STAC Armstrong

From Rpalmer
Revision as of 04:49, 12 September 2015 by Hgood (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Armstrong, Gabriel

  • STAC 5/A4/38 - B - 38 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriel Armstrong v William Stapleton, John Carre, John Pillings
  • STAC 5/A2/5 - B A - 43 Eliz - Gabriell Armstrong v John Stapleton, Edward Barber, Laurence Grundy, William Morecroft et uxor, Mary Morecroft et al
  • STAC 5/A10/28 - I D - 43 Eliz - Gabriel Armstrong v John Stapelton et al
  • STAC 5/A23/20 - I D - 43 Eliz - Gabriel Armstronge v Edward Barber et al

Armstrong, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/A7/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Devon - Nicholas Armstrong v Augustine Worthington et al

Armstrong, William

  • STAC 5/A29/29 - B A - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe, Thomas Sewell, Thomas Nelson et al
  • STAC 5/A59/16 - Rn - - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe
  • STAC 5/A1/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armestronge v Thomas Briskoe et al

Bevan Case Index

  • Armstrong v Barber - STAC 5/A23/20
  • Armstrong v Briscoe - STAC 5/A29/29, STAC 5/A1/9, STAC 5/A59/16
  • Armstrong v Stapleton - STAC 5/A2/5, STAC 5/A4/38, STAC 5/A10/28
  • Armstrong v Worthington - STAC 5/A7/19

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/A7/19 - First whether in Ester or Trynitye Terme in the xxth yere of the QM reigne Thomas Francke did not bring into the said Augustine Worthington unto his lodging at the George in Holborne one riting of advowson of the rectory of uplowman in co Devon which did seme to be graunted from the late lord Dawbeney unto one Thomas Worthington and Hughe Adlyngton, or no
  • STAC 5/A2/5 - Top part of the Bill is missing
  • STAC 5/A4/38 - Gabriel Armstrong of Thorp co Nottingham esquire. Presentation to the parish church of Kempston co Notts