Difference between revisions of "STAC Armstrong"

From Rpalmer
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
''' B ''' Bill of Complaint ''' Dr ''' Demurrer  ''' A ''' Answer ''' Rn ''' Replication ''' Rr ''' Rejoinder
 +
''' C ''' Commission ''' I ''' Interrogatories ''' D ''' Deposition
 +
<BR> <BR>
 +
 
''' Armstrong, Gabriel '''
 
''' Armstrong, Gabriel '''
 
*STAC 5/A4/38 - B - 38 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriel Armstrong v William Stapleton, John Carre, John Pillings
 
*STAC 5/A4/38 - B - 38 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriel Armstrong v William Stapleton, John Carre, John Pillings
*STAC 5/A2/5 - B A - 43 Eliz - Gabriell Armstrong v John Stapleton, Edward Barber, Laurence Grundy, William Morecroft et uxor, Mary Morecroft et al
+
*STAC 5/A2/5 - B A - 43 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriell Armstrong v John Stapleton, Edward Barber, Laurence Grundy, William Morecroft et uxor, Mary Morecroft et al
*STAC 5/A10/28 - I D - 43 Eliz - Gabriel Armstrong v John Stapelton et al
+
*STAC 5/A10/28 - I D - 43 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriel Armstrong v John Stapelton et al
*STAC 5/A23/20 - I D - 43 Eliz - Gabriel Armstronge v Edward Barber et al
+
*STAC 5/A23/20 - I D - 43 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriel Armstronge v Edward Barber et al
 +
**[[STAC co Nottingham]]
  
 
''' Armstrong, Nicholas '''
 
''' Armstrong, Nicholas '''
 
*STAC 5/A7/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Devon - Nicholas Armstrong v Augustine Worthington et al  
 
*STAC 5/A7/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Devon - Nicholas Armstrong v Augustine Worthington et al  
 +
**[[STAC co Devon]]
  
 
''' Armstrong, William '''
 
''' Armstrong, William '''
Line 12: Line 18:
 
*STAC 5/A59/16 - Rn - - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe
 
*STAC 5/A59/16 - Rn - - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe
 
*STAC 5/A1/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armestronge v Thomas Briskoe et al  
 
*STAC 5/A1/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armestronge v Thomas Briskoe et al  
 
+
**[[STAC co Cumberland]]
'''Bevan Case Index '''
+
*Armstrong v Barber - STAC 5/A23/20
+
*Armstrong v Briscoe - STAC 5/A29/29, STAC 5/A1/9, STAC 5/A59/16
+
*Armstrong v Stapleton - STAC 5/A2/5, STAC 5/A4/38, STAC 5/A10/28
+
*Armstrong v Worthington - STAC 5/A7/19
+
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
*STAC 5/A7/19 - First whether in Ester or Trynitye Terme in the xxth yere of the QM reigne Thomas Francke did not bring into the said Augustine Worthington unto his lodging at the George in Holborne one riting of advowson of the rectory of uplowman in co Devon which did seme to be graunted from the late lord Dawbeney unto one Thomas Worthington and Hughe Adlyngton, or no
 
*STAC 5/A2/5 - Top part of the Bill is missing
 
*STAC 5/A4/38 - Gabriel Armstrong of Thorp co Nottingham esquire. Presentation to the parish church of Kempston co Notts
 

Revision as of 06:15, 26 April 2019

B Bill of Complaint Dr Demurrer A Answer Rn Replication Rr Rejoinder C Commission I Interrogatories D Deposition

Armstrong, Gabriel

  • STAC 5/A4/38 - B - 38 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriel Armstrong v William Stapleton, John Carre, John Pillings
  • STAC 5/A2/5 - B A - 43 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriell Armstrong v John Stapleton, Edward Barber, Laurence Grundy, William Morecroft et uxor, Mary Morecroft et al
  • STAC 5/A10/28 - I D - 43 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriel Armstrong v John Stapelton et al
  • STAC 5/A23/20 - I D - 43 Eliz - Nottinghamshire - Gabriel Armstronge v Edward Barber et al

Armstrong, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/A7/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Devon - Nicholas Armstrong v Augustine Worthington et al

Armstrong, William

  • STAC 5/A29/29 - B A - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe, Thomas Sewell, Thomas Nelson et al
  • STAC 5/A59/16 - Rn - - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe
  • STAC 5/A1/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armestronge v Thomas Briskoe et al

Notes, Additions and Corrections