Difference between revisions of "STAC Clay"
From Waalt
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Clay, George ''' | ''' Clay, George ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/C11/20 - I D - 9 Eliz - George Cley v Rowland Hill, John Hanson | + | *STAC 5/C11/20 - I D - 9 Eliz - Shropshire - George Cley v Rowland Hill, John Hanson |
− | *STAC 5/C69/35 - B A - 39 Eliz - George Clay v Rowland Hill, John Anson et al | + | *STAC 5/C69/35 - B A - 39 Eliz - Shropshire - George Clay v Rowland Hill, John Anson et al |
− | *STAC 5/C48/38 - Rn - 40 Eliz - George Clay v Rowland Hill, John Hanson | + | *STAC 5/C48/38 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Shropshire - George Clay v Rowland Hill, John Hanson |
+ | **[[STAC co Shropshire]] | ||
''' Clay, Humphrey ''' | ''' Clay, Humphrey ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/C2/22 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Humphrey Claye, Michael Fallowes v Thomas Tew, Simon Bidall, John Chatterton, Humphrey Ilesley et al | + | *STAC 5/C2/22 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Staffordshire - Humphrey Claye, Michael Fallowes v Thomas Tew, Simon Bidall, John Chatterton, Humphrey Ilesley et al |
− | *STAC 5/C5/21 - Rr - 24 Eliz - Humphrey Clay, Michael Fallowe v Simon Bidell, John Chatterton, Humphrey Isley et al | + | *STAC 5/C5/21 - Rr - 24 Eliz - Staffordshire - Humphrey Clay, Michael Fallowe v Simon Bidell, John Chatterton, Humphrey Isley et al |
− | *STAC 5/C45/21 - I D - 24 Eliz - Humfrey Claye, Michael Fallowes v Robert Shipton, John Stretton et al | + | *STAC 5/C45/21 - I D - 24 Eliz - Staffordshire - Humfrey Claye, Michael Fallowes v Robert Shipton, John Stretton et al |
+ | **[[STAC co Stafford]] | ||
''' Clay, John ''' | ''' Clay, John ''' | ||
− | *STAC 5/C4/40 - B A - 17 Eliz - John Claye v Francis Leeke, Robert Banister, Richard Smith et al | + | *STAC 5/C4/40 - B A - 17 Eliz - Derbyshire - John Claye v Francis Leeke, Robert Banister, Richard Smith et al |
− | *STAC 5/C14/31 - I D - 17 Eliz - John Cley v Francis Leeke, Edmund Greves | + | *STAC 5/C14/31 - I D - 17 Eliz - Derbyshire - John Cley v Francis Leeke, Edmund Greves , Robert Bannister, John Grensmithe, John Spaulton, Raulf Spaulton, Thomas Henshawe |
+ | **[[STAC co Derby]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
Latest revision as of 13:35, 27 April 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Clay, George
- STAC 5/C11/20 - I D - 9 Eliz - Shropshire - George Cley v Rowland Hill, John Hanson
- STAC 5/C69/35 - B A - 39 Eliz - Shropshire - George Clay v Rowland Hill, John Anson et al
- STAC 5/C48/38 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Shropshire - George Clay v Rowland Hill, John Hanson
Clay, Humphrey
- STAC 5/C2/22 - B A Rn - 25 Eliz - Staffordshire - Humphrey Claye, Michael Fallowes v Thomas Tew, Simon Bidall, John Chatterton, Humphrey Ilesley et al
- STAC 5/C5/21 - Rr - 24 Eliz - Staffordshire - Humphrey Clay, Michael Fallowe v Simon Bidell, John Chatterton, Humphrey Isley et al
- STAC 5/C45/21 - I D - 24 Eliz - Staffordshire - Humfrey Claye, Michael Fallowes v Robert Shipton, John Stretton et al
Clay, John
- STAC 5/C4/40 - B A - 17 Eliz - Derbyshire - John Claye v Francis Leeke, Robert Banister, Richard Smith et al
- STAC 5/C14/31 - I D - 17 Eliz - Derbyshire - John Cley v Francis Leeke, Edmund Greves , Robert Bannister, John Grensmithe, John Spaulton, Raulf Spaulton, Thomas Henshawe
Notes, Additions and Corrections