Difference between revisions of "STAC Armstrong"

From Waalt
Line 12: Line 12:
 
*STAC 5/A59/16 - Rn - - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe
 
*STAC 5/A59/16 - Rn - - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe
 
*STAC 5/A1/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armestronge v Thomas Briskoe et al  
 
*STAC 5/A1/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armestronge v Thomas Briskoe et al  
 +
 +
'''Bevan Case Index '''
 +
*Armstrong v Barber - STAC 5/A23/20
 +
*Armstrong v Briscoe - STAC 5/A29/29, STAC 5/A1/9, STAC 5/A59/16
 +
*Armstrong v Stapleton - STAC 5/A2/5, STAC 5/A4/38, STAC 5/A10/28
 +
*Armstrong v Worthington - STAC 5/A7/19
  
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 
'''Notes, Additions and Corrections'''
 
*STAC 5/A2/5 - Top part of the Bill is missing
 
*STAC 5/A2/5 - Top part of the Bill is missing

Revision as of 17:33, 13 May 2015

Armstrong, Gabriel

  • STAC 5/A4/38 - B - 38 Eliz - Gabriel Armstrong v William Stapleton, John Carre, John Pillings
  • STAC 5/A2/5 - B A - 43 Eliz - Gabriell Armstrong v John Stapleton, Edward Barber, Laurence Grundy, William Morecroft et uxor, Mary Morecroft et al
  • STAC 5/A10/28 - I D - 43 Eliz - Gabriel Armstrong v John Stapelton et al
  • STAC 5/A23/20 - I D - 43 Eliz - Gabriel Armstronge v Edward Barber et al

Armstrong, Nicholas

  • STAC 5/A7/19 - I D - 21 Eliz - Nicholas Armstrong v Augustine Worthington et al

Armstrong, William

  • STAC 5/A29/29 - B A - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe, Thomas Sewell, Thomas Nelson et al
  • STAC 5/A59/16 - Rn - - Cumberland - William Armstrong v Thomas Briscoe
  • STAC 5/A1/9 - I D - 33 Eliz - Cumberland - William Armestronge v Thomas Briskoe et al

Bevan Case Index

  • Armstrong v Barber - STAC 5/A23/20
  • Armstrong v Briscoe - STAC 5/A29/29, STAC 5/A1/9, STAC 5/A59/16
  • Armstrong v Stapleton - STAC 5/A2/5, STAC 5/A4/38, STAC 5/A10/28
  • Armstrong v Worthington - STAC 5/A7/19

Notes, Additions and Corrections

  • STAC 5/A2/5 - Top part of the Bill is missing