Difference between revisions of "STAC Ascough"

From Waalt
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 +
''' Ascoughe, Henry '''
 +
*STAC 5/A32/17 - B A Rn Rr - 4 Eliz - - Henry Askowe v Edward Tyrwhite, William Singleton, Thomas Peake et al
 +
*STAC 5/A12/32 - I D - 3 Eliz - - Henry Askewe v Edward Tyrewhitt, Thomas Peeke et al
 +
*STAC 5/A8/27 - I D - 5 Eliz - - Henry Aystoughe v Edward Terwitt, Thomas Peeke, John Pereson et al
 +
*STAC 5/A9/17 - I D - 6 Eliz - - Henry Askew v Anthony Huddleston, John Page et al
 +
 +
''' Ascoughe, Henry '''
 +
*STAC 5/A33/19 - B A C I - 6 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v John Hall, William Throughton, George Cleter et al
 +
 +
''' Ascoughe, Henry '''
 +
*STAC 5/A28/37 - B A Rn - 14 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe, Walter Ascoughe v Robert Monson, Anthony Ellis, Thomas Peake
 +
*STAC 5/A9/22 - I D - 16 Eliz - - Henry Ascough, Walter Ascough v Robert Monson, George Manson, Thomas Peake
 +
*STAC 5/A56/34 - B C - 15 Eliz - - Henry Ascue v Christopher Hill, David Monson
 +
 +
''' Ascoughe, Henry '''
 +
*STAC 5/A36/18 - B A Dr C I D - 31 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Humfrey Stokewith, William Fulshawe, Edward Cutter et al
 +
*STAC 5/A6/22 - I D - 32 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Aiscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshawe et al
 +
*STAC 5/A13/2 - I - 27 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshowe et al
 +
*STAC 5/A31/12 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshaw, Humfrey Stockwith et al
 +
*STAC 5/A31/27 - I D - 31 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln
 +
*STAC 5/A45/21 - C I D - 37 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln.
 +
*STAC 5/A21/13 - C I D - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Aiscough v Henry Earl of Lincoln
 +
*STAC 7/17/60 - - - Lincolnshire - Henry Ayscough v Henry Earl of Lincoln et al
 +
**see [[STAC co Lincoln]]
 +
 +
''' Ascoughe, Henry '''
 +
*STAC 5/A38/9 - D - 27 Eliz - - Henry Ascough v William Fulshaw
 +
*STAC 5/A54/12 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v William Fulshawe
 +
*STAC 5/A33/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v 
 +
*STAC 5/A50/17 - I D - 32 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v John Billoppe
 +
*STAC 5/A53/16 - I D - 32 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v William Walleys, Edward Cutter et al
 +
*STAC 5/A26/18 - I D - 37 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v William Falshawe et al
 +
 
''' Ascoughe, Henry '''
 
''' Ascoughe, Henry '''
−
*STAC 5/A32/17 - B A Rn Rr - 4 Eliz - Henry Askowe v Edward Tyrwhite, William Singleton, Thomas Peake et al
+
*STAC 5/A37/35 - B A - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascough v Christopher Worsley, Roger Gregory Sr, Roger Gregory Jr
−
*STAC 5/A12 /32 - I D - 3 Eliz - Henry Askewe v Edward Tyrewhitt, Thomas Peeke et al
+
*STAC 5/A56/3 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascoughe v     
−
*STAC 5/A8/27 - I D - 5 Eliz - Henry Aystoughe v Edward Terwitt, Thomas Peeke, John Pereson et al
+
*STAC 5/A6/30 - I D - 40 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascoughe v Christopher Warsley
−
*STAC 5/A33/19 - B A C I - 6 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v John Hall, William Throughton, George Cleter et al
+
**see [[STAC co Lincoln]]
−
*STAC 5/A9/17 - I D - 6 Eliz - Henry Askew v Anthony Huddleston, John Page et al
 
−
*STAC 5/A28/37 - B A Rn - 14 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe, Walter Ascoughe v Robert Monson, Anthony Ellis, Thomas Peake
 
−
*STAC 5/A56/34 - B C - 15 Eliz - Henry Ascue v Christopher Hill, David Monson
 
−
*STAC 5/A9/22 - I D - 16 Eliz - Henry Ascough, Walter Ascough v Robert Monson, George Manson, Thomas Peake
 
−
*STAC 5/A13 /2 - I - 27 Eliz - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshowe et al
 
−
*STAC 5/A31/12 - I D - 30 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshaw, Humfrey Stockwith et al
 
−
*STAC 5/A36/18 - B A Dr C I D - 31 Eliz - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Humfrey Stokewith, William Fulshawe, Edward Cutter et al
 
−
*STAC 5/A31/27 - I D - 31 Eliz - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln
 
−
*STAC 5/A6/22 - I D - 32 Eliz - Henry Aiscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshawe et al
 
−
*STAC 5/A45/21 - C I D - 37 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln
 
−
*STAC 5/A21/13 - C I D - 39 Eliz - Henry Aiscough v Henry Earl of Lincoln
 
−
*STAC 7/17/60 - - - Henry Ayscough v Henry Earl of Lincoln et al
 
−
*STAC 5/A38/9 - D - 27 Eliz - Henry Ascough v William Fulshaw
 
−
*STAC 5/A54/12 - I D - 31 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v William Fulshawe
 
−
*STAC 5/A33/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v 
 
−
*STAC 5/A50/17 - I D - 32 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v John Billoppe
 
−
*STAC 5/A53/16 - I D - 32 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v William Walleys, Edward Cutter et al
 
−
*STAC 5/A26/18 - I D - 37 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v William Falshawe et al
 
−
*STAC 5/A56/3 - I D - 39 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v     
 
−
*STAC 5/A37/35 - B A - 39 Eliz -  Henry Ascough v Christopher Worsley, Roger Gregory Sr, Roger Gregory Jr
 
−
*STAC 5/A6/30 - I D - 40 Eliz - Henry Ascoughe v Christopher Warsley
 
  
 
''' Ascughe, Hugh '''  
 
''' Ascughe, Hugh '''  
−
*STAC 5/A32/4 - B A Rn C - 2 Eliz - Sir Hughe Ascughe v Francis Slingsby, Francis Tankard et al
+
*STAC 5/A32/4 - B A Rn C - 2 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Sir Hughe Ascughe v Francis Slingsby, Francis Tankard et al
−
*STAC 5/A50/39 - I D - 2 Eliz - Sir Hugh Ascoughe v Francis Slyngsbie, Francis Tankard, John Swall et al
+
*STAC 5/A50/39 - I D - 2 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Sir Hugh Ascoughe v Francis Slyngsbie, Francis Tankard, John Swall et al
 +
**see [[STAC co York NR]]
  
 
''' Ascoughe, Michael '''  
 
''' Ascoughe, Michael '''  
−
*STAC 5/A20/35 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - Michael Ascoughe v Maurice Bawdes, John Bawdes et al
+
*STAC 5/A20/35 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - - Michael Ascoughe v Maurice Bawdes, John Bawdes et al
−
*STAC 5/A8/34 - I D - 41 Eliz - Michael Aiscoughe v Morris Bawdes, John Bawdes, Charles Brigg, Thomas Pickworth
+
*STAC 5/A8/34 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Michael Aiscoughe v Morris Bawdes, John Bawdes, Charles Brigg, Thomas Pickworth
−
*STAC 5/A47/39 - B A - 41 Eliz - Michael Askaughe v Maurice Bawdes, Thomas Pickwathe, Charles Briggs et al
+
*STAC 5/A47/39 - B A - 41 Eliz - - Michael Askaughe v Maurice Bawdes, Thomas Pickwathe, Charles Briggs et al
−
*STAC 5/A30/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - Michael Ascoughe v Maurice Bandes, William Pickworth, Charles Briggs et al
+
*STAC 5/A30/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - - Michael Ascoughe v Maurice Bandes, William Pickworth, Charles Briggs et al
  
 
''' Ascough, Walter '''  
 
''' Ascough, Walter '''  
−
*STAC 5/A9/18 - I D - 14 Eliz - Walter Ascough, Henry Ascough v Peter Eyers, John Kettle, Anthony Elles et al
+
*STAC 5/A9/18 - I D - 14 Eliz - - Walter Ascough, Henry Ascough v Peter Eyers, John Kettle, Anthony Elles et al
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
−
* Brief account of Ascoe v Earl of Lincoln (37 Eliz) in [https://archive.org/stream/cu31924069587255#page/n89/mode/2up Les reportes del cases in Camera Stellata, 1593 to 1609 from the original ms. of John Hawarde edited by William Paley Baildon Published 1894, p. 12 - 13]
+
*Henry Ascough v The Earl of Lincoln, for notes on damages awarded against the Earl of Lincoln, his subsequent refusal to pay & attempts to force payment see Harrison, G. B. 1894-1991. (1939). The Elizabethan journals: being a record of those things most talked of during the years 1591-1603. Comprising : An Elizabethan journal 1591-4, A second Elizabethan journal 1595-8, A last Elizabethan journal 1599-1603. New York: Macmillan. pp iii, 91, 92, 97
−
In Camera Stellata die Martls, Januarij 29, termino Paschae [sic], Elizab. 37, 1594. Ascoe, plaintiff, and the Earl of Lincoln, defendant. for maintenance, and for buying a statute merchant and prosecuting an extent thereon, for rasinge a certificate Chancery and suborning one to do this, &c.; also when a jury was proceeding on the extent and execution thereof, being present and compelling the jury to appraise them again and below the value, and for waste in scindinge and felling 1500 timber trees at Michaelmas to the destruction of the bark. The Earls counsel moved that the bill was insufficient for these words, contrary to the lawes & statutes in that case provyded within two yeres laste paste did buye, &c., and there are divers statutes against maintenance, and the action is not maintainable unless prosecuted within one year after the offence is committed. The Court ruled that the bill was good, because it is for the Queen, for whom two years is to be allowed. Phillips says that it is not for the Queen, because of this difference, when it is for the Queen, the words are informethe to your majesty but when it is for the party, the words are, complaynethe to your majesty. But the Court was against him.
 
−
Another exception to the bill, that if it be in the disjunctive, it is bad, [was taken] by Yelverton, Serjeant, as, you committe perjurye in the 16th Interrogatory, and have prosecuted the extente, and contracted for the statute or caused some other, &c. By the Chief Justices: It is good, and there is sufficient matter in the bill besides to maintain maintenance.
 
−
The third exception—the extent was taken with the privity of the Earl—is not a good exception: by the Court. But the time of the subornation must be declared, and also of the procurement of maintenance, and it was so agreed by the Court, and on the sight of the bill it appeared plainly. And thus the Counsel for Ascoe proved their matters against the Earl, and so ended the first day. But the cause was not answered on any other day in Court, but [Page 13] was determined by the Lords in private, for the good credit of the Earl; for if the Earl had suffered the case to proceed, grave charges [grande choses] would have appeared against him. I was not informed what manner of fine was made.
 

Revision as of 11:07, 12 March 2020

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Ascoughe, Henry

  • STAC 5/A32/17 - B A Rn Rr - 4 Eliz - - Henry Askowe v Edward Tyrwhite, William Singleton, Thomas Peake et al
  • STAC 5/A12/32 - I D - 3 Eliz - - Henry Askewe v Edward Tyrewhitt, Thomas Peeke et al
  • STAC 5/A8/27 - I D - 5 Eliz - - Henry Aystoughe v Edward Terwitt, Thomas Peeke, John Pereson et al
  • STAC 5/A9/17 - I D - 6 Eliz - - Henry Askew v Anthony Huddleston, John Page et al

Ascoughe, Henry

  • STAC 5/A33/19 - B A C I - 6 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v John Hall, William Throughton, George Cleter et al

Ascoughe, Henry

  • STAC 5/A28/37 - B A Rn - 14 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe, Walter Ascoughe v Robert Monson, Anthony Ellis, Thomas Peake
  • STAC 5/A9/22 - I D - 16 Eliz - - Henry Ascough, Walter Ascough v Robert Monson, George Manson, Thomas Peake
  • STAC 5/A56/34 - B C - 15 Eliz - - Henry Ascue v Christopher Hill, David Monson

Ascoughe, Henry

  • STAC 5/A36/18 - B A Dr C I D - 31 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, Humfrey Stokewith, William Fulshawe, Edward Cutter et al
  • STAC 5/A6/22 - I D - 32 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Aiscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshawe et al
  • STAC 5/A13/2 - I - 27 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshowe et al
  • STAC 5/A31/12 - I D - 30 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln, William Fulshaw, Humfrey Stockwith et al
  • STAC 5/A31/27 - I D - 31 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ayscoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln
  • STAC 5/A45/21 - C I D - 37 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascoughe v Henry Earl of Lincoln.
  • STAC 5/A21/13 - C I D - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Aiscough v Henry Earl of Lincoln
  • STAC 7/17/60 - - - Lincolnshire - Henry Ayscough v Henry Earl of Lincoln et al

Ascoughe, Henry

  • STAC 5/A38/9 - D - 27 Eliz - - Henry Ascough v William Fulshaw
  • STAC 5/A54/12 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v William Fulshawe
  • STAC 5/A33/14 - I D - 31 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v
  • STAC 5/A50/17 - I D - 32 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v John Billoppe
  • STAC 5/A53/16 - I D - 32 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v William Walleys, Edward Cutter et al
  • STAC 5/A26/18 - I D - 37 Eliz - - Henry Ascoughe v William Falshawe et al

Ascoughe, Henry

  • STAC 5/A37/35 - B A - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascough v Christopher Worsley, Roger Gregory Sr, Roger Gregory Jr
  • STAC 5/A56/3 - I D - 39 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascoughe v
  • STAC 5/A6/30 - I D - 40 Eliz - Lincolnshire - Henry Ascoughe v Christopher Warsley

Ascughe, Hugh

  • STAC 5/A32/4 - B A Rn C - 2 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Sir Hughe Ascughe v Francis Slingsby, Francis Tankard et al
  • STAC 5/A50/39 - I D - 2 Eliz - Yorkshire NR - Sir Hugh Ascoughe v Francis Slyngsbie, Francis Tankard, John Swall et al

Ascoughe, Michael

  • STAC 5/A20/35 - B A C I D - 41 Eliz - - Michael Ascoughe v Maurice Bawdes, John Bawdes et al
  • STAC 5/A8/34 - I D - 41 Eliz - - Michael Aiscoughe v Morris Bawdes, John Bawdes, Charles Brigg, Thomas Pickworth
  • STAC 5/A47/39 - B A - 41 Eliz - - Michael Askaughe v Maurice Bawdes, Thomas Pickwathe, Charles Briggs et al
  • STAC 5/A30/21 - Rn - 41 Eliz - - Michael Ascoughe v Maurice Bandes, William Pickworth, Charles Briggs et al

Ascough, Walter

  • STAC 5/A9/18 - I D - 14 Eliz - - Walter Ascough, Henry Ascough v Peter Eyers, John Kettle, Anthony Elles et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • Henry Ascough v The Earl of Lincoln, for notes on damages awarded against the Earl of Lincoln, his subsequent refusal to pay & attempts to force payment see Harrison, G. B. 1894-1991. (1939). The Elizabethan journals: being a record of those things most talked of during the years 1591-1603. Comprising : An Elizabethan journal 1591-4, A second Elizabethan journal 1595-8, A last Elizabethan journal 1599-1603. New York: Macmillan. pp iii, 91, 92, 97
Retrieved from "https://waalt.uh.edu/index.php?title=STAC_Ascough&oldid=86049"