Difference between revisions of "STAC Bell"

From Waalt
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Bell James '''
 
''' Bell James '''
*STAC 5/B63/37 - B A Rn - 40 Eliz - James Bell v Cicely Gorges, Morris Lloyd, John Jackson et al
+
*STAC 5/B63/37 - B A Rn - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Cicely Gorges, Morris Lloyd, John Jackson et al
*STAC 5/B54/16 - I D - 39 Eliz - James Bell v Eleanor Spartchford, Cicilia Gorgos
+
*STAC 5/B54/16 - I D - 39 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Eleanor Spartchford, Cicilia Gorgos
*STAC 5/B72/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - James Bell v Cicely Gorgh, Eleanor Spatchford
+
*STAC 5/B72/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Cicely Gorgh, Eleanor Spatchford
*STAC 5/B62/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - James Bell v Eleanor Sparchford, Cicely George et al
+
*STAC 5/B62/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Eleanor Sparchford, Cicely George et al
*STAC 5/B58/21 - I D - 40 Eliz - James Bell v Elnear Spachford
+
*STAC 5/B58/21 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Elnear Spachford
*STAC 5/B12/26 - I D - 40 Eliz - James Bell v Morrice Loyd et al
+
*STAC 5/B12/26 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Morrice Loyd et al
*STAC 5/B48/11 - D - 40 Eliz - James Bell v Elianor Spachford et al
+
*STAC 5/B48/11 - D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Elianor Spachford et al
*STAC 5/B33/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - James Bell v Cicilie Gorys, Elianor Spartchford
+
*STAC 5/B33/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Cicilie Gorys, Elianor Spartchford
*STAC 5/B16/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - James Bell v Maurice Floyd
+
*STAC 7/10/49 - - - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Eleanor Spacheford, Maurice Lloyd et al
 +
*STAC 5/B16/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Maurice Floyd
 +
**[[STAC co Northampton]]
  
 
''' Bell, John '''  
 
''' Bell, John '''  
*STAC 5/B77/16 - B A - 32 Eliz - John Bell v John Kendall
+
*STAC 5/B77/16 - B A - 32 Eliz - - John Bell v John Kendall
  
 
''' Bell, Percival '''
 
''' Bell, Percival '''
*STAC 5/B93/33 - B A - 32 Eliz - Percival Bell v George Ellerby, Edward Marwood et al
+
*STAC 5/B93/33 - B A - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Percival Bell v George Ellerby, Edward Marwood et al
 
*STAC 5/B101/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - Percival Bell, James Conyers v Thomas Williamson, Michael Tubley et al
 
*STAC 5/B101/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - Percival Bell, James Conyers v Thomas Williamson, Michael Tubley et al
 +
**[[STAC co York ER]]
  
 
''' Bell, Robert '''  
 
''' Bell, Robert '''  
*STAC 5/B72/29 - I D - 13 Eliz - Robert Bell v Robert Cotterell, William Whitwood
+
*STAC 5/B4/14 - B A - 13 Eliz - - Robert Bell, John Hammond v Robert Cotterel, Thomas Higgins, John Hylsdon et al
 +
*STAC 5/B72/29 - I D - 13 Eliz - - Robert Bell v Robert Cotterell, William Whitwood
  
 
''' Attorney General '''
 
''' Attorney General '''
*STAC 5/A39/21 - B A - 35 Eliz - AG v William Bell, Leonard Prowde  
+
*STAC 5/A39/21 - B A - 35 Eliz - Worcestershire - AG v William Bell, Leonard Prowde
*STAC 5/A33/26 - I D - 35 Eliz - AG v William Bell
+
*STAC 5/A33/26 - I D - 35 Eliz - Worcestershire - AG v William Bell  
 +
**[[STAC co Worcester]]
 +
 
 +
'''Bevan Case Index '''
 +
*Bell v Cotterell - STAC 5/B4/14, STAC 5/B72/29
 +
*Bell v Ellerby - STAC 5/B93/33
 +
*Bell v Gorges - STAC 5/B63/37, STAC 5/B12/26, STAC 5/B16/24, STAC 5/B33/18, STAC 5/B48/11, STAC 5/B54/16, STAC 5/B58/21, STAC 5/B62/13, STAC 5/B72/2, STAC 7/10/49
 +
*Bell v Kendall - STAC 5/B77/16
 +
*Bell v Williamson - STAC 5/B101/29
 +
*Attorney General v Bell - STAC 5/A39/21, STAC 5/A33/26
 +
 
 +
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 13r. (kk) For slandering the Lord Abergaveny by petition, letters, and articles. Bell, a prisoner in the Marshalsea, was brought to the bar for slandering and falsely accusing the Lord Abergavenny, sometime his master, with very foul and opprobrious matters tending in some sort (if they had been true) to the loss of his Honour’s life and living by a petition exhibited to Her Majesty; and by his letters written to Sir William Walter, knight, articles included for which offence adjudged to stand on the pillory with a paper at Westminster and in the country and to lose both his ears, one here and the other there, £100 fine and not to be enlarged until his submission to the Lord Abergavenny. Michaelmas 24 Elizabeth fo. 103

Revision as of 17:01, 3 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Bell James

  • STAC 5/B63/37 - B A Rn - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Cicely Gorges, Morris Lloyd, John Jackson et al
  • STAC 5/B54/16 - I D - 39 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Eleanor Spartchford, Cicilia Gorgos
  • STAC 5/B72/2 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Cicely Gorgh, Eleanor Spatchford
  • STAC 5/B62/13 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Eleanor Sparchford, Cicely George et al
  • STAC 5/B58/21 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Elnear Spachford
  • STAC 5/B12/26 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Morrice Loyd et al
  • STAC 5/B48/11 - D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Elianor Spachford et al
  • STAC 5/B33/18 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Cicilie Gorys, Elianor Spartchford
  • STAC 7/10/49 - - - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Eleanor Spacheford, Maurice Lloyd et al
  • STAC 5/B16/24 - I D - 40 Eliz - Northamptonshire - James Bell v Maurice Floyd

Bell, John

  • STAC 5/B77/16 - B A - 32 Eliz - - John Bell v John Kendall

Bell, Percival

  • STAC 5/B93/33 - B A - 32 Eliz - Yorkshire ER - Percival Bell v George Ellerby, Edward Marwood et al
  • STAC 5/B101/29 - I D - 37 Eliz - Percival Bell, James Conyers v Thomas Williamson, Michael Tubley et al

Bell, Robert

  • STAC 5/B4/14 - B A - 13 Eliz - - Robert Bell, John Hammond v Robert Cotterel, Thomas Higgins, John Hylsdon et al
  • STAC 5/B72/29 - I D - 13 Eliz - - Robert Bell v Robert Cotterell, William Whitwood

Attorney General

  • STAC 5/A39/21 - B A - 35 Eliz - Worcestershire - AG v William Bell, Leonard Prowde
  • STAC 5/A33/26 - I D - 35 Eliz - Worcestershire - AG v William Bell

Bevan Case Index

  • Bell v Cotterell - STAC 5/B4/14, STAC 5/B72/29
  • Bell v Ellerby - STAC 5/B93/33
  • Bell v Gorges - STAC 5/B63/37, STAC 5/B12/26, STAC 5/B16/24, STAC 5/B33/18, STAC 5/B48/11, STAC 5/B54/16, STAC 5/B58/21, STAC 5/B62/13, STAC 5/B72/2, STAC 7/10/49
  • Bell v Kendall - STAC 5/B77/16
  • Bell v Williamson - STAC 5/B101/29
  • Attorney General v Bell - STAC 5/A39/21, STAC 5/A33/26

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 13r. (kk) For slandering the Lord Abergaveny by petition, letters, and articles. Bell, a prisoner in the Marshalsea, was brought to the bar for slandering and falsely accusing the Lord Abergavenny, sometime his master, with very foul and opprobrious matters tending in some sort (if they had been true) to the loss of his Honour’s life and living by a petition exhibited to Her Majesty; and by his letters written to Sir William Walter, knight, articles included for which offence adjudged to stand on the pillory with a paper at Westminster and in the country and to lose both his ears, one here and the other there, £100 fine and not to be enlarged until his submission to the Lord Abergavenny. Michaelmas 24 Elizabeth fo. 103