Difference between revisions of "STAC Basse"
From Waalt
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
*STAC 5/B66/36 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v John Chewe | *STAC 5/B66/36 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v John Chewe | ||
*STAC 5/B14/32 - I D - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v Thomas Midleton, Anthony Norman et al | *STAC 5/B14/32 - I D - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v Thomas Midleton, Anthony Norman et al | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''' Attorney General''' | ||
+ | *STAC 5/A37/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Hugh Base et uxor, Richard Sambourn et uxor, William Davies | ||
+ | *STAC 5/A31/14 - B A I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Hugh Base et uxor, Richard Samborne et uxor, William Davyes (3 Answers - from Hugh and Agnes Base, Richard & Ursula Sambourne, and William Davies) |
Revision as of 13:08, 1 December 2012
Basse, Edward
- STAC 5/B52/24 - B A - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v William Aston, John Usher, Thomas Middleton et al
- STAC 5/B61/35 - Rr - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v William Astry, John Usher
- STAC 5/B35/7 - A - 39 Eliz - Edward Bass v John Chew
- STAC 5/B47/14 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v William Astrey, John Usher
- STAC 5/B66/36 - Rn - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v John Chewe
- STAC 5/B14/32 - I D - 39 Eliz - Edward Basse v Thomas Midleton, Anthony Norman et al
Attorney General
- STAC 5/A37/36 - I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Hugh Base et uxor, Richard Sambourn et uxor, William Davies
- STAC 5/A31/14 - B A I D - 44 Eliz - AG v Hugh Base et uxor, Richard Samborne et uxor, William Davyes (3 Answers - from Hugh and Agnes Base, Richard & Ursula Sambourne, and William Davies)