Richard Andrews, Henry Humberston et al
- STAC 5/C62/2 - D - 45 Eliz - Thomas Crane v Henry Homerston, Richard Andrewes
- STAC 5/C65/5 - B Dr - Thomas Crane v Thomas Bellamy, John Litcon
Notes, Additions and Corrections:
- STAC 10/2/9: Thomas Crane v Henry Humberston. Assault, in Ilford, Essex.