Difference between revisions of "STAC Batisford"
From Waalt
(Add notes) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*STAC 5/B44/6 - B A - Mich 43/44 Eliz - John Batisford v Edward Hamond, Thomas Chapman, Nicholas Berrie et al | *STAC 5/B44/6 - B A - Mich 43/44 Eliz - John Batisford v Edward Hamond, Thomas Chapman, Nicholas Berrie et al | ||
*STAC 5/B32/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - John Batisforde v Edmund Hamond, Nicholas Berry et al | *STAC 5/B32/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - John Batisforde v Edmund Hamond, Nicholas Berry et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Notes, Additions and Corrections''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/B44/6 – Fen Drayton, Cambs [http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=15449 see VCH] |
Revision as of 22:35, 29 January 2013
Batisford, John
- STAC 5/B27/10 - B A Rn - 24 Eliz - John Battisford, William Bossard v Henry Stockwell, John Gryme et al
- STAC 5/B44/21 - B A Rn - 32 Eliz - John Battesford v Richard Monke, John Ashwood, John Palmer
- STAC 5/B54/2 - I D - 32 Eliz - John Battesford v Richard Monk, John Ashwood
- STAC 5/B99/15 - I D - 33 Eliz - John Batisford v Richard Muncke
- STAC 5/B75/9 - I D - 36 Eliz - John Batisforde v Thomas Cropwell
- STAC 5/B92/40 - Rn - 36 Eliz - John Battisford v Edward Monday et al
- STAC 5/B69/10 - Rr - 36 Eliz - John Batisforde v John Askwood, Richard Monke
- STAC 5/B44/6 - B A - Mich 43/44 Eliz - John Batisford v Edward Hamond, Thomas Chapman, Nicholas Berrie et al
- STAC 5/B32/21 - I D - 43 Eliz - John Batisforde v Edmund Hamond, Nicholas Berry et al
Notes, Additions and Corrections
- STAC 5/B44/6 – Fen Drayton, Cambs see VCH