STAC Baldwin

From Rpalmer
Revision as of 03:46, 2 May 2019 by Hgood (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Baldwin, Charles

  • STAC 5/B88/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwin v Richard Warde, Robert Smyth et al
  • STAC 5/B104/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth et al
  • STAC 5/B105/33 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth
  • STAC 5/B108/34 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwin v Robert Smith, Henry Furnes et al
  • STAC 5/B99/3 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith
  • STAC 5/B95/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, Francis Smith, William Tiptowe et al
  • STAC 5/B75/37 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smythe et al
  • STAC 5/B41/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, William Tiptowe, William Ward et al

Baldwin, Christopher

  • STAC 5/B3/30 - B A - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - Christopher Baldwyn v Richard Tempest, Hugh Laycocke, Peter Hargreaves, Leonard Smith, Robert Smith

Baldwin, Edmund

  • STAC 5/B38/13 - I D - 41 Eliz - Edmund Baldwin v Thomas Griffith
  • STAC 5/B38/23 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Edmund Baldwin v Thomas Griffith

Baldwin, William

  • STAC 5/B25/19 - B A - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwin v Levye Basmore
  • STAC 5/B20/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levi Bassmore
  • STAC 5/B26/8 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levy Basmore

Bevan Case Index

  • Baldwin v Basmore - STAC 5/B25/19, STAC 5/B20/24, STAC 5/B26/8
  • Baldwin v Griffith - STAC 5/B38/13, STAC 5/B38/23
  • Baldwin v Pryne - STAC 5/B53/6 see STAC Bawdwin
  • Baldwin v Rolfe - STAC 5/B97/22 see STAC Bawdwin
  • Baldwin v Smith - STAC 5/B88/34, STAC 5/B41/21, STAC 5/B75/37, STAC 5/B95/15, STAC 5/B99/3, STAC 5/B104/9, STAC 5/B105/33, STAC 5/B108/34
  • Baldwin v Tempest - STAC 5/B3/30

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/B88/34; B75/37; B41/21; B99/3; B95/15; B104/9; B108/34; B105/33: River Lea, Middlesex/Essex. See Fairclough, K.; doctoral thesis "THE RIVER LEA 1571-1767: A River Navigation prior to canalisation", Chapter 12
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 37r. Perjury in affidavit in this court dismissed for that the affidavit and bill varied in substance. Bawden, plaintiff; Mountford: for perjury in an affidavit in this court which was dismissed for that the bill and affidavit agreed not in substance. Hillary 22 Elizabeth (kk)