STAC Bold

From Waalt
Revision as of 19:08, 24 November 2019 by Hgood (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Bold, Edward

  • STAC 5/B73/19 - B - - Edward Bold v John Brooke, Richard Wood
  • STAC 5/B84/20 - B A - 38 Eliz - Edward Bold v William Pooler, Thomas Huntbatch
  • STAC 5/B85/5 - I D - 38 Eliz - Edward Bolde v John Woolridge, William Pooler et al
  • STAC 5/B68/11 - Rn - 40 Eliz - Edward Bolde v William Pooler
  • STAC 5/B78/35 - B A - 38 Eliz - Edward Bold v Robert Whitmore, Walter Symonds et al
  • STAC 5/B105/36 - B A C - 41 Eliz - Edward Bold v Edward Cowper, Robert Coxe et al

Bold, Edward

  • STAC 5/B50/9 - I D - 41 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Bolde v Edward Walter, Edward Cowper et uxor, Robert Coxe et al
  • STAC 5/B19/28 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Bolde v John Walter, Edward Walter, William Pie et al
  • STAC 5/B30/3 - B A Rn - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Boulde v John Walter, William Walter et al
  • STAC 5/B96/38 - Rn - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Bolde v William Walter, John Walter, William Pye
  • STAC 5/B84/3 - I D - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Bould v John Walter, William Walter, William Pye
  • STAC 5/B81/17 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Bold v John Walter, Edward Walter, James Robinson et al
  • STAC 5/B28/8 - C I D - 44 Eliz - Staffordshire - Edward Bolde v John Walter, William Walter, William Pye

Bolde, Francis

Bould, John

  • STAC 5/B110/14 - B - 11 Eliz - John Bould v Richard Eaton, Thomas Burrows et al

Bould, Rees

  • STAC 5/B87/27 - B A C I D - 34 Eliz - Anglesey - Rees Bould alias Price Bolde v Owen Griffith, Richard Lewis, William Griffith et al
  • STAC 5/B20/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Anglesey - Rees Boulde v William Griffith, Richard Lewis et al
  • STAC 5/B24/31 - I D - 34 Eliz - Anglesey - Rees Bould v Hugh Lewis, William Griffith et al
  • STAC 5/B86/9 - B A C I - 37 Eliz - Anglesey - Rees Bould v Owen Wood, Richard Morgan, John Bodychen et al
  • STAC 5/B86/11 - B A Rn Dr C I D - 35 Eliz - Anglesey - Rees Bould v John Meyrick, Richard Johnson, Owen Wood

Bould, Rees

  • STAC 5/B21/23 - B A C I D - 33 Eliz - Anglesey - Rees Boulde v Owen Wood, Hugh Lewis

Bould, Rees

  • STAC 5/B67/30 - C I D - 37 Eliz - Rees Boold v Richard ap John Morgan, Owen Gwyn, William Roberts
  • STAC 5/B70/25 - Rn - 37 Eliz - Rees Boulde v William Roberts, Richard ap John
  • STAC 5/B58/9 - I D - 37 Eliz - Rees Boold v William Roberts

Bold, Richard

  • STAC 5/B106/16 - B - - Richard Bolde v John Hassilhurst, Arthur Jenyson et al
  • STAC 5/B107/40 - B - - Richard Bold v John Child, Thomas Haywood
  • STAC 5/B83/11 - C I D - 34 Eliz - Richard Bould v Richard Lewis, Owen Wood

Bold, Richard

  • STAC 5/B113/22 - A - - Flint - Richard Boold v David ap William, John Parker et al
  • STAC 5/B95/8 - D - 12 Eliz - Flint - Richard Bolde v David Ap William
  • STAC 5/B57/40 - C I D - 12 Eliz - Flint - Richard Bolde v Hugh Trevor

Bould, Richard

  • STAC 5/B101/3 - B A - 44 Eliz - Richard Bould v Thomas Lovatt, George Alleyne et al
  • STAC 5/B104/20 - I D - 44 Eliz - Richard Bold, Francis Fyton v John Lovett, John Adderley et al
  • STAC 5/B54/26 - I D - 44 Eliz - William Boulde, Francis Fytton v Thomas Lovatt

Bolde, Roger

  • STAC 5/B103/20 - B - - Roger Bolde v Sir John Holcroft, Thomas Woodward et al

Bould, William

  • STAC 5/B86/10 - B A Rn - 8 Eliz - Anglesey - William Bould v Lewis ap Merrick ap Owen, Owen Wood
  • STAC 5/B104/28 - I D - - Anglesey - Richard Bowlde v Davyd ap William, Lewis ap Merrick ap Owen

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 64r. For not returning recognizance. Practice to indict one of felony. Granting a commission of rebellion. Bold, plaintiff; Wood, Lewes, Griffith et al, defendants: for not returning recognizances taken before some of the defendants being justices of peace for practice and unlawful conspiracy to indict the plaintiff as accessory to a supposed felony and for a contempt and misdemeanor in beating a commissioner of rebellion when he arrested the defendant by force thereof being awarded out of this court for which conspiracy and practise and beating of the commission of rebellion Griffith fined 100 marks for the conspiracy and £40 for beating the commission but the other defendant dismissed with £10 cost, for that the matters were not deemed worthy to trouble the court nor proved as seemeth. Michaelmas 38 Elizabeth (kk)
Retrieved from "https://waalt.uh.edu/index.php?title=STAC_Bold&oldid=85379"