Difference between revisions of "STAC Baldwin"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Baldwin, Charles '''
 
''' Baldwin, Charles '''
 
*STAC 5/B88/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwin v Richard Warde, Robert Smyth et al
 
*STAC 5/B88/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwin v Richard Warde, Robert Smyth et al
Line 6: Line 10:
 
*STAC 5/B99/3 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith
 
*STAC 5/B99/3 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith
 
*STAC 5/B95/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, Francis Smith, William Tiptowe et al
 
*STAC 5/B95/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, Francis Smith, William Tiptowe et al
*STAC 5/B75/37 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smythe et al
 
 
*STAC 5/B75/37 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smythe et al
 
*STAC 5/B75/37 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smythe et al
 
*STAC 5/B41/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, William Tiptowe, William Ward et al
 
*STAC 5/B41/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, William Tiptowe, William Ward et al
  
 
''' Baldwin, Christopher '''
 
''' Baldwin, Christopher '''
*STAC 5/B3/30 - B A - 37 Eliz - Christopher Baldwyn v Richard Tempest, Hugh Laycocke, Peter Hargreaves, Leonard Smith, Robert Smith
+
*STAC 5/B3/30 - B A - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - Christopher Baldwyn v Richard Tempest, Hugh Laycocke, Peter Hargreaves, Leonard Smith, Robert Smith
 +
**[[STAC co York WR]]
  
 
''' Baldwin, Edmund '''
 
''' Baldwin, Edmund '''
Line 18: Line 22:
  
 
''' Baldwin, William '''
 
''' Baldwin, William '''
*STAC 5/B25/19 - B A - 34 Eliz - William Baldwin v Levye Basmore
+
*STAC 5/B25/19 - B A - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwin v Levye Basmore
*STAC 5/B20/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - William Baldwyn v Levi Bassmore
+
*STAC 5/B20/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levi Bassmore
*STAC 5/B26/8 - Rn - 34 Eliz - William Baldwyn v Levy Basmore
+
*STAC 5/B26/8 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levy Basmore
 +
 
 +
''' Bevan Case Index '''
 +
*Baldwin v Basmore - STAC 5/B25/19, STAC 5/B20/24, STAC 5/B26/8
 +
*Baldwin v Griffith - STAC 5/B38/13, STAC 5/B38/23
 +
*Baldwin v Pryne - STAC 5/B53/6 see [[STAC Bawdwin]]
 +
*Baldwin v Rolfe - STAC 5/B97/22 see [[STAC Bawdwin]]
 +
*Baldwin v Smith - STAC 5/B88/34, STAC 5/B41/21, STAC 5/B75/37, STAC 5/B95/15, STAC 5/B99/3, STAC 5/B104/9, STAC 5/B105/33, STAC 5/B108/34
 +
*Baldwin v Tempest - STAC 5/B3/30
  
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
+
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''  
 +
*STAC 5/B88/34; B75/37; B41/21; B99/3; B95/15; B104/9; B108/34; B105/33: River Lea, Middlesex/Essex. See Fairclough, K.; doctoral thesis [http://www.leeandstort.co.uk/Fairclough/007%20-%20CHAPTER%2012.pdf "THE RIVER LEA 1571-1767: A River Navigation prior to canalisation", Chapter 12]
 +
*Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 37r. Perjury in affidavit in this court dismissed for that the affidavit and bill varied in substance. Bawden, plaintiff; Mountford: for perjury in an affidavit in this court which was dismissed for that the bill and affidavit agreed not in substance. Hillary 22 Elizabeth (kk)

Revision as of 03:46, 2 May 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Baldwin, Charles

  • STAC 5/B88/34 - B A - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwin v Richard Warde, Robert Smyth et al
  • STAC 5/B104/9 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth et al
  • STAC 5/B105/33 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smyth
  • STAC 5/B108/34 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwin v Robert Smith, Henry Furnes et al
  • STAC 5/B99/3 - C I D - 36 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith
  • STAC 5/B95/15 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, Francis Smith, William Tiptowe et al
  • STAC 5/B75/37 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smythe et al
  • STAC 5/B41/21 - I D - 35 Eliz - Charles Baldwyn v Robert Smith, William Tiptowe, William Ward et al

Baldwin, Christopher

  • STAC 5/B3/30 - B A - 37 Eliz - Yorkshire WR - Christopher Baldwyn v Richard Tempest, Hugh Laycocke, Peter Hargreaves, Leonard Smith, Robert Smith

Baldwin, Edmund

  • STAC 5/B38/13 - I D - 41 Eliz - Edmund Baldwin v Thomas Griffith
  • STAC 5/B38/23 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Edmund Baldwin v Thomas Griffith

Baldwin, William

  • STAC 5/B25/19 - B A - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwin v Levye Basmore
  • STAC 5/B20/24 - I D - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levi Bassmore
  • STAC 5/B26/8 - Rn - 34 Eliz - - William Baldwyn v Levy Basmore

Bevan Case Index

  • Baldwin v Basmore - STAC 5/B25/19, STAC 5/B20/24, STAC 5/B26/8
  • Baldwin v Griffith - STAC 5/B38/13, STAC 5/B38/23
  • Baldwin v Pryne - STAC 5/B53/6 see STAC Bawdwin
  • Baldwin v Rolfe - STAC 5/B97/22 see STAC Bawdwin
  • Baldwin v Smith - STAC 5/B88/34, STAC 5/B41/21, STAC 5/B75/37, STAC 5/B95/15, STAC 5/B99/3, STAC 5/B104/9, STAC 5/B105/33, STAC 5/B108/34
  • Baldwin v Tempest - STAC 5/B3/30

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/B88/34; B75/37; B41/21; B99/3; B95/15; B104/9; B108/34; B105/33: River Lea, Middlesex/Essex. See Fairclough, K.; doctoral thesis "THE RIVER LEA 1571-1767: A River Navigation prior to canalisation", Chapter 12
  • Case Book BL Harley MS 2143 fo. 37r. Perjury in affidavit in this court dismissed for that the affidavit and bill varied in substance. Bawden, plaintiff; Mountford: for perjury in an affidavit in this court which was dismissed for that the bill and affidavit agreed not in substance. Hillary 22 Elizabeth (kk)