Difference between revisions of "STAC Bray"
From Waalt
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder | ||
+ | ''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition | ||
+ | <BR> <BR> | ||
+ | |||
''' Bray, Edmund''' | ''' Bray, Edmund''' | ||
*STAC 5/B106/20 - B A Rn - 7 Eliz - Edmond Braye v Thomas Dutton, Hugh Lawes et al | *STAC 5/B106/20 - B A Rn - 7 Eliz - Edmond Braye v Thomas Dutton, Hugh Lawes et al | ||
Line 15: | Line 19: | ||
*STAC 5/B5/14 - B A - 12 Eliz - Richard Bray v Perce Edgecomb, John Darryle Jr, Richard Lyon Jr, Mark Baker et al | *STAC 5/B5/14 - B A - 12 Eliz - Richard Bray v Perce Edgecomb, John Darryle Jr, Richard Lyon Jr, Mark Baker et al | ||
*STAC 5/B53/39 - I D - 13 Eliz - Richard Bray v John Darryce, John Lyon | *STAC 5/B53/39 - I D - 13 Eliz - Richard Bray v John Darryce, John Lyon | ||
− | + | ||
+ | ''' Bray, Richard ''' | ||
*STAC 5/B76/12 - B A - 31 Eliz - Richard Bray, John Pope, Thomas Collyn v William Pekyn, John Haydon, William Rowe et al | *STAC 5/B76/12 - B A - 31 Eliz - Richard Bray, John Pope, Thomas Collyn v William Pekyn, John Haydon, William Rowe et al | ||
*STAC 5/B66/8 - B - 26 Eliz - Richard Braye v William Welsheman, William Symons, Ralph Keit et al | *STAC 5/B66/8 - B - 26 Eliz - Richard Braye v William Welsheman, William Symons, Ralph Keit et al | ||
*STAC 5/B22/20 - I D - 1 Eliz - Richard Braye et al v John Robyn et al | *STAC 5/B22/20 - I D - 1 Eliz - Richard Braye et al v John Robyn et al | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B46/11 - B - 42 Eliz - Richard Bray et uxor, Robert Derden, Edward Bray John Conwaye v Robert Rogers, John Copley et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Bray, Richard ''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B82/36 - B A C - 13 Eliz - Richard Bray v Roger Portington | ||
*STAC 5/B3/2 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington, John West, Thomas Stamforde, Richard Fange, John Sheemelde et al | *STAC 5/B3/2 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington, John West, Thomas Stamforde, Richard Fange, John Sheemelde et al | ||
*STAC 5/B46/14 - B - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portinton, John West, Thomas Slanyford et al | *STAC 5/B46/14 - B - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portinton, John West, Thomas Slanyford et al | ||
Line 24: | Line 33: | ||
*STAC 5/B34/29 - A - 42 Eliz - Richard Bray v Roger Portington et al | *STAC 5/B34/29 - A - 42 Eliz - Richard Bray v Roger Portington et al | ||
*STAC 5/B47/12 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington et al | *STAC 5/B47/12 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington et al | ||
− | |||
*STAC 5/B2/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington | *STAC 5/B2/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington | ||
Line 36: | Line 44: | ||
*STAC 5/B113/39 - B A - 30 Eliz - Thomas Bray v John Awnsty | *STAC 5/B113/39 - B A - 30 Eliz - Thomas Bray v John Awnsty | ||
*STAC 5/B49/3 - I D - 30 Eliz - Thomas Bray v John Awnsly | *STAC 5/B49/3 - I D - 30 Eliz - Thomas Bray v John Awnsly | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | ''' | + | ''' Bray, Thomas ''' |
− | * | + | *STAC 5/B52/23 - B A D - 42 Eliz - Kent - Thomas Bray v Christopher Hudson, John Elfrith, William Legg |
− | + | *STAC 5/B19/3 - I D - 42 Eliz - Kent - Thomas Braye v Christopher Hudson et al | |
− | + | **see [[STAC co Kent]] | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | * | ||
− | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections | + | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' |
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 12:32, 4 November 2019
B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder
C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition
Bray, Edmund
- STAC 5/B106/20 - B A Rn - 7 Eliz - Edmond Braye v Thomas Dutton, Hugh Lawes et al
- STAC 5/B14/24 - D - 8 Eliz - Edmund Braye v [blank] Dutton
Bray, Francis
- STAC 5/B39/36 - B - 35 Eliz - Francis Braye v Anthony Rowland, Christofer Merrell
Bray, John
- STAC 5/B27/21 - B A - 42 Eliz - John Braye v James Demetrius, Henry Cule et al
Bray, Sylvester
- STAC 5/B105/31 - B - 29 Eliz - Sylvester Braye v John Perry, Robert Hale et al
Bray, Richard
- STAC 5/B5/14 - B A - 12 Eliz - Richard Bray v Perce Edgecomb, John Darryle Jr, Richard Lyon Jr, Mark Baker et al
- STAC 5/B53/39 - I D - 13 Eliz - Richard Bray v John Darryce, John Lyon
Bray, Richard
- STAC 5/B76/12 - B A - 31 Eliz - Richard Bray, John Pope, Thomas Collyn v William Pekyn, John Haydon, William Rowe et al
- STAC 5/B66/8 - B - 26 Eliz - Richard Braye v William Welsheman, William Symons, Ralph Keit et al
- STAC 5/B22/20 - I D - 1 Eliz - Richard Braye et al v John Robyn et al
- STAC 5/B46/11 - B - 42 Eliz - Richard Bray et uxor, Robert Derden, Edward Bray John Conwaye v Robert Rogers, John Copley et al
Bray, Richard
- STAC 5/B82/36 - B A C - 13 Eliz - Richard Bray v Roger Portington
- STAC 5/B3/2 - B A C I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington, John West, Thomas Stamforde, Richard Fange, John Sheemelde et al
- STAC 5/B46/14 - B - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portinton, John West, Thomas Slanyford et al
- STAC 5/B5/38 - B A C I D - 43 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington, John West, Thomas Stainford, Richard Fauge et al
- STAC 5/B34/29 - A - 42 Eliz - Richard Bray v Roger Portington et al
- STAC 5/B47/12 - Rn - 43 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington et al
- STAC 5/B2/24 - I D - 42 Eliz - Richard Braye v Roger Portington
Bray, Robert
- STAC 5/B98/28 - Rr - 40 Eliz - Robert Braye v Edward Hallam alias Holland, James Tenby et al
- STAC 5/B90/16 - I - 38 Eliz - Robert Bray v Edward Hollam alias Holland, John Teubs
- STAC 5/B32/37 - I D - 38 Eliz - Robert Brag v [blank] Trynbry et al
- STAC 5/B29/11 - B A C I D - 38 Eliz - Robert Bray v Edward Hollam alias Holland, Thomas Mitchell et al
Bray, Thomas
- STAC 5/B113/39 - B A - 30 Eliz - Thomas Bray v John Awnsty
- STAC 5/B49/3 - I D - 30 Eliz - Thomas Bray v John Awnsly
Bray, Thomas
- STAC 5/B52/23 - B A D - 42 Eliz - Kent - Thomas Bray v Christopher Hudson, John Elfrith, William Legg
- STAC 5/B19/3 - I D - 42 Eliz - Kent - Thomas Braye v Christopher Hudson et al
- see STAC co Kent
Notes, Additions and Corrections